Abstract
This chapter adds to the body of research on engineering in early childhood education by describing the multiple research components associated with the development of an early childhood engineering curriculum, Seeds of STEM. Since very few research studies were devoted to the topic of engineering in early childhood , the Seeds of STEM research team was charged with developing many of the tools and instruments to be used throughout the project. The chapter describes the research conducted by the Seeds of STEM team in order to establish the framework for the curriculum, the development process, evaluation of fidelity of implementation, as well as the effectiveness of the curriculum. More specifically, the chapter addresses the following questions on curriculum development research: (a) Who should be part of the curriculum development team? (b) What is a successful curriculum development process? (c) What principles should guide the Seeds of STEM units? (d) How should the curriculum’s effectiveness be measured? and (e) What measures should be taken to ensure fidelity of implementation?
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Ackerman, D. & Barnett, S. (2005). Prepared for kindergarten: What does “readiness” mean? National Institute for Early Education Research Policy Brief.
Bagiati, A., & Evangelou, D. (2015). Engineering curriculum in the preschool classroom: The teacher’s experience. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 23(1), 112–128.
Bagiati, A., Yoon, S. Y., Evangelou, D., & Ngambeki, I. (2010). Engineering curricula in early education: Describing the landscape of open resources. Early Childhood Research and Practice, 12(2), 1–15.
Bowman, B. T., Donovan, M. S., & Burns, M. S. (Eds.). (2001). Eager to learn: Educating our preschoolers. Washington D.C.: National Academies Press.
Brenneman, K. (2011). Assessment for preschool science learning and learning environments. Early Childhood Research and Practice 13(1).
Brenneman, K., Stevenson-Boyd, J., & Frede, E. (2009). Math and science in preschool: Policies and practices. National Institute for Early Education Research Policy Brief.
Brophy, S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M., & Rogers, C. (2008). Advancing engineering education in P-12 classrooms. The Research Journal for Engineering Education, 369–387.
Cabell, S., Justice, L. M., Konold, T., & McGinty, A. (2011). Profiles of emergent literacy skills among preschool children who are at-risk for academic difficulties. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 26(1), 1–14.
Camilli, G., Vargas, S., Ryan, S., & Barnett, W. S. (2010). Meta-analysis of the effects of early education interventions on cognitive and social development. Teachers College Record, 112(3), 579–620.
Care, E., Denas, J., & Brown, R. (2007). The realism and sex type of four- to five-year-old children’s occupational aspirations. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 5, 155–168.
CCNY (Carnegie Corporation of New York). (2009). The opportunity equation—Transforming mathematics and science education for citizenship and the global economy. Available https://www.carnegie.org/media/filer_public/80/c8/80c8a7bc-c7ab-4f49-847d-1e2966f4dd97/ccny_report_2009_opportunityequation.pdf. Accessed February 18, 2016.
Century, J., Rudnick, M., & Freeman, C. (2010). A framework for measuring fidelity of implementation: A foundation for shared language and accumulation of knowledge. American Journal of Evaluation, 31(2), 199–218.
Christenson, L. A., & James, J. (2015). Building bridges to understanding in a preschool classroom: A morning in the block center. Young Children, 26–31.
Clasessens, A., Duncan, G., & Engel, M. (2009). Kindergarten skills and fifth grade achievement: Evidence from the ECLS-K. Economics of Education Review, 28, 415–427.
Clements, D. H. (2007). Curriculum research: Toward a framework for ‘research-based curricula’. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38, 35–70.
Cohen, L., & Uhry, J. (2011). Naming block structures: A multimodal approach. Early Education Journal, 39, 79–87.
Cunningham, C. (2009). Engineering is elementary. The Bridge, 39(3), 11–17.
Cunningham, C. M., & Lachapelle, C. P. (2007). Engineering is Elementary: Children’s changing understandings of science and engineering. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, HI.
Cunningham, C., & Lachapelle, C. (2010). The impact of Engineering is Elementary (EiE) on students’ attitudes toward engineering and science. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Louisville, KY.
Custer, R., & Daugherty, J. (2009). Professional development for teachers of engineering: Research and related activities. The Bridge, 39(3), 18–24.
Dayton Regional STEM Center (2011). STEM Education Quality Framework. Available http://daytonregionalstemcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Final-Framework-copyrighted.pdf.
Diamond, K. E., Justice, L. M., Siegler, R. S., & Snyder, P. A. (2013). Synthesis of IES research on early intervention and early childhood education (NCSER 2013–3001). Washington, DC: National Center for Special Education Research, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
Diamond, K. E., & Powell, D. R. (2011). An iterative approach to the development of a professional development intervention for head start teachers. Journal of Early Intervention, 33(1), 75–93.
Dubosarsky, M., Murphy, B., Roehrig, G., Frost, L. C., Jones, J., Carlson, S. P. … Bement, J. (2011). Animal tracks on the playground, minnows in the sensory table: Incorporating cultural themes to promote preschoolers’ critical thinking in American Indian Head Start classrooms. Young Children, 66(5), 20–29.
