Skip to main content
  • 154 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter describes the design of an empirical study of the effects of referent similarity on the speech of L1 and L2 speakers of English. The chapter outlines the purpose of the study, the experimental design employed, background information concerning the participants, the tasks used to collect the data, and the data collection and analysis procedures employed. The aim throughout is to provide a sound basis for the replication of the study, in whole or in part, in future research. The following chapter will discuss the findings for referent similarity on English use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Coltheart, M. (1981). The MRC psycholinguistics database. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 497–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diessel, H., & Tomasello, M. (2005). A new look at the acquisition of relative clauses. Language, 81, 882–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Educational Testing Service. (2008). TOEIC test data and analysis 2007: Number of examinees and scores in FY2007. Tokyo: The Institute for International Business Corporation, TOEIC Steering Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R., & Barkhuizen, G. (2005). Analyzing learner language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, W., & Olson, D. (1975). The elaboration of the noun phrase in children’s descriptions of objects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 19, 371–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, C. (2006). Modes of comparison. Proceeding of CLS, 43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, C., Kormos, J., & Minn, D. (2017). Task repetition and second language speech processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39, 167–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, M. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Oxford, UK: Wiley Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacWhinney, B. (2001). The competition model: The input, the context, and the brain. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 69–90). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Meara, P. (2005a). Llama_D: A test of phonetic memory. Retrieved March, 2012, from http://www.lognostics.co.uk/tools/llama/

  • Meara, P. (2005b). Llama_F: A test of grammatical inferencing. Retrieved March, 2012, from http://www.lognostics.co.uk/tools/llama/

  • Meara, P. (2005c). LLAMA language aptitude tests: The manual. Retrieved March, 2012, from http://www.lognostics.co.uk/tools/llama/

  • Ravid, D., & Berman, R. (2010). Developing noun phrase complexity at school age: A text-embedded cross-linguistic analysis. First Language, 30, 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, P. (2011a). Task-based language learning: A review of the issues. Language Learning, 61(Suppl. 1), 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, P. (2011b). Second language task complexity, the cognition hypothesis, language learning and performance. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 3–37). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sapir, E. (1944). Grading, a study in semantics. Philosophy of Science, 11, 93–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, M., Verspoor, M., & MacWhinney, B. (2011). Coding and extracting data. In M. Verspoor, K. de Bot, & W. Lowie (Eds.), A dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and techniques (pp. 39–54). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Service, E. (1992). Phonology, working memory & foreign language learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45a, 21–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Service, E., & Kahonen, V. (1995). Is the relationship between phonological memory and foreign language learning accounted for by vocabulary acquisition? Applied PsychoLinguistics, 16, 155–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shuttleworth, M. (2009). Counterbalanced measures design. Retrieved November, 2011, from Experiment Resources: http://www.experiment-resources.com/cpimterbalanced-measures-design.html

  • Speciale, G., Ellis, N., & Bywater, T. (2004). Phonological sequence learning and short-term store capacity determine second language vocabulary acquisition. Applied PsychoLinguistics, 25, 293–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yule, G. (1997). Referential communication tasks. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lambert, C. (2019). Methods. In: Referent Similarity and Nominal Syntax in Task-Based Language Teaching. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3089-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3089-6_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-3088-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-3089-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics