Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Attending to Out-of-Field Teaching: Implications of and for Education Policy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Examining the Phenomenon of “Teaching Out-of-field”

Abstract

In this chapter, we argue that policy should take account of teaching out of field because it is systemic. Rather than being a product of poor teacher retention, we show that teachers teaching out of field has consequences for teacher retention. We illustrate opportunities for providing differentiated professional learning for people working in schools. Research, reports and commentary on education policy regarding the incidence of, perceptions of and responses to out-of-field teaching in secondary education with a particular focus on STEM disciplines are reviewed. Whilst education systems and policies differ between, and within countries, the review identifies policies and practices that impact incidence of and responses to out-of-field teaching. Scenarios taken from particular studies will be used to illustrate contexts, policies and practices. The review explores who takes responsibility within the education systems and jurisdictions for attending to the issue of teaching across specialisms, who is undertaking what actions, and what further steps are needed by the various policymakers and implementers to respond appropriately.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Victorian Certificate of Education, last 2 years of secondary school in the state of Victoria, Australia.

References

  • Adamson, F., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2012). Funding disparities and the inequitable distribution of teachers: Evaluating sources and solutions. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 20(37). http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/1053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akiba, M., LeTendre, G. K., & Scribner, J. P. (2007). Teacher quality, opportunity gap, and national achievement in 46 countries. Educational Researcher, 36(7), 369–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, B. D., & Weber, M. (2016). State school finance inequities and the limits of pursuing teacher equity through departmental regulation. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 24(47), http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.24.2230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, D. S. (2010). The impact of competing definitions of quality on the geographical distribution of teachers, Educational Policy, 24(2), 359–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L., & Rothman, R. (2011). Teacher and leader effectiveness in high-performing education systems. Washington, D.C.: Alliance for Excellent Education and Stanford, CA: Stanford Center for Opportunity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L., & Sykes, G. (2003). Wanted, a national teacher supply policy for education: The right way to meet the “Highly Qualified Teacher” challenge. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 11(33). http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v11n33/.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education (DfE), England & Wales. (2013). Evaluation of the mathematics specialist teacher (MaST) programme. Matthew Walker, Suzanne Straw, Jennifer Jeffes, Marian Sainsbury, Charlotte Clarke & Graham Thom and National Foundation for Educational Research & SQW. Research report June 2013. Retrieved August 17, 2017, from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/206773/DFE-RR274.pdf.

  • Department for Education (DfE), England and Wales. (2016). School Workforce in England: November 2016. SFR 25/2017. Retrieved August 18, 2017, from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/620825/SFR25_2017_MainText.pdf.

  • Department of Education New South Wales. (2014). Great teaching, inspired learning: implementation—steering committee progress report. http://www.dec.nsw.gov.au/our-services/schools/great-teaching-inspired-learning.

  • Drake, P. (2009a). Working for learning: Teaching assistants developing mathematics for teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(1), 67–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drake, P. (2009b). Mathematics for teaching: what makes us want to? In L. Black, H. Mendick, & Y. Solomon (Eds.), Mathematical relationships in education: Identities and participation (pp. 161–172). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake, P. (2015). Becoming known through email: A case of woman, leadership and an awfully familiar strange land. Gender and Education, 27(2), 148–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du Plessis, A. (2015). Effective education: Conceptualising the meaning of out-of-field teaching practices for teachers, teacher quality and school leaders. International Journal of Educational Research, 72, 89–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2012). Supporting the teaching professions for better learning outcomes accompanying the document communication from the commission rethinking Education: Investing in skills for better socio-economic outcomes. SWD/2012/0374 final. Retrieved August 17, 2017, from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:52012SC0374.

  • Handal, B., Watson, K., Petocz, P., & Maher, M. (2013). Retaining mathematics and science teachers in rural and remote schools. Australian and International Journal of Rural Education, 23(3), 13–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingersoll, R. M. (1998). The problem of out-of-field teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 79(10), 773–776.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingersoll, R. M. (2002). The organization of schools as an overlooked source of underqualified teaching. Teaching quality policy briefs. 7. http://www.ctpweb.org.

  • Ingersoll, R. M. (2011). Do we produce enough mathematics and science teachers? Phi Delta Kappan, 92(6), 37–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingersoll, R. M (2012). Beginning teacher induction: what the data tell us? Induction is an education reform whose time has come. Education Week Spotlight 16 May 2012, Retrieved August 21, 2017, from http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2012/05/16/kappan_ingersoll.h31.html.

  • Ingersoll, R., & May, H. (2012). The magnitude, destinations, and determinants of mathematics and science teacher turnover. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 34(4), 435–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. M., Kardos, S. M., Kauffman, D., Liu, E., & Donaldson, M. L. (2004). The support gap: New teachers’ early experiences in high-income and low-income schools, Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen, R. (2012). Curriculum Leadership: Reforming and reshaping successful practice in remote and regional indigenous education. In J. Dindyal, L. P. Cheng, & S. F. Ng (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 370–377). Singapore: MERGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, S., Jackson, J., Walstab, A., & Huo, S. (2015). Educational opportunity in Australia 2015: Who succeeds and who misses out. Melbourne: Centre for International Research on Education Systems, Victoria University, for the Mitchell Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, T., Cooksey, R., Panizzon, D., Parnell, A., & Pegg, J. (2006). Science, ICT and Mathematics Education in Rural and Regional Australia the SiMERR National Survey. A research report prepared for the Department of Education, Science and Training, National Centre of Science, ICT and Mathematics Education for Rural and Regional Australia, University of New England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S., Tytler, R., Freeman, B., & Roberts, K. (2013). STEM: Country comparisons. Melbourne: The Australian Council of Learned Academies. http://www.acola.org.au.

  • Masters, G. (2015). Planning a Stronger Workforce, Teacher: Evidence + Insight + Action. Australian Council for Educational Research. http://www.teachermagazine.com.au/geoff-masters/article/planning-a-stronger-teacher-workforce.

  • Mayer, D., Doecke, B., Ho, P., Kline, J., Kostogriz, A., Moss, J., North, J., Walker-Gibbs, B., & Hodder, P. (2014). Longitudinal teacher education and workforce study (Final Report, November, 2013). Canberra: Department of Education, Commonwealth of Australia. https://docs.education.gov.au/system/files/doc/other/ltews_main_report.pdf.

  • McKenzie, P., Weldon, P., Rowley, G., Murphy, M., & McMillan, J. (2014). Staff in Australia’s schools 2013: Main report on the survey. Camberwell: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011. International results in mathematics. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS and PIRLS International Study Centre, Boston College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noyes, A., Wake, G., & Drake, P. (2013). Time for curriculum reform: The case of mathematics. Curriculum Journal, 24(4), 511–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quartz, K., Barraza-Lyons, K., & Thomas, A. (2005). Retaining teachers in high-poverty schools: A policy framework. In N. Bascia, A. Cumming, A. Datnow, K. Leithwood, & D. Livingstone (Eds.), International handbook of educational policy (pp. 491–506). The Netherlands: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ranson, S. (2003). Public accountability in the age of neo-liberal governance. Journal of Education Policy, 18(5), 459–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, N. S., & Johnson, S. M. (2015). Teacher turnover in high poverty schools: What we know and can do. Teachers Record, 117(3), 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skourdoumbis, A. (2013). Classroom teacher effectiveness research and inquiry, and its relevance to the development of public education policy: An Australian context. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(8), 967–985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, M. (2016). Subject knowledge enhancement courses a decade on: Redefining professional knowledge in mathematics teacher education. In Teacher education in challenging times: Lessons for professionalism, partnership and practice. Routledge: Research in Teacher Education. ISBN: 9781138943360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steyn, G. M., & du Plessis, E. (2007). The implications of the out-of-field phenomenon for effective teaching, quality education and school management. Africa Education Review, 4(2), 144–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stockard, J., & Lehman, M. B. (2004). Influences on the satisfaction and retention of 1st-year teachers: The importance of effective school management. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(5), 742–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamir, E. (2013). What keeps teachers in and what drives them out: How urban public, urban Catholic, and Jewish Day Schools affect beginning teachers’ careers. Teachers College Record, 115(6), 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Törner, G., & Törner, A. (2012). Underqualified math teachers or out‐of‐field teaching in Mathematics—A neglectable Field of Action? In Mathematikunterricht im Kontext von Realität, Kultur und Lehrerprofessionalität (pp. 196–206). Wiesbaden Germany: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2016). The world needs almost 69 million new teachers to reach the 2030 Education Goals. UIS Fact Sheet No. 39 October 2016. Retrieved April 20, 2017, from http://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/fs39-the-world-needs-almost-69-million-new-teachers-to-reach-the-2030-education-goals-2016-en.pdf.

  • Vale, C., Atweh, B., Averill, R., & Skourdoumbis, A. (2016a). Equity, social justice and ethics in mathematics educations. In K. Makar, S. Dole, J. Visnovska, M. Goos, A. Bennison, & K. Fry (Eds.), Research in mathematics education in Australasia 2012–2015 (pp. 97–118). Rotterdam: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vale, C., Hobbs, L., & Speldewinde, C. (2016b). The problem of out-of-field teaching: A critical lens on policy in Australia. Paper presented at Teaching Across Specialisation (TAS) Collective, ECER Conference, 26–27 August, 2016, Dublin, Ireland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weldon, P. (2016). Out-of-field teaching in secondary schools. Policy Insights, Issue 6. Camberwell: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weldon, P., McKenzie, P., Kleinhenz, E., & Reid, K. (2012). Teach for Australia pathway: Evaluation report phase 2 of 3. Camberwell: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Y. (2014). The relationship between school organizational characteristics and reliance on out-of-field teachers in mathematics and science: Cross-National evidence from TALIS 2008. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 23, 483–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

    Colleen Vale

  2. Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia

    Pat Drake

Authors
  1. Colleen Vale
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pat Drake
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Colleen Vale .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Deakin University , Waurn Ponds, VIC, Australia

    Linda Hobbs

  2. University of Duisburg-Essen , Duisburg, Germany

    Günter Törner

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Vale, C., Drake, P. (2019). Attending to Out-of-Field Teaching: Implications of and for Education Policy. In: Hobbs, L., Törner, G. (eds) Examining the Phenomenon of “Teaching Out-of-field”. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3366-8_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3366-8_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-3365-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-3366-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation