Skip to main content

Perspectives for a Historic Urban Landscape Approach in Porto, Portugal

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1105 Accesses

Part of the book series: Creativity, Heritage and the City ((CHC,volume 2))

Abstract

The Recommendation on the Historic Urban Landscape invites states parties to consider more sustainable development models for urban conservation policies and practices. Urban conservation strategies have a long history in the city of Porto. Hence, this background has a direct influence on the nomination process of the Historic Centre of Porto, inscribed on the World Heritage list in 1996. Presenting a perspective of the existing strategies and policies in urban conservation management and reflecting on the implementation of a HUL approach in Porto, this paper analyses several tools, namely, the Municipal Master Plan (PDM) and the WH Management Plan, among others. The results indicate the existence of strengths and potentialities that need to be developed and improved, through the increase of more participatory processes, as well as more investment in identifying the values and their relation to specific threats.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Hereafter HUL Recommendation

  2. 2.

    Regime Jurídico dos Instrumentos de Gestão Territorial: RJIGT (Law Framework for Spatial Planning Tools): Decree-Law no. 380/99 of 22 September, recently reviewed by the Decree-Law no. 80/2015, of 14 May

  3. 3.

    Also known as Instrumentos de Gestão Territorial (Spatial Planning Tools), being constituted by the PDM (Plano Director Municipal: Municipal Master Plan), the PU (Plano de Urbanização: Urban Plan) and the PP (Plano de Pormenor: Detailed Plan)

  4. 4.

    Urban development in Portugal is ruled by the PDMs, which are crucial legal instrument in the management of the municipal territory. The PDM defines the strategic framework of territorial development of the municipality, being the reference instrument for the elaboration of the other municipal plans (RJIGT).

  5. 5.

    Gabinetes Técnicos Locais: GTL

  6. 6.

    To shorten, in this article authors opted to use the 1996 property name – Historic Centre of Porto.

  7. 7.

    Decree-Law no. 794/76, of 5 November, changed by the Decree-Laws no. 313/80, of 19 August and no. 400/84, of 31 December.

  8. 8.

    Área de Reabilitação Urbana: ARU (Law no. 32/2012, of 14 August).

  9. 9.

    Through the Housing and Urban Rehabilitation Institute (Instituto de Reabilitação Urbana: IHRU).

  10. 10.

    Direção Geral do Património Cultural: DGPC.

  11. 11.

    Direção Regional da Cultural Norte: DRCN.

  12. 12.

    Direção Geral dos Monumentos e Edificios Nacionais: DGEMN.

  13. 13.

    The CRUARB (Comissariado para a Renovação Urbana da Área de Ribeira/Barredo) was the entity in charge of the rehabilitation and recovering process in the Porto Historic Centre (including the WH classified area) since 1974 until 2003. It has been replaced in 2004 by Porto Vivo SRU.

  14. 14.

    The PDM Heritage Charter is a static tool that can be periodically updated (e.g. the 2006 PDM Heritage Charter was updated in 2012).

  15. 15.

    The following Public Interest Ensembles (CIP) are currently listed: Avenida dos Aliados, Avenida da Boavista, Avenida Montevideo, Praça da Republica and Rua Álvares Cabral, Conjunto da Foz Velha and Historic Zone of Porto.

  16. 16.

    The historic centre considered in Management Plan corresponds to the area nationally listed as IIP in 1997 (see Fig. 23.3), a slightly larger than the area inscribed in the World Heritage list.

References

  • Aguiar, J. (2010). Após Veneza: do restauro estilístico para o restauro crítico. In J. Custódio & M. Soromenho (Eds.), 100 anos de património: memória e identidade (pp. 219–236). Lisboa: Instituto de Gestão do Património Arquitectónico e Arqueológico, I.P.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandarin, F., & Van Oers, R. (2012). The historic urban landscape: Managing heritage in a urban century. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • CEAU-FAUP. (2017). Estudo de Caracterização e diagnóstico sobre o tema “Valores Patrimoniais” no âmbito da revisão do Plano Diretor Municipal do Porto. Centro de Estudos de Arquitectura e Urbanismo - Faculdade de Arquitectura da Universidade do Porto. Câmara Municipal do Porto: Porto.

    Google Scholar 

  • CMP. (2005a). Relatório do PDM Porto. Vols. I. Porto: Câmara Municipal do Porto.

    Google Scholar 

  • CMP. (2005b). Relatório do PDM Porto. Vols. II. Porto: Câmara Municipal do Porto.

    Google Scholar 

  • DMPOT. (2012). SIM-PORTO: Avaliação da Implementação do Sistema Multicritério de Informação da Cidade do Porto (Dezembro, 2012). Porto: Divisão Municipal de Planeamento e Ordenamento do Território (Câmara Municipal do Porto).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, T. C. (2007). Sulla storia del restauro in Portogallo: provvedimenti, protagonisti, interventi, in “Ananke” n° 52, Alinea Editrice, Milano, Settembre 2007, pp. 78–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, T. C., & Pinto, L., (2017). Inquiry to local inhabitants of the Historic Centre of Porto. Porto: Centro de Estudos de Arquitectura e Urbanismo (not published).

    Google Scholar 

  • Getty. (2010). Historic urban environment. Conservation challenges and priorities for action. Meeting report. Los Angeles: Getty Conservation Institute. Available via http://www.getty.edu/conservation/publications_resources/pdf_publications/historic_urban_environment.html. Cited 20 June 2017.

  • Gustcoven, E. (2016). Attributes of world heritage cities, sustainability by management – a comparative study between the world heritage cities of Amsterdam, Edinburgh and Querétaro. Thesis to obtain the degree of Master of Science in Conservation of Monuments and Sites. Leuven: Belgium: KU Leuven.

    Google Scholar 

  • INE. (2009). Resident population by place of residence (Grande Porto, Porto), gender and age group, for year 2009. Lisboa: Instituto Nacional de Estatística. Available via http://www.ine.pt/xportal/xmain?xpid =INE&xpgid=ine_indicadores&indOcorrCod=0000611&contexto=pi&selTab=tab0. Cited 30 Nov 2017.

  • INE. (2011). Censos 2011 - Statistics Portugal (Instituto Nacional de Estatística). Available at https://ine.pt/xportal/xmain?xpgid=ine_main&xpid=INE Accessed on 15 Dec 2017.

  • Loza, R. (1993). Porto a Património Mundial: processo de candidatura da cidade do Porto à classificação pela UNESCO como Património Cultural da Humanidade. Porto: Câmara do Municipal do Porto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loza, R. (1998). Porto Património Mundial II: Processo de Candidatura do Centro Histórico do Porto à UNESCO. Porto: Câmara do Municipal do Porto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loza, R. (2000). Porto Património Mundial III. CRUARB – 25 anos de Reabilitação Urbana. Porto: Câmara do Municipal do Porto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loza, R. (2017). As Caves de Gaia e o Centro Histórico do Porto – uma relação indissociável. In Cidades de Rio e Vinho. Memória, Património, Reabilitação, Vila nova de Gaia: Gaiurb/Afrontamento.

    Google Scholar 

  • PDM Porto (2006). 1ª Revisão do Plano Diretor Municipal do Porto. Porto: Câmara Municipal do Porto. Available via http://www.dgterritorio.pt/sistemas_de_informacao/snit/igt_em_vigor__snit_/acesso_simples/. Cited 6 Dec 2017.

  • Pinho, A. (2009). Conceitos e políticas europeias de reabilitação urbana. Análise da experiência portuguesa dos Gabinetes Técnicos Locais. Lisboa: Universidade de Lisboa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porto Vivo SRU. (2008). Management plan of Porto world heritage, vol. III. Porto: Porto Vivo Sociedade de Reabilitação Urbana. Available via http://www.portovivosru.pt/pt/centro-historico/plano-de-gestao. Cited 6 Dec 2017.

  • Porto Vivo SRU. (2010–2014). Management plan monitoring reports. Porto: Porto Vivo Sociedade de Reabilitação Urbana. Available via http://www.portovivosru.pt/pt/centro-historico/monitorizacao-plano-de-gestao. Cited 6 Dec 2017.

  • Tarrafa Silva, A. (2017). Historic urban landscape approach and spatial planning. Exploring the integration of heritage issues in local planning in Portugal. Thesis to obtain the degree of Master of Science in Urban and Spatial Planning. Lisboa: Universidade de Lisboa: Instituto Superior Técnico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarrafa Silva, A., Valverde, I., & Pereira Roders, A. (2017). Recomendação sobre as Paisagens Históricas Urbanas: Um modelo para integrar a gestão de recursos urbanos e atingir a eficiência necessária ao século XXI. Revista Património. N° 4. Direção-Geral do Património Cultural. (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Távora, F. (1969). Estudo de Renovação da Ribeira Barredo. Porto: Câmara Municipal do Porto.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (1996). Decisions adopted at the 20th session of the world heritage committee. Paris: UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Available via http://whc.unesco.org/archive/repcom96.htm#755. Cited 6 Dec 2017.

  • UNESCO. (1998). State of conservation report – Porto. Paris: UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Available via http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/755/documents/. Cited 6 Dec 2017.

  • UNESCO. (2006). Periodic reporting – Porto. Paris: UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Available via http://whc.unesco.org/archive/periodicreporting/EUR/cycle01/section2/755-summary.pdf. Cited 6 Dec 2017.

  • UNESCO. (2011). Recommendation on the historic urban landscape. Paris: UNESCO. Available via http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=48857&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html. Cited 20 Jun 2017.

  • UNESCO. (2016). Report of the decisions adopted during the 40th sesssion of the world heritage committee. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Available via http://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/6841. Cited 6 Dec 2017.

  • Veillon, R. (2014). State of conservation of world heritage properties. A statistical analysis (1979–2013). Paris: UNESCO World Heritage Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veldpaus, L. (2015). Historic urban landscapes: framing the integration of urban and heritage planning in multilevel governance. Eindhoven: Eindhoven University of Technology. Available via RESEARCHGATE. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282005137. Cited 6 Dec 2017.

  • Veldpaus, L., & Pereira Roders, A.R. (2013). Historic urban landscape: An assessment framework. In IAIA13 conference proceedings. Available via RESEARCHGATE. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260124111. Cited 6 Dec 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHITRAP. (2016). The HUL guidebook. Shanghai: World Heritage Institute of Training and Research for the Asia and the Pacific Region. Available via https://go-hul.com/resources/. Cited 20 Jun 2017.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Teresa Cunha Ferreira .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ferreira, T.C., Silva, A.T. (2019). Perspectives for a Historic Urban Landscape Approach in Porto, Portugal. In: Pereira Roders, A., Bandarin, F. (eds) Reshaping Urban Conservation. Creativity, Heritage and the City, vol 2. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8887-2_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8887-2_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-8886-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-8887-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics