Abstract
The incorporation of social perspectives into standard manageability administration, instruments, and approaches had picked up noticeable quality as of late. An expanding number of activities advancing supply chain due perseverance have been situating social issues as a focal concern. Social life cycle assessment gives an all-encompassing, fundamental, and thorough apparatus to comprehend social issues that may emerge in the esteem chains of items and administrations managing human life today. For the most part the “Life cycle assessment” for bioenergy included three classifications: (i) Bioenergy creation, (ii) Environmental issues, (iii) Environmental target. This implies LCA techniques have been broadly utilized as a part of evaluating the natural effect from different sorts of bioenergy generation process. Uniquely, the greenhouse gases pulled in more consideration in this exploration territory. Because of the natural impacts, confinements, and additionally changes of the non-renewable energy sources, usage of substitution energies, for example, sustainable power sources is one of the principle arrangements keeping in mind the end goal to defeat to the vitality concerns. Among sustainable power sources, bioenergy and its related advancements is imperative for specialists and approach producers. Albeit diverse bioenergy advances have been produced, understanding the market and business possibilities of every innovation is imperative.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Alidrisi, H., & Demirbas, A. (2016). Enhanced electricity generation by using biomass materials. Energy Sources Part A Recovery, Utilization and Environmental Effects, 38(10), 1419–1427.
Aslani, A., Antila, E., & Wong, K. F. V. (2012). Comparative analysis of energy security in the Nordic countries: The role of renewable energy resources in diversification. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 4(6), 062701.
Aslani, A., Mazzuca-Sobczuk, T., Eivazi, S., & Bekhrad, K. (2018). Analysis of bioenergy technologies development based on life cycle and adaptation trends. Renewable Energy, 127, 1076–1086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.05.035.
Demirbas, A., Taylan, O., & Kaya, D. (2016). Biogas production from municipal sewage sludge (MSS). Energy Sources Part A: Recovery, Utilization and Environmental Effects, 34(23), 3027–3033.
Dey, S., & Bhattacharya, P. (2016). Performance analysis of biogas plant for cooking applications and cost analysis. Energy Education Science and Technology Part B: Social and Educational Studies, 8(1), 1–12.
Eskandary, H. (2017). Improving energy efficiency in agronomical systems. Energy Education Science and Technology Part A: Energy Science and Research, 35(1), 45–54.
Jayakumar, P. (2009). Solar energy resources assessment handbook. In Prepared for Asian and Pacific Centre for Transfer of Technology (APCTT) of the United Nations—Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP) (p. 117).
Karkoodi, S., Aslani, A., Talebi, M., Roumi, S., Abbassi, A. (2018). Transient 3D: Simulation of a flat plate solar collector in a mild climate condition. International Journal of Energy Optimization and Engineering. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijeoe.2018070105.
Nasir, I. M., Ghazi, T. I. M., Omar, R., & Idris, A. (2014). Bioreactor performance in the anaerobic digestion of cattle manure: A review. Energy Sources Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 36(13), 1476–1483.
Nigam, P. S., & Singh, A. (2011). Production of liquid biofuels from renewable resources. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 37, 52–68.
Nizami, A. S., Shahzad, K., Rehan, M., Ouda, O. K. M., Khan, M. Z., Ismail, I. M. I., et al. (2017). Developing waste biorefinery in Makkah: A way forward to convert urban waste into renewable energy. Applied Energy, 186(1), 186–196.
Taylan, O., Kaya, D., Bakhsh, A. A., & Demirbas, A. (2018). Bioenergy life cycle assessment and management in energy generation. Energy Exploration & Exploitation, 36, 166–181.
Tran, Th. (2007). Review of methods and tools applied in technology assessment literature. In PICMET ’07 - 2007 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology, IEEE Publisher. https://doi.org/10.1109/PICMET.2007.4349490
Werle, S., & Dudziak, M. (2014). Analysis of organic and inorganic contaminants in dried sewage sludge and by-products of dried sewage sludge gasification. Energies, 7(1), 462–476.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Saravanan, A., Kumar, P.S. (2019). Social Life Cycle Assessment of Renewable Bio-Energy Products. In: Muthu, S. (eds) Social Life Cycle Assessment. Environmental Footprints and Eco-design of Products and Processes. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3233-3_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3233-3_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-3232-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-3233-3
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)