Skip to main content

Out-of-Field Teaching Affecting Students and Learning: What Is Known and Unknown

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This chapter presents a review of empirical literature which has investigated the research relating to the association between teacher qualification to teach a subject and the quality of student outcomes. The studies reported mixed findings when investigating the hypothesis that qualified, in-field teachers obtain better student outcomes then unqualified, out-of-field teachers. It is proposed that the research relating to the out-of-field phenomenon is not sufficiently mature for definitive conclusions to be made. It is considered that the differences in definitional and methodological approaches being used need to be overcome. To produce an empirical base of sound evidence, future research would require a more sophisticated approach to defining out-of-field membership, based perhaps on a construct such as identity, and methodological techniques such as multilevel regression modelling on an appropriately sized dataset.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Programme for International Student Assessment.

  2. 2.

    Trends in Mathematics and Science Study.

References

  • Baumert, J., & Kunter, M. (2013). The COACTIV model of teachers’ professional competence. In M. Kunter, J. Baumert, W. Blum, U. Klusmann, S. Krauss & M. Neubrand (Eds.), Cognitive activation in the mathematics classroom and professional competence of teachers. results from the COACTIV project (pp. 25–48). NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Baumert, J., et al. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 133–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blömeke, S., Olsen, R. V., & Suhl, U. (2016). Relation of student achievement to the quality of their teachers and instructional quality. In T. Nilsen & J.-E. Gustafsson (Eds.), Teacher quality, instructional quality and student outcomes. Relationships across countries, cohorts and time (pp. 21–50). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosse, M., & Törner, G. (2015). Teacher identity as a theoretical framework for researching out-of-field teaching mathematics teachers. In C. Bernack, R. Erens, A. Eichler & T. Leuders (Eds.), Views and beliefs in mathematics education (pp. 1–14). Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, E. T., Molfese, V. J., & Molfese, P. (2008). Preschool student learning in literacy and mathematics: impact of teacher experience, qualifications, and beliefs on an at-risk-sample. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 13(1), 106–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buddin, R., & Zamarro, G. (2009). Teacher qualifications and middle school student achievement. Retrieved June 30, 2017, from www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/working_papers/2009/RAND_WR671.pdf.

  • Burke, P. (2006). Identity change. Social Psychology Quarterly, 69(1), 81–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clotfelter, C. T., Ladd, H. F., & Vigdor, J. L. (2006). Teacher-student matching and the assessment of teacher effectiveness. Journal of Human Resources, 41(4), 778–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clotfelter, C. T., Ladd, H. F., & Vigdor, J. L. (2012). Teacher credentials and student achievement in high school. Journal of Human Resources, 45(3), 655–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education policy analysis archives, 8(1). Retrieved June 30, 2017, from epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/download/392/515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dee, T. S., & Cohodes, S. R. (2008). Out-of-field teachers and student achievement: Evidence from matched-pairs comparisons. Public Finance Review, 36(7), 7–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diez, M. E. (2010). It is complicated: Unpacking the flow of teacher education’s impact on student learning. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(5), 441–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du Plessis, A. E. (2013). Understanding the out-of-field teaching experience. A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Queensland. Retrieved June 30, 2017, from http://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:330372/s4245616_phd_submission.pdf.

  • Du Plessis, A. E. (2015). Effective education: Conceptualising the meaning of out-of-field teaching practices for teachers, teacher quality and school leaders. International Journal of Educational Research, 72, 89–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldhaber, D. D., & Brewer, D. J. (1996). Evaluating the effect of teacher degree level on educational performance. Developments in School Finance, 199–210. Retrieved June 30, 2017, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs97/97535l.pdf.

  • Goldhaber, D. D., & Brewer, D. J. (2000). Does teacher certification matter? High school certification status and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22, 129–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldhaber, D. D. (2002). The mystery of good teaching. Education Next, 2(1), 50–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, L. (2012). Teaching out-of-field: Factors shaping identities of secondary science and mathematics. Teaching Science, 58(1), 21–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, L. (2013a). Boundary crossings of out-of-field teachers: Locating learning possibilities amid disruption. In J. Langan-Fox & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Boundary-spanning in organizations: Network, influence, and conflict (pp. 7–28). NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, L. (2013b). Teaching ‘out-of-field’ as a boundary-crossing event: Factors shaping teacher identity. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(2), 271–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, L., & Richter, D. (2016). Aspekte der Aus- und Fortbildung von Deutsch- und Englischlehrkräften im Ländervergleich. In P. Stanat, K. Böhme, S. Schipolowski & N. Haag (Eds.), IQB-Bildungstrend 2015. Sprachliche Kompetenzen am Ende der 9. Jahrgangsstufe im zweiten Ländervergleich (pp. 481–507). Münster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hox, J. J. (2010). Multilevel analysis. Techniques and applications. NY & Hove, GB: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ingersoll, R. (1999). The problem of underqualified teachers in American secondary schools. Educational Researcher, 28(2), 26–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingersoll, R. M. (2002). Measuring out-of-field teaching. Unpublished manuscript, Graduate School of Education, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingersoll, R. M. (2003). Out-of-field teaching and the limits of teacher policy. Report of The Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy and The Consortium for Policy Research in Education, 32 pages. Retrieved June 30, 2017, from http://www.education.uw.edu/ctp/sites/default/files/ctpmail/PDFs/LimitsPolicy-RI-09-2003.pdf.

  • Kane, T. J., Rockoff, J. E., & Staiger, D. O. (2007). Photo finish: Certification does not guarantee a winner. Education Next, 7(1), 61–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunter, M., Baumert, J., Blum, W., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S., & Neubrand, M. (Eds.). (2013a). Cognitive activation in the mathematics classroom and professional competence of teachers. Results from the COACTIV project. Results from the COACTIV project NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunter, M., Kleickmann, T., Klusmann, U., & Richter, D. (2013). The Development of Teachers’ Professional Competence. In M. Kunter, J. Baumert, W. Blum, U. Klusmann, S. Krauss & M. Neubrand (Eds.), Cognitive activation in the mathematics classroom and professional competence of teachers. Results from the COACTIV Project (pp. 63–78). NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyriakides, L., Creemers, B. P., & Antoniou, P. (2009). Teacher behaviour and student outcomes: Suggestions for research on teacher training and professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(1), 12–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, P. (2006). Englisch-Hörverstehen am Ende der Grundschulzeit. In W. Bos & M. Pietsch (Eds.), KESS 4—Kompetenzen und Einstellungen von Schülerinnen und Schülern am Ende der Jahrgangsstufe 4 in Hamburger Grundschulen (pp. 203–224). Münster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monk, D. H., & King, J. (1994). Multi-level teacher resource effects on pupil performance in secondary Mathematics and Science: The role of teacher subject-matter preparation. In R. Ehrenberg (Ed.), Contemporary policy issues: Choices and consequences in education (pp. 29–58). Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O, Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College Chestnut Hill, MA, USA, and International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA) IEA Secretariat Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Retrieved June 30, 2017, from http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2011/downloads/T11_IR_Mathematics_FullBook.pdf.

  • Ní Ríordáin, M., Paolucci, C., & Dwyer, L. M. (2017). An examination of the professional development needs of out-of-field mathematics teachers. Teacher and Teacher Education, 64, 162–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olitsky, S. (2007). Facilitating identity formation, group membership and learning in science classrooms: What can be learned from out-of-field teaching in an urban school? Science Education, 91, 201–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porsch, R., & Wendt, H. (2015). Welche Rolle spielt der Studienschwerpunkt von Sachunterrichtslehrkräften für ihre Selbstwirksamkeit und die Leistungen ihrer Schülerinnen und Schüler? In H. Wendt, T. Stubbe, K. Schwippert & W. Bos (Eds.), IGLU & TIMSS. 10 Jahre international vergleichende Schulleistungsforschung in der Grundschule. Vertiefende Analysen zu IGLU und TIMSS 2001 bis 2011 (pp. 161–183). Münster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porsch, R., & Wendt, H. (2017). Mathematikunterricht und Studienschwerpunkte der Lehrkräfte: Gibt es Auswirkungen auf die Mathematikleistungen von Grundschülerinnen und -schülern? Nationale Befunde aus TIMSS 2011. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 45(2), 115–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter, D., Kuhl, P., Haag, N., & Pant, H. A. (2013). Aspekte der Aus- und Fortbildung von Mathematik- und Naturwissenschaftslehrkräften im Ländervergleich. In H. A. Pant, P. Stanat, U. Schroeders, A. Roppelt, T. Siegle & C. Pöhlmann (Eds.), IQB-Ländervergleich 2012. Mathematische und naturwissenschaftliche Kompetenzen am Ende der Sekundarstufe I (pp. 367–390). Münster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schüler, S., Rösken-Winter, B., Weißenrieder, J., Lambert, A., & Römer, M. (2015). Characteristics of out-of-field teaching: Teacher beliefs and competencies. In K. Krainer & Nada Vondrová (Eds.), CERME 9. Proceedings of the Ninth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 3254–3261). Retrieved June 30, 2017, from http://www.mathematik.unidortmund.de/~prediger/ERME/CERME9_Proceedings_2015.pdf.

  • Tella, A. (2008). Teacher variables as predictors of academic achievement of primary school pupils mathematics. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 1(1), 16–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiedemann, J., & Billmann-Mahecha, E. (2007). Macht das Fachstudium einen Unterschied? Zur Rolle der Lehrerexpertise für Lernerfolg und Motivation in der Grundschule. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 53(1), 58–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, L.-T., & Yang, C.-C. (2015). Hierarchical effects of school-, classroom-, and student-level factors on the science performance of eighth-grade Taiwanese students. International Journal of Science Education, 37(8), 1166–1181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, C., & Richter, D. (2017). Der Einfluss fachfremden Unterrichts auf die Schülerleistung: Können Unterschiede in der Klassenzusammensetzung zur Erklärung beitragen? Unterrichtswissenschaft, 45(2), 136–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuzovsky, R. (2009). Teachers’ qualifications and their impact on student achievement: Findings from TIMSS 2003 data for Israel. In M. v. Davier & D. Hastedt (Eds.), Issues and methodologies in large-scale assessments (IERI Monograph Series, Vol. 2, pp. 37–62). Hamburg/Princeton: IEA-ETS Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raphaela Porsch .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Porsch, R., Whannell, R. (2019). Out-of-Field Teaching Affecting Students and Learning: What Is Known and Unknown. In: Hobbs, L., Törner, G. (eds) Examining the Phenomenon of “Teaching Out-of-field”. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3366-8_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3366-8_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-3365-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-3366-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics