Skip to main content

Can Geopolymer Concrete Replace the Conventional Concrete?—State of the Art

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Sustainable Construction and Building Materials

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 25))

Abstract

Environmental pollution badly affects the ecosystem. Cement is the main ingredient for the production of concrete. Cement production, however, involves burning of limestone resulting in emission of carbon dioxide (CO2) gas into the atmosphere. The release in CO2 causes global warming. Geopolymer concrete is one of the solutions for dealing with this problem since, because of geopolymerisation the need for cement can be totally eliminated. This paper reports the state of the art of the present status of geopolymer concrete. It has been found that with the use of alkaline activators such as sodium or potassium silicates and hydroxides in conjunction with industrial wastes such as fly ash, ground granulated blast furnace slag, etc. a paste is formed which acts as a binder. Parameters affecting the properties of geopolymer concrete are the molarity of the alkaline solution, proportions of the binders used, curing conditions and also the aggregate properties have influence on the resulting properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Gartner, E. (2004). Industrially interesting approaches to ‘low-CO2’ cements. Cement and Concrete Research, 34(9), 1489–1498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Vijaya Rangan, B. (2016). Geopolymer concrete for environmental protection. Special IssueFuture Concrete, March 23, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Toniolo, N., & Boccaccini, A. R. (2017). Fly ash-based geopolymers containing added silicate waste: A review. Ceramics International, 43, 14545–14551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Singh, B., Ishwarya, G., Gupta, M., & Bhattacharyya, S. K. (2015). Geopolymer concrete: A review of some recent developments. Construction and Building Materials, 85, 78–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhuang, H. J., Zhang, H. Y., & Xu, H. (2017). Resistance of geopolymer mortar to acid and chloride attacks. Procedia Engineering, 210, 126–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ganapati, N., Prasad, A. S. S. N., Adiseshu, S., & Satayanarayana, P. V. V. (2012). A study on strength properties of geopolymer concrete with addition of GGBS. International Journal of Engineering Research and Development, 2(4), 19–28.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hardjito, D., & Fung, S. S. (2010). Fly ash-based geopolymer mortar incorporating bottom ash. Modern applied science, 4, 44–52.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fernandez-Jiminez, A. M., Palomo, A., & Lopez-Hombrados, C. (2016). Engineering properties of alkali-activated fly ash concrete. ACI Mater J, 103, 106–112.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Olivia, M., & Nikraz, H. (2012). Properties of fly ash geopolymer concrete designed by Taguchi method. Materials and Design, 36, 191–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ramujee, K. (2016). Strength and setting times of F-type fly ash-based geopolymer mortar. International Journal of Earth Sciences and Engineering 09(03), 360–365. ISSN 0974-5904.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wallah, S. E., & Rangan, B. V. (2006). Low-calcium fly ash-based geopolymer concrete: Long-term properties. Research Report GC2, Perth: Faculty of Engineering, Curtin University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lloyd, N. A., & Rangan, B. V. (2010). Geopolymer concrete with fly ash. In Second International Conference on Sustainable Construction Materials and Technologies. Coventry University and the University of Wisconsin Milwaukee Centre for By-products Utilization. June 2010. ISBN 978-1-4507-1490-7.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Albitar, M., Mohamed Ali, M.S., Visintin, P., Drechsler, M. (2015). Effect of granulated lead smelter slag on strength of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 83, 128–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Vijayalaxmi Kedilaya .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Prashanth, S., Vijayalaxmi Kedilaya, B. (2019). Can Geopolymer Concrete Replace the Conventional Concrete?—State of the Art. In: Das, B., Neithalath, N. (eds) Sustainable Construction and Building Materials. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering , vol 25. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3317-0_72

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3317-0_72

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-3316-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-3317-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics