Skip to main content

A Different Kind of Society

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Networked Citizen
  • 266 Accesses

Abstract

Schudson’s monitorial citizen is no longer viable as the key descriptor of citizens’ engagement in the twenty-first century because, this chapter argues, it is principally the product of a world structured according to the logic of the nation state. Though borders and states are still crucial, the chapter suggests, networks have become a central feature of everyday life. This shift has impacted the way in which citizens engage in politics. We have moved away from a society predominantly inhabited by monitorial citizens to one in which the key quality of politically active citizens is to be networked.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Innis 1951.

  2. 2.

    McLuhan 2001, 151.

  3. 3.

    Deibert 2000, 23.

  4. 4.

    McLuhan 1997, 228.

  5. 5.

    Popper 1966, 171.

  6. 6.

    McLuhan 1962.

  7. 7.

    McLuhan 1997, 232.

  8. 8.

    McLuhan 2001.

  9. 9.

    McLuhan 1962.

  10. 10.

    Kenneth Boulding quoted in McLuhan 2001, 41.

  11. 11.

    McLuhan 2001, 248.

  12. 12.

    Castells 2001, 3.

  13. 13.

    Castells 1996.

  14. 14.

    Castells 2004b, 3–4.

  15. 15.

    Watts and Strogatz 1998.

  16. 16.

    Castells 2004b, 5.

  17. 17.

    Keane 1999.

  18. 18.

    More on this point, one important change in the Seventies was the commercialisation of the personal computer . In January 1975, the front cover of the monthly issue of Popular Electronics pictured the new product of a little-known company from Albuquerque (New Mexico) called Micro Instrumentation Telemetry System (MITS). The product advertised on the cover was the Altair 8800, and it was designed by the company’s founder, H. Edward Roberts. It was the first-ever personal computer, even before Steve Wozniak’s more celebrated machine, the 1976 Apple I. The Altair, whose rather unusual name was apparently inspired by the science fiction television series Star Trek, was a groundbreaking product. As the spaceship in the TV series, it was a probe that transported the average American family into the uncharted space of the computer age and inspired a new generation of curious and inventive explorers. The Altair 8800 and the many clones that quickly followed were to the computer research community what the Renaissance and printing press had been for the late Middle Ages in Europe: they inspired a whole generation of scientists and entrepreneurs. For instance, Bill Gates and Paul Allen, Microsoft founders, were the authors (together with Monte Davidoff) of the Altair Basic application, which they licensed to Ed Robison at MITS in the early months of 1975. Gates and Allen were greatly inspired by the potential of the Altair 8800; they saw in it the chance of a lifetime: both decided to drop college and start their own business. Similarly impressed were Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak who went on to create Apple Computer in 1976. The Altair opened a breach in the protecting walls surrounding what had been hitherto a closed community. The Altair was also the first economic and powerful probe within reach of everyone to explore and expand the new galaxy of communication still in its infancy: the Internet. That probe started a long process of invasion and mutation of that galaxy. As soon as those PCs were connected to the Internet, the network made resources, until then only available to few, potentially within reach of the many, and in the long run even to those users who knew nothing about the technology they used. Mims 1985; Les Solomon 1984; Gates et al. 1995.

  19. 19.

    Castells 2001, 2; 2004c, 10–11.

  20. 20.

    Eisenstein 1980.

  21. 21.

    Chadwick 2006, 17–21.

  22. 22.

    Castells 2004a, 137.

  23. 23.

    Castells 2012.

References

  • Castells, Manuel. 1996. The Rise of the Network Society. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——–. 2001. The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, Business, and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004a. “Globalization and Identity in the Network Society: A Rejoinder to Calhoun, Lyon and Touraine.” In Manuel Castells, edited by Frank Webster and Basil Dimitriou, 2, 135–51. Sage Masters of Modern Social Thought. London; Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004b. “Informationalism, Networks, and the Network Society: A Theoretical Blueprint.” In The Network Society: A Cross-Cultural Perspective, edited by Manuel Castells, 3–43. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———, ed. 2004c. The Network Society: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. Cambridge, UK; Malden, MA: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick, Andrew. 2006. Internet Politics: States, Citizens, and New Communication Technologies. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deibert, Ronald. 2000. Parchment, Printing, and Hypermedia: Communication and World Order Transformation. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstein, Elizabeth L. 1980. The Printing Press as an Agent of Change. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gates, Bill, Nathan Myhrvold, and Peter Rinearson. 1995. The Road Ahead. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innis, Harold Adams. 1951. The Bias of Communication. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keane, John. 1999. “Public Life in the Era of Communicative Abundance.” Canadian Journal of Communication 24 (2). http://www.cjc-online.ca/index.php/journal/article/view/1094.

  • Les Solomon. 1984. “Solomon’s Memory.” InfoWorld, October 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan, Marshall. 1962. The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1997. “The Playboy Interview.” In Essential McLuhan, edited by Eric McLuhan and Frank Zingrone, 222–60. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. Understanding Media. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mims, Forrest M. 1985. “The Tenth Anniversary of the Altair 8800.” Computers & Electronics, January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Karl Raimund. 1966. The Open Society and Its Enemies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, Duncan J., and Steven H. Strogatz. 1998. “Collective Dynamics of ‘Small-World’ Networks.” Nature 393 (6684): 440–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Navarria, G. (2019). A Different Kind of Society. In: The Networked Citizen. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3293-7_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics