Skip to main content

Referential Communication and L2 Production

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Referent Similarity and Nominal Syntax in Task-Based Language Teaching
  • 161 Accesses

Abstract

The present chapter discusses some of the roles that referential communication tasks have been argued to play in L2 performance and acquisition. Referential communication tasks are first defined in the way that it will be used throughout the book. A distinction is then made between two types of communication: (1) interactional communication, which is listener focused, and (2) transactional communication, which is message focused. This distinction is then elaborated into a discussion of specific constraints on task performance which optimize communication regardless of whether learners are using their L1 as children or using an additional language as adults. Following this, an approach to classifying and sequencing referential communication tasks in L2 instruction is outlined. In this approach, the functional demands of different discourse genres (i.e., description, instruction, narration and exposition) are argued to be related to conceptually motivated aspects of the developing language system. A discussion of the limitations of tasks in pushing some redundant aspects of language is then provided together with some possible ways of addressing this problem. The chapter closes with a discussion of the potential mediating effects of proficiency in task performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Berman, R. (2008). The psycholinguistics of developing text construction. Journal of Child Language, 35, 775–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Teaching the spoken language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (1998). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2002). Doing focus on form. System, 30, 419–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Givon, T. (1985). Function, structure and language acquisition. In D. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, Vol. 2: Theoretical issues (pp. 1005–1027). Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, W., & Perdue, C. (1993). Utterance structure. In C. Perdue (Ed.), Adult language acquisition: Crosslinguistic perspectives: The results (pp. 3–40). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krauss, R., & Weinheimer, S. (1964). Changes in reference phrases as a function of frequency of usage in social interaction. Psychonomic Science, 1, 113–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krauss, R., & Weinheimer, S. (1966). Concurrent feedback, confirmation, and the encoding of referents in verbal communication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 343–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krauss, R., & Weinheimer, S. (1967). Effect of referent similarity and communication mode on verbal encoding. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 359–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, C., & Robinson, P. (2014). Learning to perform narrative tasks: A semester-long study of task sequencing effects. In M. Baralt, R. Gilabert, & P. Robinson (Eds.), Task sequencing and instructed second language learning. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997). Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 26, 141–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, M., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15–41). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loschky, L., & Bley-Vroman, R. (1993). Grammar and task-based methodology. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 123–167). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nobuyoshi, J., & Ellis, R. (1993). Focused communication tasks and second language acquisition. ELT Journal, 47, 203–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perdue, C. (1993). Adult language acquisition: Crosslinguistic perspectives: The results. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, P. (2011). Second language task complexity, the cognition hypothesis, language learning and performance. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 3–37). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Skehan, P. (2009). Modeling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30, 510–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output on its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics (pp. 125–144). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R., & Robinson, P. (1995). Current approaches to syllabus design: A discussion with Ron White. Guidelines, 17, 93–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yule, G. (1997). Referential communication tasks. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lambert, C. (2019). Referential Communication and L2 Production. In: Referent Similarity and Nominal Syntax in Task-Based Language Teaching. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3089-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3089-6_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-3088-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-3089-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics