Abstract
Recently, some research has demonstrated that a fiscal policy runs procyclically in most developing countries. Preceding studies have proposed two explanations for this: (i) imperfection in international credit markets that prevents developing countries from borrowing during bad times and (ii) political distortion to accelerate fiscal expansion during bad times. In this chapter, we review preceding empirical literature and summarize important points to be considered. The theoretical literature will be surveyed in the next chapter. Then, we analyze fiscal cyclicality by ourselves while considering these points. Our three types of simple analyses show the following: (i) fiscal procyclicality does exist, even if we carefully address the causality problem; (ii) not only developing countries but also some industrialized countries may implement fiscal policies procyclically; and (iii) the possibility of a procyclical fiscal policy is higher when the government function is weak.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Nevertheless, Alesina et al. (2008) pointed out that the quality of data on the composition of government spending was very poor for developing countries.
- 2.
Unfortunately, figures for the correlation of these fiscal components of central governments are not presented in Frankel et al. (2013).
- 3.
- 4.
We cannot know whether this government consumption is or is not that of the central governments in the paper.
- 5.
These include the original 20 countries plus Australia, Finland, Japan, and New Zealand.
- 6.
The number of lags was selected as 1 when we follow the Schwartz information criterion, but the choice of lags does not affect the results.
- 7.
We have other political and democracy indices such as the Worldwide Governance Indicators and the International Country Risk Guide dataset, which Frankel et al. (2013) used. To compare the relationship between the correlation and each of these political indices would be interesting, but we have kept this for future study.
- 8.
We collected this rating data from the website of CountryEconomy.com (https://countryeconomy.com/). Incidentally, Alesina et al. (2008) adopted the rating from S&P and not Fitch Ratings.
- 9.
We calculate this average on a 365-day basis.
- 10.
Alesina et al. (2008) stated that the results become inconclusive upon adding the proxy for the degree of financial constraints and political factors simultaneously.
References
Alesina, A., Campante, F., & Tabellini, G. (2008). Why is fiscal policy often procyclical? Journal of the European Economic Association, 6(5), 1006–1036.
Aizenman, J., Gavin, M., & Hausmann, R. (1996). Optimal tax and debt policy with endogenously imperfect creditworthiness. NBER Working Paper, No. 5558.
Aizenman, J., Gavin, M., & Hausmann, R. (2000). Optimal tax and debt policy with endogenously imperfect creditworthiness. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 9(4), 367–395.
Barro, R. (1979). On the determination of public debt. Journal of Political Economy, 87(5), 940–971.
Blanchard, O., & Perotti, R. (2002). An empirical characterization of the dynamic effects of changes in government spending and taxes on output. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(4), 1329–1368.
Carneiro, F., & Garrido, L. (2015). New evidence on the cyclicality of fiscal policy. The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series, Working Paper, No. 7293.
Égert, B. (2010). Fiscal policy reaction to the cycle in the OECD: Pro- or counter-cyclical? OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 763.
Frankel, J. A., Végh, C. A., & Vuletin, G. (2013). On graduation from fiscal procyclicality. Journal of Development Economics, 100(1), 32–47.
Gavin, M., & Perotti, R. (1997). Fiscal policy in Latin America. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 12, 11–70.
Gavin, M., Hausmann, R., Perotti, R., & Talvi, E. (1996). Managing fiscal policy in Latin America and the Caribbean: Volatility, procyclicality and limited creditworthiness. Inter-American Development Bank Office of the Chief Economist Working Paper, No. 326.
Henisz, W. (2000). The institutional environment for economic growth. Economics and Politics, 12(1), 1–31.
Holtz-Eakin, D., Newey, W., & Rosen, H. S. (1988). Estimating vector autoregressions with panel data. Eonometrica, 56(6), 1371–1395.
Ilzetzki, E. (2011). Rent-seeking distortions and fiscal procyclicality. Journal of Development Economics, 96(1), 30–46.
Ilzetzki, E., & Végh, C. A. (2008). Procyclical fiscal policy in developing countries: Truth or fiction? NBER Working Paper, No. 14191.
Jaimovich, D., & Panizza, U. (2007). Procyclicality or reverse causality? Inter-American Development Bank Research Department Working Paper, No. 599.
Kaminsky, G., Reinhart, C., & Végh, C. A. (2004). When it rains, it pours: Procyclical capital flows and macroeconomic policies. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 19, 11–82.
Kekic, L. (2007). The economist intelligence unit’s index of democracy. http://www.economist.com/media/pdf/DEMOCRACY_INDEX_2007_v3.pdf.
Lane, P. R. (2003). The cyclical behaviour of fiscal policy: Evidence from the OECD. Journal of Public Economics, 87(12), 2661–2675.
Manasse, P. (2006). Procyclical fiscal policy: Shocks, rules, and institutions—A view from MARS. IMF Working Paper, WP/06/27.
Riascos, A., & Végh, C. A. (2003). Procyclical government spending in developing countries: The role of capital market imperfections. UCLA and Banco Republica, Colombia: Mimeo.
Stein, E., Talvi, E., & Gristani, A. (1999). Institutional arrangements and fiscal performance: The Latin American experience. NBER Working Paper, No. 6358.
Talvi, E., & Végh, C. (2000). Tax base variability and procyclical fiscal policy. NBER Working Paper, No. 7499.
Talvi, E., & Végh, C. (2005). Tax base variability and procyclical fiscal policy in developing countries. Journal of Development Economics, 78(1), 156–190.
Tornell, A., & Lane, P. R. (1999). The voracity effect. American Economic Review, 89(1), 22–46.
Végh, C. A., & Vuletin, G. (2015). How is tax policy conducted over the business cycle? American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 7(3), 327–370.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix: Abbreviations and Length of Time Series by Country
Appendix: Abbreviations and Length of Time Series by Country
Abbreviations | Country name | Beginning date of series | |
---|---|---|---|
GDP | Gov’t Cons. | ||
ARG | Argentina | Q1-1993 | Q1-2004 |
AUS | Australia | Q1-1960 | Q1-1995 |
AUT | Austria | Q1-1988 | Q1-1995 |
BEL | Belgium | Q1-1995 | Q1-1995 |
BRA | Brazil | Q1-1996 | Q1-1996 |
CAN | Canada | Q1-1961 | Q1-1995 |
CHL | Chile | Q1-2003 | Q1-2003 |
COL | Colombia | Q1-2000 | Q1-2000 |
CRI | Costa Rica | Q1-1991 | Q1-1995 |
CZE | Czech Republic | Q1-1996 | Q1-1996 |
DNK | Denmark | Q1-1995 | Q1-1995 |
EST | Estonia | Q1-1995 | Q1-1995 |
FIN | Finland | Q1-1990 | Q1-1995 |
FRA | France | Q1-1960 | Q1-1995 |
DEU | Germany | Q1-1991 | Q1-1995 |
GRC | Greece | Q1-1995 | Q1-1995 |
HUN | Hungary | Q1-1995 | Q1-1995 |
ISL | Iceland | Q1-1997 | Q1-1997 |
IND | India | Q2-2011 | Q2-2011 |
IDN | Indonesia | Q1-1990 | Q1-1995 |
IRL | Ireland | Q1-1997 | Q1-1997 |
ISR | Israel | Q1-1995 | Q1-1995 |
ITA | Italy | Q1-1981 | Q1-1995 |
JPN | Japan | Q1-1994 | Q1-1995 |
KOR | Korea | Q1-1960 | Q1-1995 |
LVA | Latvia | Q1-1995 | Q1-1995 |
LTU | Lithuania | Q1-1995 | Q1-1995 |
LUX | Luxembourg | Q1-1995 | Q1-1995 |
MEX | Mexico | Q1-1993 | Q1-1995 |
NLD | Netherlands | Q1-1988 | Q1-1995 |
NZL | New Zealand | Q1-1988 | Q1-1995 |
NOR | Norway | Q1-1978 | Q1-1995 |
POL | Poland | Q1-1995 | Q1-1995 |
PRT | Portugal | Q1-1995 | Q1-1995 |
RUS | Russia | Q1-2003 | Q1-2003 |
SVK | Slovak Republic | Q1-1997 | Q1-1997 |
SVN | Slovenia | Q1-1995 | Q1-1995 |
ZAF | South Africa | Q1-1960 | Q1-1995 |
ESP | Spain | Q1-1995 | Q1-1995 |
SWE | Sweden | Q1-1960 | Q1-1995 |
CHE | Switzerland | Q1-1980 | Q1-1995 |
TUR | Turkey | Q1-1998 | Q1-1998 |
GBR | United Kingdom | Q1-1960 | Q1-1995 |
USA | United States | Q1-1960 | Q1-1995 |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Development Bank of Japan
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ihori, T., Kameda, K. (2018). Numerical Overview of Fiscal Cyclicality. In: Procyclical Fiscal Policy. SpringerBriefs in Economics(). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2995-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2995-1_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-2994-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-2995-1
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)