Abstract
Hyperspectral remote sensing has been gaining attention from the past few decades. Due to the diverse and high dimensionality nature of the remote sensing data, it is called as remote sensing Big Data. Hyperspectral images have high dimensionality due to number of spectral bands and pixels having continuous spectrum. These images provide us with more details than other images but still, it suffers from ‘curse of dimensionality’. Band selection is the conventional method to reduce the dimensionality and remove the redundant bands. Many methods have been developed in the past years to find the optimal set of bands. Generalized covering-based rough set is an extended method of rough sets in which indiscernibility relations of rough sets are replaced by coverings. Recently, this method is used for attribute reduction in pattern recognition and data mining. In this paper, we will discuss the implementation of covering-based rough sets for optimal band selection of hyperspectral images and compare these results with the existing methods like PCA, SVD and rough sets.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
L’heureux, A., et al.: Machine learning with big data: challenges and approaches. IEEE Access 5, 7776–7797 (2017)
Patra, S., Bruzzone, L.: A rough set based band selection technique for the analysis of hyperspectral images. In: 2015 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS) (2015)
Maji, P., Paul, S.: Rough set based maximum relevance-maximum significance criterion and gene selection from microarray data. Int. J. Approx. Reason. (2010) (Elsevier)
Jensen, K., Shen, Q.: Semantics-preserving dimentionality reduction: rough and fuzzy rough based approches. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 16, 1457–1471 (2004)
Rodarmel, C., Shan, J.: Principal component analysis for hyperspectral image classification. Surveying Land Inf. Syst. 62(2), 115–000 (2002)
Guo, B., et al.: Band selection for hyperspectral image classification using mutual information. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 3(4), 522–526 (2006)
Lavanya, A., Sanjeevi, S.: An improved band selection technique for hyperspectral data using factor analysis. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens. 41(2), 199–211 (2013)
Nahr, S., Talebi, P., et al.: Different optimal band selection of hyperspectral images using a continuous genetic algorithm. In: ISPRS—International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XL-2/W3, pp. 249–253 (2014)
Shi, H., Shen, Y., Liu, Z.: Hyperspectral bands reduction based on rough sets and fuzzy C-means clustering. IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement and Technology Conference 2, 1053–1056 (2003)
Zakowski, W.: Approximations in the space (u, \(\pi \)). Demonstratio Math. 16, 761–769 (1983)
Kotsiantis, S., Kanellopoulos, D.: Discretization techniques: a recent survey. GESTS Int. Trans. Comput. Sci. Eng. 32(1), 47–58 (2006)
Wang, C., Shao, M., et al.: An improved attribute reduction scheme with covering based rough sets. Appl. Soft Comput. (2014) (Elsevier)
https://americaview.org/program-areas/research/accuracy-assessment-resources/indian-pine/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kelam, H., Venkatesan, M. (2019). Optimal Band Selection Using Generalized Covering-Based Rough Sets on Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Big Data. In: Peter, J., Alavi, A., Javadi, B. (eds) Advances in Big Data and Cloud Computing. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 750. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1882-5_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1882-5_24
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-1881-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-1882-5
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)