Skip to main content

Relations between the US Hegemony and Its Position in Taiwan Issue

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Power, Interests, and Internal Factors
  • 402 Accesses

Abstract

It is clear that American political elites have a basic consensus on the Taiwan Issue, that is, the country’s important interests will be seriously damaged if the mainland achieves national unification. Based on this consensus, the elites do not differ much on how to respond to this threat and what price the US may need to pay. In fact, this consensus is so stable that American elite cohesion on the Taiwan Issue has almost never declined. The recent moves have proved that most politicians still hold the same views on forming alliances and using scarce resources to cope with the threat, even when there is intensive political competition among them. On the other hand, although the US government’s legitimacy has not been questioned by society, Washington’s hardline policies toward the mainland which may cause serious military conflict can hardly receive strong social support because of the heavy burden that will be placed on the whole society. It is noteworthy that the target of “No Use of Force” has implied that even those elites who strongly support Taiwan’s stance and try to raise the level of security cooperation between US and Taiwan are not overly confident about whether the government can resist increasing pressures from society if the country becomes involved in a serious military conflict in the Taiwan Strait. The reason is that the US territory is very unlikely to be directly threatened by China, and thus Chinese unification will not be perceived by society as a threat that can affect most people. Furthermore, the US military power has allowed its people to believe that their country will be able to win any military conflict. In these circumstances, the US social cohesion will not be largely enhanced by the mainland’s pursuit of unification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A.F.K. Organski. (1968). World Politics[M]. Alfred A. Knopf, 364pp.

  2. 2.

    A.F.K. Organski and J. Kugler. (1981). The War ledger[M]. University of Chicago Press, p. 19.

  3. 3.

    A.F.K Organski. (1958). World Politics[M]. Alfred A. Knopf, chap. 1.

  4. 4.

    A.F.K. Organski. (1968). World Politics. Alfred A. Knopf[M], 364pp.

  5. 5.

    A.F.K. Organski and J. Kugler. (1981). The War Ledger[M]. University of Chicago Press, p. 39.

  6. 6.

    F.W. Korkisch. (2006). Quadrennial Defense Review Report[J], p. 30.

  7. 7.

    R. Tammen, J. Kugler, D. Lemke, et al. (2000). Power Transitions[J]. Strategies for the 21st Century: 31–32.

  8. 8.

    S. Chan. (2004). Exploring Puzzles in Power-Transition Theory: Implications for Sino-American relations[J]. Security Studies 13 (3): 103–141.

  9. 9.

    G. Modelski. (1987). Long Cycles in World Politics[M]. Springer, p. 14.

  10. 10.

    L.S. Goldberg. (2010). Is the International role of the Dollar Changing?[J]. Current Issues in Economics and Finance 16 (1).

  11. 11.

    W. Ming-ye. (2010). The Intermediate Zones: Key to the Harmony World [J][C]//. Northeast Asia Forum 3: 010.

  12. 12.

    B. Obama. (2013). Remarks by President Obama to the Australian Parliament[J]. Available: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/11/17/remarks-president-obama-australian-parliament. Last accessed 17 Nov. 2011.

  13. 13.

    T. Donlinon. (2012). Remarks by National Security Advisor Tom Donilon—As Prepared for Delivery[J]. White House Office of the Press Secretary: 15.

  14. 14.

    L. Panetta. (2012). The US Rebalance towards the Asia-Pacific[J]. Speech at the 11th Shangri-La Dialogue, Singapore, June, p. 2.

  15. 15.

    A. Heywood. (1994). Political Ideas and Concepts: An Introduction[M]. London: Macmillan, pp. 100–101.

  16. 16.

    J.S. Nye. (2004). Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics[M]. Public Affairs, p. 5.

  17. 17.

    Wu Xinbo. (2013). The Transformation of Asia-Pacific Regional Order. Beijing: Current Affairs Press, 175pp.

  18. 18.

    World Bank. (2015). GDP at Market Prices. Available: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD?page=4. Last accessed 27 May 2016.

  19. 19.

    E.S. Medeiros and M.T. Fravel. (2003). China’s New Diplomacy[J]. Foreign Affairs 82: 22.

  20. 20.

    A.I. Johnston. (2013). How New and Assertive is China’s New Assertiveness?[J]. International Security 37 (4): 7–48.

  21. 21.

    S. Guo-bing. (2005). The US-China Trade Balance and RMB’s Exchange Rate: An Empirical Analysis [J][J]. Contemporary Finance & Economics 1: 008.

  22. 22.

    Xinhua News Agency. (2013). Comparison of Military Spending among China, the US and Japan. Available: http://news.xinhuanet.com/mil/2013-03/05/c_124419059.htm. Last accessed 27 May 2016.

  23. 23.

    A. Kent. (2002). China’s International Socialization: The Role of International Organizations[J]. Global Governance 8 (3): 343–364.

  24. 24.

    Zbigniew K. Brzeziński. (2007). The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives. Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Publishing House, pp. 21–32.

  25. 25.

    S. Walt. (2014). Democracy, Freedom, and Apple Pie Aren’t a Foreign Policy[J]. Foreign Policy: 1.

  26. 26.

    Pang Weidong. (2013). Strategic Cooperation of Vietnam and India and Its Impact on China. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 3 (3): 50–56.

  27. 27.

    Z. Gao. (1994). The South China Sea: From Conflict to Cooperation?[J]. Ocean Development & International Law 25 (3): 345–359.

  28. 28.

    Secretary of Defense Ash Carter. (2016). Remarks by Secretary Carter and Q&A at the Shangri-La Dialogue, Singapore. Available: http://www.defense.gov/News/News-Transcripts/Transcript-View/Article/791472/remarks-by-secretary-carter-and-qa-at-the-shangri-la-dialogue-singapore. Last accessed 7 June 2016.

  29. 29.

    Liu Jianhua and Deng Biao. (2010). The US Hegemony: Decline or Continuance. Pacific Journal 18 (1): 26–35.

  30. 30.

    B.O. Hing. (2000). To be an American: Cultural Pluralism and the Rhetoric of Assimilation[M]. NYU Press.

  31. 31.

    T. Havrilesky. (1993). Monetary Policy Signaling from the Administration to the Federal Reserve[M]//The Pressures on American Monetary Policy. Springer US, pp. 117–154.

  32. 32.

    G.S. Goldberg and M.G. Rosenthal. (2011). The Jobs Crisis: How to Solve It and Begin to Fix Our Broken Economy[J]. New Politics 13 (2): 60.

  33. 33.

    E. Ratner. (2013). Rebalancing to Asia with an Insecure China[J]. The Washington Quarterly 36 (2): 21–38.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sang, X. (2019). Relations between the US Hegemony and Its Position in Taiwan Issue. In: Power, Interests, and Internal Factors. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2892-3_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics