Skip to main content

Role of Plant Health Parameters in Understanding Spatial Heterogeneity of Hydraulic Conductivity of Vegetated Soil: A Case Study of Urban Green Infrastructure Monitoring

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 8th International Congress on Environmental Geotechnics Volume 3 (ICEG 2018)

Part of the book series: Environmental Science and Engineering ((ENVENG))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Development of green infrastructure is widely adopted as a key strategy for enhancing socio-ecological benefits in urban areas. Generally, four categories of vegetation exist in urban green infrastructure. Those are (i) vegetated soil under tree shade during entire daylight period, (ii) vegetated soil under tree shade during 3–4 h of daylight period, (iii) vegetated soil under light during entire daylight period and (iv) soil surface covered by mix grass and shredded leaves. Previous studies have shown that presence of vegetation may influence hydraulic conductivity. The main factors those govern such influence are found to be growth of vegetation, which is directly related to photosynthesis and stomatal conductance. Stomatal conductance is the measure of passage of carbon dioxide or water vapor through stomata of leaf. The objective of this study is to investigate role of plant health parameters in understanding spatial heterogeneity of hydraulic conductivity in urban green infrastructure. Field monitoring of mix vegetated soil was conducted for about three months. Plant health is investigated in terms of vegetation growth and stomatal conductance. Stomatal conductance and hydraulic conductivity were measured in 150 locations in selected site once every month. Stomatal conductance was measured using an electronic sensor (leaf porometer). Mini disk infiltrometer was used to measure hydraulic conductivity. Stomatal conductance of mix grass under light for longer duration (around 8 h) was found to be higher than that under light for shorter duration (3–4 h) and shade. Hydraulic conductivity of mix grass cover under shade was found to be relatively low. As compared to stomatal conductance, preferential flow is found to be more dominant in governing the hydraulic conductivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Leung AK, Garg A, Coo JL, Ng CWW, Hau BCH (2015) Effects of the roots of Cynodon dactylon and Schefflera heptaphylla on water infiltration rate and soil hydraulic conductivity. Hydrol Process 29(15):3342–3354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Leung AK, Garg A, Ng CWW (2015) Effects of plant roots on soil-water retention and induced suction in vegetated soil. Eng Geol 193:183–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Berretta C, Poë S, Stovin V (2014) Moisture content behaviour in extensive green roofs during dry periods: the influence of vegetation and substrate characteristics. J Hydrol 511:374–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Garg A, Coo JL, Ng CWW (2015) Field study on influence of root characteristics on soil suction distribution in slopes vegetated with Cynodon dactylon and Schefflera heptaphylla. Earth Surf Proc Land 40(12):1631–1643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gadi VK, Tang YR, Das A, Monga C, Garg A, Berretta C, Sahoo L (2017) Spatial and temporal variation of hydraulic conductivity and vegetation growth in green infrastructures using infiltrometer and visual technique. CATENA 155:20–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mitchell AR, Ellsworth TR, Meek BD (1995) Effect of root systems on preferential flow in swelling soil. Commun Soil Sci Plan 26(15–16):2655–2666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Huat BB, Ali FH, Low TH (2006) Water infiltration characteristics of unsaturated soil slope and its effect on suction and stability. Geotech Geol Eng 24(5):1293–1306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Meerow S, Newell JP (2017) Spatial planning for multifunctional green infrastructure: growing resilience in Detroit. Landscape Urban Plan 159:62–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Palla A, Berretta C, Lanza LG, La Barbera P (2008) Modelling storm water control operated by green roofs at the urban catchment scale. In: 11th International Conference on Urban Drainage, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK

    Google Scholar 

  10. A.S.T.M. D2487-11 (2011) Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purpose (Unified Soil Classification System). Annual Book of ASTM Standards (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Decagon Devices (2006) Leaf porometer. Operator’s manual. Version 1.0. Decagon Devices. Inc. Pullman, WA

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jones HG (2013) Plants and microclimate: a quantitative approach to environmental plant physiology. Cambridge University Press (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Decagon Devices (2012) Minidisk Infiltrometer User’s Manual Version 10. Pullman, WA (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ghestem M, Sidle RC, Stokes A (2011) The influence of plant root systems on subsurface flow: implications for slope stability. Bioscience 61(11):869–879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang R (1997) Determination of soil sorptivity and hydraulic conductivity from the disk infiltrometer. Soil Sci Soc Am J 61(4):1024–1030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Carsel RF, Parrish RS (1988) Developing joint probability distributions of soil water retention characteristics. Water Resour Res 24(5):755–769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zeiger E, Farquhar GD, Cowan IR (1987) Stomatal function. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gross K, Homlicher A, Weinreich A, Wagner E (1996) Effect of shade on stomatal conductance, net photosynthesis, photochemical efficiency and growth of oak saplings. Annales des sciences forestières, EDP Sci 53(2–3):279–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vinay Kumar Gadi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Garg, A. et al. (2019). Role of Plant Health Parameters in Understanding Spatial Heterogeneity of Hydraulic Conductivity of Vegetated Soil: A Case Study of Urban Green Infrastructure Monitoring. In: Zhan, L., Chen, Y., Bouazza, A. (eds) Proceedings of the 8th International Congress on Environmental Geotechnics Volume 3. ICEG 2018. Environmental Science and Engineering(). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2227-3_47

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics