Skip to main content

Surrogate-Based Optimization of a Biplane Wells Turbine

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1091 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 23))

Abstract

Oscillating Water Column (OWC) is one of the most popular wave energy converters being used for the last two decades. The pneumatic energy from water waves inside the air chamber of OWC is converted into mechanical energy with the help of Wells turbine. Biplane Wells turbine has inherent advantage over the monoplane turbine in terms of starting characteristics and operating range. The main parameters affecting the performance of biplane Wells turbine are the gap between the planes and the offset angle between blades in two planes. Surrogate-based optimization represents the optimization methodologies that use surrogate modelling techniques to find out maxima or minima. Surrogate modelling techniques are very useful for design analysis that uses computationally expensive codes such as Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD). In the present work, flow over a biplane Wells turbine is simulated using CFD and optimized using surrogate approach. Radial Basis Neural Network (RBNN) method is used to create the surrogate. Blade thickness and the offset angle defining the circumferential position of blades in two planes are considered as the two variables and the objective function is taken as efficiency of the turbine rotor. The comparison of performance between the reference blade and the optimized blade is presented in this article.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

ρ:

Air density (kg/m3)

ω:

Angular velocity (rad/s)

c:

Chord length (m)

η:

Efficiency

\( \varphi \) :

Flow coefficient

R:

Rotor tip radius (m)

T:

Torque (N-m)

CT:

Torque coefficient

\( \Delta P_{0} \) :

Total pressure drop (Pa)

\( \Delta P_{0}^{*} \) :

Pressure drop coefficient

Q:

Volume flow rate (m3/s)

ua:

Inlet air velocity (m/s)

ut:

Tip speed velocity (m/s)

OWC:

Oscillating Water Column

RMS:

Root Mean Square

SST:

Shear Stress Transport

RSM:

Response Surface Methodology

ANN:

Artificial Neural Network

KRG:

Kriging

RBNN:

Radial Basis Neural Network

References

  1. Raghunathan S (1995) The wells air turbine for wave energy conversion. Prog Aerosp Sci 31:335–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-0421(95)00001-F

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gato LM, Curran R (1996) Performance of the biplane wells turbine. Trans ASME 118:210–215

    Google Scholar 

  3. Raghunathan S, Tan CP (1983) The performance of biplane wells turbine. J Energy 7:741–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Raghunathan S, Setoguchi T, Kaneko K (1989) The effect of inlet conditions on the performance of wells turbine. J Energy Res Technol 111:37. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3231399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shaaban S (2012) Insight analysis of biplane wells turbine performance. Energy Convers Manag 59:50–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2012.02.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Queipo NV, Haftka RT, Shyy W, Goel T, Vaidyanathan R, Kevin Tucker P (2005) Surrogate-based analysis and optimization. Prog Aerosp Sci 41:1–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2005.02.001

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Forrester AIJ, Keane AJ (2009) Recent advances in surrogate-based optimization. Prog Aerosp Sci 45:50–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2008.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Halder P, Samad A (2016) Optimal wells turbine speeds at different wave conditions. Int J Marine Energy 16:133–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijome.2016.05.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Halder P, Samad A, Thevenin D (2017) Improved design of a wells turbine for higher operating range. Renew Energy 106:122–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.01.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jin R, Chen W, Simpson TW (2001) Comparative studies of metamodelling techniques under multiple modelling criteria. Struct Multidiscip Opt 23:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-001-0160-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Myers RH, Montgomery DC, Anderson-cook CM (2017) Response surface methodology. Metallurgia Italiana. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781107415324.004

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tapas K. Das .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Das, T.K., Samad, A. (2019). Surrogate-Based Optimization of a Biplane Wells Turbine. In: Murali, K., Sriram, V., Samad, A., Saha, N. (eds) Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference in Ocean Engineering (ICOE2018). Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering , vol 23. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3134-3_48

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3134-3_48

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-3133-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-3134-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics