Abstract
A closer look at current activities in and methods used for knowledge production, problem-solving, business operating, and policy-making reveals that traditional approaches are increasingly becoming subject to severe modifications and revisions as well to theory as to practice. Knowledge seems to transform into a kind of commodity with knowledge production itself widely viewed as the driving force of both the economy and the sciences in developed nations. However, generation of knowledge seems to have become as complex, uncoordinated, and unsustainable as the current dynamic interactions between society and nature. This state of affairs is reflected, among other things, by the dereliction and shortcomings of policy instruments and programs to produce outcomes as planned and by the prevalence of various hurdles, which still impede the diffusion of newly emerging knowledge and insight aimed at supporting sustainable development. Hence, there appears to be a huge gap between what we know and what is currently done. In this chapter, selected aspects are discussed pertaining to knowledge translation with a focus on balancing learning/unlearning, knowledge organization and representation, and knowledge flows related to reverse innovation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Knorr-Cetina K. Epistemic cultures: how the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1999.
Hacking I. The self-vindication of the laboratory sciences. In: Pickering A, editor. Science as practice and culture. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1992. p. 29–64.
Ryle G. The concept of mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1949.
Ferguson ES. Engineering and the mind’s eye. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1992.
Vincenti WG. What engineers know and how they know it. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1990.
Pitt J. What engineers know. Techné. 2001;5(3):17–30.
Frodeman R. Interdisciplinary research and academic sustainability: managing knowledge in an age of accountability. Environ Conserv. 2011;38(2):105–12.
Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, Schwartzman S, Scott P, Trow M. The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. 10th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2010.
Nowotny H, Scott P, Gibbons M. Rethinking science: knowledge in an age of uncertainty. 9th ed. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2010.
Fuller S. The governance of science. Buckingham: Open University Press; 2000.
Etzkowitz H, Leydesdorff L. The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and “mode 2” to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Res Policy. 2000;29(2):109–23.
Gupta AK, Tesluk PE, Taylor MS. Innovation at and across multiple levels of analysis. Organ Sci. 2007;18:885–97.
Greve HR, Taylor A. Innovations as catalysts for organizational change: shifts in organizational cognition and search. Adm Sci Q. 2000;45:54–80.
Salge TO, Vera A. Benefiting from public sector innovation: the moderating role of customer and learning orientation. Public Adm Rev. 2012;72(4):550–60.
Quintane E, Casselman RM, Reiche BS, Nylund P. Innovation as a knowledge-based outcome. J Knowl Manag. 2011;15(6):928–47.
Woolf SH. The meaning of translational research and why it matters. JAMA. 2010;299(2):211–3.
Strauss SE, Tetroe J, Graham I. Defining knowledge translation. Can Med Assoc J. 2009;181(3–4):165–8.
Curran JA, Grimshaw JM, Hayden JA, Campbell B. Knowledge translation research: the science of moving research into policy and practice. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2011;31(3):174–80.
Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP, Lavis JN, Hill SJ, Squires JE. Knowledge translation of research findings. Implement Sci. 2012;7:50.
Lavis JN, Robertson D, Woodside JM, McLeod CB, Abelson J. How can research organizations more effectively transfer knowledge to decision makers? Milbank Q. 2003;81(2):221–2.
Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB. Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006;26(1):13–24.
Lomas J. The in-between world of knowledge brokering. Br Med J. 2007;334:129–32.
Ward V, House A, Hamer S. Knowledge brokering: the missing link in the evidence to action chain. Evid Policy. 2009;5(3):267–79.
Bornbaum CC, Kornas K, Peirson L, Rosella LC. Exploring the function and effectiveness of knowledge brokers as facilitators of knowledge translation in health-related settings: a systematic review and thematic analysis. Implement Sci. 2015;10:162.
Meyer M. The rise of the knowledge broker. Sci Commun. 2010;32(1):118–27.
CHSRF. The Theory and Practice of Knowledge Brokering in Canada’s Health System. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Health Services Research Foundation; 2003.
Pennell KG, Thompson M, Rice JW, Senier L, Brown P, Suuberg E. Bridging research and environmental regulatory processes: the role of knowledge brokers. Environ Sci Technol. 2013;47(21):11985–92.
DePasse JW, Lee PT. A model for reverse innovation in health care. Glob Health. 2013;9:40.
Kulasabanathan K, Issa H, Bhatti Y, Prime M, del Castillo J, Darzi A, Harris M. Do international health partnerships contribute to reverse innovation? A mixed methods study of THET-supported partnerships in the UK. Glob Health. 2017;13:25.
Harris M, Weisberger E, Silver D, Dadwal V, Macinko J. That’s not how the learning works—the paradox of reverse innovation: a qualitative study. Glob Health. 2016;12:36.
Syed SB, Dadwal V, Rutter P, Storr J, Hightower JD, Gooden R, Carlet J, Nejad SB, Kelly ET, Donaldson L, Pittet D. Developed—developing country partnerships: benefits to developed countries? Glob Health. 2012;8:17.
Tyfield D, Wilsdon J. Low carbon China: disruptive innovation and the role of international collaboration. Nottingham, UK: The University of Nottingham, China Policy Institute; 2009. Paper no. 41.
Snowdon AW, Bassi H, Scarffe AD, Smith AD. Reverse innovation: an opportunity for strengthening health systems. Glob Health. 2015;11:2.
Mytelka LK. Locational tournaments, strategic partnerships and the state. In: Gertler MS, Wolfe DA, editors. Innovation and social learning. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan; 2002. p. 89–110.
Casillas JC, Acedo FJ, Barbero JL. Learning, unlearning and internationalisation: evidence from the pre-export phase. Int J Inf Manag. 2010;30(2):162–73.
Nonaka I, Takeuchi H. A theory of organizational knowledge creation. Int J Technol Manag. Special issue on unlearning and learning for technological innovation. 1996;11(7/8):833–45.
Rabbiosi L, Santangelo GD. Parent company benefits from reverse knowledge transfer: the role of the liability of newness in MNEs. J World Bus. 2013;48(1):160–70.
Rushmer R, Davies HTO. Unlearning in health care. Quality and Safety. 2004;13(Suppl. II):ii10–5.
Antonacopoulou EP. Impact and scholarship: unlearning and practicing to co-create actionable knowledge. Manag Learn. 2009;40(4):421–30.
Otto HE. Reverse flow of knowledge and the development of sustainable energy systems. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on EcoBalance; Oct 27–30; Tsukuba, Japan. 2014. Paper no.: 28D5-3.
Govindarajan V, Trimble C. Reverse innovation: create far from home, win everywhere. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press; 2012.
Prahalad CK. Bottom of the pyramid as a source of breakthrough innovations. Product Innovat Manag. 2012;29(1):6–12.
Simon HA. Studying human intelligence by creating artificial intelligence. Am Sci. 1981;69(3):300–9.
Savelsbergh ER, de Jong T, Ferguson-Hessler MGM. Competence-related differences in problem representations. In: van Sommeren M, Reimann P, de Jong T, Boshuizen H, editors. The role of multiple representations in learning and problem solving. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1998. p. 262–82.
Briggs G, Shamma DA, Cañas AJ, Carff R, Scargle J, Novak JD. Concept maps applied to mars exploration public outreach. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Concept Mapping, Sept 14–17; Pamplona; 2004. p. 109–116.
Eppler MJ. Making knowledge visible through intranet knowledge maps: concepts, elements, cases. In: Holsapple CW, editor. Handbook on knowledge management. Berlin: Springer; 2003. p. 189–206.
Novak JD, Cañas AJ. The origins of the concept mapping tool and the continuing evolution of the tool. Inf Vis. 2006;5(3):175–84.
Novak JD. Learning, creating, and using knowledge: concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations. New York: Routledge; 2010.
Clariana RB, Engelmann T, Kozlov M. The influence of graphical or textual representations on team concept map form: further validation of a measure of knowledge structure. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Concept Mapping, vol. 1; September 5–9, Tallinn, Estonia. 2016. p. 351–54.
Probst GJ, Raub S, Romhardt K. Managing knowledge: building blocks for success. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons; 2000.
Authier M, Lévy P. Les Arbres de Connaissance. Paris: La Découverte; 1999.
Kaplan J. Handbook on trees of knowledge. SCATE project, study circles: a tool for empowerment, Socrates Programme, Grundtvig Action. Brussels: European Commission; 2006.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Otto, H.E. (2019). Perspectives of Knowledge Translation Within Sustainable Product Development. In: Hu, A., Matsumoto, M., Kuo, T., Smith, S. (eds) Technologies and Eco-innovation towards Sustainability II. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1196-3_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1196-3_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-1195-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-1196-3
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)