Abstract
Political opportunity refers to the “dimensions of the political environment” within which movement participants evaluate how their collective action can achieve their goals (Tarrow 1994). The structure of political opportunity, as McAdam (1996, p. 27) has suggested, includes four major components: increasing or decreasing openness in institutionalized political systems, increasing or decreasing instability in the alignment of government elites, changing levels of elite support for collective action, and the capacity of the government to contain collective action.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
Koopmans (2004) also observes that the “selection processes” of movement participants (i.e., their framing strategy and their choice of political opportunities) may “evolve” as a result of contact with factors, such as the influence of the media, which may not engage “directly” with the core concerns of the participants.
- 4.
This term builds upon the “frame analysis” paradigm developed by Goffman and Berger in Frame Analysis (1986).
- 5.
An Internet post retrieved by the first author.
- 6.
There was also a protest against anticipated pollution in October 2001 in the town (see Deng and Yang 2013).
- 7.
For a discussion of factors that trigger the central government to intervene in protests, and how this contributes to protest success, see Cai (2008).
- 8.
For more information on this case, see Deng and O’Brien (2013).
- 9.
An Internet post retrieved by the first author.
- 10.
One official from Huashui town, when reflecting on the incident, suggested: “In 2004, the villagers cleverly used the policies the government was advocating at the time: getting close to the people (qinmin zhengce), ‘putting people first,’ and ‘scientific development.’”
- 11.
Until the summer of 2007, of the villagers whom the author interviewed, there was only one activist who—because they had undertaken training in “methods of public participation and temporary measures for environmental impact assessment,” provided by a Beijing NGO—knew that there was an Environmental Impact Assessment Law.
- 12.
The construction of industrial parks was (and perhaps still is) perceived to be able to improve the reputations and careers of local officials, and consequently all kinds of industrial parks and economic development zones had sprung up everywhere around the year of 2000. In the eastern coastal regions, economic development zones tended to be small and disorganized, and quite a few of these were not really used for development sake. At the same time, because the setup of industrial parks had involved the displacement of many farmers without adequate compensation and assistance with relocation, there were many related mass incidents. According to Chen Xiwen, director of the Central Rural Working Group, in the few years before 2006, mass incidents relating to rural land disputes made up approximately 50% of all rural mass incidents (see Chang 2007).
- 13.
From August 8 to September 19, 2003, ten supervision groups were sent to investigate the implementation of the central land policy across China. One investigator found: “What appeared to be vigorous internal investigation and rectification processes were actually quite worrisome. In my view, all local governments did this to take advantage of the regulation that conducting self-investigation and self-rectification would result in more lenient penalties, rather than aiming to genuinely improve the local land markets” (see Tang 2005).
- 14.
Sourced from a reflection report on the Huashui incident written by a key county leader.
- 15.
One petition letter suggested that after the written decisions of legal penalties were made by the Bureau of Land and Resources, the Zhuxi Chemical Park had not shrunk but was in fact gradually expanding. More than 100 buildings were constructed in the following two months.
- 16.
- 17.
From a record of a meeting of cadres in Huashui town on March 4, 2005.
- 18.
The authors suggest: “By acting as if they have the rights that they lack, the refugees actualize their political freedom and equality. Even if the public sphere has been defined through their exclusion, they act.”
References
Benney, J. 2013. Defending Rights in Contemporary China. Oxford: Routledge.
Briggs, A. 2005. China’s pollution victims: Still seeking a dependable remedy. Georgetown International Environmental Law Review 18: 305–333.
Cai, Y. 2008. Power structure and regime resilience: Contentious politics in China. British Journal of Political Science 38(3): 411–432.
Cai, Y. 2010. Collective Resistance in China: Why Popular Protests Succeed or Fail. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Chang, H. 2007. “‘Yi hao wenjian zuo ban, Chen Xiwen jiedu ‘xin nongcun jianshe yuannian’” (“Number one document” issued yesterday, Chen Xiwen analyses “the first year of construction of the new countryside”). Caijing Wang (Business and Economics Net). Available at http://www.caijing.com.cn/2007-01-30/100016039.html.
Costain, A.N. 1992. Inviting Women’s Rebellion: A Political Process Interpretation of the Women’s Movement. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Deng, Y., and K. J. O’Brien. 2013. Relational Repression in China: Using Social Ties to Demobilize Protesters. The China Quarterly 215: 533–552.
Deng, Y., and K.J. O’Brien. 2014. Societies of senior citizens and popular protest in rural Zhejiang. The China Journal 71: 172–188.
Deng, Y., and G. Yang. 2013. Pollution and Protest in China: Environmental Mobilization in Context. The China Quarterly 214: 321–336.
Downs, A. 1967. Inside Bureaucracy. Boston: Little, Brown.
Goffman, E., and B.M. Berger. 1986. Frame Analysis. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
Goodwin, J., J.M. Jasper, and J. Khattra. 1999. Caught in a winding, snarling vine: The structural bias of political process theory. Sociological Forum 14(1): 27–54.
Huashui Township Government. 2004. “Guanyu yaoqiu xunsu jianli lipei jizhi jiejue zhuxi gongneng qu maodun jiufen de baogao” (Report on the necessity to establish timely compensation mechanism for solving conflicts in the Zhuxi Functional Area), July 6, 2004.
Keck, M.E., and K. Sikkink. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Koopmans, R. 2004. Movements and media: Selection processes and evolutionary dynamics in the public sphere. Theory and Society 33(3): 367–391.
Kremmel, K., and B. Pali. 2015. “Refugee Protests and Political Agency: Framing Dissensus through Precarity.” In: R. Sollund (ed.) Green Harms and Crimes: Critical Criminology in a Changing World. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kurzman, C. 1996. Structural Opportunity and Perceived Opportunity in Social-Movement Theory: The Iranian revolution of 1979. American Sociological Review 61(1): 153–170.
Li, Y. 2005. Dang zhuiqiu jingji liyi zaoyu huanbao fengbao he nengyuan weiji (The pursuit of economic benefit encounters the environmental protection storm and the energy crisis). Zhongguo Xin Shidai (China’s New Era), February 24, 2005.
Lieberthal, K. 1997. China’s governing system and its impact on environmental policy implementation. China Environmental Series 1: 3–8.
McAdam, D. 1982. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
McAdam, D. 1996. “Conceptual Origins, Current Problems, Future Directions.” In: D. McAdam, J.D. McCarthy, and M.N. Zald (eds.) Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Meyer, D.S., and W.A. Gamson. 1996. “Framing Political Opportunity.” In: D. McAdam, J.D. McCarthy, and M.N. Zald (eds.) Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
O’Brien, K.J., and L. Li. 2006. Rightful Resistance in Rural China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
O’Brien, K.J., and Y. Deng. 2015. Repression backfires: Tactical radicalization and protest spectacle in rural China. Journal of Contemporary China 93: 457–470.
Pan, Y. 2004. Huanjing baohu yu gongzong canyu (Environmental protection and public participation). Zhongguo Jianzai (China Disaster Reduction) 6 (2004): 24–25.
Sawyers, T.M., and D.S. Meyer. 1999. Missed opportunities: Social movement abeyance and public policy. Social Problems 46(2): 187–206.
Scott, J.C. 1985. Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Shi, F. 2005. Guanxi wangluo yu dangdai Zhongguo jiceng shehui yundong—yi yi ge jiequ huanbao yundong ge’an wei li (Guanxi networks and grassroots social movements in modern China—A case study of a street-level environmental movement). Xuehai (Academia Bimestris) no. 3 (2005): 76–88.
Shi, F., and Y. Cai. 2006. Disaggregating the state: Networks and collective resistance in Shanghai. The China Quarterly 186: 314–332.
Suh, D. 2001. How do political opportunities matter for social movements: Political opportunity, misframing, pseudosuccess, and pseudofailure. The Sociological Quarterly 42(3): 437–460.
Tang, X. 2005. Ducha yinxiang lu—yige jizhe de ducha suixing jilu (A record of supervision and inspection—a report from an accompanying journalist). Zhongguo Tudi (China Land) 3 (2005): 9–11.
Tarrow, S. 1989. Democracy and Disorder: Protest and Politics in Italy 1965–1975. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Tarrow, S. 1994. Power in Movement. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Tarrow, S. 2005. The New Transnational Activism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Tullock, G. 1987. The Politics of Bureaucracy. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
van Rooij, B. 2010. The people vs. pollution: Understanding citizen action against pollution in China. Journal of Contemporary China 19(63): 55–77.
Xie, Y. 2010. Cong ‘sifa dongyuan’ dao ‘jietou kangyi’—nongmingong jiti xingdong shibai de zhengzhi yinsu jiqi houguo” (From “judicial mobilisation” to “street protest”—the political factors and consequences of the failure of collective action by migrant workers). Kaifang Shidai (Open Times) 9 (2010): 46–56.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Deng, Y., Benney, J. (2019). Selective Use of Political Opportunity: A Case of Environmental Protest in Rural China. In: Yu, J., Guo, S. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Local Governance in Contemporary China. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2799-5_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2799-5_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-2798-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-2799-5
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)