Skip to main content

Stochastic Representation of NCEP GEFS to Improve Sub-seasonal Forecast

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Current Trends in the Representation of Physical Processes in Weather and Climate Models

Part of the book series: Springer Atmospheric Sciences ((SPRINGERATMO))

Abstract

The National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) Global Ensemble Forecast System (GEFS) has been in daily operation to provide probabilistic guidance for public since December 1992. Since July 2017, the GEFS was extended from 16 days to 35 days forecast to support NCEP Climate Prediction Center (CPC)’s sub-seasonal forecast. The latest GEFS version was upgraded in three areas to improve sub-seasonal forecast: (1) introducing a new set of stochastic physical perturbations to improve model uncertainty representation for the tropics; (2) a 2-tiered SST approach to consider ocean impact; and (3) a new scale-aware convection scheme to improve model physics for tropical convection and MJO forecasts. The new set of stochastic physical perturbations include stochastic kinetic energy backscatter to make up subscale energy lost during model integration; stochastic physics perturbation tendency with five different spatial and temporal scales to perturb physical tendency; and stochastic perturbed humidity on the model lower level. After upgraded to new set of stochastic physical perturbations, the MJO forecast skill has been improved from 12.5 days of a 25-month period to nearly 22 days by combining all three modifications include stochastic physics. In the extratropics, the 500-hPa geopotential height; surface temperature and precipitation are improved for sub-seasonal timescale as well. However, the raw forecast skills of surface temperature and precipitation are extremely low, and the results imply that calibration may be important and necessary for surface temperature and precipitation forecast for the sub-seasonal timescale due to the large systematic model errors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Berner, J., G.J. Shutts, M. Leutbecher, and T.N. Palmer. 2009. A spectral stochastic kinetic energy backscatter scheme and its impact on flow-dependent predictability in the ECMWF ensemble prediction system. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 66 (3): 603–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buizza, R., M. Miller, and T. Palmer. 1999. Stochastic representation of model uncertainties in the ECMWF ensemble prediction system. Quarterly Journal Royal Meteorological Society 125 (560): 2887–2908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, H.M., S.-J. Lock, I.M. Moroz, and T.M. Palmer. 2017. Introducing independent patterns into the stochastically perturbed parametrization tendencies (SPPT) scheme. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Part A 143 (706): 2168–2181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, J., W. Wang, Y.C. Kwon, S.-Y. Hong, V. Tallapragada, and F. Yang. 2017. Updates in the NCEP GFS cumulus convection schemes with scale and aerosol awareness. Weather and Forecasting. https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-17-0046.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou, D., Z. Toth, Y. Zhu, and W. Yang. 2008. Evaluation of the impact of the stochastic perturbation schemes on global ensemble forecast. In Proceedings of the 19th conference on probability and statistics, New Orleans, LA, American Meteor Society. https://ams.confex.com/ams/88Annual/webprogram/Paper134165.html.

  • Johnson, N.C., D. Collins, S. Feldstein, M. L’Heureux, and E. Riddle. 2014. Skillful wintertime North American temperature forecasts out to 4 weeks based on the state of ENSO and the MJO. Weather and Forecasting 29: 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-13-00102.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirtman, B.P., D. Min, and J.M. Infanti. 2014. The North American multimodel ensemble: Phase-1 seasonal-to-interannual prediction; Phase-2 toward developing intraseasonal prediction. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 95: 585–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, W., R. Yu, H. Liu, and Y. Yu. 2001. Impacts of diurnal cycle of SST on the intraseasonal variation of surface heat flux over the western Pacific warm pool. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences 18 (5): 793–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, W., Y. Zhu, X. Zhou, D. Hou, E. Sinsky, C. Melhauser, M. Pena, H. Guan, and R. Wobus. 2018. Evaluating the MJO prediction skill from different configurations of NCEP GEFS extended forecast. Climate Dynamics, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-018-4423-9.

  • Ling, T., M. Xu, X.-Z. Liang, J.X.L. Wang, and Y. Noh. 2015. A multilevel ocean mixed layer model resolving the diurnal cycle: Development and validation. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems 07. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015ms000476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X., T. Wu, S. Yang, T. Li, W. Jie, L. Zhang, Z. Wang, X. Liang, Q. Li, Y. Cheng, H. Ren, Y. Fang, and S. Nie. 2016. MJO prediction using the sub-seasonal to seasonal forecast model of Beijing Climate Center. Climate Dynamics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3264-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, E. 1969. The predictability of a flow which possesses many scales of motion. Tellus 21: 289–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1969.tb00444.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, T.N., et al. 2004. Development of a European multi-model ensemble system for seasonal to inter-annual prediction (DEMETER). Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 85: 853–872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, T.N., R. Buizza, F. Doblas-Reyes, T. Jung, M. Leutbecher, G. Shutts, M. Steinheimer, and A. Weisheimer. 2009. Stochastic parametrization and model uncertainty. Technical Report ECMWF RD Tech. Memo. 598, 42 pp. http://www.ecmwf.int/publications/.

  • Shin, D.W., and T.N. Krishnamurti. 2003. Short- to medium-range superensemble precipitation forecasts using satellite products: 1. Deterministic forecasting. Journal of Geophysical Research 108 (D8): 8383. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001jd001511.

  • Shutts, G. 2005. A kinetic energy backscatter algorithm for use in ensemble prediction systems. Quarterly Journal Royal Meteorological Society 131: 3079–3102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shutts, G. 2015. A stochastic convective backscatter scheme for use in ensemble prediction systems. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society: Part A 141 (692): 2602–2616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shutts, G., and T.N. Palmer. 2004. The use of high-resolution numerical simulations of tropical circulation to calibrate stochastic physics schemes. In Proceedings of the ECMWF/CLIVAR simulation and prediction of intra-seasonal variability with emphasis on the MJO, Reading, United Kingdom, European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, 83–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian, D., Eric F. Wood, and X. Yuan. 2017. CFSv2-based sub-seasonal precipitation and temperature forecast skill over the contiguous United States. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 21: 1477–1490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tompkins, A.M., and J. Berner. 2008. A stochastic convective approach to account for model uncertainty due to unresolved humidity variability. Journal Geophysical Research 113: D18101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Troccoli, A. 2010. Seasonal climate forecasting. Meteorological Applications 17: 251–268. https://doi.org/10.1002/met.184.

  • Vitart, F. 2014. Evolution of ECMWF sub-seasonal forecast skill scores. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 140: 1889–1899. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, X., Y. Zhu, D. Hou, and D. Kleist. 2016. Comparison of the ensemble transform and the ensemble Kalman filter in the NCEP global ensemble forecast system. Weather and Forecasting 31: 2058–2074.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, X., Y. Zhu, D. Hou, Y. Luo, J. Peng, and D. Wobus. 2017. The NCEP global ensemble forecast system with the EnKF initialization. Weather and Forecasting 32: 1989–2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Y.X., M. Zhou, W. Pena, C.Melhauser Li, and D. Hou. 2017. Impact of sea surface temperature forcing on weeks 3 and 4 forecast skill in the NCEP global ensemble forecasting system. Weather and Forecasting 32: 2159–2173. https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-17-0093.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Y., X. Zhou, W. Li, D. Hou, C. Melhauser, E. Sinsky, M. Pena, B. Fu, H. Guan, W. Kolczynski, R. Wobus, and V. Tallapragada. 2018. An assessment of subseasonal forecast skill using an extended global ensemble forecast system (GEFS). Journal of Geophysical Research 6732–6745. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028506.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all of the helps from EMC ensemble team members, and Dr. Bing Fu helped to provide Figs. 2 and 3; Mr. Eric Sinsky provided Figs. 4 and 6 in particular. This study is partially supported through NWS’s Office of Science and Technology Integration (OSTI) and NOAA’s Climate Program Office (CPO)’s Modeling, Analysis, Predictions, and Projections (MAPP) program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuejian Zhu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zhu, Y., Li, W., Zhou, X., Hou, D. (2019). Stochastic Representation of NCEP GEFS to Improve Sub-seasonal Forecast. In: Randall, D., Srinivasan, J., Nanjundiah, R., Mukhopadhyay, . (eds) Current Trends in the Representation of Physical Processes in Weather and Climate Models. Springer Atmospheric Sciences. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3396-5_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics