Abstract
This chapter presents a review of empirical literature which has investigated the research relating to the association between teacher qualification to teach a subject and the quality of student outcomes. The studies reported mixed findings when investigating the hypothesis that qualified, in-field teachers obtain better student outcomes then unqualified, out-of-field teachers. It is proposed that the research relating to the out-of-field phenomenon is not sufficiently mature for definitive conclusions to be made. It is considered that the differences in definitional and methodological approaches being used need to be overcome. To produce an empirical base of sound evidence, future research would require a more sophisticated approach to defining out-of-field membership, based perhaps on a construct such as identity, and methodological techniques such as multilevel regression modelling on an appropriately sized dataset.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Programme for International Student Assessment.
- 2.
Trends in Mathematics and Science Study.
References
Baumert, J., & Kunter, M. (2013). The COACTIV model of teachers’ professional competence. In M. Kunter, J. Baumert, W. Blum, U. Klusmann, S. Krauss & M. Neubrand (Eds.), Cognitive activation in the mathematics classroom and professional competence of teachers. results from the COACTIV project (pp. 25–48). NY: Springer.
Baumert, J., et al. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 133–180.
Blömeke, S., Olsen, R. V., & Suhl, U. (2016). Relation of student achievement to the quality of their teachers and instructional quality. In T. Nilsen & J.-E. Gustafsson (Eds.), Teacher quality, instructional quality and student outcomes. Relationships across countries, cohorts and time (pp. 21–50). Cham: Springer.
Bosse, M., & Törner, G. (2015). Teacher identity as a theoretical framework for researching out-of-field teaching mathematics teachers. In C. Bernack, R. Erens, A. Eichler & T. Leuders (Eds.), Views and beliefs in mathematics education (pp. 1–14). Wiesbaden: Springer.
Brown, E. T., Molfese, V. J., & Molfese, P. (2008). Preschool student learning in literacy and mathematics: impact of teacher experience, qualifications, and beliefs on an at-risk-sample. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 13(1), 106–126.
Buddin, R., & Zamarro, G. (2009). Teacher qualifications and middle school student achievement. Retrieved June 30, 2017, from www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/working_papers/2009/RAND_WR671.pdf.
Burke, P. (2006). Identity change. Social Psychology Quarterly, 69(1), 81–96.
Clotfelter, C. T., Ladd, H. F., & Vigdor, J. L. (2006). Teacher-student matching and the assessment of teacher effectiveness. Journal of Human Resources, 41(4), 778–820.
Clotfelter, C. T., Ladd, H. F., & Vigdor, J. L. (2012). Teacher credentials and student achievement in high school. Journal of Human Resources, 45(3), 655–681.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education policy analysis archives, 8(1). Retrieved June 30, 2017, from epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/download/392/515.
Dee, T. S., & Cohodes, S. R. (2008). Out-of-field teachers and student achievement: Evidence from matched-pairs comparisons. Public Finance Review, 36(7), 7–32.
Diez, M. E. (2010). It is complicated: Unpacking the flow of teacher education’s impact on student learning. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(5), 441–450.
Du Plessis, A. E. (2013). Understanding the out-of-field teaching experience. A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Queensland. Retrieved June 30, 2017, from http://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:330372/s4245616_phd_submission.pdf.
Du Plessis, A. E. (2015). Effective education: Conceptualising the meaning of out-of-field teaching practices for teachers, teacher quality and school leaders. International Journal of Educational Research, 72, 89–102.
Goldhaber, D. D., & Brewer, D. J. (1996). Evaluating the effect of teacher degree level on educational performance. Developments in School Finance, 199–210. Retrieved June 30, 2017, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs97/97535l.pdf.
Goldhaber, D. D., & Brewer, D. J. (2000). Does teacher certification matter? High school certification status and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22, 129–146.
Goldhaber, D. D. (2002). The mystery of good teaching. Education Next, 2(1), 50–55.
Hobbs, L. (2012). Teaching out-of-field: Factors shaping identities of secondary science and mathematics. Teaching Science, 58(1), 21–29.
Hobbs, L. (2013a). Boundary crossings of out-of-field teachers: Locating learning possibilities amid disruption. In J. Langan-Fox & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Boundary-spanning in organizations: Network, influence, and conflict (pp. 7–28). NY: Routledge.
Hobbs, L. (2013b). Teaching ‘out-of-field’ as a boundary-crossing event: Factors shaping teacher identity. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(2), 271–297.
Hoffmann, L., & Richter, D. (2016). Aspekte der Aus- und Fortbildung von Deutsch- und Englischlehrkräften im Ländervergleich. In P. Stanat, K. Böhme, S. Schipolowski & N. Haag (Eds.), IQB-Bildungstrend 2015. Sprachliche Kompetenzen am Ende der 9. Jahrgangsstufe im zweiten Ländervergleich (pp. 481–507). Münster: Waxmann.
Hox, J. J. (2010). Multilevel analysis. Techniques and applications. NY & Hove, GB: Routledge.
Ingersoll, R. (1999). The problem of underqualified teachers in American secondary schools. Educational Researcher, 28(2), 26–37.
Ingersoll, R. M. (2002). Measuring out-of-field teaching. Unpublished manuscript, Graduate School of Education, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Ingersoll, R. M. (2003). Out-of-field teaching and the limits of teacher policy. Report of The Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy and The Consortium for Policy Research in Education, 32 pages. Retrieved June 30, 2017, from http://www.education.uw.edu/ctp/sites/default/files/ctpmail/PDFs/LimitsPolicy-RI-09-2003.pdf.
Kane, T. J., Rockoff, J. E., & Staiger, D. O. (2007). Photo finish: Certification does not guarantee a winner. Education Next, 7(1), 61–67.
Kunter, M., Baumert, J., Blum, W., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S., & Neubrand, M. (Eds.). (2013a). Cognitive activation in the mathematics classroom and professional competence of teachers. Results from the COACTIV project. Results from the COACTIV project NY: Springer.
Kunter, M., Kleickmann, T., Klusmann, U., & Richter, D. (2013). The Development of Teachers’ Professional Competence. In M. Kunter, J. Baumert, W. Blum, U. Klusmann, S. Krauss & M. Neubrand (Eds.), Cognitive activation in the mathematics classroom and professional competence of teachers. Results from the COACTIV Project (pp. 63–78). NY: Springer.
Kyriakides, L., Creemers, B. P., & Antoniou, P. (2009). Teacher behaviour and student outcomes: Suggestions for research on teacher training and professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(1), 12–23.
May, P. (2006). Englisch-Hörverstehen am Ende der Grundschulzeit. In W. Bos & M. Pietsch (Eds.), KESS 4—Kompetenzen und Einstellungen von Schülerinnen und Schülern am Ende der Jahrgangsstufe 4 in Hamburger Grundschulen (pp. 203–224). Münster: Waxmann.
Monk, D. H., & King, J. (1994). Multi-level teacher resource effects on pupil performance in secondary Mathematics and Science: The role of teacher subject-matter preparation. In R. Ehrenberg (Ed.), Contemporary policy issues: Choices and consequences in education (pp. 29–58). Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O, Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College Chestnut Hill, MA, USA, and International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA) IEA Secretariat Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Retrieved June 30, 2017, from http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2011/downloads/T11_IR_Mathematics_FullBook.pdf.
Ní Ríordáin, M., Paolucci, C., & Dwyer, L. M. (2017). An examination of the professional development needs of out-of-field mathematics teachers. Teacher and Teacher Education, 64, 162–174.
Olitsky, S. (2007). Facilitating identity formation, group membership and learning in science classrooms: What can be learned from out-of-field teaching in an urban school? Science Education, 91, 201–221.
Porsch, R., & Wendt, H. (2015). Welche Rolle spielt der Studienschwerpunkt von Sachunterrichtslehrkräften für ihre Selbstwirksamkeit und die Leistungen ihrer Schülerinnen und Schüler? In H. Wendt, T. Stubbe, K. Schwippert & W. Bos (Eds.), IGLU & TIMSS. 10 Jahre international vergleichende Schulleistungsforschung in der Grundschule. Vertiefende Analysen zu IGLU und TIMSS 2001 bis 2011 (pp. 161–183). Münster: Waxmann.
Porsch, R., & Wendt, H. (2017). Mathematikunterricht und Studienschwerpunkte der Lehrkräfte: Gibt es Auswirkungen auf die Mathematikleistungen von Grundschülerinnen und -schülern? Nationale Befunde aus TIMSS 2011. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 45(2), 115–135.
Richter, D., Kuhl, P., Haag, N., & Pant, H. A. (2013). Aspekte der Aus- und Fortbildung von Mathematik- und Naturwissenschaftslehrkräften im Ländervergleich. In H. A. Pant, P. Stanat, U. Schroeders, A. Roppelt, T. Siegle & C. Pöhlmann (Eds.), IQB-Ländervergleich 2012. Mathematische und naturwissenschaftliche Kompetenzen am Ende der Sekundarstufe I (pp. 367–390). Münster: Waxmann.
Schüler, S., Rösken-Winter, B., Weißenrieder, J., Lambert, A., & Römer, M. (2015). Characteristics of out-of-field teaching: Teacher beliefs and competencies. In K. Krainer & Nada Vondrová (Eds.), CERME 9. Proceedings of the Ninth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 3254–3261). Retrieved June 30, 2017, from http://www.mathematik.unidortmund.de/~prediger/ERME/CERME9_Proceedings_2015.pdf.
Tella, A. (2008). Teacher variables as predictors of academic achievement of primary school pupils mathematics. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 1(1), 16–33.
Tiedemann, J., & Billmann-Mahecha, E. (2007). Macht das Fachstudium einen Unterschied? Zur Rolle der Lehrerexpertise für Lernerfolg und Motivation in der Grundschule. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 53(1), 58–73.
Tsai, L.-T., & Yang, C.-C. (2015). Hierarchical effects of school-, classroom-, and student-level factors on the science performance of eighth-grade Taiwanese students. International Journal of Science Education, 37(8), 1166–1181.
Ziegler, C., & Richter, D. (2017). Der Einfluss fachfremden Unterrichts auf die Schülerleistung: Können Unterschiede in der Klassenzusammensetzung zur Erklärung beitragen? Unterrichtswissenschaft, 45(2), 136–155.
Zuzovsky, R. (2009). Teachers’ qualifications and their impact on student achievement: Findings from TIMSS 2003 data for Israel. In M. v. Davier & D. Hastedt (Eds.), Issues and methodologies in large-scale assessments (IERI Monograph Series, Vol. 2, pp. 37–62). Hamburg/Princeton: IEA-ETS Research Institute.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Porsch, R., Whannell, R. (2019). Out-of-Field Teaching Affecting Students and Learning: What Is Known and Unknown. In: Hobbs, L., Törner, G. (eds) Examining the Phenomenon of “Teaching Out-of-field”. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3366-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3366-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-3365-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-3366-8
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)