Skip to main content

Deep Learning-Based Automatic Segmentation of the Proximal Femur from MR Images

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Intelligent Orthopaedics

Part of the book series: Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology ((AEMB,volume 1093))

Abstract

This chapter addresses the problem of segmentation of proximal femur in 3D MR images. We propose a deeply supervised 3D U-net-like fully convolutional network for segmentation of proximal femur in 3D MR images. After training, our network can directly map a whole volumetric data to its volume-wise labels. Inspired by previous work, multi-level deep supervision is designed to alleviate the potential gradient vanishing problem during training. It is also used together with partial transfer learning to boost the training efficiency when only small set of labeled training data are available. The present method was validated on 20 3D MR images of femoroacetabular impingement patients. The experimental results demonstrate the efficacy of the present method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.amira.com/

References

  1. Laborie L, Lehmann T, Engester I et al (2011) Prevalence of radiographic findings thought to be associated with femoroacetabular impingement in a population-based cohort of 2081 healthy young adults. Radiology 260:494–502

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Leunig M, Beaulé P, Ganz R (2009) The concept of femoroacetabular impingement: current status and future perspectives. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467: 616–622

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Clohisy J, Knaus E, Hunt DM et al (2009) Clinical presentation of patients with symptomatic anterior hip impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467: 638–644

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Perdikakis E, Karachalios T, Katonis P, Karantanas A (2011) Comparison of MR-arthrography and MDCT-arthrography for detection of labral and articular cartilage hip pathology. Skeletal Radiol 40:1441–1447

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Xia Y, Fripp J, Chandra S, Schwarz R, Engstrom C, Crozier S (2013) Automated bone segmentation from large field of view 3D MR images of the hip joint. Phys Med Biol 21:7375–7390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Xia Y, Chandra S, Engstrom C, Strudwick M, Crozier S, Fripp J (2014) Automatic hip cartilage segmentation from 3D MR images using arc-weighted graph searching. Phys Med Biol 59:7245–66

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Gilles B, Magnenat-Thalmann N (2010) Musculoskeletal MRI segmentation using multi-resolution simplex meshes with medial representations. Med Image Anal 14:291–302

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Arezoomand S, Lee WS, Rakhra K, Beaule P (2015) A 3D active model framework for segmentation of proximal femur in MR images. Int J CARS 10:55–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chandra S, Xia Y, Engstrom C et al (2014) Focused shape models for hip joint segmentation in 3D magnetic resonance images. Med Image Anal 18: 567–578

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Krizhevsky A, ISutskever, Hinton G (2012) Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In: Pereira F, Burges CJC, Bottou L, Weinberger KQ (eds) Advances in neural information processing systems, vol 25. Curran Associates, Inc., Red Hook, pp 1097–1105

    Google Scholar 

  11. Long J, Shelhamer E, Darrell T (2015) Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR 2015), pp 3431–3440, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  12. Prasson A, Igel C, Petersen K et al (2013) Deep feature learning for knee cartilage segmentation using a triplanar convolutional neural network. In: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on medical image computing and computer assisted intervention (MICCAI 2013), vol 16(Pt 2), pp 246–53, Nagoya

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cicek O, Abdulkadir A, Lienkamp S, Brox T, Ronneberger O (2016) 3D u-net: learning dense volumetric segmentation from sparse annotation. In: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on medical image computing and computer assisted intervention (MICCAI 2016). LNCS, vol 9901, pp 424–432, Athens

    Google Scholar 

  14. Milletari F, Navab N, Ahmadi SA (2016) V-net: fully convolutional neural networks for volumetric medical image segmentation. In: Proceedings of the 2016 international conference on 3D vision (3DV). IEEE, pp 565–571, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dou Q, Yu L, Chen H, Jin Y, Yang X, Qin J, Heng PA (2017) 3D deeply supervised network for automated segmentation of volumetric medical images. Med Image Anal 41:40–54

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Ioffe S, Szegedy C (2015) Batch normalization: accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift. In: Proceedings of international conference on machine learning (ICML 2015), Lille

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yosinski J, Clune J, Bengio Y, Lipson H (2014) How transferable are features in deep neural networks? In: Advances in neural information processing systems, pp 3320–3328, Curran Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Deng J, Dong W, Socher R, Li LJ, Li K, Fei-Fei L (2009) ImageNet: a large-scale hierarchical image database. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR 2009), Miami Beach

    Google Scholar 

  19. Simonyan K, Zisserman A (2014) Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv:1409.1556

    Google Scholar 

  20. Szegedy C, Liu W, Jia Y et al (2015) Going deeper with convolutions. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR 2015), Boston. IEEE, pp 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tran D, Bourdev L, Fergus R, Torresani L, Paluri M (2015) Learning spatiotemporal features with 3D convolutional networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision (CVPR 2015), pp 4489–4497, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  22. Karasawa K, Oda M, Kitasakab T et al (2017) Multi-atlas pancreas segmentation: atlas selection based on vessel structure. Med Image Anal 39:18–28

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This chapter was modified from the paper published by our group in the MICCAI 2017 Workshop on Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (Zeng and Zheng, MLMI@MICCAI 2017: 274-282). The related contents were reused with the permission. This study was partially supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation via project 205321_163224/1.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guoyan Zheng .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zeng, G., Zheng, G. (2018). Deep Learning-Based Automatic Segmentation of the Proximal Femur from MR Images. In: Zheng, G., Tian, W., Zhuang, X. (eds) Intelligent Orthopaedics. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 1093. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1396-7_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics