Abstract
The present chapter discusses some of the roles that referential communication tasks have been argued to play in L2 performance and acquisition. Referential communication tasks are first defined in the way that it will be used throughout the book. A distinction is then made between two types of communication: (1) interactional communication, which is listener focused, and (2) transactional communication, which is message focused. This distinction is then elaborated into a discussion of specific constraints on task performance which optimize communication regardless of whether learners are using their L1 as children or using an additional language as adults. Following this, an approach to classifying and sequencing referential communication tasks in L2 instruction is outlined. In this approach, the functional demands of different discourse genres (i.e., description, instruction, narration and exposition) are argued to be related to conceptually motivated aspects of the developing language system. A discussion of the limitations of tasks in pushing some redundant aspects of language is then provided together with some possible ways of addressing this problem. The chapter closes with a discussion of the potential mediating effects of proficiency in task performance.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Berman, R. (2008). The psycholinguistics of developing text construction. Journal of Child Language, 35, 775–771.
Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Teaching the spoken language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (1998). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2002). Doing focus on form. System, 30, 419–432.
Givon, T. (1985). Function, structure and language acquisition. In D. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, Vol. 2: Theoretical issues (pp. 1005–1027). Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Klein, W., & Perdue, C. (1993). Utterance structure. In C. Perdue (Ed.), Adult language acquisition: Crosslinguistic perspectives: The results (pp. 3–40). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Krauss, R., & Weinheimer, S. (1964). Changes in reference phrases as a function of frequency of usage in social interaction. Psychonomic Science, 1, 113–114.
Krauss, R., & Weinheimer, S. (1966). Concurrent feedback, confirmation, and the encoding of referents in verbal communication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 343–346.
Krauss, R., & Weinheimer, S. (1967). Effect of referent similarity and communication mode on verbal encoding. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 359–363.
Lambert, C., & Robinson, P. (2014). Learning to perform narrative tasks: A semester-long study of task sequencing effects. In M. Baralt, R. Gilabert, & P. Robinson (Eds.), Task sequencing and instructed second language learning. London: Continuum.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997). Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 26, 141–165.
Long, M., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15–41). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Loschky, L., & Bley-Vroman, R. (1993). Grammar and task-based methodology. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 123–167). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Nobuyoshi, J., & Ellis, R. (1993). Focused communication tasks and second language acquisition. ELT Journal, 47, 203–210.
Perdue, C. (1993). Adult language acquisition: Crosslinguistic perspectives: The results. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Robinson, P. (2011). Second language task complexity, the cognition hypothesis, language learning and performance. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 3–37). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Skehan, P. (2009). Modeling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30, 510–532.
Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output on its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics (pp. 125–144). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
White, R., & Robinson, P. (1995). Current approaches to syllabus design: A discussion with Ron White. Guidelines, 17, 93–101.
Yule, G. (1997). Referential communication tasks. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lambert, C. (2019). Referential Communication and L2 Production. In: Referent Similarity and Nominal Syntax in Task-Based Language Teaching. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3089-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3089-6_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-3088-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-3089-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)