Skip to main content

Governance Models and Policy Framework: Some Chinese Perspectives

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Local Governance in Contemporary China
  • 1000 Accesses

Abstract

Governance systems not only reflect the political and constitutional arrangements in different countries, including the administrative, legal, and regulatory frameworks, but also the underlying economic forces, including institutions, policy instruments, and information flows. The interactions are important, as is the sequencing of measures. The tendency of international experts and agencies to assume that more junior levels of government in China behave as they might in the US, often leads to inappropriate analyses and policy prescriptions. Similarly, focusing on the political or administrative aspects in isolation from the economic underpinnings may be a mistake.

This chapter reflects an ongoing work program on multilevel finance and sustainable development being undertaken by the author at the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE). Many of the ideas have been presented at seminars at the LSE, Bonn, Turin, Peking, Sun Yat-Sen, and Zhejiang Universities. Helpful comments from Gao Xiang are acknowledged, and the usual disclaimer applies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This refers to the general principle that characterized a series of reforms, starting with agriculture, then state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and local governments, and the associated fiscal arrangements.

  2. 2.

    The US investment financing system functions, although the adequacy is open to question with the crumbling infrastructure in most major cities, highways, and bridges. The amounts of financing required far exceed the amounts linked to local tax bases and has led to the arguments for additional federally financed or guaranteed investments. This introduces game-play considerations into the US governance model that have yet to play out.

  3. 3.

    It should be noted that the democratic electoral process does not preclude “bad decisions,” such as Brexit, or periodic capture by nondemocratic and xenophobic forces, such as during the 1930s.

  4. 4.

    See also Ahmad and Brosio (2015) for more recent developments in the positive literature.

  5. 5.

    This was dictated by both administrative constraints and revenue concerns, and while it created an additional cost for exporters, lower Chinese wage levels more than compensated for the disadvantage. This lacuna was addressed in the move toward crediting of input taxation on investments, or the shift from an investment-type to a consumption-type VAT, in the reforms of 2006.

  6. 6.

    For a review of the positive theories of multilevel finance that address gainers and losers of alternative institutional and policy arrangements in relation to various interest groups, and associated policy implications, see Handbook of Multilevel Finance (2015).

  7. 7.

    See Lou Jiwei, 1997.

  8. 8.

    For a recent review of PPPs and incentive issues at multiple levels of government, see Ahmad et al. (2018a, b) (G24 Working Paper).

References

  • Ahmad, Ehtisham, Niu Meili and Xiao Kezhou, eds., 2018a, Fiscal underpinnings for sustainable development in China—rebalancing in Guangdong. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, Ehtisham, Amar Bhattacharya, Annalisa Vinella and Kezhou Xiao, 2018b, “Involving the Private Sector and PPPs in Financing Public Investments,” in Ahmad, Niu and Xiao (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, Ehtisham and Xiaorong Zhang, 2018, “Towards monitoring and managing subnational liabilities in China: lessons from the balance sheet for county K,” in Ahmad, Niu and Xiao (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, Ehtisham (2017), “Political Economy of Tax Reform for the SDGs: Improving the investment climate, addressing inequality; stopping the cheating.” Intergovernmental Group of 24, Working Paper, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, Ehtisham, Massimo Bordignon and Giorgio Brosio, eds., 2016, Multilevel Finance and the Euro Crisis, Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, Ehtisham and Giorgio Brosio, eds., 2015, Handbook of Multilevel Finance, Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, Ehtisham, Giorgio Brosio and Caroline Pöschl, 2015, “Local property taxation and benefits in developing countries: overcoming political resistance”, in Ahmad and Brosio 2015, op cit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, Ehtisham, James Rydge and Nicholas Stern, 2013, “Structural change leads to tax reforms leads to structural change,” China Development Forum March 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, Ehtisham, 2008, “Tax reforms and the sequencing of intergovernmental reforms in China: preconditions for a Xiaokang society,” in Lou Jiwei and Shulin Wang, eds., 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, Ehtisham and Giorgio Brosio, eds., 2006, Handbook of Fiscal Federalism, Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, Ehtisham, Ben Lockwood and Raju Singh, 2004, “Financial Consequences of the Chinese VAT Reform.” International VAT Monitor May/June: 181–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, Ehtisham and Vito Tanzi, eds., 2002, Managing Fiscal Decentralization, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, Ehtisham, Li Keping and Tom Richardson, 2002, “Recentralization in China?” in Ehtisham Ahmad and Vito Tanzi, 2002, eds.,

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, Ehtisham, Gao Qiang and Vito Tanzi, 1995, Reforming China’s Public Finances, International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambrosanio, Flavia, Paolo Balduzzi and Massimo Bordignon, 2016, “Economic crisis and fiscal federalism in Italy,” in Ahmad, Bordignon and Brosio, eds., 2016, op cit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besley, Tim and Ann Case, 1995, “Incumbent behavior, vote-seeking, tax-setting and yardstick competition,” American Economic Review, 85(1), 25–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breton, A., 1965, “A theory of government grants,” Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, 31, 175–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breton, A., 2002, “An introduction to decentralization failure,” in Ehtisham Ahmad and Vito Tanzi, eds., (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K., 2016, “A response to Francis Fukuyama’s ‘Reflections on Chinese Governance’,” Journal of Chinese Governance, September 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Färber, Gisela and Zhijie Wang, 2018, “Subnational public debt in China and Germany—a comparative assessment,” in Ahmad, Niu and Xiao 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F., 2016, “Reflections on Chinese Governance,” Journal of Chinese Governance, September 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao Qiang, 1995, “Problems in Chinese intragovernmental fiscal relations, tax-sharing system and future reforms,” in Ahmad, Gao and Tanzi, 1995, op cit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, Alexander, John Jay and James Madison, 1787–88, The Federalist Papers, reprinted in Penguin Classics, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinrichs, H., 1966, A General Theory of Tax Structure During Economic Development, Harvard University Press. Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • IMF, 2016, China: Article IV Consultation Report, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Shangxi and Li Chengwei, 2018, “Public services evaluation from the perspective of public risk management”, in Ahmad, Niu and Xiao (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood, B., 2015, “The Political Economy of Decentralization,” in Ahmad and Brosio, 2015, op cit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lou Jiwei and Shulin Wang, eds., 2008, Fiscal Reforms in China, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Xubei and Zhu Nong, 2018, “Hub-periphery development pattern and inclusive growth: case study of Guangdong province,” in Ahmad, Niu and Xiao, 2018, op cit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musgrave, R., 1959, The Theory of Public Finance, McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pi-Han Tsai, 2016, “Fiscal incentives and political budget cycles in China,” International Tax and Public Finance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rostow, W.W., 1960, The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-Communist Manifesto, Cambridge University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi Yao Bin, 1995, “Unifying the Enterprise Income Tax and reforming profit distribution between Government and State Owned Enterprises,” in Ahmad, Gao and Tanzi 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanzi, V., 1987, “Quantitative characteristics of the tax systems of developing countries,” in D. Newbery and N. Stern, eds., The Theory of Taxation for Developing Countries, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, K., 2018, “Managing subnational liability for sustainable development: a case study of Guangdong Province,” in Ahmad, Niu and Xiao (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu Shanda and Ma Lin, 1995, “Reform and the market economy and tax in China,” in Ahmad, Gao and Tanzi, 1995, op cit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jing Zhang, 2015, “Government Finances and Public Interests: Perspectives on State Building,” Journal of Chinese Governance.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ehtisham Ahmad .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ahmad, E. (2019). Governance Models and Policy Framework: Some Chinese Perspectives. In: Yu, J., Guo, S. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Local Governance in Contemporary China. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2799-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics