Skip to main content

Academic Dishonesty Intentions in the Perspectives of Higher Education in Malaysia

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the Second International Conference on the Future of ASEAN (ICoFA) 2017 - Volume 1

Abstract

Nowadays, academic dishonesty has become an endemic academic phenomenon because students seem to be treating cheating on tests or examinations as a common thing. Therefore, this study was conducted to investigate the intentions for engaging in academic dishonesty among degree students in public higher education in Malaysia by explaining the most prevalent predictors of academic dishonesty, which are attitude, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, ethical behavior, and moral reasoning. A total of 346 respondents were involved in this study, composed of degree students from accountancy, surveying, plantation, applied science, marine science, business and management, computer science, and sports science programs. Results illustrate that subjective norms were found insignificantly related to the intentions to be involved in academic dishonesty because the respondents have treated cheating as common norm and considered it not weird to be involved in cheating. Attitude, perceived behavioral control, ethical belief, and moral reasoning were found to be significantly related to academic dishonesty intentions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abdol Mohammadi, M. J., & Baker, C. R. (2007). The relationship between ethical reasoning and plagiarism in accounting courses: A replication study. Issues in Accounting Education, 22, 45–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adesile, & Mohamad. (2013). Predicting the underlying factors of academic dishonesty among undergraduates in public universities: A path analysis approach. Journals of Academic Ethics, 11(2), 103–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (1991a). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211 people.umass.edu/psyc661/pdf/tpb.obhdp.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (1991b). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human, 50, 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior (Vol. 278). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall https://doi.org/Z.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alleyne, P., & Phillips, K. (2011). Exploring academic dishonesty among university students in Barbados: An extension to the theory of planned behaviour. Journal of Academic Ethics, 9, 323–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, L., & Ajzen, I. (1991). Predicting dishonest actions using the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 25, 285–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malgwi, C. A., & Rakovski, C. C. (2008). Behavioural implications and evaluation of academic fraud risk factors. Journal of Forensic Accounting, 1, 37.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L. (2005). It takes a village: Academic dishonesty and educational opportunity. Liberal Education, 91(3), 26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L., Butterfield, K. D., & Trevino, L. K. (2006). Academic dishonesty in graduate business programs: Prevalence, causes, and proposed action. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(3), 294–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mihelič, K. K., Lipičnik, B., & Tekavčič, M. (2010). Ethical leadership. International Journal of Management & Information Systems, 14(5), 31–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J., Thoma, S., & Edwards, L. (1997). Designing and validating a measure of moral judgment: Stage preference and stage consistency approaches. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 5–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafie, L. A., & Nayan, S. (2012). The Net Generation and Academic Dishonesty in Malaysia. Technology innovation in educations. 181–186. Conference, 8th Technology innovations in education, Porto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, R. R. (1992). The challenge of ethical behavior in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(7), 505–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, T. H., Kisamore, J. L., & Jawahar, I. M. (2010). Predicting academic dishonesty: Theory of planned behavior and personality. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 32, 35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shamshul Anaz Kassim .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kassim, S.A., Mhd Nasir, N.F., Johari, N.R., Razali, N.F.Y. (2019). Academic Dishonesty Intentions in the Perspectives of Higher Education in Malaysia. In: Mat Noor, A., Mohd Zakuan, Z., Muhamad Noor, S. (eds) Proceedings of the Second International Conference on the Future of ASEAN (ICoFA) 2017 - Volume 1. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8730-1_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics