Skip to main content

Teaching Out-of-Field as a Phenomenon and Research Problem

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Teacher specialisations ensure that teachers have the specialised knowledge to teach in that subject, or year level. They provide a sense of identity, and help to organise teachers around common commitments and expertise. What happens for teachers who find themselves teaching a subject or level or which they are not specialised? While we know about teaching out-of-field from practice and research, there is a need to share and learn from each other in a way that respects international differences in how this phenomenon is understood and manifested. This chapter has three intentions: to highlight the significance of teaching out-of-field as a phenomenon and a research problem; summarise the dimensions and issues associated with out-of-field teaching; and provide a rationale for taking an international perspective on examining the out-of-field phenomenon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The TAS Collective is a group of researchers and practitioners with an interest in sharing and exploring issues relating to the out-of-field phenomenon.

  2. 2.

    The Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) asks teachers and school leaders about working conditions and learning environments at their schools.

  3. 3.

    The Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) examines the performance of 15-year old students of science, mathematics and reading.

References

  • Australian Mathematical Sciences Institute [AMSI]. (2013). Discipline profile of the mathematical sciences. Melbourne: AMSI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous, (2013). Shattered dreams. Science Education News, 62(3), 154–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosse, M., & Törner, G. (2013). Out-of-field teaching mathematics teachers and the ambivalent role of beliefs—a first report from interviews. In M. S. Hannula, P. Portaankorva-Koivisto, A. Laine, & L. Näveri (Eds.), Current State of Research on Mathematical Beliefs XVIII Proceedings of the MAVI-18 Conference (pp. 341–355). Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosse, M., & Törner, G. (2015a). The practice of out-of-field teaching in mathematics classrooms-a German case study. In L. Sumpter (Ed.), Current State of Research on Mathematical Beliefs XX: Proceedings of the MAVI-20 Conference Kultur och Lärande, Vol. 2015:04 (pp. 77–88). Falun: Högskolan Dalarna University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosse, M., & Törner, G. (2015b). Teacher identity as a theoretical framework for researching out-of-field teaching mathematics teachers. In C. Bernack, R. Erens, A. Eichler, & T. Leuders (Eds.), Views and beliefs in mathematics education -contributions of the 19th MAVI conference (pp. 1–14). Wiesbaden: Springer Spektrum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodbelt, S. (1990). Out-of-field teaching. The Clearing House, 63(6), 282–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulman, J. (2008). Outfielder stories: Supporting primary teachers teaching secondary science to come in from the margins. Ph.D., Central Queensland University, North Rockhampton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bürgerschaft der Freien Hansestadt Hamburg. (2016). Schriftliche Kleine Anfrage der Abgeordneten Anna-Elisabeth von Treuenfels-Frowein (FDP) vom 14.01.16 und Antwort des Senats. Drucksache 21/2874, 22.01.16. https://kleineanfragen.de/hamburg/21/2874-fachfremd-erteilter-schulunterricht-in-den-gesellschaftswissenschaftlichen-faechern.

  • Caldis, S. (2017). Teaching ‘out-of-field’: Teachers having to know what they do not know. Geography Bulletin, 49(1), 13–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsen, W. S. (1992). Closing down the conversation: Discouraging student talk on unfamiliar science content. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 27(2), 15–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, K. K. H., & Yung, B. H. W. (2018). Developing pedagogical content knowledge for teaching a new topic: More than teaching experience and subject matter knowledge. Research in Science Education, 48(2), 233–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cinkir, S., & Kurum, G. (2015). Discrepancy in tea her employment: The problem of out-of-field teacher employment. Educational Planning, 22(1), 29–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clerkin, A., Perkins, R., & Cunningham, R. (2015). TIMSS 2015 in Ireland: Mathematics and science in primary and post-primary schools. Dublin Educational Research Centre. http://www.erc.ie/studies/timss/.

  • Coetzer, L., & Coetzee, E. (2015). Out-of-field teaching as a major cause for teachers’ stress and tension related experiences in the rural areas of South Africa. In Proceedings of MAC-ETeL 2015: Multidisciplinary Academic Conference on Education, teaching and E-learning. Prague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crisan, C., & Rodd, M. (2011). Teachers of mathematics to mathematics teachers: A TDA mathematics development programme for teachers. British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 31(3), 29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darby, L. (2005). Science students’ perceptions of engaging pedagogy. Research in Science Education, 35, 425–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of State policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dee, T. S., & Cohodes, S. R. (2008). Out-of-field teachers and student achievement: Evidence from matched-pairs comparisons. Public Finance Review, 36(1), 7–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du Plessis, A. E. (2005) The implications of the out of field phenomenon for school management. Master of Education Thesis, University of South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Plessis, A. E. (2014). Understanding the out-of-field teaching experience. A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The University of Queensland, Brisbane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Plessis, A. E. (2015). Effective education: Conceptualising the meaning of out-of-field teaching practices for teachers, teacher quality and school leaders. International Journal of Educational Research, 72(2015), 89–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du Plessis, A. E., Carroll, A., & Gillies, R. M. (2014). Out-of-field teaching and professional development: A transnational investigation across Australia and South Africa. International Journal of Educational Research, 66, 90–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du Plessis, A. E., Carroll, A., & Gillies, R. M. (2015). Understanding the lived experiences of novice out-of-field teachers in relation to school leadership practices. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 43(1), 4–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du Plessis, A. E. (2018). Professional support beyond initial teacher education: How to manage teaching out-of-field. Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education Council. (2018). Optimising STEM industry-school partnerships: Inspiring Australia’s next generation Final Report. South Carlton: Education Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ee gyeong, K. (2011). Out-of-field secondary school teachers in Korea: Their realities and implications. KEDI Journal of Educational Policy, 8(1), 29–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faulkner, F., Lane, C., & Smith, A. (2016) A CPD programme for out-of-field mathematics teachers: Programme outline and preliminary evaluations by participants. In Science and Mathematics Education Conference, 16th–17th June 2016, Dublin City University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greary, T., Barnes, I., Mostafa, T., Pensiero, N., & Swensson, C. (2016). Trends in Maths and Science Study (TIMSS): National Report for England. Research report, UCL Institute of Education, for the English Department of Education. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/timss-2015-national-report-for-england.

  • Harris, K. L., & Jensz, F. (2006). The preparation of mathematics teachers in Australia. In Meeting the Demand for Suitably Qualified Mathematics Teachers in Secondary Schools. Melbourne, Australia: Centre of the Study of Higher Education, The University of Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, K.-L., Jensz, F., & Baldwin, G. (2005). Who’s teaching science? Meeting the demand for qualified science teachers in Australian secondary schools. Melbourne, Australia: Centre for the Study of Higher Education, The University of Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, J. (2014). Mathematics after 16: The state of play, challenges and ways ahead. London: Nuffield Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, L. (2012). Examining the aesthetic dimensions of teaching: Relationships between teacher knowledge, identity and passion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 718–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, L. (2013a). Teaching ‘out-of-field’ as a boundary-crossing event: Factors shaping teacher identity. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(2), 271–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, L. (2013b). Boundary crossings of out-of-field teachers: Locating learning possibilities amid disruption. In J. Langan-Fox & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Boundary-spanning in organizations: Network, influence, and conflict (pp. 7–28). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, L. (2015). Too many teachers teaching outside their area of expertise. The Conversation Australia, The Conversation Trust. Retrieved April 13, 2015, from https://theconversation.com/too-many-teachers-teaching-outside-their-area-of-expertise-39688.

  • Hobbs, L. & Törner, G. (Eds.) (2014). Taking an international perspective on “Out-of-field” Teaching: Proceedings and agenda for research and action from the 1st Teaching Across Specialisations (TAS) Collective Symposium. TAS Collective. https://www.uni-due.de/TAS.

  • Ibarra, H. (1999). Provisional selves: Experimenting with image and identity in professional adaptation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 764–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingersoll, R. (1998). The problem of out-of-field teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 773–776.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingersoll, R. M. (1999). The problem of underqualified teachers in American secondary schools. Educational Researcher, 28(2), 26–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingersoll, R. M. (2002). Out-of-field teaching, educational inequity, and the organization of schools: An exploratory analysis. Washington, DC: Centre of the Study of Teaching and Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingersoll, R. M. (Ed.). (2007). A comparative srtudy of teacher preparation and qualifications in six nations. Pennsylvania: CPRE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, J., Whannell, R., & Hobbs, L. (accepted). Designing professional learning for in-service teachers teaching out-of-field. Teaching and Teacher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E., & Luft, J. A. (2008). Experienced secondary science teachers’ representation of pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1343–1363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luft, J. A., Dubois, S. L., Nixon, R. S., & Campbell, B. K. (2015). Supporting newly hired teachers of science: Attaining teacher professional standards. Studies in Science Education, 51(1), 1–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McConney, A., & Price, A. (2009a). An assessment of the phenomenon of “teaching out-of-field” in WA schools. Perth, Australia: Western Australian College of Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConney, A., & Price, A. (2009b). Teaching out-of-field in Western Australia. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 34(6), 86–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neakrase, J. J. (2010). Nature of nurture? A characterization of the knowledge and practices of in- and out-of-field beginning secondary physics teachers. A Dissertation presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy, Arizona State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ní Ríordáin, M., & Hannigan, A. (2009). Out-of-field teaching in post-primary mathematics education: An analysis of the Irish context. Research report, National Centre for Excellence in Mathematics and Science Teaching and Learning. ISBN 1–905952-23-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ní Ríordáin, M., & Hannigan, A. (2011). Who teaches mathematics at second-level in Ireland? Irish Educational Studies, 30(3), 289–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nixon, R., Luft, J. A., & Ross, R. (2017). Prevalence and predictors of out-of-field teaching in the first five years. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olitsky, S. (2006). Facilitating identity formation, group membership, and learning in science classrooms: What can be learned from out-of-field teaching in an urban school? Science Education, 91(2), 201–221. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pillay, H., Goddard, R., & Wilss, L. (2005). Well-being, burnout and competence: Implications for teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 30(2), 22–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porsch, R. (2016). Fachfremd unterrichten in Deutschland: Definition–Verbreitung–Auswirkungen. Die Deutsche Schule, 108(1), 9–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Productivity Commission. (2012). Schools Workforce. Research Report, Canberra Productivity Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Productivity Commission. (2017). Shifting the dial: 5 year productivity review. Canberra: Productivity Commission. (Inquiry report no. 84).

    Google Scholar 

  • Salleh, U. K. M. (2013a). An investigation into differences between out-of-field and in-field history teachers’ influence on learning experiences in Malaysian secondary schools. Ph.D. thesis, University of Adelaide.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salleh, U. K. M. (2013b). Differences between in-field and out-of-field history teachers influence on students learning experience in Malaysian secondary schools. Creative Education, 4(9), 5–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schueler, S., Roesken-Winter, B, Weißenrieder, J., Lambert, A. & Romer, M. (2016). Characteristics of out-of-field teaching: Teacher beliefs and competencies. In K. Krainer, & N. Vondrova (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education, Feb 2015, pp. 3254–3261. Prague: Czech Republic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selvakumaran, Y. (in preparation). From weakness to strength: Turning the challenge of ‘out of field teaching’ into a team that thrives. In D. M. Netolicky, J. Andrews, & C. Paterson (Eds.) Flip the system Australia: What matters in education. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharplin, E. D. (2014). Reconceptualising out-of-field teaching: Experiences of rural teachers in Western Australia. Educational Research, 56(1), 97–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steyn, G., & Du Plessis, E. (2007). The implication of the out-of-field phenomenon for effective teaching, quality education and school management. Africa Education Review, 4(2), 144–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, T. (2000). The future of the past: Final report of the national inquiry into school history. Retrieved January 6 2010 from http://www.dest.gov.au.

  • The School District of Volusia County. (2017). Out of Field. http://myvolusiaschools.org/hr-certification/Pages/Out-of-Field.aspx.

  • Thomson, S., Hillman, K., & Wernert, N. (2012). Monitoring Australian year 8 student achievement internationally: TIMSS 2011. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER).

    Google Scholar 

  • Törner, G., & Törner, A. (2012). Underqualified math teachers or out-of-field teaching in mathematics–a neglectable field of action? In Blum et al. (Eds.) Mathematikunterricht im Kontext von Realität, Kultur und Lehrerprofessionalität (pp. 196–206). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vukovic, R. (2017). School improvement Episode 11: Out-of-field teaching. https://www.teachermagazine.com.au/articles/school-improvement-episode-11-out-of-field-teaching.

  • Weldon, P. R. (2015). The teacher workforce in Australia: Supply, demand and data issues. Policy Insights, Issue 2. Melbourne: CER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weldon, P. R. (2016). Out-of-field teaching in Australian secondary schools. In Policy Insights, (vol. 6). Melbourne: ACER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Y. (2012). Out-of-field teaching: A cross-national study on teacher labour market and teacher quality. Ph.D. thesis, Michigan State University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda Hobbs .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hobbs, L., Törner, G. (2019). Teaching Out-of-Field as a Phenomenon and Research Problem. In: Hobbs, L., Törner, G. (eds) Examining the Phenomenon of “Teaching Out-of-field”. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3366-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3366-8_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-3365-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-3366-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics