Skip to main content

Colposcopic Features of Cervical Intraepithelial Lesions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Preventive Oncology for the Gynecologist

Abstract

Cervical cancer screening of women of appropriate age followed by treatment of the screen-detected abnormalities can significantly reduce the incidence of cervical cancer and also the mortality from the disease. Colposcopy is an important triage tool interposed between screening and histopathological diagnosis and treatment; therefore, a thorough knowledge of the procedure is essential for the providers. The characteristics of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) on colposcopy depend on the grade of the lesion, and its diagnosis can be mastered by the providers with the help of the subject knowledge, clinical practice and self-evaluation by colposcopic-histopathological correlation. The key features that are evaluated during colposcopy are acetowhiteness, blood vessels, iodine staining, margin/surface of the lesion and lesion size. The International Federation of Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy (IFCPC) introduced a new system of nomenclature for colposcopy in the year 2011, in which the abnormal findings have been categorized as grade 1 or minor findings, grade 2 or major findings, suspected invasion and non-specific findings. The benign abnormalities have been grouped as miscellaneous findings. Describing the type of transformation zone and the final scoring of the abnormalities using the ‘Swede score’ has been made mandatory in the new nomenclature system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

AIS:

Adenocarcinoma-in-situ

CIN:

Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

HPV:

Human papillomavirus

IFCPC:

The International Federation of Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy

SCJ:

Squamocolumnar junction

TZ:

Transformation zone

VIA:

Visual inspection with acetic acid

WHO:

The World Health Organization

References

  1. Schiffman M, Kjaer SK. Chapter 2: Natural history of anogenital human papillomavirus infection and neoplasia. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2003;31:14–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wheeler CM. Natural history of human papillomavirus infections, cytologic and histologic abnormalities, and cancer. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am. 2008;35(4):519–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Koutsky LA, Holmes KK, Critchlow CW, Stevens CE, Paavonen J, Beckmann AM, et al. A cohort study of the risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3 in relation to papillomavirus infection. N Engl J Med. 1992;327(18):1272–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kiviat NB, Koutsky LA. Specific human papillomavirus types as the causal agents of most cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: implications for current views and treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85(12):934–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kiviat NB, Critchlow CW, Kurman RJ. Reassessment of the morphological continuum of cervical intraepithelial lesions: does it reflect different stages in the progression to cervical carcinoma? IARC Sci Publ. 1992;119:59–66.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Park J, Sun D, Genest DR, Trivijitsilp P, Suh I, Crum CP. Coexistence of low and high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix: morphologic progression or multiple papillomaviruses? Gynecol Oncol. 1998;70(3):386–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Winer RL, Kiviat NB, Hughes JP, Adam DE, Lee SK, Kuypers JM, et al. Development and duration of human papillomavirus lesions, after initial infection. J Infect Dis. 2005;191(5):731–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Crum CP. Contemporary theories of cervical carcinogenesis: the virus, the host, and the stem cell. Mod Pathol. 2000;13(3):243–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jeronimo J, Massad LS, Castle PE, Wacholder S, Schiffman M. Interobserver agreement in the evaluation of digitized cervical images. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110(4):833–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ferris DG, Litaker M. Interobserver agreement for colposcopy quality control using digitized colposcopic images during the ALTS trial. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2005;9(1):29–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Massad LS, Jeronimo J, Schiffman M. Interobserver agreement in the assessment of components of colposcopic grading. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111(6):1279–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hammes LS, Naud P, Passos EP, Matos J, Brouwers K, Rivoire W, et al. Value of the International Federation for Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy (IFCPC) Terminology in predicting cervical disease. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2007;11(3):158–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Li Y, Duan X, Sui L, Xu F, Xu S, Zhang H, et al. Closer to a uniform language in colposcopy: study on the potential application of 2011 International Federation for Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy Terminology in clinical practice. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:8984516.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Cristiani P, Costa S, Schincaglia P, Garutti P, de Bianchi PS, Naldoni C, et al. An online quality assurance program for colposcopy in a population-based cervical screening setting in Italy: results on colposcopic impression. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2014;18(4):309–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Prendiville W, Sankaranarayanan R. Colposcopy and treatment of cervical precancer, IARC technical publications, 45. Lyon: IARC; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mitchell MF. Accuracy of colposcopy. Consult Obstet Gynecol. 1994;6:70–3.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mustafa RA, Santesso N, Khatib R, Mustafa AA, Wiercioch W, Kehar R, et al. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the accuracy of HPV tests, visual inspection with acetic acid, cytology, and colposcopy. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2016;132:259–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Massad LS, Halperin CJ, Bitterman P. Correlation between colposcopically directed biopsy and cervical loop excision. Gynecol Oncol. 1996;60:400–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Pretorius RG, Zhang WH, Belinson JL, Huang MN, Wu LY, Zhang X, et al. Colposcopically directed biopsy, random cervical biopsy, and endocervical curettage in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia II or worse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:430–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Massad LS, Jeronimo J, Katki HA, Schiffman M, National Institutes of Health/American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology Research Group. The accuracy of colposcopic grading for detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2009;13(3):137–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Shastri SS, Mittra I, Mishra GA, Gupta S, Dikshit R, Singh S, et al. Effect of VIA screening by primary health workers: randomized controlled study in Mumbai, India. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106(3):dju009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Further Reading

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Partha Basu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Basu, P., Joshi, S., Poli, U. (2019). Colposcopic Features of Cervical Intraepithelial Lesions. In: Mehta, S., Singla, A. (eds) Preventive Oncology for the Gynecologist. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3438-2_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3438-2_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-3437-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-3438-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics