Skip to main content

Introduction: Authoritarian Governance in Singapore’s Developmental State

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Limits of Authoritarian Governance in Singapore’s Developmental State

Abstract

This introductory chapter frames Singapore’s socio-economic and political challenges within the context of governance in an authoritarian developmental state at a critical crossroads. A key challenge confronting Singapore’s developmental state has arguably been the unravelling ‘growth with equity’ social compact in part due to the selective embrace of neo-liberal policies since about the mid-1980s. Singapore’s political and policy trajectory is analysed in relation to the pioneering Northeast Asian developmental states of Japan, South Korea and Taiwan—states that have transitioned to robust democracies and mature economies whilst deepening protectionist social policies. Key issues and questions raised in this chapter and this edited volume include: Why has Singapore’s developmental state remained one-party dominant and authoritarian despite possessing a sizeable educated middle-class and an economy that is touted as one of the wealthiest in GDP per capita terms? Is Singapore’s development model, which is driven by government-linked companies and foreign multinational corporations, sustainable? Is Singapore’s political economy close to reaching its limits, in terms of promoting innovative knowledge industries and creative entrepreneurship without heavy reliance on ‘foreign talent’? Do the technocratic politicians governing Singapore possess the political entrepreneurship required to facilitate effective state-society linkages based on ‘deliberative development’ and ‘co-production’, which is a foundation of sophisticated knowledge economies and polities? How will deepening intra-elite divisions amongst ‘disaffected insiders’ impact on Singapore’s political and economic development?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Barr, M. D. (2014). The Ruling Elite of Singapore: Networks of Power and Influence. London: I.B.Tauris.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barr, M. D. (2017, June 22). “Dynastic Demolition in Singapore?”, East Asia Forum. http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2017/06/22/dynastic-demolition-in-singapore/

  • Barr, M. D. (2008). “Singapore: The Limits of a Technocratic Approach to Health Care”, Journal of Contemporary Asia, 38(3): 395−416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capoccia, G. (2015). “Critical Junctures and Institutional Change’, In J. Mahoney and K. Thelen (eds.), Advances in Comparative-Historical Analysis (pp. 147−179). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Carney, R. (2016). “Varieties of Hierarchical capitalism: family and State Market Economies in East Asia”, The Pacific Review, 29(2): 137−163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carney, R. and Loh, Y. Z. (2009). “Institutional (Dis)Incentives to Innovate: An Explanation for Singapore’s Innovation Gap”, Journal of East Asian Studies, 9(2): 291−319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, P. (2010). “Constructing the 21st Century Developmental State”, In O. Edigheji (ed.), Constructing a Democratic Developmental State in South Africa, Capetown: HSRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, P. and Heller, P. (2015). “Human Development, State Transformation and the Politics of the Developmental State”, In S. Leibfried, E. Huber, M. Lange, J. Levy & J. Stephens (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Transformations of the State, Oxford: Oxford University Press, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199691586.013.37.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goh C. B. (2016). From Traders to Innovators: Science and Technology in Singapore since 1965, Singapore: ISEAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, J., Pierson, P. & Thelen, K. (2015). “Drift and Conversion: Hidden Faces of Institutional Change”, In J. Mahoney and K. Thelen (eds.), Advances in Comparative-Historical Analyses (pp. 180−208), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Haggard, Stephen and Krugman (2008). Development, Democracy and the Welfare State, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam, Lydia. (2018, February 19). Singapore Budget 2018, The Straits Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitsky, S. and Way, L. (2009). Competitive Authoritarianism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, L. (2014). “Singapore’s Success: After the Miracle”, In Robert Looney (ed.), Handbook of Emerging Economies (pp. 203−226), London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, L. (2016). “Fifty Years of Development in the Singapore Economy”, In L. Lim (ed.), Singapore Economic Development: Retrospection and Reflections (pp. 1−16), Singapore: World Scientific.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Low, D. and Vadaketh, S. (2014). Hard Choices, Singapore: NUS Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, Kevin (2017). ‘China’s Disaffected Insiders’, Journal of Democracy, 28(3).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortmann, S. and Thompson, M. R. (2014). China’s obsession with Singapore: Learning authoritarian modernity, The Pacific Review, 27(3): 433−455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, I. and Wong, J. (2008). Institutions and Institutional Purpose, Politics & Society, 36(1): 61−88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahim, L. Z. (2015). Reclaiming Singapore’s Growth with Equity Social Compact, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 16(2): 160−176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahim, L. Z. (2001 [1998]). The Singapore Dilemma, KL: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahim, L. Z. (2009). Singapore in the Malay World, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodan, G. (2016). Capitalism, Inequality and Ideology in Singapore: New Challenges for the Ruling Party, Asian Studies Review, 40(2): 211−230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schedler, A. (2013). The Politics of Uncertainly, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiao Yin Kuik. (2017, 3 March). The Ones One Walk Towards, Available at http://m.facebook.com/notes/shiao-yin-kuik/the-ones-who-walk-towards-2017/10155

  • Slater, D. (2012). Strong State Democratization in Malaysia and Singapore, Journal of Democracy, 23(2): 19−33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Online Citizen. (2017, January 24). Ong Ye Kung: Singapore’s One-Party System a Result of Free and Fair Elections.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist. (2012, 24 May). Shopping Spree: Military Spending in Southeast Asia.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist. (2014, 15 March). Planet Plutocrats.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, J. (2011). Betting on Biotech: Innovation and the Limits of Asia’s Developmental State, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • World Economic Forum. (2017). Inclusive Growth and Development Report 2017, Geneva: World Economic Forum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lily Zubaidah Rahim .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rahim, L.Z., Barr, M.D. (2019). Introduction: Authoritarian Governance in Singapore’s Developmental State. In: Rahim, L.Z., Barr, M.D. (eds) The Limits of Authoritarian Governance in Singapore’s Developmental State. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1556-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics