Abstract
This chapter sets the background for the study of labour law and labour resistance in Vietnam as a transitional economy. It outlines important changes in labour relations and discusses structural factors underpinning the prevalence of labour resistance following industrial transition in Vietnam. Drawing from political economy and rightful resistance literature, the chapter examines different views concerning the role of legal institutions in advancing labour rights and factory workers’ actions to protect those rights. Yet there has been little in-depth analysis in existing literature as to how workers perceive their rights in relation to the labour law, and whether and how values embedded in law underpin their claims and ideals of justice. The chapter moves on to discuss the conceptual framework used in this book, adopted from socio-legal studies, which allows for a nuanced understanding of the intersection between law and other social norms and institutions in shaping labour resistance in Vietnam.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Foreign enterprises account for 2.7 per cent of all enterprises in Vietnam in 2015, dropping from 3.9 per cent in 2000 (General Statistics Office 2017a). However, registered foreign capital has increased over the year, jumping from US $6.84 million to $24.1 million from 2005 to 2015, despite suffering a significant fall after 2008 following the aftermath of the Asian Financial Crisis (General Statistics Office 2017b). The total disbursed foreign capital has seen a more stabilising trend since 2008, ranging from US $10 to $14 million each year.
- 2.
Government of Vietnam (2009). Decree 13/NQ-CP on the directions and measures to attract and manage foreign direct investment in the future.
- 3.
See Chan and Norlund (1998) for a comprehensive discussion of Chinese and Vietnamese labour regimes.
- 4.
James Scott’s moral economy framework (1976), which traces the values that shape social relationships and inform understandings of justice in pre-capitalist peasant society, has been referred to occasionally in analyses of labour resistance in China and Vietnam. For Scott, subsistence needs are a fundamental right of agrarian societies and infringement of this right has been a major cause of peasant resistance in times of crisis (Scott 1976, pp. 6–10). Having their subsistence needs fulfilled becomes a benchmark for peasants to judge whether the state and landlords are treating them in an ethical or exploitative manner.
- 5.
I use the term ‘capitalist’ here to refer to a model of development in which the state allows and facilitates the growth of private capital. I note, however, that Vietnam in particular still holds on to socialist ideology. The proclaimed ‘socialist-oriented market economy’ (kinh tế thị trướng định hướng xã hội chủ nghĩa) is a ‘multi-sectoral commodity economy that functions according to market principles and follows the management of the State under the leadership of the Communist Party’ (Central Committee of the CPV 2011).
- 6.
In Vietnam, the saying ‘the king’s edict stops at the village gates’ (phép vua thua lệ làng) (Wells-Dang 2014, p. 162) is often quoted by legal scholars to illustrate the dominance of local social values over new state laws, which are seen as transplants of global standards.
- 7.
An offshoot of the law and society movement in the USA, socio-legal research has moved beyond legal studies of texts and formal law-making processes and shed light on the relevance of law in individuals’ pursuit of justice and social movements (Merry 1990; Ewick and Silbey 1992; McCann 1994; McCann and March 1996). This law and society intellectual movement emerged in the 1970s and originally centred on illuminating the gap between ‘law in the books’ and ‘law in action’ and uses ‘methods of behavioral science’ to examine how law matters in people’s approach to social problems (Liu 2015, p. 3).
- 8.
Other sources have also stressed the socio-economic disadvantages of migrant workers compared to local workers, which are mainly due to the household registration system (hộ khẩu) in Vietnam that ties a citizen’s one and only legal residence status to their household (Hoang 2011). Migrant workers thus face difficulty in accessing social services, such as public healthcare, childcare, and children’s schooling, at their destination provinces.
- 9.
My involvement in a strike that is deemed politically sensitive, if by chance discovered by the state’s civil security forces, might have caused trouble for the workers with whom I talked.
- 10.
Information on strikes, including the company’s name, the reasons and resolutions, the number of workers involved, the duration of strikes, was obtained from the upper-level and provincial unions.
- 11.
As will be discussed shortly, these core workers received training about the Labour Code and other labour laws and policies and were introduced to me by the Legal Aid Centre, which belongs to the provincial Labour Federation. Here I wish to reiterate John Gilliom’s note in his study on American welfare mothers, which emphasises the importance of obtaining ‘the level of trust necessary to undertake meaningful interviews’ (2001, p. 46) rather than the scientific representation of the sample. Interviews with mothers receiving welfare in his research were indeed conducted by two women who share the same social status and locality with his research participants (p. 45).
References
Becker, J. (2014). Social Ties, Resources and Migrant Labor Contention in Contemporary China: From Peasants to Protesters. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Chan, A. & Norlund, I. (1998). Vietnamese and Chinese Labour Regimes: On the Road to Divergence. The China Journal, 40, 173–197.
Chan, A. & Siu, K. (2012). Chinese Migrant Workers: Factors Constraining the Emergence of Class Consciousness. In Carrillo, B. & Goodman, D. S. (eds.). China’s Peasants and Workers: Changing Class Identities. London: Edward Elgar.
Chan, A. (2001). China’s Workers under Assault: The Exploitation of Labor in a Globalizing Economy. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
Chan, C. K-C. (2008). The Challenge of Labour in China: Strikes and the Changing Labour Regime in Global Factories. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Warwick, Coventry.
Chen, F. (2000). Subsistence Crises, Managerial Corruption and Labour Protests in China. The China Journal, 44, 41–63.
Cotterrell, R. (2006). Law, Culture and Society: Legal Ideas in the Mirror of Social Theory. Hampshire & Burlington: Ashgate.
Do, Q. C. & van den Broek, D. (2013). Wildcat strikes: A catalyst for union reform in Vietnam?. Journal of Industrial Relations, 55 (5), 783–799.
Đồng Nai Labour Federation (2014). Report on the work of taking care of material and mental lives for workers and the situation of strikes and work stoppages.
Elfstrom, M. & Kuruvilla, S. (2014). The Changing Nature of Labour Unrest in China. ILR Review, 67 (2), 453–480.
Engel, D. (1998). How Does the Law Matter in the Constitution of Legal Consciousness?. In B. J. Garth & A. Sarat (eds.), How Does the Law Matter? Illinois: Northwestern University Press.
Ewick, P. & Silbey, S. (1992). Conformity, Contestation and Resistance: An Account of Legal Consciousness. New England Law Review, 26, 731–749.
Ewick, P. & Silbey, S. (1998). The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Felstiner, W., Abel, R. & Sarat, A. (1980/1981). The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming…. Law and Society Review, 15 (3/4), 631–654.
Friedman, E. & Lee, C. K. (2010). Remaking the World of Chinese Labour: A 30-Year Retrospective. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 48 (3), 507–533.
Friedman, E. (2014). Insurgency Trap: Labor Politics in Post-Socialist China. Ithaca: ILR Press.
Gallagher, M. (2006). Mobilizing the Law in China: ‘Informed Disenchantment’ and the Development of Legal Consciousness. Law & Society Review, 40 (4), 783–816.
General Statistics Office (2017a). Vietnamese Business in the First 15 Years of the Decade (2000–2014). Statistics Publishing House.
General Statistics Office (2017b). Foreign Direct Investment licensed in the period 1988–2016. https://www.gso.gov.vn/default.aspx?tabid=716. Accessed 2nd February 2018.
Gillespie, J. & Nicholson, P. (eds.) (2005). Asian Socialism and Legal Change: The Dynamics of Vietnamese and Chinese Reform. Canberra: ANU E Press & Asia Pacific Press.
Gilliom, J. (2001). Overseers of the Poor: Surveillance, Resistance, and the Limits of Privacy. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press
Government of Vietnam (2009). Decree 13/NQ-CP on the directions and measures for attracting and managing foreign direct investment in the future.
He, X. & Feng, Y. (2016). Mismatched Discourses in the Petition Offices of Chinese Courts. Law & Social Inquiry, 41 (1), 212–241.
He, X., Wang, L. & Su, Y. (2013). Above the Roof, Beneath the Law: Perceived Justice behind Disruptive Tactics of Migrant Wage Claimants in China. Law & Society Review, 47 (4), 703–738.
Hoang, L. A. (2011). Gendered Networks and Migration Decision-making in Northern Vietnam. Social & Cultural Geography, 12 (5), 419–434.
Hui, E. S-I. & Chan, C. K-C. (2012). The ‘Harmonious Society’ as a Hegemonic Project: Labour Conflicts and Changing Labour Policies in China. Labour, Capital and Society, 44 (2), 153–183.
Hurst, W. & O’Brien, K. J. (2002). China’s Contentious Pensioners. The China Quarterly, 170, 345–360.
Knutsen, H. M. & Hansson, E. (2010). Theoretical Approaches to Changing Labour Regimes in Transition Economies. In A. C. Bergene, S. B. Endresen & H. M. Knutsen (eds.). Missing Links in Labour Geography. England: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
Koh, D. (2007). Modern Law, Traditional Ethics, and Contemporary Political Legitimacy in Vietnam. In S. Balmé & M. Sidel (eds.), Vietnam’s New Order: International Perspectives on the State and Reform in Vietnam. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lee, C. K. & Hsing, Y-T. (2010). Social Activism in China: Agency and Possibilities. In Y-T. Hsing & C. K. Lee (eds.). Reclaiming Chinese Society: The New Social Activism. London: Routledge.
Lee, C. K. (2007). Against the Law: Labor Protests in China’s Rustbelt and Sunbelt. Berkeley, Los Angeles & London: University of California Press.
Liu, S. (2015). Law’s Social Forms: A Powerless Approach to the Sociology of Law. Law & Social Inquiry, 40 (1), 1–28.
Lorentzen, P. & Scoggins, S. (2015). Understanding China’s Rising Rights Consciousness. The China Quarterly, 223, 638–657.
Marshall, A-M. (2003). Injustice Frames, Legality, and the Everyday Construction of Sexual Harassment. Law and Social Inquiry, 28 (3), 659–690.
Marshall, A-M. (2005). Idle Rights: Employees’ Rights Consciousness and the Construction of Sexual Harassment Policies. Law & Society Review, 39 (1), 83–124.
McCann, M. & March, T. (1996). Law and Everyday Forms of Resistance: A Socio-Political Assessment. Studies in Law, Politics, and Society, 15, 207–236.
McCann, M. (1994). Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.
Merry, S. E. (1990). Getting Justice and Getting Even: Legal Consciousness among Working-Class Americans. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.
Nghiem, L. H. (2006). Work Culture, Gender and Class in Vietnam: Ethnographies of Three Garment Workshops in Ha Noi. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
O’Brien, K. & Li, L. (2006). Rightful Resistance in Rural China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pham, D. N. (2005). Confucianism and the Conception of the Law in Vietnam. In J. Gillespie & P. Nicholson (eds.). Asian Socialism and Legal Change: The Dynamics of Vietnamese and Chinese Reform. Canberra: ANU E Press & Asia Pacific Press.
Pringle, T. & Clarke, S. (2011). The Challenge of Transition: Trade Unions in Russia, China and Vietnam. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Pun, N. & Smith, C. (2007). Putting Transnational Labour Process in its Place: the Dormitory Labour Regime in Post-Socialist China. Work, Employment and Society, 21 (1), 27–45.
Pun, N. (2005). Made in China: Women Factory Workers in a Global Workplace. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
Pun, N. (2016). Migrant Labor in China: Post-Socialist Transformations. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Quan, K. (2015). One Step Forward: Collective Bargaining Experiments in China and Vietnam. In A. Chan (ed.). Chinese Workers in Comparative Perspective. Ithaca: ILR Press.
Quinn, Beth A. (2000) The Paradox of Complaining: Law, Humor, and Harassment in the Everyday Work World. Law & Social Inquiry, 25 (4), 1151–1185.
Sarat, A. (1990). …The Law is All Over: Power, Resistance and the Legal Consciousness of the Welfare Poor. Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities, 2 (2), 343–379.
Scott, J. (1976). The Moral Economy of the Peasant: Rebellion and Subsistence in Southeast Asia. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Steinberg, M. W. (2010). Marx, Formal Subsumption and the Law. Theory and Society, 39 (2), 173–202.
The Central Committee of the Communist Party of Vietnam (2011). Political Report at the 11th National Congress.
Tran, A. (2007). Alternative to the ‘Race to the Bottom’ in Vietnam: Minimum Wage Strikes in Vietnam and their Aftermath. Labor Studies Journal, 32 (4), 430–451.
Trần, N. A. (2013). Ties that Bind: Cultural Identity, Class, and Law in Vietnam’s Labor Resistance. Ithaca: Cornell Southeast Asia Program Publications.
Vietnam General Confederation of Labour (2015). Report on the situation of labour disputes and strikes from 2009–2014.
Walder, A. (1986). Communist Neo-Traditionalism: Work and Authority in Chinese Industry. Berkeley, Los Angeles & London: University of California Press.
Wells-Dang, A. (2014). The Political Influence of Civil Society in Vietnam. In London, J. (ed.). Politics in Contemporary Vietnam: Party, State and Authority Relations. Hampshire, England & New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wong, L. (2011). Chinese Migrant Workers: Rights Attainment Deficits, Rights Consciousness and Personal Strategies. The China Quarterly, 208, 870–892.
Yang, L. & van der Wal, Z. (2014). Rule of Morality vs. Rule of Law?. Public Integrity, 16 (2), 187–206.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nguyen, T.P. (2019). Introduction. In: Workplace Justice. Critical Studies of the Asia-Pacific. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3116-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3116-9_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-3115-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-3116-9
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)