Skip to main content

Industrialization as Capacity Building: Skills, Technical Progress, and Technical Capabilities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
How Nations Succeed: Manufacturing, Trade, Industrial Policy, and Economic Development
  • 1071 Accesses

Abstract

Many confuse industrialization with the construction of factory buildings. In fact, it is primarily a skill accumulation and a capacity-building process with a significant intangible aspect; more than hardware, industrialization resembles software. Successful industrialization is possible if skill accumulation and the capacity-building processes are successful. A key implication is that industrial policy should take this into consideration in order to achieve its targets. Instead of targeting mere construction of factory buildings, industrial policy should focus on the long-term capacity-building process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This chapter draws on YĆ¼lek (2017).

  2. 2.

    Lall (1992).

  3. 3.

    Yun (2007).

  4. 4.

    Kim (2001: 267).

  5. 5.

    Cohen and Levinthal (1990).

  6. 6.

    Yun (2007: 34).

  7. 7.

    Lall (2000).

  8. 8.

    Reinstaller and Unterlass (2012).

  9. 9.

    Reinstaller and Unterlass (2012), RadoÅ”ević and YƶrĆ¼k (2015).

  10. 10.

    Cohen and Levinthal (1990).

  11. 11.

    Chandler (1990).

  12. 12.

    Barney (1991), Makadok (2001), Hamel and Prahalad (1992).

  13. 13.

    Mathews (2002).

  14. 14.

    Mathews and Cho (1999).

  15. 15.

    Kim (1997), Mathews (2006).

  16. 16.

    Mathews (2006: 468).

  17. 17.

    Wright (1936), Arrow (1962).

  18. 18.

    Kim (1998, 2001), Hobday (1995), Kim and Nelson (2000), Bell (1984), Hitt et al. (2000).

  19. 19.

    Hobday (1995).

  20. 20.

    Hobday (1995).

  21. 21.

    Lall (1992).

  22. 22.

    Bell and Pavitt (1992).

References

  • Arrow, K. J. (1962). The economic implications of learning by doing. The Review of Economic Studies, 29(3), 155ā€“173.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99ā€“120.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Bell, M. (1984). ā€œā€˜Learningā€™and the accumulation of industrial technological capacity in developing countriesā€, in Technological capability in the Third World, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 187ā€“209.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Bell, M., & Pavitt, K. (1992). Accumulating technological capability in developing countries. The World Bank Economic Review, 6(suppl 1), 257ā€“281.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Chandler, A. D. (1990). Scale and scope: The dynamics of industrial competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, Special Issue: Technology, Organizations, and Innovation, 35(1), 128ā€“152.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1992). Strategy as stretch and leverage. Harvard Business Review, 71(2), 75ā€“84.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Lee, H. U. (2000). Technological learning, knowledge management, firm growth and performance: An introductory essay. Journal of Engineering and Technology management, 17(3ā€“4), 231ā€“246.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Hobday, M. (1995). East Asian latecomer firms: learning the technology of electronics. World Development, 23(7), 1171ā€“1193.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Kim, L. (1997). The dynamics of Samsungā€™s technological learning in semiconductors. California Management Review, 39(3), 86ā€“100.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Kim, L. (1998). Crisis construction and organizational learning: Capability building in catching-up at Hyundai Motor. Organization Science, 9(4), 506ā€“521.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Kim, L. (2001). The dynamics of technological learning in industrialisation. International Social Science Journal, 53(168), 297-308.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Kim, L., & Nelson, R. R. (2000). Technology, learning, and innovation: Experiences of newly industrializing economies. Cambridge University Press.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Lall, S. (1992). Technological capabilities and industrialization. World Development, 20(2), 165ā€“186.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Lall, S. (2000). Technological change and industrialization in the Asian newly industrializing economies: Achievements and challenges. Technology, Learning, & Innovation: Experiences of Newly Industrializing Economies, 13ā€“68.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Makadok, R. (2001). Toward a synthesis of the resource-based and dynamic-capability views of rent creation. Strategic Management Journal, 22(5), 387ā€“401.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Mathews, J. A. (2002). Competitive advantages of the latecomer firm: A resource-based account of industrial catch-up strategies. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(4), 467ā€“488.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Mathews, J. A. (2006). Strategizing, disequilibrium, and profit. Stanford University Press.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Mathews, J. A., & Cho, D. S. (1999). Combinative capabilities and organizational learning in latecomer firms: The case of the Korean semiconductor industry. Journal of World Business, 34(2), 139ā€“156.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • RadoÅ”ević, S., & YƶrĆ¼k, E. A. (2015). New metrics of technology upgrading: The Central and East European Countries in a comparative perspective, Grincoh Working Paper No 3.04.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Reinstaller, A., & Unterlass, F. (2012). Comparing business R&D across countries over time: A decomposition exercise using data for the EU 27. Applied Economics Letters, 19(12), 1143ā€“1148.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Wright, T. P. (1936). Factors affecting the cost of airplanes. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, 3(4), 122ā€“128.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • YĆ¼lek, M. A. (2017). On the middle income trap, the industrialization process and appropriate industrial policy. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 17(3), 325ā€“348.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Yun, J. J. (2007). ā€œThe development of technological capability and the transformation of inward FDI in Korea from 1962 to 2000ā€, in Mahlich, J. & Pascha, W. (eds.) Innovation and technology in Korea: Challenges of a newly advanced economy. Physica-Verlag.

    Google ScholarĀ 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

Ā© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

YĆ¼lek, M.A. (2018). Industrialization as Capacity Building: Skills, Technical Progress, and Technical Capabilities. In: How Nations Succeed: Manufacturing, Trade, Industrial Policy, and Economic Development. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0568-9_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0568-9_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-0567-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-0568-9

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics