Skip to main content

From Dense Fog to Gentle Mist: Getting Started in Surgical Education Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advancing Surgical Education

Part of the book series: Innovation and Change in Professional Education ((ICPE,volume 17))

  • 1288 Accesses

Overview

Understanding and conducting surgical education research can be difficult for the beginner. The idea that prompted this chapter is that it is useful to break down some initially opaque concepts into steps. In this chapter, the reader is taken on a journey that provides an explanation of some signposts for the novice qualitative surgical researcher. These include scoping a broad list of “burning questions” down to asking a potentially answerable question and choosing a research paradigm that aligns with researcher perspective and the research setting. Some visual tools to aid the research process are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Davis, M. H., & Ponnamperuma, G. G. (2006). Medical education research at the crossroads. Lancet, 367(9508), 377–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gill, D., Griffin, A., Woolf, K., & Cave, J. (2009). Twelve tips for studying medical education at doctoral level. Medical Teacher, 31(7), 601–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Markert, R. J. (2010). Getting started on your research: Practical advice for medical educators. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 22(4), 317–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kneebone, R. (2002). Total internal reflection: An essay on paradigms. Medical Education, 36(6), 514–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cook, D. A. (2010). Getting started in medical education scholarship. The Keio Journal of Medicine, 59(3), 96–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Smith, H., Wright, D., Morgan, S., Dunleavey, J., & Moore, M. (2002). The ‘research spider’: A simple method of assessing research experience. Primary Health Care Research & Development, 3(3), 139–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cristancho, S., & Varpio, L. (2016). Twelve tips for early career medical educators. Medical Teacher, 38(4), 358–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Siddiqui, Z. S., & Jonas-Dwyer, D. R. (2012). Twelve tips for supervising research students. Medical Teacher, 34(7), 530–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bergman, E., de Feijter, J., Frambach, J., Godefrooij, M., Slootweg, I., Stalmeijer, R., et al. (2012). AM last page: A guide to research paradigms relevant to medical education. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 87(4), 545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cook, D. A., Bordage, G., & Schmidt, H. G. (2008). Description, justification and clarification: A framework for classifying the purposes of research in medical education. Medical Education, 42(2), 128–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lingard, L., Reznick, R., Espin, S., Regehr, G., & DeVito, I. (2002). Team communications in the operating room: Talk patterns, sites of tension, and implications for novices. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 77(3), 232–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Swales, J., & Feak, C. B. (2004). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential skills and tasks (2nd ed.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Blanco, M. A., & Lee, M. Y. (2012). Twelve tips for writing educational research grant proposals. Medical Teacher, 34(6), 450–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. National Health and Medical Research Council. Health and research ethics 2015 [cited 2016 31 October]. Available from: https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/health-ethics

  15. Hill, E., & Vaughan, S. (2013). The only girl in the room: How paradigmatic trajectories deter female students from surgical careers. Medical Education, 47(6), 547–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Franco-Cardenas, V., Rosenberg, J., Ramirez, A., Lin, J., & Tsui, I. (2015). Decadelong profile of women in ophthalmic publications. JAMA Ophthalmology, 133(3), 255–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Parle, G., & Parle, J. (2015). Summary report: Expert Advisory Group advising the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons. Discrimination, bullying and sexual harassment prevalence survey.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bordage, G. (2001). Reasons reviewers reject and accept manuscripts: The strengths and weaknesses in medical education reports. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 76(9), 889–896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lingard, L. (2015). Joining a conversation: The problem/gap/hook heuristic. Perspectives on Medical Education, 4(5), 252–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ramani, S., & Mann, K. (2016). Introducing medical educators to qualitative study design: Twelve tips from inception to completion. Medical Teacher, 38(5), 456–463.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Colville, D. J. (2011). ‘We need you to be able to do this operation’: Continuity and contradiction in the training of ophthalmologists. Monash University http://arrow.monash.edu.au/hdl/1959.1/530686

  22. Higgs, J. (1988). Structuring Qualtiative research theses. In J. Higgs (Ed.), Writing qualitative research (pp. 137–150). Sydney: Hambden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Byrne-Armstron, H., Higgs, J., & Horsfall, D. (Eds.). (2001). Critical moments in qualitative research. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann. (Diagram is page 61).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Higgs, J. (Ed.). (1988). Writing qualitative research (pp. 137–150). Sydney: Hambden Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deb Colville .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Colville, D., Green, C. (2019). From Dense Fog to Gentle Mist: Getting Started in Surgical Education Research. In: Nestel, D., Dalrymple, K., Paige, J., Aggarwal, R. (eds) Advancing Surgical Education. Innovation and Change in Professional Education, vol 17. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3128-2_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3128-2_32

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-3127-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-3128-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics