Skip to main content

Enriching Indigenous Ureolytic Bacteria in Coastal Beach Sand

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Environmental Science and Engineering ((ENVENG))

Abstract

In this study, a series of enrichment tests were conducted to investigate the effectiveness of two enriching media on the indigenous ureolytic bacteria in Hawaiian coastal beach sand. Sand collected from the intertidal zone of the Kailua Beach was used in the study, which was subjected to the erosion action of wave and tide periodically. Two media applied were YE (yeast extract only) and YEU medium (yeast extract with urea). Shaking incubation test was conducted up to 72 h to stimulate the indigenous ureolytic bacteria. The pH, ammonium concentration, ureolytic activity, and viable bacterial colony number of the enriched bacterial solution were measured at 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, 48 h and 72 h respectively. Results show that the primary stimulation occurred within the first 48 h. The concentration of ammonium ions and ureolytic activity were significantly increased and the viable bacterial colony number was slightly decreased at the end of the enrichment. These observations indicate that the ureolytic bacteria resided in the intertidal zone can be enriched effectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bird ECF (1985) Coastline changes. a global review. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ruggiero P, Komar PD, McDougal WG, Marra JJ, Beach RA (2001) Wave runup, extreme water levels and the erosion of properties backing beaches. J Coast Res 17(2):407–419

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fletcher CH, Romine BM, Genz AS, Barbee MM, Dyer M, Anderson TR, Richmond BM (2011) National assessment of shoreline change: historical shoreline change in the Hawaiian Islands. Director 51(3):ix–xvi(8)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Romine BM, Fletcher CH, Barbee MM, Anderson TR, Frazer LN (2013) Are beach erosion rates and sea-level rise related in Hawaii. Global Planet Change 108:149–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Finkl CW (1981) Beach nourishment, a practical method of erosion control. Geo-Mar Lett 1(2):155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shin EC, Oh YI (2007) Coastal erosion prevention by geotextile tube technology. Geotext Geomembr 25(4–5):264–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Van Rijn LC (2011) Coastal erosion and control. Ocean Coast Manag 54(12):867–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wheeler JL (1992) U.S. Patent No. 5,129,756. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gedan KB, Kirwan ML, Wolanski E, Barbier EB, Silliman BR (2011) The present and future role of coastal wetland vegetation in protecting shorelines: answering recent challenges to the paradigm. Clim Change 106(1):7–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Meyer DL, Townsend EC, Thayer GW (1997) Stabilization and erosion control value of oyster cultch for intertidal marsh. Restor Ecol 5(1):93–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mortensen BM, Haber MJ, DeJong JT, Caslake LF, Nelson DC (2011) Effects of environmental factors on microbial induced calcium carbonate precipitation. J Appl Microbiol 111(2):338–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jiang NJ, Yoshioka H, Yamamoto K, Soga K (2016) Ureolytic activities of a urease-producing bacterium and purified urease enzyme in the anoxic condition: implication for subseafloor sand production control by microbially induced carbonate precipitation (MICP). Ecol Eng 90:96–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jiang NJ, Soga K, Kuo M (2016) Microbially induced carbonate precipitation for seepage-induced internal erosion control in sand–clay mixtures. J Geotech Geoenvironmental Eng 143(3):04016100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Keykha HA, Asadi A, Huat BB, Kawasaki S (2018) Microbial induced calcite precipitation by Sporosarcina pasteurii and Sporosarcina aquimarina. Environ Geotech, 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  15. Whiffin VS (2004) Microbial CaCO3 precipitation for the production of biocement (Doctoral dissertation, Murdoch University)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Greenberg AE, Clesceri LS, Eaton AD (1992) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 18th edn. EPS Group. Inc., Hanover, Maryland

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ning-Jun Jiang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wang, YJ., Han, XL., Jiang, NJ. (2019). Enriching Indigenous Ureolytic Bacteria in Coastal Beach Sand. In: Zhan, L., Chen, Y., Bouazza, A. (eds) Proceedings of the 8th International Congress on Environmental Geotechnics Volume 3. ICEG 2018. Environmental Science and Engineering(). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2227-3_42

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics