Abstract
In addition to formal terms of service and contracts between platform owners, users, and other stakeholders, there can be seen an implicit social contract taking place in online platforms, and influencing the social dynamics, such as trust, expectations, and perceived social justice, taking place within platforms, and driving their growth and success in the background. This paper examines the nature of that social contract, to better understand the complex social dynamics taking place in online platforms. To accomplish that objective, we draw from classic Enlightenment thinkers, e.g., Rousseau, Locke, and Hobbes, to analyze key aspects of social contracts, which we define as the alignment of stakeholder interests, stakeholder support, economic and social justice, and transparency of expectations. As our main contribution, we develop a conceptual framework for the analysis of platforms based on social contract theory, the Platforms as a Social Contract framework. The applicability of the framework is illustrated through a case analysis of YouTube, a popular online content platform. The rich understanding provided by the social contract perspective, embodied in our framework, entails many potential advantages to platform owners, including understanding user motivations and reactions so that effective platform governance with maintaining a sustainable solution to the chicken-and-egg problem becomes possible. While individual platforms may come and go, each faces the same fundamental social dynamics that can be explained and understood by applying the social contract framework presented in this research. This research shows how the framework can be used for analysis of online platforms, as well as suggests future research avenues for developing deeper understanding of platforms as a social contract.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
For clarity, we point out that Enlightenment philosophers were obviously influenced by earlier thinkers, dating back to Ancient Greek (e.g., Plato’s teachings on the role of the state as a governing body) and Ancient Rome (e.g., the notion of contract which was central in the Roman society).
- 4.
“Conseil d’Etat,” a nonexecutive consultative body providing guidance or advice to the state in economic and social matters among other topics
References
Anderson, S. P., & Gabszewicz, J. J. (2006). The media and advertising: A tale of two-sided markets. In Handbook of the economics of art and culture (Vol. 1, pp. 567–614). Philadelphia: Elsevier.
Armstrong, M. (2006). Competition in two-sided markets. RAND Journal of Economics, 37(3), 668–691.
Birke, D. (2008). The economics of networks – A survey of the empirical literature (SSRN scholarly paper, No. ID 1264662). Rochester: Social Science Research Network.
Bolukbasi, T., Chang, K.-W., Zou, J. Y., Saligrama, V., & Kalai, A. T. (2016). Man is to computer programmer as woman is to homemaker? Debiasing word embeddings. In Advances in neural information processing systems (pp. 4349–4357).
Bose, N. K., & Liang, P. (1996). Neural network fundamentals with graphs, algorithms and applications. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Caillaud, B., & Jullien, B. (2003). Chicken & egg: Competition among intermediation service providers. RAND Journal of Economics, 34, 309–328.
Casey, T. R., & Töyli, J. (2012). Dynamics of two-sided platform success and failure: An analysis of public wireless local area access. Technovation, 32(12), 703–716.
Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405.
Colomer, J. M. (2002). Political institutions in Europe. London: Psychology Press.
Dillahunt, T., Lampinen, A., O’Neill, J., Terveen, L., & Kendrick, C. (2016). Does the sharing economy do any good? In Proceedings of the 19th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work and social computing companion (pp. 197–200). New York: ACM.
Economides, N., & Katsamakas, E. (2006). Two-sided competition of proprietary vs. open source technology platforms and the implications for the software industry. Management Science, 52(7), 1057–1071.
Eisenmann, T., Parker, G., & Van Alstyne, M. (2011). Platform envelopment. Strategic Management Journal, 32(12), 1270–1285.
Evans, D. S. (2003). Some empirical aspects of multi-sided platform industries. Review of Network Economics, 2(3), 191–209.
Evans, D. S. (2011). How catalysts ignite: The economics of platform-based start-ups. In A. Gawer (Ed.), Platforms, markets and innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Gallopín, G. C., Funtowicz, S., O’Connor, M., & Ravetz, J. (2001). Science for the twenty-first century: From social contract to the scientific core. International Social Science Journal, 53(168), 219–229.
Gawer, A. (2011). Platforms, markets and innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Hagiu, A. (2006). Pricing and commitment by two-sided platforms. The Rand Journal of Economics, 37(3), 720–737.
Hagiu, A., & Wright, J. (2014). Marketplace or reseller? Management Science, 61(1), 184–203.
Hagiu, A., & Wright, J. (2015). Multi-sided platforms. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 43, 162–174.
Hobbes, T. (2010). Leviathan: Or the matter, forme, & power of a common-wealth ecclesiasticall and civill (I. Shapiro, Ed.) (Reprint ed.). New Haven: Yale University Press.
Johnstone, S. (2011). A history of trust in ancient Greece. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.
Katz, M. L., & Shapiro, C. (1985). Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. The American Economic Review, 75(3), 424–440.
Katz, M. L., & Shapiro, C. (1994). Systems competition and network effects. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(2), 93–115.
Lampinen, A., & Cheshire, C. (2016). Hosting via Airbnb: Motivations and financial assurances in monetized network hospitality. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1669–1680). New York: ACM.
Lampinen, A., Bellotti, V., Monroy-Hernández, A., Cheshire, C., & Samuel, A. (2015). Studying the sharing economy: Perspectives to peer-to-peer exchange. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference companion on computer supported cooperative work & social computing (pp. 117–121). New York: ACM.
Locke, J. (1988). Locke: Two treatises of government (P. Laslett, Ed.) (3rd ed.). Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
Malin, B. J., & Chandler, C. (2016). Free to work anxiously: Splintering precarity among drivers for Uber and Lyft. Communication, Culture & Critique, 10, 382–400.
Mas, I., & Radcliffe, D. (2011). Scaling mobile money. Journal of Payments Strategy & Systems, 5(3), 298–315.
Oakeshott, M. (1991). On human conduct. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., & Tucci, C. L. (1998). Clarifying business models: Origins, present, and future of the concept. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 16, 1–25.
Parker, G. G., & Van Alstyne, M. W. (2005). Two-sided network effects: A theory of information product design. Management Science, 51(10), 1494–1504.
Pettit, P. (1997). Republicanism: A theory of freedom and government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Proudhon, P.-J. (1969). Selected writings of Pierre-Joseph Proudhon. Garden City: Anchor Books.
Rifkin, J. (2014). The zero marginal cost society: The internet of things, the collaborative commons, and the eclipse of capitalism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Rochet, J.-C., & Tirole, J. (2003). Platform competition in two-sided markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(4), 990–1029.
Rochet, J.-C., & Tirole, J. (2005). Two-sided markets: A progress report (IDEI working paper, No. 275). Toulouse: Institut d’Économie Industrielle (IDEI).
Rousseau, J.-J. (2003). On the social contract (G. D. H. Cole, Trans.) (Dover Thrift Editions ed.). New York: Dover Publications.
Salminen, J. (2014). Startup dilemmas – Strategic problems of early-stage platforms on the internet. Turku: Turku School of Economics.
Salminen, J., & Teixeira, J. (2013). Fool’s gold? Developer dilemmas in a closed mobile application market platform. In Proceedings of the ICEC 2013 the 15th International Conference on Electronic Commerce, Turku.
Sawhney, M., Verona, G., & Prandelli, E. (2005). Collaborating to create: The internet as a platform for customer engagement in product innovation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 19(4), 4–17.
Scholz, T. (2016). Platform cooperativism. Challenging the corporate sharing economy. New York: Rosa Luxemburg Foundation.
Seamans, R., & Zhu, F. (2013). Responses to entry in multi-sided markets: The impact of craigslist on local newspapers. Management Science, 60(2), 476–493.
Shy, O. (2011). A short survey of network economics. Review of Industrial Organization, 38(2), 119–149.
Smith, A. (1994). The wealth of nations (E. Cannan, Ed.) (Sixth Printing ed.). New York: Modern Library.
Spooner, L. (1973). No treason: The constitution of no authority. Colorado Springs: Ralph Myles Publisher.
Susarla, A., Barua, A., & Whinston, A. B. (2009). A transaction cost perspective of the “software as a service” business model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26(2), 205–240.
Williamson, O. E. (1981). The economics of organization: The transaction cost approach. American Journal of Sociology, 87(3), 548–577.
Zeng, Q., Zhang, Y., & Jing, N. (2013). Research on the mechanism of trust in the open online sourcing marketplace. In J. Zhang, Z. J. Wang, S. R. Zhu, & X. M. Meng (Eds.), Information technology applications in industry (Pts 1–4, Vol. 263–266, pp. 2732–2737). Stafa-Zurich: Trans Tech Publications.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Salminen, J., Gach, N., Kaartemo, V. (2018). Platform as a Social Contract: An Analytical Framework for Studying Social Dynamics in Online Platforms. In: Smedlund, A., Lindblom, A., Mitronen, L. (eds) Collaborative Value Co-creation in the Platform Economy. Translational Systems Sciences, vol 11. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8956-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8956-5_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-8955-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-8956-5
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)