Abstract
This chapter describes the development procedure of general circulation model (GCM) with full representation of cloud microphysics at a medium-range horizontal resolution of 50 km and discusses the simulation results of their precipitation climatology and Madden and Julian Oscillation (MJO). One issue of developing such a GCM is to modify the cloud microphysics suitable to the horizontal resolution. In the present study, the modification is made based on sensitivity experiments for the parameters of the important processes sensitive to the model resolution, particularly the condensation process and the terminal velocity. It is demonstrated that shallow convection and scale-dependent deep convection are still needed in the present model of 50 km resolution with cloud microphysics. The present GCM is shown to simulate the precipitation statistic such as the light and heavy precipitation frequencies and the MJO reasonably well, although the MJO intensity is rather strong. Both cloud microphysics and scale-dependent deep convection play important roles in simulating a realistic MJO in the present GCM. Also noted is that the precipitation climatologies of the present atmospheric GCM (AGCM) and the coupled ocean–atmosphere GCM (CGCM) are quite different from each other, indicating that the air–sea interaction plays an important role in determining the climatology, and this result suggests us to tune the model physics and their parameters with CGCM rather than with AGCM.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ahn, M.-S., and I.S. Kang. 2018. A practical approach to scale-adaptive deep convection in a GCM by controlling the cumulus base mass flux. npj Climate and Atmospheric Science (in revision).
Ahn, M.-S., D. Kim, K.R. Sperber, I.S. Kang, E. Maloney, D. Waliser, H. Hendon on behalf of WGNE MJO Task Force. 2017. MJO simulation in CMIP5 climate models: MJO skill metrics and process oriented diagnosis. Climate Dynamics 49: 4023–4045.
Arakawa, A., J.-H. Jung, and C.-M. Wu. 2011. Toward unification of the multiscale modeling of the atmosphere. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 11 (8): 3731–3742.
Benedict, J.J., and D.A. Randall. 2009. Structure of the Madden-Julian oscillation in the superparameterized CAM. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 66 (11): 3277–3296.
Bryan, G.H., and H. Morrison. 2012. Sensitivity of a simulated squall line to horizontal resolution and parameterization of microphysics. Monthly Weather Review 140 (1): 202–225.
Bryan, G.H., J.C. Wyngaard, and J.M. Fritsch. 2003. Resolution requirements for the simulation of deep moist convection. Monthly Weather Review 131 (10): 2394–2416.
Chen, C.-T., and T. Knutson. 2008. On the verification and comparison of extreme rainfall indices from climate models. Journal of Climate 21: 1605–1621.
DeMott, C.A., D.A. Randall, and M. Khairoutdinov. 2007. Convective precipitation variability as a tool for general circulation model analysis. Journal of Climate 20: 91–112.
Grabowski, W.W., X. Wu, M.W. Moncrieff, and W.D. Hall. 1998. Cloud-resolving modeling of cloud systems during Phase III of GATE. Part II: Effects of resolution and the third spatial dimension. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 55 (21): 3264–3282.
Ham, Yoo-Geun, Jong-Seong Kug, In-Sik Kang, Fei-Fei Jin, and Axel Timmermann. 2010. Impact of diurnal atmosphere-ocean coupling on tropical climate simulations using a coupled GCM. Climate Dynamics 34: 905–917.
Holloway, C.E., S.J. Woolnough, and G.M.S. Lister. 2013. The effects of explicit versus parameterized convection on the MJO in a large-domain high-resolution tropical case study. Part I: Characterization of large-scale organization and propagation*. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 70: 1342–1369.
Holloway, C.E., S.J. Woolnough, and G.M.S. Lister. 2015. The effects of explicit versus parameterized convection on the MJO in a large-domain high resolution tropical case study. Part II: Processes leading to differences in MJO development. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 72: 2719–2743.
Hung, M.-P., J.-L. Lin, W. Wang, D. Kim, T. Shinoda, and S.J. Weaver. 2013. MJO and convectively coupled equatorial waves simulated by CMIP5 climate models. Journal of Climate 26: 6185–6214.
Iorio, J., P. Duffy, B. Govindasamy, S. Thompson, M. Khairoutdinov, and D. Randall. 2004. Effects of model resolution and subgrid-scale physics on the simulation of precipitation in the continental United States. Climate Dynamics 23 (3–4): 243–258.
Jung, J.-H., and A. Arakawa. 2004. The resolution dependence of model physics: Illustrations from nonhydrostatic model experiments. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 61 (1): 88–102.
Kang, I.-S., Y.-M. Yang, and W.-K. Tao. 2015. GCMs with implicit and explicit representation of cloud microphysics for simulation of extreme precipitation frequency. Climate Dynamics 45: 325–335.
Kang, I.-S., M.-S. Ahn, and Y.-M. Yang. 2016. A GCM with cloud microphysics and its MJO simulation. Geoscience Letters 3: 16.
Kim, D., and I.-S. Kang. 2012. A bulk mass flux convection scheme for climate model: Description and moisture sensitivity. Climate Dynamics 38: 411–429.
Klemp, J.B., and R. Wilhelmson. 1978. The simulation of three-dimensional convective storm dynamics. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 35: 1070–1096.
Kodama, C., Y. Yamada, A.T. Noda, K. Kikuchi, Y. Kajikawa, T. Nasuno, T. Tomita, T. Yamaura, H.G. Takahashi, M. Hara, Y. Kawatani, M. Satoh, and M. Sugi. 2015. A 20-year climatology of a NICAM AMIP-type simulation. Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan 93: 393–424.
Le Trent, H., and Z.-X. Li. 1991. Sensitivity of an atmospheric general circulation model to prescribed SST changes: Feedback effects associated with the simulation of cloud optical properties. Climate Dynamics 5 (3): 175–187.
Lee, M.-I., I.-S. Kang, J.-K. Kim, and B.E. Mapes. 2001. Influence of cloud-radiation interaction on simulating tropical intraseasonal oscillation with an atmospheric general circulation model. Journal Geophysical Research 106 (14): 219–233.
Li, F., W.D. Collins, M.F. Wehner, D.L. Williamson, J.G. Olson, and C. Algieri. 2011. Impact of horizontal resolution on simulation of precipitation extremes in an aqua-planet version of community atmospheric model (CAM3). Tellus A 63: 884–892.
Lin, S.-J. 2004. A “vertically Lagrangian” finite-volume dynamical core for global models. Monthly Weather Review 132 (10): 2293–2307.
Lin, Y.-L., R.D. Farley, and H.D. Orville. 1983. Bulk parameterization of the snow field in a cloud model. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology 22 (6): 1065–1092.
Miura, H., M. Satoh, T. Nasuno, A.T. Noda, and K. Oouchi. 2007. A Madden-Julian oscillation event realistically simulated by a global cloud-resolving model. Science 318 (5857): 1763–1765.
Miyakawa, T., M. Satoh, H. Miura, H. Tomita, H. Yashiro, A.T. Noda, Y. Yamada, C. Kodama, M. Kimoto, and K. Yoneyama. 2014. Madden-Julian oscillation prediction skill of a new-generation global model. Nature Communications 5: 3769.
Moorthi, S., and M.J. Suarez. 1992. Relaxed Arakawa–Schubert: A parameterization of moist convection for general circulation models. Monthly Weather Review 120: 978–1002.
Moncrieff, M.W., and E. Klinker. 1997. Organized convective systems in the tropical western Pacific as a process in general circulation models. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 123: 805–828.
Nakajima, T., M. Tsukamoto, Y. Tsushima, and A. Numaguti. 1995. Modelling of the radiative processes in an AGCM. Climate System Dynamics and Modelling 3: 104–123.
Noh, Y., and H.J. Kim. 1999. Simulations of temperature and turbulence structure of the oceanic boundary layer with the improved nearsurface process. Journal of Geophysical Research 104: 15621–15634.
Oouchi, K., A.T. Noda, M. Satoh, H. Miura, H. Tomita, T. Nasuno, and S. Iga. 2009. A simulated preconditioning of typhoon genesis controlled by a boreal summer Madden-Julian Oscillation event in a global cloud-system-resolving model. SOLA 5: 65–68.
Pauluis, O., and S. Garner. 2006. Sensitivity of radiative-convective equilibrium simulations to horizontal resolution. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 63 (7): 1910–1923.
Satoh, M., and Coauthors. 2014. The non-hydrostatic icosahedral atmospheric model: Description and development. Progress in Earth and Planetary Science 1: 18.
Tao, W.-K., J. Simpson, D. Baker, S. Braun, M.-D. Chou, B. Ferrier, D. Johnson, A. Khain, S. Lang, and B. Lynn. 2003. Microphysics, radiation and surface processes in the Goddard Cumulus Ensemble (GCE) model. Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics 82 (1): 97–137.
Tiedtke, M. 1984. Sensitivity of the time-mean large-scale flow to cumulus convection in the ECMWF model, 297–316.
Tomita, H., H. Miura, S. Iga, T. Nasuno, and M. Satoh. 2005. A global cloud-resolving simulation: Preliminary results from an aqua planet experiment. Geophysical Reseach Letters 32: 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL022459.
Wehner, M.F., R.L. Smith, G. Bala, and P. Duffy. 2010. The effect of horizontal resolution on simulation of very extreme US precipitation events in a global atmosphere model. Climate Dynamics 34: 241–247.
Weisman, M.L., W.C. Skamarock, and J.B. Klemp. 1997. The resolution dependence of explicitly modeled convective systems. Monthly Weather Review 125 (4): 527–548.
Zhu, H., H. Hendon, and C. Jakob. 2009. Convection in a parameterized and superparameterized model and its role in the representation of the MJO. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 66 (9): 2796–2811.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kang, IS., Ahn, MS. (2019). A Gray Zone GCM with Full Representation of Cloud Microphysics. In: Randall, D., Srinivasan, J., Nanjundiah, R., Mukhopadhyay, . (eds) Current Trends in the Representation of Physical Processes in Weather and Climate Models. Springer Atmospheric Sciences. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3396-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3396-5_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-3395-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-3396-5
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)