Duncan, F. J., Dowsett, C. J., Claessent, A., Magnuson, K., Huston, A. C., Klebanove, P., et al. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1428–1446.
Eccles, J. S., Jacobs, J. E., & Harold, R. D. (1990). Gender role stereotypes, expectancy effects, and parents' socialization of gender differences. Journal of social issues, 46(2), 183–201.
Eshach, H. (2006). Science literacy in primary schools and pre-schools. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Evangelou, D. (2010). Child development perspective in engineering education: Why STEM now? Early Childhood Research and Practice, 12(2).
Federal Interagency Forum on Child and Family Statistics. (2013). America’s children: Key national indicators of well-being. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Fennema, E. H., & Sherman, J. A. (1977). Sex-related differences in mathematics achievement, spatial visualization, and sociocultural factors. American Educational Research Journal, 14, 51–71.
French, L. (2004). Science as the center of a coherent, integrated early childhood curriculum. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19, 138–149.
Gelman, S. A. (1999). Concept development in preschool children. Dialogue on early childhood science, mathematics, and technology education. Washington, DC: Project 2061, American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Genishi, C., & Goodwin, A. L. (2008). Diversities in early childhood education: Rethinking and doing. New York: Routledge.
Ginsburg, H., Lee, J., & Boyd, J. (2008). Mathematics education for young children: What it is and how to promote it. Social Policy Report, 22, 1–23.
Gorey, K. M. (2001). Early childhood education: A meta-analytic affirmation of the short- and long-term benefits of educational opportunity. School Psychology Quarterly, 16(1), 9–30.
Gormley, W. T., Phillips, D., & Gayer, T. (2008). Preschool programs can boost school readiness. Science, 320, 1723–1724.
Greenfield, D. B., Jirout, J., Dominguez, X., Greenberg, A., Maier, M., & Fuccillo, J. (2009). Science in the preschool classroom: A programmatic research agenda to improve science readiness. Early Education and Development, 20(2), 238–264.
Hill, C., Corbett, C., & St. Rose, A. (2008) Why so few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. AAUW http://www.aauw.org/files/2013/02/Why-So-Few-Women-in-Science-Technology-Engineering-and-Mathematics.pdf.
Hjalmarson, M., Diefes-Dux, H. A., & Moore, T. (2008). Designing model development sequences for engineering. In J. Zawojewski, K. Bowman, & H. A. Diefes-Dux (Eds.), Mathematical modeling in engineering education: Designing experiences for all students. Roterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Hsu, M. C., Purzer, S., & Cardella, M. E. (2011). Elementary teacher’s views about teaching design, engineering, and technology. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 1, 31–39.
Jacobs, J. E., & Eccles, J. S. (1985). Gender differences in math ability: The impact of media reports on parents. Educational researcher, 14(3), 20–25.
Jenniches, S., & Didion, C. (2009). Engineergirl! A website to interest girls in engineering. The Bridge, 39(3), 38–44.
Katehi, L., Pearson, G., & Feder, M. (2009). The status and nature of K-12 engineering education in the United States. The Bridge, 39(3), 5–10.
Katz, L. G. (2010). STEM in the early years. Early Childhood Research and Practice, 12(2), 11–19. Retrieved from: http://ecrp.uiuc.edu/beyond/seed/katz.html.
Kinzie, M. B., Pianta, R. C., Kilday, C. R., McGuire, P. R., & Pinkham, A. M. (2009, March). Development of curricula, teacher supports, and assessments for pre-kindergarten mathematics and science. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE), Washington, D.C.
Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., et al. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: Putting learning by design into practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 495.
Levitch, A. & Gable, S. (2016). Reducing stereotyping in the preschool classroom. Available http://extension.missouri.edu/hes/childcare/reducestereotype.htm. Accessed February 18, 2016.
Lindeman, K. W., Jabot, M., & Berkley, M. T. (2013). The role of STEM (or STEAM) in the early childhood setting. In L. E. Cohen & S. Waite-Stupiansky (Eds.), Learning Across the Early Childhood Curriculum, 17, 95–114. Advances in Early Education and Day Care series. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.
Lynch, S. (2001). ‘‘Science for all’’ is not equal to ‘‘One size fits all’’: Linguistic and cultural diversity and science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(5), 622–627.
Mehalik, M. M., Doppelt, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2008). Middle-school science through design-based learning versus scripted inquiry: Better overall science concept learning and equity gap reduction. Journal of Engineering Education, 97, 71–85.
Moomaw, S. (2012). STEM begins in the early years. School Science and Mathematics, 112, 57–58.
National Academy of Engineering. (2006). Tech tally: Approaches to assessing technological literacy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Academy of Engineering, & National Research Council. (2009). Engineering in K-12 education: Understanding the status and improving the prospects. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
National Research Council. (2009). Mathematics learning in early childhood: Paths toward excellence and equity. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (2002). Scientific research in education. In R. J Shavelson & L Towne (Eds.), Committee on scientific principles for education research. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
NSB (National Science Board). (2007). A national action plan for addressing the critical needs of the U.S. science, technology, education, and mathematics education system. Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation.
New, R. S. (1999). Playing fair and square: Issues of equity in preschool mathematics, science, and technology. Dialogue on Early Childhood Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education: Fostering High Quality Programs. Washington, DC: Project 2061, American Association for the Advancement of Science. http://www.project2061.org/publications/earlychild/online/fostering/new.htm.
Novak, J. D. (1977). A theory of education. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
O’Donnell, C. (2008). Defining, conceptualizing, and measuring fidelity of implementation and its relationship to outcomes in K-12 curriculum intervention research. Review of Educational Research, 78, 33–84.
Piaget, J. (1961). The child’s conception of number. New York: Norton.
Powell, D. R., Son, S., File, N., & San Juan, R. R. (2010). Parent-school relationships and children’s academic and social outcomes in public school pre-kindergarten. Journal of School Psychology, 48(4), 269–292.
Roberts, L. C., & Hill, H. T. (2003). Using children’s literature to debunk gender stereotypes. In Carol Copple (Ed.), A world of difference: Readings on teaching young children in a diverse society (pp. 125–127).
Samarapungavan, A., Mantzicopoulos, P., & Patrick, H. (2008). Learning science through inquiry in kindergarten. Science Education, 92(5), 868–908.
Schunn, C. D. (2009). How kids learn engineering: The cognitive science perspective. The Bridge: Linking engineering and society. US: National Academy of engineering of the National Academies.
Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. M. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Sleeter, C. E., & Grant, C. A. (1999). Making choices for multicultural education: Five approaches to race, class and gender (3rd ed.). New Jersey: Merrill.
Sneider, C. I. (Ed.). (2014). The go-to guide for engineering curricula, preK-5: Choosing and using the best instructional materials for your students. Corwin Press.
Stoll, J., Hamilton, A., Oxley, E., Eastman, A. M., & Brent, R. (2012). Young thinkers in motion: Problem solving and physics in preschool. Young Children, 67, 20–26.
Center, Southern Poverty Law. (1997). Gender learning in early childhood. Starting small: Teaching tolerance in preschool and the early grades (pp. 50–54). Author. Reprinted: Montgomery, AL.
Sullivan, A., Kazakoff, E. R., & Bers, M. U. (2013). The wheels on the bot go round and round: Robotics curriculum in pre-kindergarten. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 12, 203–219.
Swim, J. K. (1994). Perceived versus meta-analytic effect sizes: An assessment of the accuracy of gender stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 21–36.
Torres-Crespo, M. N., Kraatz, E., & Pallansch, L. (2014). From fearing STEM to Playing with It: The natural integration of STEM into the preschool classroom. Journal of the Southeastern Regional Association of Teacher Educators, 23(2), 8–16.
Tunks, K. W. (2009). Block play: Practical suggestions for common dilemmas. Dimensions of Early Childhood, 37, 3–8.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics (2007). The Nation’s Report Card: America’s high school graduates: Results from the 2005 NAEP High School Transcript Study, by C. Shettle et al. (NCES 2007-467) Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
Van Meeteren, B., & Zan, B. (2010). Revealing the work of young engineers in early childhood education. Early Childhood Research and Practice. Collected Papers from the SEED (STEM in Early Education and Development) Conference.
Wang, J., Werner-Avidon, M., Newton, L., Randol, S., Smith, B., & Walker, G. (2013). Ingenuity in action: Connecting tinkering to engineering design processes. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 3, 1–23.
Warren, B., Ballenger, C., Ogonowski, M., Rosebery, A. S., & Hudicourt-Barnes, J. (2001). Rethinking diversity in learning science: The logic of everyday sense making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 529–552.
Wolfson, W. (n.d.). Engineering Lens. Retrieved from: http://www.integratingengineering.org/index.html.
Worth, K. (2010). Science in early childhood classrooms: Content and process. Collected Papers from the SEED (STEM in Early Education and Development) Conference. Retrieved from: http://ecrp.uiuc.edu/beyond/seed/worth.html.
Wynn, T., & Harris, J. (2013). Toward a STEM and arts curriculum: Creating the teacher team. Art Education, 65, 42–47.
Xie, Y., & Shauman, K. A. (2003). Women in science: Career processes and outcomes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Acknowledgements
The research reported here was supported by the Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education, through Grant R305A150571 to Worcester Polytechnic Institute. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not represent views of the Institute or the US Department of Education.
The authors would like to thank Dr. Katherine Chen and Leah Reppucci for their thoughtful comments and feedback.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dubosarsky, M., John, M.S., Anggoro, F., Wunnava, S., Celik, U. (2018). Seeds of STEM: The Development of a Problem-Based STEM Curriculum for Early Childhood Classrooms. In: English, L., Moore, T. (eds) Early Engineering Learning. Early Mathematics Learning and Development. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8621-2_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8621-2_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-8620-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-8621-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)