Skip to main content

Automatic Mass Detection from Mammograms with Region-Based Convolutional Neural Network

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 875))

Abstract

Automatic detection of breast mass from mammograms is a challenging task. Recently, Convolution Neural Networks (CNNs) have been proposed to address this task. However, the performance of these CNN-based detection methods is still limited due to high complexity of breast tissue and varying shape of masses. An Automatic Mass Detection framework with Region-based CNN (AMDR-CNN) is presented in this paper, aiming to efficiently exploit informative features from mammograms. Under a hierarchical candidate mass region generation method with a full-size mammogram, the mammogram is greatly simplified and high-quality region proposals are generated. Then, a deeper CNN is introduced, which simultaneously predicts object bounds and scores at each position. In contrast to previous works, the deeper CNN learns the effective features of mass as well as helps produce accurate detection results. The experiments are performed on two public datasets, which achieves a better performance than state-of-the-art algorithms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ferlay, J., Héry, C., Autier, P., Sankaranarayanan, R.: Global burden of breast cancer. In: Li, C. (ed.) Breast Cancer Epidemiology, pp. 1–19. Springer, New York (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0685-4_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Broeders, M., et al.: The impact of mammography screening on breast cancer mortality in Europe: a review of observational studies. J. Med. Screen. 19(suppl 1), 14–25 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tabar, L., et al.: Mammography service screening and mortality in breast cancer patients: 20-year follow-up before and after introduction of screening. Lancet 361(9367), 1405–1410 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Elmore, J.G., et al.: Variability in interpretive performance at screening mammography and radiologists’ characteristics associated with accuracy1. Breast Dis. Year Book Q. 21(4), 330–332 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Barlow, W.E., et al.: Accuracy of screening mammography interpretation by characteristics of radiologists. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 97(12), 1840–1850 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brewer, N., Salz, T., Lillie, S.E.: Systematic review: the long-term effects of false-positive mammograms. Ann. Intern. Med. 147(10), 739–740 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Myers, E.R., et al.: Benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: a systematic review. JAMA 314(15), 1615 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., Hinton, G.E.: ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In: International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. He, K., et al.: Delving deep into rectifiers: surpassing human-level performance on ImageNet classification, pp. 1026–1034 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kooi, T., et al.: Large scale deep learning for computer aided detection of mammographic lesions. Med. Image Anal. 35, 303–312 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Becker, A.S., et al.: Deep learning in mammography: diagnostic accuracy of a multipurpose image analysis software in the detection of breast cancer. Investig. Radiol. 52(7), 434 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dhungel, N., Carneiro, G., Bradley, A.P.: Fully automated classification of mammograms using deep residual neural networks. In: IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lotter, W., Sorensen, G., Cox, D.: A multi-scale CNN and curriculum learning strategy for mammogram classification. In: Cardoso, M.J. (ed.) DLMIA/ML-CDS -2017. LNCS, vol. 10553, pp. 169–177. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67558-9_20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Moreira, I.C., et al.: INbreast: toward a full-field digital mammographic database. Acad. Radiol. 19(2), 236–248 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ertosun, M.G., Rubin, D.L.: Probabilistic visual search for masses within mammography images using deep learning. In: IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine, pp. 1310–1315. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Arevalo, J., et al.: Representation learning for mammography mass lesion classification with convolutional neural networks. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 127(C), 248–257 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., Malik, J.: Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Szegedy, C., et al.: Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the impact of residual connections on learning (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ren, S., et al.: Faster R-CNN: towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks. In: International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Girshick, R.: Fast R-CNN. In: IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kozegar, E., et al.: Assessment of a novel mass detection algorithm in mammograms. J. Cancer Res. Ther. 9(4), 592 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Eltonsy, N.H., Tourassi, G.D., Elmaghraby, A.S.: A concentric morphology model for the detection of masses in mammography. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 26(6), 880 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sampat, M.P., et al.: A model-based framework for the detection of spiculated masses on mammography. Med. Phys. 35(5), 2110–2123 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dhungel, N., Carneiro, G., Bradley, A.P.: Automated mass detection in mammograms using cascaded deep learning and random forests. In: International Conference on Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Campanini, R., Dongiovanni, D., Iampieri, E., et al.: A novel featureless approach to mass detection in digital mammograms based on support vector machines. Phys. Med. Biol. 49(6), 961–975 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Lei Cui or Qirong Bu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wu, Y., Shi, W., Cui, L., Wang, H., Bu, Q., Feng, J. (2018). Automatic Mass Detection from Mammograms with Region-Based Convolutional Neural Network. In: Wang, Y., Jiang, Z., Peng, Y. (eds) Image and Graphics Technologies and Applications. IGTA 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 875. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1702-6_44

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1702-6_44

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-1701-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-1702-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics