Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Bioherbicidal Concept: A Novel Strategy to Control Weeds

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Microbial Bioprospecting for Sustainable Development

  • 1001 Accesses

Abstract

Weeds have the potential to reduce the yield or quality of crops and produce a damaging effect on economic, social or conservation values. As peoples are more aware about environmental conservation, pressure is mounting for the development of effective and environment-friendly approaches to control weeds, on the scientists and active researchers in biological control field. Phytopathogenic microorganisms or microbial compounds, known as bioherbicides, for the biocontrol of weeds are most prominent alternative to minimize the hazardous chemicals/herbicides. Besides consistent research efforts and attempts in the area of bioherbicides throughout the globe, only 17 mycoherbicides have been registered worldwide. Advancement to develop mycoherbicides is relatively in suspended phase due to various restrictions like biological, economic and regulatory factors. Although only few bioherbicides are available in the market, biological control technology will be the leading approach to control unwanted plants. As the use of toxic herbicides is less desired because of their negative impact on crops, environment, ecosystem and human being, more funding needs to be applied to encourage researches for bioherbicides. In this review, we are concerned with various types of strategies, formulation of bioherbicides, steps in the development of mycoherbicide and constraints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agrios GN (2005) Plant pathology, 5th edn. Elsevier Academic Press, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Aneja KR (1999) Biotechnology for the production and enhancement of mycoherbicide potential. In: Singh J, Aneja KR (eds) From Ethnomycology to fungal biotechnology. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 91–114

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Aneja KR (2009) Biotechnology: an alternative novel strategy in agriculture to control weeds resistant to conventional herbicides. In: Lawrence R, Gulati AK, Abraham G (eds) Antimicrobial resistance from emerging threats to reality. Narosa Publishing House, New Delhi, pp 160–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Aneja KR, Kumar V, Jiloha P, Kaur M, Sharma C, Surain P, Dhiman R, Aneja A (2013) Potential bioherbicides: Indian perspectives. In: Salar RK, Gahlawat SK, Siwach P, Duhan JS (eds) Biotechnology: prospects and applications. Springer, New Delhi, pp 197–215

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (2003). A study of socio-economic impact of combine harvesters. Final report submitted to NATP, New Delhi, pp 1–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Ash GJ (2010) The science, art and business of successful bioherbicides. Biol Control 52:230–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auld BA (1992) Development and commercialization of biocontrol agents. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Weed Congress, AgMedia, Malbourne, Australia, pp 269–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Auld BA, Morin L (1995) Constraints in the development of bioherbicides. Weed Tech 9:638–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auld BA, Hertherington SD, Smith HE (2003) Advances in bioherbicide formulation. Weed Bio Manag 3:61–67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey JA, O’Connell RJ, Pring RJ, Nash C (1992) Infection strategies of colletotrichum species. In: Bailey JA, Jeger MJ (eds) Colletotrichum: biology, pathology and control. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 88–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey KL, Boyetchko SM, Langle T (2010) Social and economic drivers shaping the future of biological control: a Canadian perspective on the factors affecting the development and use of microbial biopesticides. Biol Control 52:222–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman R (2001) IMPECCA: an international, collaborative program to investigate the development of a mycoherbicide for use against water hyacinth in Africa. In: Julien MH, Hill MP, Center TD, Jianqing D (eds) Biological and integrated control of water hyacinth, Eichhornia crassipes. Proceedings of the 2nd Meeting of the Global Working Group for the Biological and Integrated Control of Water Hyacinth, 9–12 October 2000, Beijing, China. ACIAR Proceedings 102, ACIAR, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyetchko SM, Peng G (2004) Challenges and strategies for development of Mycoherbicides. In: Arora DK (ed) Fungal biotechnology in agricultural, food and environmental applications. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 11–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyette CD, Walker HL (1985) Evaluation of Fusarium lateritium as a biological herbicide for controlling velvet leaf (Abutilon theophrasti) and prickly sida (Sida spinosa). Weed Sci 34:106–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyette CD, Quimby PC Jr, Connick WJ Jr, Daigle DJ, Fulgham FE (1991) Progress in the production, formulation and application of mycoherbicides. In: TeBeest DO (ed) Microbial Control of weeds. Chapman Hall, New York, pp 209–222

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Boyette CD, Quimby PC, Caesar AJ, Birdsall JL, Connick WJ, Daigle DJ, Jackson MA, Egley GH, Abbas HK (1996) Adjuvants, formulations and spraying systems for improvement of mycoherbicides. Weed Technol 10:637–644

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burnside AC (1979) Weeds. In: Ennis WB Jr (ed) Introduction to crop protection. American society of agronomy, Madison, pp 27–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Charudattan R (2001) Biological control of weeds by means of plant pathogens: significance for integrated weed management in modern agro ecology. Biol Control 46:229–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Charudattan R, de Loach J (1988) Management of pathogens and insects for weed control in agroecosystems. In: Altieri MA, Liebman M (eds) Weed management in agroecosystems: ecological approaches. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 245–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Chutia M, Mahanta JJ, Bhattacharyya N, Bhuyan M, Boruah P, Sharma TC (2007) Microbial herbicides for weed management: prospects, progress and constraints. Plant Pathol J 6:200–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Connick WJ Jr (1988) Formulation of living biological control agents with alginate. In: Cross B, Scher HB (eds) Pesticide formulations: innovations and developments, ACS symposium series no. 371. American Chemistry Society, Washington, DC, pp 241–250

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Connick WJ Jr, Boyette CD, Mcalpine JR (1991) Formulations of Mycoherbicides using a pesta like process. Biol Control 1:281–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel JT, Templeton GE, Smith RJ Jr, Fox WT (1973) Biological control of northern jointvetch in rice with an endemic fungal disease. Weed Sci 21:303–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Egley GH, Boyette CD (1995) Water corn oil emulsion enhances conidia germination and mycoherbicidal activity of Colletotrichum truncatum. Weed Sci 43:312–317

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • El-Sayed W (2005) Biological control of weeds with pathogens: current status and future trends. Z Pflanzenkrankh Pflanzenschutz 112:209–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Foy CL (1989) Adjuvants: terminology, classification and mode of action. In: PNP C, Gran CA, Hinshalwood AM, Simundson E (eds) Adjuvants and agrochemicals, vol 1. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman TE (1977) Biological control of aquatic plants with plant pathogens. Aquat Bot 3:145–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman TE, Charudattan R, Zetter FW (1973) Biological control of water weeds with plant pathogens, Water resources research publication no. 23. University of Florida, Gainesville

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullaway DT (1954) Biological control of cactus in Hawaii. J Econ Entomol 47(4):696–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green S, Steward Wade SM, Boland GJ, Teshler MP, Liu SH (1998) Formulations of microorganisms for biological control of weeds. In: Boland GJ, Kuykenadall LD (eds) Plant-microbe interaction and biological control. Marcel Dekker Inc, New York, pp 249–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Gressel J, Michaeli D, Kampel V, Amsellem Z, Warshawsky A (2002) Ultralow calcium requirements of fungi facilitate use of calcium regulating agents to suppress host calcium-dependent defenses, synergizing infection by a mycoherbicide. J Agric Food Chem 50:6353–6360

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hajek AE (2004) Natural enemies- an introduction to biological control. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hasan S, Ayres PG (1990) The control of weeds through fungi: principles and prospects. New Phytol 115:201–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heap IM (2006). International survey of herbicide resistant weeds online. http://www.weedscience.org/In.asp. Accessed 2 Aug 2016

  • Klein TA, Auld BA, Wang F (1995) Evaluation of oil suspension emulsions of Colletotrichum orbiculare as a mycoherbicide in field trials. Crop Protect 14:193–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li y, Sun Z, Zhuang X, Xu L, Chen S, Li M (2003) Research progress on microbial herbicides. Crop Prot 47:252

    Google Scholar 

  • Loretta OR, Martin M, Williams II (2006) Conidial germination and germ tube elongation of Phomopsis amaranthicola and Microsphaeropsis amaranthi on leaf surfaces of seven Amaranthus species: implications for biological control. Biol Control 38:356–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mortensen K (1988) The potential of an endemic fungus, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides for biological control of round-leaved mallow (Malva pusilla) and velvet leaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Weed Sci 36:473–478

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller-Schaerer H, Frantzen J (1996) An emerging system management approach for biological weed control in crops: Senecio vulgaris as a research model. Weed Res 36:483–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller-Schaerer H, Scheepens PC (1997) Biological control of weeds in crops: a coordinated European research programme (COST-816). Integr Pest Manage Rev 2:45–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell PJ, Zoschke A (1996) Limitations to the development and commercialization of mycoherbicides by industry. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international weed control congress. Copenhagen, Denmark, pp 1189–1195

    Google Scholar 

  • Oehrens E (1977) Biological control of the blackberry through the introduction of rust, Phragmidium violaceum in Chile. FAO Pl Prot Bull 25:26–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Paau AS (1988) Formulations useful in applying beneficial microorganisms to seeds. Trends in Biotech 6:276–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad R (1993) Role of adjuvants in modifying the efficacy of a bioherbicide on forest species: compatibility studies under laboratory conditions. Pest Sci 38(2–3):273–275

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad R (1994) Influence of several pesticides and adjuvants on Chondrostereum purpureum-a bioherbicidal agent for control of forest weeds. Weed Technol 8:445–449

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Quimby PC (1982) Impact of diseases on plant populations. In: Biological control of weed with plant pathogens. Wiley, New York, pp 47–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Quimby PC, Zidack NK, Boyette CD, Grey WE (1999) A simple method for stabilizing and granulating fungi. Biocontrol Sci Tech 9:5–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes DJ (1993) Formulation of biological control agents. In: Jones DG (ed) Exploitation of microorganisms. Chapman Hall, London, pp 411–439

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sands DC, Miller RV (1993) Evolving strategies for biological control of weeds with plant pathogens. Pest Sci 37:399–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TeBeest DO, Templeton GE (1985) Mycoherbicides: progress in the biological control of weeds. Plant Dis 69:6–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Templeton GE (1992) Use of Colletotrichum strains as mycoherbicides. In: Bailey JA, Jeger MJ (eds) Colletotrichum: biology, pathology and control. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 358–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Templeton GE, Smith RJ Jr, Tebeest DO (1979) Biological weed control with mycoherbicides. Ann Rev Phytopath 17:301–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tranel PJ, Wright TR (2002) Resistance of weeds to ALS- inhibiting herbicides: what have we learned? Weed Sci 50:700–712

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Varshney JG, Prasad Babu MBB (2008) Future scenario of weed management in India. Indian J Weed Sci 40(1&2):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker HL, Connick WJ Jr (1983) Sodium alginate for production and formulation of mycoherbicides. Weed Sci 31:333–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson AK (1989) Current advances in bioherbicide research. Brighton Crop Protection Conference- Weeds:987–996

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson AK (1991) The classical approach with plant pathogens. In: TeBeest DO (ed) Microbial control of weeds. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 3–23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Watson AK, Wymore LA (1990) Identifying limiting factors in the biocontrol of weeds. In: Baker R, Dunn P (eds) New directions in biological control. UCLA Symposia on Molecular and Cellular Biology, New Series 112, Alan R. Liss, New York, pp 305–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Weidmann GJ (1988) Effects of nutritional amendments on conidial production of Fusarium solani f. sp. cucurbitae on sodium alginate granules and on control of Texas gourd. Plant Dis 72:757–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson CL (1965) Consideration of the use of persimmon wilt as a silvercide for weed persimmon. Plant Dis Report 49:780–791

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson CL (1969) Use of plant pathogens in weed control. Ann Rev Phytopath 76:411–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winder RS, Watson AK (1994) A potential microbial control of fire weed (Epilobium angustifolium). Phytoprotection 75:19–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Womack JG, Burge MN (1993) Mycoherbicide formulation and the potential for bracken control. Pest Sci 37:337–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaduraju NT (2006) Herbicide resistant crops in weed management. In: The extended summaries, golden jubilee national symposium on conservation agricultural and environment. Banaras Hindu University, Banaras, pp 2970–2980

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang S, Jong SC (1995) Host range determination of Myrothecium verrucaria isolated from leafy spurge. Plant Dis 79:994–997

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biotechnology, Maharishi Markandeshwer University, Mullana, Ambala, Haryana, India

    Vikas Kumar

  2. Department of Microbiology, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra, Haryana, India

    Neeraj K. Aggarwal

  3. Department of Microbiology, Choudhary Charan Singh University, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India

    Anjali Malik

Authors
  1. Vikas Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Neeraj K. Aggarwal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anjali Malik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Microbiology, School of Bioengineering and Biosciences, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab, India

    Joginder Singh

  2. Department of Microbiology, School of Bioengineering and Biosciences, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab, India

    Deepansh Sharma

  3. Department of Microbiology, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab, India

    Gaurav Kumar

  4. Department of Biochemistry, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab, India

    Neeta Raj Sharma

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kumar, V., Aggarwal, N.K., Malik, A. (2018). Bioherbicidal Concept: A Novel Strategy to Control Weeds. In: Singh, J., Sharma, D., Kumar, G., Sharma, N. (eds) Microbial Bioprospecting for Sustainable Development. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0053-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation