Abstract
A Practice Scaffolding Interactive Platform (PracSIP) is a social learning platform which supports students in collaborative project-based learning by simulating a professional practice. It puts the core tools of the simulated practice at the students’ disposal, and it organizes collaboration, structures the students’ activity, and interactively supports subject learning. It facilitates students’ development of complex competencies, and at the same time, it supports the students’ development of skills defined in the curriculum. The paper introduces the concept, presents the theoretical foundations, and gives an example of a PracSIP
This chapter is based on and expands (Bundsgaard, 2009).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Surkes, M. A., Tamim, R., et al. (2008). Instructional interventions affecting critical thinking skills and dispositions: A stage 1 meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 1102–1134. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308326084.
Barron, B., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). Prospects and challenges for inquiry-based approaches to learning. In H. Dumont, D. Istance, & F. Benavides (Eds.), The nature of learning: Using research to inspire practice. Paris, France: OECD.
Barron, B. J., Schwartz, D. L., Vye, N. J., Moore, A., Petrosino, A., Zech, L., & Bransford, J. D. (1998). Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on problem- and project-based learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ez.statsbiblioteket.dk:2048/eric/docview/62487307/13A59086B1D68B59086/1?accountid=14468.
Bradley-Levine, J., & Mosier, G. (2014). Literature review on project-based learning. Retrieved from http://cell.uindy.edu/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/PBL-Lit-Review_Jan14.2014.pdf.
Bundsgaard, J. (2005). Bidrag til danskfagets it-didaktik, med særligt henblik på kommunikative kompetencer og på metodiske forandringer af undervisningen (2. udgave). Odense, Denmark: Ark.
Bundsgaard, J. (2009). A practice scaffolding interactive platform. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on computer supported collaborative learning (Vol. 1, pp. 522–526). Rhodes, Greece: International Society of the Learning Sciences. Retrieved from http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1600053.1600129.
Bundsgaard, J., & Fougt, S. S. (Forthcoming). Faglighed og scenariedidaktik. In T. Hanghøj, J. Bundsgaard, M. Misfeldt, S. S. Fougt, & V. Hetmar (Eds.), Scenariedidaktik. Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Barron, B. (2010). Prospects and challenges for inquiry-based approaches to learning. In The nature of learning (pp. 199–225). OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/the-nature-of-learning/prospects-and-challenges-for-inquiry-based-approaches-to-learning_9789264086487-11-en;jsessionid=8mb7h1ssj77s6.delta.
Dochy, F., Segers, M., Van den Bossche, P., & Gijbels, D. (2003). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 13(5), 533–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00025-7.
Furtak, E. M., Seidel, T., Iverson, H., & Briggs, D. C. (2012). Experimental and quasi-experimental studies of inquiry-based science teaching: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 300–329.
Gregersen, C., & Mikkelsen, S. S. (2007). Ingen arme, ingen kager!. Copenhagen: Unge Pædagoger.
Hatfield, D., & Shaffer, D. W. (2006). Press play: Designing an epistemic game engine for journalism. In Paper presented at the paper presented at the international conference of the learning sciences (ICLS). Bloomington, IN.
Hixson, N. K., Ravitz, J., & Whisman, A. (2012). Extended professional development in project-based learning: Impacts on 21st century skills teaching and student achievement. West Virginia Department of Education. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED565466.
Krajcik, J. S., & Shin, N. (2014). Project-based learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2nd ed., pp. 275–297). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519526.018.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://www.statsbiblioteket.dk/au/#/search?query=recordID%3A%22sb_4913635%22.
Mergendoller, J. R., Maxwell, N. L., & Bellisimo, Y. (2006). The effectiveness of problem-based instruction: A comparative study of instructional methods and student characteristics. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1026.
OECD Publishing. (2010). The nature of learning: Using research to inspire practice. Washington: Organization for Economic Cooperation & Development.
Pea, R. (2004). The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 423–451.
Rocard, M., Csermely, P., Jorde, D., Lenzen, D., Walberg-Henriksson, H., & Hemmo, V. (2007). Science education NOW. A renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe. Bruxelles, Belgium: Europakommisionen.
Schneider, R. M., Krajcik, J., Marx, R. W., & Soloway, E. (2002). Performance of students in project-based science classrooms on a national measure of science achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(5), 410–422. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10029.
Shaffer, D. W. (2005). Epistemic games. Innovate, 1(6). Retrieved from http://www.innovateonline.info/index.php?view=article&id=79.
Shaffer, D. W. (2006). Epistemic frames for epistemic games. Computers & Education, 46(3), 223–234.
Walker, A., & Leary, H. (2009). A problem based learning meta analysis: Differences across problem types, implementation types, disciplines, and assessment levels. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 3(1), 6–28.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://www.statsbiblioteket.dk/au/#/search?query=recordID%3A%22sb_4996632%22.
Wood, D., Bruner, J., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bundsgaard, J. (2019). Using Technology to Scaffold Progressive Teaching. In: Babaci-Wilhite, Z. (eds) Promoting Language and STEAM as Human Rights in Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2880-0_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2880-0_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-2879-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-2880-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)