Skip to main content

Abstract

The awareness of sustainability issues has gained greater prominence in today’s investment. Moreover, fueled by the emerging practice of sustainability, the accounting framework opened a window, shifting sustainability from a “concept” to a “transformative practice.” SROI plays a crucial role in attaining performance excellence and sustainable growth as it not only recognizes benefits from the investment but also continues to prove, improve, and become more sustainable. Therefore, transformation of “investment as usual” and building of a more sustainable future will be a good milestone in SROI. Sustainability in SROI can be achieved through the triple bottom line (TBL) approach which captures the essence of sustainability by measuring the impact of investment based on the three important pillars: social, economic, and environmental elements. The importance of integrating sustainable return ((i) social, (ii) economic, and (iii) environmental) into considerations in every investment is to give it the same priority. This chapter defines sustainability as the intersection of TBL in the case of Sungai Muda Flood Mitigation Program. The SROI methodology provides a way of expressing social, environmental, and economic return in a mixed-method framework which involves both qualitative and quantitative data using monetary ratio. This study found the net social benefit comprising of sustainable return to be positive. Hence, the program is a beneficial social investment and brings a huge impact on the individual, community, and society. Consequently, SROI provides a certain toolset for stakeholders that intend to measure sustainability using a ringgit-oriented approach and to engage in social investment in today’s economic age.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arvidson, M., Lyon, F., McKay, S., & Moro, D. (2013). Valuing the social? The nature and controversies of measuring social return on investment (SROI). Voluntary Sector Review, 4, 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the sustainable corporation: Win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review, 90–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, J. (2003). The blended value proposition: Integrating social and financial returns. California Management Review, 45, 35–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JPS – Jabatan Pengairan dan Saliran. (2016). Maklumat Asas Pejabat Pengurusan Lembangan Sungai Muda.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, F., & Arvidson, M. (2011). Social impact measurement as an entrepreneurial process (Working Paper 66). The Third Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotheroe, N., & Richards, A. (2007). Social return on investment and social enterprise: Transparent accountability for sustainable development. Social Enterprise Journal, 3(1), 31–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slaper, T. F., & Hall, T. J. (2011). The triple bottom line: What is it and how does it works? Indiana Business Review, 86, 4–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenzel, P. L. (2010). Sustainability, the triple bottom line, and the global reporting initiative. Global Edge Business Review, 4(6), 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuan, M. T. (2008). Measuring and/or estimating social value creation: Insights into eight integrated cost approaches. Final Paper. Prepared for Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Impact Planning and Improvement.

    Google Scholar 

  • UPE – Unit Perancangan Ekonomi, UPE. (2013). Malaysia wellbeing report. Putrajaya: Unit Perancangan Ekonomi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J., Cofield, A. M., Ellison, H., Jansen, F., McKessar, M., O’Rourke, S., & Seybert, E. (2010). Sustainable return on investment: A pathway towards widespread sustainability measurement and communication. The Journal of Record, 3(4), 235–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zappala, G., & Lyons, M. (2009). Recent approaches to measuring social impact in the Third Sector: An overview (CSI Background Paper No. 6).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Don Ramli, D.R., Aiyub, K., Arifin, K. (2019). SROI Toward Sustainability As a Transformative Practice. In: Mat Noor, A., Mohd Zakuan, Z., Muhamad Noor, S. (eds) Proceedings of the Second International Conference on the Future of ASEAN (ICoFA) 2017 - Volume 1. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8730-1_36

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics