Skip to main content

Helping Learners Through Transitions: Threshold Concepts, Troublesome Knowledge and Threshold Capability Framework in Surgery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Advancing Surgical Education

Part of the book series: Innovation and Change in Professional Education ((ICPE,volume 17))

  • 1468 Accesses

Overview

This chapter explores a constructivist theory that can inform the design of surgical education and training programs, especially to address areas of particular challenge. Threshold concepts, troublesome knowledge and threshold capability are introduced and illustrated in paediatric surgical training and transition to cardiothoracic surgical practice. Like other theories in this section, threshold concepts involve transformation of individuals’ ways of thinking, movement through a liminal state. This transformation is often associated with the development of a professional identity and represents an ontological shift in how the individual sees themselves and may reflect how others see them too. Learners can, however, sometimes find themselves in a stuck place where they can move neither forwards nor backwards. The ideas explored in this chapter may provide insights with which educators can help learners to move beyond their current state, to anticipate and plan for troublesome areas in learning, so that they can successfully navigate transitions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sharples, M., et al. (2014). Innovating pedagogy 2014. In Open University Innovation Report 3. Milton Keynes: The Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Meyer, R., & Land, R. (2003). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Linkages to ways of thinking and practising within the disciplines, In ETL Project. Coventry: Universities of Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Neve, H., Wearn, A., & Collett, T. (2015). What are threshold concepts and how can they inform medical education? Medical Teacher, 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barradell, S. (2013). The identification of threshold concepts: A review of theoretical complexities and methodological challenges. Higher Education, 65, 265–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rowbottom, D. P. (2007). Demystifying threshold concepts. Journal of Philospophy of Education, 41, 263–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Land, R. (2011). There could be trouble ahead: Using threshold concepts as a tool of analysis. International Journal for Academic Development, 16, 175–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. O’Donnell, R. (2010). A critique of the threshold concept hypothesis and an application in economics. Working paper 164. [cited 2014 October 5th]. Available from: http://www.finance.uts.edu.au/research/wpapers/wp164.pdf

  8. Perkins, D. (1999). The many faces of constructivism. Educational Leadership, 57, 6–11.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in Progress. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schwartzman, L. (2010). Transcending disciplinary boundaries. A proposed theoretical foundation for threshold concepts. In J. H. Meyer, R. Land, & C. Baillie (Eds.), Threshold concepts and transformational learning (pp. 21–44). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wearn, A., O’Callaghan, A., & Barrow, M. (2016). Becoming a different doctor: Identifying threshold concepts when doctors in training spend six months with a hospital palliative care team. In R. Land, J. Meyer, & M. Flanagan (Eds.), Threshold concepts in practice. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Meyer, J., & Land, R. (2005). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): Epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning. Higher Education, 49(3), 373–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gennep, A. V. (1960). The rites of passage. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Goethe, R. (2003). Ritual and liminality (NCSS theme: Culture) – purpose, background, and context. Available from: http://www.uiowa.edu/~socialed/lessons/rituals.htm

  16. Bowden, J. (2004). Capabilities driven curriculum design. In C. Baillie & I. Moore (Eds.), Effective teaching and learning in engineering (pp. 36–47). London: Kogan Page.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Male, S., et al. (2016). Students’ experiences of threshold capability development with intensive mode teaching. In M. A. Davis & A. Goody (Eds.), Research and development in higher education: The shape of higher education (pp. 192–201). Hammondville: HERDSA.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Land, R., & Meyer, J. (2011). The scalpel and the ‘Mask’: Threshold concepts and surgical education. In H. Fry & R. Kneebone (Eds.), Surgical education: Theorising an emerging domain (pp. 91–106). London: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Blackburn, S., & Nestel, D. (2014). Troublesome knowledge in paediatric surgical trainees: A qualitative study. Journal of Surgical Education, 71(5), 756–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rees-Lee, J., & O’Donoghue, J. (2009). Inspirational surgical education: The way to a mature specialist identity. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 62(5), 564–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Moulton, C. A., et al. (2007). Slowing down when you should: A new model of expert judgment. Academic Medicine, 82(10 Suppl), S109–S116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jin, C. J., et al. (2012). Pressures to “measure up” in surgery: Managing your image and managing your patient. Annals of Surgery, 256, 989–993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Baillie, C., Bowden, J. A., & Meyer, J. H. (2013). Threshold capabilities: Threshold concepts and knowledge capability linked through variation theory. Higher Education, 65, 227–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Luu, S., Leung, S. O., & Moulton, C. A. (2012). When bad things happen to good surgeons: Reactions to adverse events. The Surgical Clinics of North America, 92(1), 153–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Luu, S., et al. (2012). Waking up the next morning: Surgeons’ emotional reactions to adverse events. Medical Education, 46(12), 1179–1188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Meyer, J. H., & Land, R. (2005). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): Epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning. Higher Education, 49, 373–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. RACS. (2014). Preparation for practice. [cited 2014 October 5th]. Available from: http://www.surgeons.org/for-health-professionals/register-courses-events/professional-development/preparation-for-practice/

  28. Evgeniou, E., & Loizou, P. (2012). The theoretical base of e-learning and its role in surgical education. Journal of Surgical Education, 69, 665–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kneebone, R. (2009). Perspective: Simulation and transformational change: The paradox of expertise. Academic Medicine, 84, 954–957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon Blackburn .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Blackburn, S., Smith, J., Nestel, D. (2019). Helping Learners Through Transitions: Threshold Concepts, Troublesome Knowledge and Threshold Capability Framework in Surgery. In: Nestel, D., Dalrymple, K., Paige, J., Aggarwal, R. (eds) Advancing Surgical Education. Innovation and Change in Professional Education, vol 17. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3128-2_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3128-2_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-3127-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-3128-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics