Skip to main content

Disaster, Development, and Water: The Reconstruction and (Re)Fabrication of Hazardous Waterscapes in Post-tsunami India

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Asian Tsunami and Post-Disaster Aid

Abstract

The 2004 Asian tsunami devastated the East coast of India, setting in motion the country’s largest reconstruction project. Entire villages had to be rebuilt, including water infrastructure. This paper examines the outcomes of water sector reconstruction across 14 villages that were rebuilt in Nagapattinam District, Tamil Nadu, and Karaikal District, Puducherry. The objective is to critique post-tsunami reconstruction through the lens of ‘water’. The focus is on water quality and methods to cope with poor water quality, but ancillary issues of access, quantity, and pressure are also explored. Household (n = 74) and key informant interviews (n = 66), focus group discussions (n = 14), water quality tests (n = 378), and photographs are used to construct a socio-geographical narrative and a visual ethnography of the post-disaster built environments. A unifying theme is that the hazardous pre-disaster context was essentially refabricated through reconstruction processes to fashion hazardous waterscapes of manmade, engineered proportions—an outcome mirroring a ‘disaster after the disaster.’ Moreover, the ability of residents to manage water-related hazards is limited, because residents have been dealt waterscapes over which they command little power. Many factors exist outside residents’ bounds of influence, permitting few opportunities to surmount, let alone subvert, the hazardous waterscapes. Thus, residents are forced to operate within a narrow band of functional possibilities. The result is not only constrained agency, but that subjects are driven to acclimate, acculturate, and ultimately submit to the waterscapes they inhabit.

This research was supported by a Fulbright-Nehru Fellowship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    All names of interlocutors are anonymous except for those with official titles.

  2. 2.

    There should be a 30.5 m (100 ft) buffer between groundwater sources and sewerage infrastructure, and groundwater sources should also be placed uphill of sewerage infrastructure (Woodson 2010). At the villages, this buffer is impossible due to high housing (and therefore sewerage infrastructure) densities—which is further complicated by open air defecation. Field measurements indicate that the furthest a hand-pump or borewell is from sewerage infrastructure is 9.1 m, and the flatness of sites precludes the uphill placement of groundwater sources.

  3. 3.

    The ‘poof-poof’ sound, due to dry pipes during non-supply windows, is common across all villages and acts as a sensory reminder of piped water being tainted as a result of no supply or pressure for a majority of the day.

  4. 4.

    A Ministry of Urban Development (2011, 48) report crystallizes this contention: “In a continuously pressurized distribution system, contaminants surrounding the pipelines cannot penetrate even if there are breaks in the pipes and joints. Without continuous pressure, street run-off, drainage water, raw sewage from adjacent sewerage lines and leaky septic tanks get sucked into the water mains.”.

  5. 5.

    Kodams are water collection and storage vessels. They typically hold a volume of 12–18 L.

  6. 6.

    Nath (2000) found that 68% of households in rural India take water from storage vessels in the manner described here. Furthermore, Nath confirms that repeated contact with drinking water during collection, storage, and serving increases risks for post-point contamination, and this was also confirmed in the study villages (see Juran and MacDonald 2014 and Juran et al. 2017).

References

  • Adams, V., T. van Hattum, and D. English. 2009. Chronic Disaster Syndrome: Displacement, Disaster Capitalism, and the Eviction of the Poor from New Orleans. American Ethnologist 36 (4): 615–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, J., and J. Eyles. 1997. Evaluating Qualitative Research in Social Geography: Establishing ‘Rigour’ In Interview Analysis. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 22 (4): 505–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhave, P.R. 2003. Optimal Design of Water Distribution Networks. UK: Alpha Science International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, M., and R. Talbot. 2005. Water: A Matter of Life and Health-Water Supply and Sanitation in Village India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Button, G., and A. Oliver-Smith. 2008. Disaster, Displacement, and Employment: Distortion of Labor Markets During Post-Katrina Reconstruction. In Capitalizing on Catastrophe: Neoliberal Strategies in Disaster Reconstruction, ed. N. Gunewardena and M. Schuller, 123–145. New York: AltaMira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chacko, E. 2004. Positionality and Praxis: Fieldwork Experiences in Rural India. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 25 (1): 51–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chinn, T.D. 2009. Water Supply. In Environmental Engineering: Prevention and Response to Water-, Food-, Soil-, and Airborne Diseases and Illnesses, ed. N. Nemerow, F. Agardy, P. Sullivan, and J. Salvato, 1–131. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elangovan, R., L. Philip, and B.S. Murty. 2006. Users Manual on Water Quality Analysis: Water Quality Test Kit-15. Chennai: Indian Institute of Technology-Madras.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, A., B. Mailloux, K. Ahmed, A. van Green, L. McKay, and P. Culligan. 2011. Hand-Pumps as Reservoirs for Microbial Contamination of Well Water. Journal of Water and Health 9 (4): 708–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. 1973. Thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture. In The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays, ed. C. Geertz, 3–32. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juran, L. 2015. A Framework for Integrating Water Projects in Disaster Reconstruction Processes in the International Context. Public Works Management and Policy 20 (4): 305–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juran, L., and M.C. MacDonald. 2014. An Assessment of Boiling as a Method of Household Water Treatment in South India. Journal of Water and Health 12 (4): 791–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juran, L., M.C. MacDonald, N.B. Basu, S. Hubbard, R. Rajagopal, P. Rajagopalan, and L. Philip. 2017. Development and Application of a Multi-Scalar, Participant-Driven Water Poverty Index in Post-Tsunami India. International Journal of Water Resources Development 33 (6): 955–975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, J., J. Ashmore, E. Babister, and I. Kelman. 2008. The Meaning of “Build Back Better”: Evidence from Post-Tsunami Aceh and Sri Lanka. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 16 (1): 24–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longhurst, R. 2010. Semi-Structured Interviews and Focus Groups. In Key Methods In Geography, 2nd ed, ed. N. Clifford, S. French, and G. Valentine, 103–115. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, M. 2009. Building Back Better: The Large-Scale Impact of Small-Scale Approaches to Reconstruction. World Development 37 (2): 385–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Urban Development. 2011. Report on Indian Urban Infrastructure and Services. New Delhi: Ministry of Urban Development, Government of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nath, K.J. 2000. Environmental Sanitation and Community Water Supply: Country Situation Analysis. New Delhi: Independent Commission on Health in India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pile, S. 1991. Practising Interpretive Geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 16 (4): 458–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pink, S. 2001. Doing Visual Ethnography: Images, Media, and Representation in Research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, E.W., R.B. Baird, A.D. Eaton, and L.S. Clesceri (eds.). 2012. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 22nd ed. Washington D.C.: American Public Health Association/American Water Works Association/Water Environment Federation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuller, M. 2008. Deconstructing the Disaster after the Disaster: Conceptualizing Disaster Capitalism. In Capitalizing on Catastrophe: Neoliberal Strategies in Disaster Reconstruction, ed. N. Gunewardena and M. Schuller, 123–145. New York: AltaMira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. 1981. Humanistic Method in Contemporary Social Geography. Area 13 (4): 293–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobsey, M.D., and F.K. Pfaender. 2002. Evaluation of the H2S Method for Detection of Fecal Contamination of Drinking Water. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virmani, S. 2008. Disasters Within Disaster: Failed Interventions We Can Learn From. Bhuj: Hunnarshala Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodson, R. 2010. A Builder’s Guide to Wells and Septic Systems. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J., S. Gundry, and R. Conroy. 2004. Household Drinking Water in Developing Countries: A Systematic Review of Microbiological Contamination between Source and Point-Of-Use. Tropical Medicine and International Health 9 (1): 106–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author greatly thanks the research participants in Nagapattinam and Karaikal, without whom this research would not be possible. The author also thanks Annie George, BEDROC, Rajagopal Chidambaram, E. Nagarajan, N. Kalyani, and Breeanna Prince for logistical support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luke Juran .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Juran, L. (2018). Disaster, Development, and Water: The Reconstruction and (Re)Fabrication of Hazardous Waterscapes in Post-tsunami India. In: Reddy, S. (eds) The Asian Tsunami and Post-Disaster Aid. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0182-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0182-7_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-0181-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-0182-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics