Skip to main content

Contextual Factors Affecting the Modes of Interaction in Governance: The Case of Dam Removal in Japan

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Interactive Approaches to Water Governance in Asia

Abstract

This chapter discusses the first Japanese case of dam removal policy. The Arase Dam in Kumamoto Prefecture was built for hydropower generation as a symbol of economic development in 1955. After its construction, local residents came to realize the damage caused by the dam, such as flood damage and eutrophication of the reservoir. In parallel with the anti-dam construction movement, at another site in the same river basin, the local village and fishermen began to ask the prefectural government to remove the Arase Dam when the permit for hydropower generation expired in 2003. Until the governor of the prefecture decided to remove the dam, there had been a series of complex interactions among different levels of government, local residents, fishery cooperatives, and downstream farmers, with political dynamics from changes of top leaders in elections. This chapter focuses on the contextual factors in interactive governance and stresses the importance of resistance strategy, which has been discussed in case studies of local commons in Japan, rather than collaborative governance discussed in many water governance studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Inoue (2004) also discusses that each stakeholder should have differentiated legitimacy according to their dependence on the targeted resource.

  2. 2.

    Japan has the two-tier local government system, including prefectures and municipalities. Municipalities include cities (Shi), towns (Cho), and villages (Son or Mura). For the details on Japanese local government, see Reed (1986) and Jacobs (2003).

  3. 3.

    Among those newspapers, only Kumamoto Nichinichi Shinbun is the local newspaper published at Kumamoto; the others are the nationwide newspapers.

  4. 4.

    It is made from concrete and is “called a gravity dam because gravity holds it down to the ground stopping the water in the reservoir pushing it over” (The British Dam Society 2010).

  5. 5.

    Kumamoto Nichinichi Shimbun, May 25, 1951.

  6. 6.

    Kumamoto Nichinichi Shimbun, February 11, 1951.

  7. 7.

    Kumamoto Nichinichi Shimbun, December 23, 1954.

  8. 8.

    This film is available at the following website (http://www.kagakueizo.org/create/other/5533/).

  9. 9.

    Interview, March 6, 2016.

  10. 10.

    Details of flood damage are described in detail in the interview report (Kumagawa ryuiki jyumin kikitorichosa hokokushu henshuiinkai 2008).

  11. 11.

    Since sweetfish caught in the Kuma River had been highly valued for their size and taste (Hanaoka 1934; Kosaki 1960), it is regarded as a symbol of the Kuma River.

  12. 12.

    For more details on the Kawabegawa Dam issues, see Takahashi (2009) or Kumamoto Nichinichi Shimbun shuzaihan (2010).

  13. 13.

    Yomiuri Shimbun, June 16, 2001.

  14. 14.

    Kumamoto Nichinichi Shimbun, July 16, 2002.

  15. 15.

    Asahi Shimbun, August 11, 2002.

  16. 16.

    Kumamoto Nichinichi Shimbun, September 27, 2002.

  17. 17.

    Kumamoto Nichinichi Shimbun, October 18, 2002.

  18. 18.

    Kumamoto prefectural assembly meeting minutes, December 10, 2002.

  19. 19.

    Kumamoto Nichinichi Shimbun, October 30, 2002.

  20. 20.

    Kumamoto Nichinichi Shimbun, November 4, 2002. Unfortunately, the amount of related tax revenue and subsidy remains unclear due to the limited available documents.

  21. 21.

    Kumamoto Nichinichi Shimbun, July 3, 2008; May 5, 2009; March 7, 2010.

  22. 22.

    Asahi Shimbun, June 7, 2008.

  23. 23.

    Asahi Shimbun, July 1, 2008.

  24. 24.

    Kumamoto Nichinichi Shinbun, November 25, 2009.

  25. 25.

    Kumamoto Nichinichi Shinbun, December 15, 2009.

  26. 26.

    Asahi Shinbun, September 14, 2009.

  27. 27.

    Kumamoto Nichinichi Shinbun, October 15, 2009.

  28. 28.

    Asahi Shinbun, January 15, 2010.

  29. 29.

    Asahi Shinbun, February 3, 2010.

  30. 30.

    Interview, February 2, 2015.

  31. 31.

    Interview, March 5, 2016.

  32. 32.

    Interview, September 24, 2015.

  33. 33.

    Interview, September 24, 2015.

  34. 34.

    The strategies they adopted were mainly political campaigning. There was no litigation concerning Arase Dam removal.

References

  • Abe, R. 2007. Ikanishite Jinkobutu ha seiji to naruka: Arase damu haiki no seijikatei [How Artifacts Become Politicalization?: Political Process of the Arase Dam Removal]. Shakaigaku kenkyuka kiyo [Annals of Graduate School of Sociology] 7: 39–55 [in Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansell, C., and A. Gash. 2007. Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18: 543–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beach, Derek, and Rasmus Brun Pedersen. 2013. Process-Tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Crozier, Michel J., Samuel P. Huntington, and Joji Watanuki. 1975. The Crisis of Democracy. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelenbos, J. 2005. Institutional Implications of Interactive Governance: Insights from Dutch Practice. Governance 18: 111–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edelenbos, J., and I. Van Meerkerk. 2016. Vitality in Interactive Governance: Conditions and Challenges. In The Challenges of Collaboration in Environmental Governance: Barriers and Responses, ed. R.D. Margerum and C.J. Robinson. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelenbos, J., N.V. Schie, and L. Gerrits. 2010. Organizing Interfaces Between Government Institutions and Interactive Governance. Policy Sciences 43: 73–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, F. 2012. Participatory Governance: From Theory to Practice. In The Oxford Handbook of Governance, ed. D. Levi-Faur. New York: Oxford university Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanaoka, I. 1934. Kumagawa annai [Kuma River Guide]. Kumamoto: Nagasakijiro shoten shiten. [in Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Hori, M. 2011. Koteki gabanansuron no totatsuten: Gabanansu kenkyu no kaiko to tenbo wo megutte [Achievement of the Public Governance Studies: Retrospective View and Vision of Governance Studies]. In Koteki gabanansuno dotaikenkyu: Seifu no sadoyoshiki no henyo, ed. Niikawa. [Studies on Dynamics of Public Governance: Transformation of modes of government activities] Kyoto: Minerva shobo. [in Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Inoue, M. 2004. Komonzu no shiso wo motomete [A Quest for the Thought on Commons]. Tokyo: Iwanami shoten. [in Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, A.J. 2003. Devolving Authority and Expanding Autonomy in Japanese Prefectures and Municipalities. Governance 16 (4): 601–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jentoft, S., and M. Bavinck. 2014. Interactive Governance for Sustainable Fisheries: Dealing with Legal Pluralism. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 11: 71–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kooiman, J., ed. 1993. Modern Governance: New Government-Society Interactions. London: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. Governing as Governance. London: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kooiman, J., M. Bavinck, S. Jentoft, and R. Pullin, eds. 2005. Fish for Life: Interactive Governance for Fisheries. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koontz, Tomas M. 2004. Collaborative Environmental Management: What Roles for Government? Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosaki, K. (ed.) 1960. Kumagawa gaido [Kuma River Guide]. Kumamoto: Kumamoto nichinichi shinbun. [in Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumagawa ryuiki jyumin kikitorichosa hokokushu henshuiinkai. 2008. Damuha suigaiwo hikiokosu: Kumagawa kawabegawano suigai higaishaha kataru [Dam Causes the Flood Damages: Voices of Victims of the Flood at Kuma River and Kawabe River]. Tokyo: Kadensha. [in Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumamoto nichinichi shimbun shuzaihan. 2010. Datsudamuno yukue: Kawabegawa damuwo tou [Fate of a No-Dam Policy: Questioning the Kawabegawa Dam]. Tokyo: Kadokawa gakugei shuppan. [in Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, A. 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale university press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowry, William R. 2003. Dam Politics: Restoring America’s Rivers. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. Policy Reversal and Changing Politics: State Governments and Dam Removals. State Politics & Policy Quarterly 5 (4): 394–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/153244000500500405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. Policy Changes on Canada’s Rivers: Different but Not Isolated. Review of Policy Research 26 (6): 783–800. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2009.00416.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mertha, A.C., and W.R. Lowry. 2006. Unbuilt Dams: Seminal Events and Policy Change in China, Australia, and the United States. Comparative Politics 39: 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitsumata, G. 2013. Complementary Environmental Resource Policies in the Public, Commons and Private Spheres: An Analysis of External Impacts on the Commons. In Local Commons and Democratic Environmental Governance, ed. T. Murota and K. Takeshita. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitsumata, G., and H. Saitoh. 2010. Kankyoshigenkanrino kyochisenryaku to teikosenryaku ni kansuru ichishiron: Gyosei no kochokutekitaioukaniaru Toyota shi Inabu jyusan zaisanku no jirei kara [A Consideration on the Collaborative Governance Strategy and Resistant Governance Strategy for Natural Resource Management: On the Basis of a Case Study of Inabu Property Ward Forests in Toyota, Aichi, Japan]. Shodai ronshu [Journal of University of Hyogo] 61: 151–178. [in Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Miwa, D., and G. Mitsumata. 2010. Komonzu wo mamori ikasu senryaku nikansuru ichikosatsu: Kinnenno hogakuteki komonzukenkyu no ryukou ni yosete [A Consideration on the Strategy for the Resistance and Utilization of the Commons]. Shodai ronshu [Journal of University of Hyogo] 61: 1–32. [in Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyoshi, N. 2007. Ryuikikanri no hoseisaku: Kenzen na mizujyunkan to sogoteki ryuikikanri no jitsugen ni mukete [Law and Policy for the Watershed Management: Toward the Realization of Sound Water Cycle and Integrated Watershed Management]. Tokyo: Jigakusha shuppan. [in Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Obitani, H. 2003. Damukensetsu wo meguru kankyoundo to chiikisaisei: Tairitsu to kyodo no dainamizumu [Environmental Movement and Regional Revitalization Over the Dam Built: Dynamism of Conflict and Collaboration]. Kyoto: Showado. [in Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohno, T. 2013. Institutional Design of Watershed Committees in Japan. In Local Commons and Democratic Environmental Governance, ed. T. Murota and K. Takeshita. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, S. 1986. Japanese Prefectures and Policymaking. Pittsburgh: The University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittel, H.W.J., and M.M. Webber. 1973. Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. Policy Sciences 4: 155–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P. 1988. An Advocacy Coalition Framework of Policy Change and the Role of Policy-Oriented Learning Therein. Policy Sciences 21 (2–3): 129–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, Paul A., Will Focht, Mark Lubell, Zev Trachtenberg, Arnold Vedlitz, and Marty Matlock, eds. 2005. Swimming Upstream: Collaborative Approaches to Watershed Management, American and Comparative Environmental Policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakamoto Village History Editorial Committee. 1990. Sakamoto sonshi [Sakamoto Village History]. Kumamoto: Sakamoto sonshi hensan iinkai.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seki, Y., A. Masano, and K. Kajiwara 2015. Shakaiteki kyotsushihon toshiteno mizu [Water as a Social Common Capital]. Tokyo: Kadensha. [in Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi, Y. 2009. Kawabegawa damuha iranai: Takara wo mamoru kokyojigyo he [We Do not Need the Kawabegawa Dam: For the Public Works to Protect a Tresure]. Tokyo: Iwanami shoten. [in Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  • The British Dam Society. 2010. Types of Dams: Gravity Dam. http://britishdams.org/about_dams/gravity.htm. Accsessed 2 Mar 2016.

  • Torfing, Jacob, B. Guy Peters, Jon Pierre, and Eva Sørensen. 2012. Interactive Governance: Advancing the Paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press on Demand.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tsuru, S. 2013. Nihon hatsuno dam tekkyo no genba karano houkoku: Arase dam kono 1nen(3) [Report from the Field of the first dam removal case in Japan: Annual report of Arase dam (3)]” Shiranuikai/Kumagawa Ryuuikiken Gakkaishi [Journal of Society for Shiranui Sea and Kuma River Watershed Studies] 7(1): 31–34. [in Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, S.M., and H. Ishiga. 2014. Assessment of Dam Removal from Geochemical Examination of Kuma River Sediment, Kyushu, Japan. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 186 (12): 8267–8289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-014-4002-4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Some fieldworks for this study were jointly conducted with the support of Gaku Mitsumata, Daisaku Shimada, and Kazuki Kagohashi. This study is partly supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP 16K16236.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomohiko Ohno .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: Chronology of the Arase Dam construction and removal from the 1950s to 2010

Appendix: Chronology of the Arase Dam construction and removal from the 1950s to 2010

Date(s)

Event

Phase 1: Dam as a symbol of “development” (1960s)

1950s

Electricity shortage at Kumamoto Prefecture

Kuma River General Development Plan

1955

Completion of the Arase Dam construction work

Phase 2: Dam as a source of “nuisance” (1965–1980s)

1965

Sever flood damage around the Arase Dam site and its reservoir

Criticism by inhabitants for the failure of the dams’ flood control

 

Degradation of the reservoir’s water quality

Phase3: Dam removal stimulated by dam construction controversies (1990s–2007)

Late 1990

Nationwide controversies over the Kawabegawa Dam construction

2001

Proposal for local referendum at Sakamoto Village on the Kawabegawa Dam construction and its rejection by village assembly

2002

Formation of “Arase Dam organization” by inhabitants and fishermen

Several organizations and inhabitants jointly submitted the petition to remove dam and its acceptance by village assembly

LDP-K proposed the Arase Dam removal

Governor Shiotani expresses her decision to remove Arase Dam in 7 years

Phase 4: Change of local government attitudes and citizen protests (2008–2010)

April 2008

Mr. Kabashima became the new governor of Kumamoto Prefecture

June 2008

Governor Kabashima announced his decision to cancel the Arase Dam’s removal

Fierce opposition movements and lobbying against governor’s decision by inhabitants

November 2008

Project team at the prefectural government reported the removal cost excess the status quo cost

August 2009

Candidate who advocate the dam removal was elected as new Yatsushiro City mayor

Changes of national government from LDP to DPJ

January 2010

DPJ government expressed its view that water license of Arase Dam cannot be renewed and will expire in the end of March 2010

February 2010

Governor Kabashima applied new water license for maintaining Arase Dam

LDP-K proposed cuts in the budgets for maintaining Arase Dam and their proposal was accepted in a unanimous at prefectural assembly

March 2010

Governor Kabashima expressed his final decision to remove Arase Dam

Phase 5: Dam removal and signs of watershed restoration (2010–)

April 2010

The gate of Arase Dam was opened

September 2012

The removal work had started

  1. Source: Compiled by the author based on the data from interviews and collected newspaper articles

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ohno, T. (2019). Contextual Factors Affecting the Modes of Interaction in Governance: The Case of Dam Removal in Japan. In: Otsuka, K. (eds) Interactive Approaches to Water Governance in Asia. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2399-7_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics