Skip to main content

A Qualitative–Quantitative Methodological Approach for Sustainable Reclamation of Open Dumps: The Case of the Controlled Dump of Tripoli

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Waste Valorisation and Recycling
  • 852 Accesses

Abstract

Municipal Solid Waste Management (MSWM) is a major problem facing the Urban Commune Al-Fayhaa (UCF) in Lebanon for more than 40 years. The population growth, the presence of Syrian refugees due to the political conflict, and scarce availability of land have led to a crisis in UCF existing controlled dump (CD) which covers an area of 60,000 m2, serving approximately 500,000 persons with an average 425 tons/day of waste. The site approached its final grades since 2012 and is still used. The aim of this study is to find an effective solution to the problem of the current crisis in this CD. The methodology follows a five-step procedure: identification and review of relevant literature; data collection; meeting with the concerned stakeholders; fieldwork; data processing; and solution to this problem. Four scenarios are studied (leave controlled dump as it is; closure and cover of CD; enhanced landfill mining and reclamation (mobile plant); and enhanced landfill mining and reclamation (stationary plant)). The results show that enhanced landfill mining and reclamation with mobile sorting plant on-site is the best applicable solution, and an immediate decision should be considered to prevent additional public health problems and degradation of the environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Al-Salem SM, Lettieri P, Baeyens J (2009) Recycling and recovery routes of plastic solid waste (PSW): a review. Waste Manag 29(10):2625–2643

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bosmans A, Vanderreydt I, Geysen D, Helsen L (2013) The crucial role of waste-to-energy technologies in enhanced landfill mining: a technology review. Clean Prod 55(1):10–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Deutz P, Neighbour G, McGuire M (2010) Integrating sustainable waste management into product design: sustainability as a functional requirement. Sustain Dev 18:229–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Di Maria F, Micale C, Sordi A, Cirulli G, Marionni M (2013) Urban Mining: quality and quantity of recyclable and recoverable material mechanically and physically extractable from residual waste. Waste Manag 33:2594–2599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. El-Hoz M (2005) Sanitary landfill extension. In: The tenth international waste management and landfill symposium, Sardinia, Italy, 3–7 Oct 2005

    Google Scholar 

  6. El-Hoz M (2012) Evaluation of composting processing technologies for the treatment of urban municipal solid waste. In: The twenty-seventh international conference, on solid waste technology and management, Philadelphia, PA U.S.A., March 11–14, pp 1394–1405

    Google Scholar 

  7. El-Hoz M (2015) Market-based system of municipal solid waste composting. Solid Waste Technol Manag 41(3):239–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. El-Hoz M (2017) Enhancing governance, transparency and accountability for sustainable solid waste management. In: The thirty-second international conference on solid waste technology and management, Philadelphia, PA, U.S.A., March 19–22, pp 40–58

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ford S, Warren K, Lorton C, Smithers R, Read A, Hudgins M (2013) Feasibility and viability of landfill mining and reclamation in Scotland (scoping study), final report, zero waste Scotland. http://ee.ricardo.com/cms/assets/Documents-for-Insight-pages/Resource-efficiency/Feasability-and-Viability-of-LFMR-Scotland-1904130.pdf

  10. Frändegård P, Krook J, Svensson N, Eklund M (2013) A novel approach for environmental evaluation of landfill mining. Clean Prod 55:24–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hogland W (2002) Remediation of an old landfill site. Environ Sci Pollut Res 9(1):49–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hogland W, Marques M, Nimmermark S (2004) Landfill mining and waste characterization: a strategy for remediation of contaminated areas. Mater Cycles Waste Manag 6:119–124

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jain P, Townsend T, Johnson P (2012) Case study of landfill reclamation at a Florida landfill site. Waste Manag 33(1):109–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Johansson N, Krook J, Eklund M (2012) Transforming dumps into gold mines: experiences from Swedish case studies. Environ Innov Soc Transit 5:33–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Johansson N, Krook J, Eklund M, Berglund B (2013) An integrated review of concepts and initiatives for mining the technosphere: towards a new taxonomy. Clean Prod 55(1):35–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jones PT, Geysen D, Tielemans Y, Van Passel S, Pontikes Y, Blanpain B (2013) Enhanced landfill mining in view of multiple resource recovery: a critical review. Clean Prod 55:45–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kaartinen T, Sormunen K, Rintala J (2013) Case study on sampling, processing and characterization of landfilled municipal solid waste in the view of landfill mining. Clean Prod 55(15):56–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Krook J (2010) Urban and landfill mining: emerging global perspectives and approaches. Clean Prod 18:1772–1773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Krook J, Svensson N, Eklund M (2012) Landfill mining: a critical review of two decades of research. Waste Manag 32(3):513–520

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Krook J, Baas L (2013) Getting serious about mining the technosphere: a review of recent landfill mining and urban mining research. Clean Prod 55(15):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kurian J, Esakku S, Palanivelu K, Selvam A (2003) Studies on landfill mining at solid waste dumpsites in India. In: Proceedings Sardinia’03, ninth international Landfill symposium, Cagliari, Italy, pp 248–255

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kurian J, Esakku S, Nagendran R (2007) Mining compost from dumpsites and bioreactor landfills. Environ Technol Manag 7:317–325

    Google Scholar 

  23. Marella G, Raga R (2014) Use of the contingent valuation method in the assessment of a landfill mining project. Waste Manag 34(7):1199–1205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Observatory of Environment and Development (2017) Urban Commune Al-Fayhaa, Progress Report

    Google Scholar 

  25. Prechthai T, Padmasri M, Visvanathan C (2008) Quality assessment of mined MSW from an open dumpsite for recycling potential. Resour Conserv Recycl 53:70–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Quaghebeur M, Laenen B, Geysen D, Nielsen P, Pontikes Y, Van Gerven T, Spooren J (2013) Characterization of landfilled materials: screening of the enhanced landfill mining potential. Clean Prod 55:72–83

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Raga R, Cossu R (2013) Bioreactor tests preliminary to landfill in situ aeration: a case study. Waste Manag 33(4):871–880

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. SWEEPNET (2010) Country Report on the Solid Waste Management in Lebanon

    Google Scholar 

  29. Van der Zee DJ, Achterkamp MC, de Visser BK (2004) Assessing the market opportunities of landfill mining. Waste Manag 24:795–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Van Passel S, Dubois M, Eyckmans J (2013) The economics of enhanced landfill mining: private and societal performance drivers. Clean Prod 55:92–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wagner TP, Raymond T (2015) Landfill mining: case study of a successful metals recovery project. Waste Manag 45:448–457

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. World Bank, SWEEPNET (2014) Cost of environmental degradation due to solid waste management practices in Beirut and Mount Lebanon, Final Draft

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zhao Y, Song L, Huang R, Li X (2007) Recycling of aged refuse from a closed landfill. Waste Manage Res 25(2):130–138

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhou Chuanbin, Fang Wenjun, Wanying Xu, Cao Aixin, Wang Rusong (2014) Characteristics and the recovery potential of plastic wastes obtained from landfill mining. Clean Prod 80:80–86

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhou C, Gong Z, Hu J, Cao A, Liang H (2015) A cost-benefit analysis of landfill mining and material recycling in China. Waste Manag 35:191–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author expresses her appreciation to the Urban Commune of Al-Fayhaa for its cooperation in this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mervat El-Hoz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

El-Hoz, M. (2019). A Qualitative–Quantitative Methodological Approach for Sustainable Reclamation of Open Dumps: The Case of the Controlled Dump of Tripoli. In: Ghosh, S. (eds) Waste Valorisation and Recycling. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2784-1_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics