Abstract
This chapter attempts to provide a Cultural Constructivist perspective to explain Sino-Japanese relations. Rather than substantiating the agents and issues, its central theme is to bring forth the relational dynamics of the two nations, against the backdrop of their philosophical ontologies and cultural behavior patterns. From a relational angle, this chapter analyzes how China and Japan are related to each other. The epistemological methodology here is interpretive, based on the ontological assumption that social relationality might be different across cultural boundaries. The purpose of examining the cultural differences between the two peoples is not to distinguish each of their national characters. Rather, it aims to reinterpret the meanings and implications culture has for comprehending contemporary world affairs. Longitudinally reviewing bilateral relations since the 1972 rapprochement, the chapter argues that mutual misunderstandings, born not out of lack of information, but a cultural fault line of relationality, have exacerbated distrust between the two peoples. Thus, the first step towards disentangling the strand must begin with fostering mutual understanding of each other’s philosophical world views and cultural behavior patterns.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
Recent studies show how these classical schools of Chinese philosophy play significant roles in different social conditions in contemporary China. See for example, Hue (2007).
- 3.
Confucianism , as the official philosophy throughout most of Imperial China’s history, has no doubt shaped much of this onto-ethical thinking that discloses being in moral consciousness and moral action.
- 4.
This yin yang holistic is said to be alien to Western rationality which cannot tolerate opposites. See, Sorajjakool (2000).
- 5.
Shinto does not seek converts, because it is an ethnic rather than a universal religion. It is characterized by its lack of any complex creedal or doctrinal system, and emphasis on attitudes and customs (Kasulis 1990: 440).
- 6.
For an analysis of corporate behavior from this angle, see Siddharthan (1999).
- 7.
- 8.
The sudden announcement of Sino-American rapprochement is also known to the Japanese as the “Nixon Shock.”. Tokyo only learnt of Nixon’s planned visit to China a few hours before it was made public. Fearing being left behind in the narrow valley (tanima) of the U.S.-Soviet-China triangle, the Japanese elite and public were under enormous pressure to quickly normalize with China (Shinohara 1971: 149).
- 9.
For a detailed comparison of the negotiation power of China and Japan, refer to Uemura (2013).
- 10.
My account of the Yasukuni issue in the following several paragraphs is mostly based on Murai (2006).
- 11.
Boshin War , also known as the Japanese Revolution, was a civil war fought between the Tokugawa Shogunate and the Imperial Court. The war ended the over 200 years of the Edo era, and brought the Meiji Restoration and a new phase of Japan’s modernization.
- 12.
Collective enshrinement of class A war criminals was not made public until April 1979, when Asahi Shimbun, a major newspaper, covered this issue. Hata (2005).
- 13.
For a detailed account of China’s anti-Japan nationalism, see Gries (2005).
Bibliography
Abe, S. 2015. Toward an alliance of hope: Address to a Joint Meeting of the U.S. Congress by Prime Minister Shinzo Abe. (Prime Minister of Japan and His Cabinet). http://japan.kantei.go.jp/97_abe/statement/201504/uscongress.html. Accessed 12 Dec 2015.
Ando, Masashi, and Kazuaki Kotake. eds. 1994. Genten Chugoku Gendai-shi, vol.8, Nitchu-kankei [Original sources modern history of China, vol.8, Japan-China relations]. Tokyo: Iwatami-shoten.
Barnard, C. 2003. Language, ideology, and Japanese history textbooks. London: Routledge Curzon.
Beasley, W.G. 1999. The Japanese experience. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
Bellah, Robert N. 1970. Beyond belief: Essays on religion in a post traditional world. New York: Harper & Row.
Berger, T.U. 1993. From sword to chrysanthemum. International Security 17 (4).
Bukh, A. 2007. Japan’s history textbooks debate. Asian Survey 47 (5): 683–704.
Caldarelli, Guido, and Michele Catanzaro. 2012. Networks: A very short introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
Campbell, Joseph. 1962. Oriental mythology. New York: Viking Press.
Carpenter, T.G. 2013. Japan’s containment strategy against China. Foreign Policy, June 17.
Cheng, Chung-ying. 2002. An onto-hermeneutic interpretation of twentieth-century Chiense philosophy: Identity and vision. In Contemporary Chinese philosophy, ed. Chung-Ying Cheng and Nicholas Bunnin. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Chew, Matthew M. 2014. Rethinking the relationship between intellectuals and nationalism: A sociology of knowledge approach to philosophers’ construction of national cultural identities in modern Japan and China. Current Sociology 62 (3): 314–333.
Christensen, T.J. 1999. China, the U.S.-Japan alliance, and the security dilemma in East Asia. International Security 23 (4).
Crossley, N. 1996. Intersubjectivity: The fabric of social becoming. London: Sage.
Deal, Peter N. 1991. Ethics in the Japanese religious tradition. In A bibliographic guide to the comparative study of ethics, ed. John Carman and Mark Juergensmeyer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dudden, Alexis. 2008. Troubled apologies among Japan, Korea, and the United States. New York: Columbia University Press.
Dunning, John H., and Changsu Kim. 2007. The cultural roots of Guanxi: An exploratory study. The World Economy 30 (2): 329–341.
Emirbayer, Mustafa. 1997. Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology 103 (2): 281–317.
Fitzgerald, T. 2003. ‘Religion’ and the ‘secular’ in Japan. Electronic Journal of Japanese Studies. www.japanesesudies.org.uk/discussionpapers/Fitzgerald.html. Accessed 18 May 2016.
Foucault, M. 1987. Mental illness and psychology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Fujioka, N. 2000. “Jigyaku rekishi kan” no byouri [The pathology of a “masochist view of history”]. Tokyo: Bungei shunju.
Glasner, S.B. 2015. South China Sea FON Op. Cogitasia Podast (Center for Strategic and International Studies). http://csis.org/multimedia/cogitasia-podcast-south-china-sea-fon-op-jokowis-dc-visit. Accessed 12 Dec 2015.
Gries, P.H. 2004. China’s new nationalism. Berkeley: University of California Press.
———. 2005. China’s ‘new thinking’ on Japan. The China Quarterly 184: 831–850.
Hata, Ikuhiko. 2005. Gendaishi no taiketsu [Clash over contemporary history], 51–63. Tokyo: Bunshun Bunko.
He, Y. 2009. The search for reconciliation: Sino-Japanese and German-Polish relations since World War II. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hue, Ming-Tak. 2007. The influence of classic Chinese philosophy of Confucianism, Taoism and Legalism on classroom discipline in Hong Kong junior secondary schools. Pastoral Care in Education 25 (2): 38–45.
Hughes, Christopher. 2009. Japan’s response to China’s rise: Regional engagement, global containment, dangers of collision. International Affairs 85 (4): 837–856.
Hwang, Kwang-kuo. 1987. Face and favor: The Chinese power game. The American Journal of Sociology 92 (4): 944–974.
Ibaraki, S. 2006. Rekishi kyokasho ni miru nichu no sogo ninshiki [Mutual perception in the Japanese and Chinese history textbooks] In Tairitsu to kyozon no rekishi ninshiki [History perception of confrontation and coexistence], eds. Liu Jie et al. Tokyo: The University of Tokyo Press.
Irie, Yoshimasa. 1997. The history of the history textbook controversy. Japan Echo, August.
Jackson, Patrick T., and Daniel H. Nexon. 1999. Relations before states: Substance, process and the study of world politics. European Journal of International Relations 5 (3): 291–332.
Jeans, B.R. 2005. Victims or victimizers? The Journal of Military History 69 (1): 149–195.
Jiang, Xinyan. 1992. The law of non-contradiction and Chinese philosophy. History and Philosophy of Logic 13 (1): 1–14.
———. 2002. Zhang Dongsun: Pluralist epistemology and Chinese philosophy. In Contemporary Chinese philosophy, eds. Cheng Chung-Ying and Nicholas Bunnin. Blackwell Publishers, Chap. 3.
Jiang, L.F. 2004. Zhongguo minzhong dui riben de buqinjingan xianzhu zengqiang [The Chinese common people’s much stronger sense of being not on intimate terms with Japan]. Riben Xuekan [Japanese Studies] 6.
Kasulis, Thomas P. 1990. Intimacy: A general orientation in Japanese religious values. Philosophy East and West 40 (4): 433–449.
———. 1995. Sushi, science, and spirituality: Modern Japanese philosophy and its views of western science. Philosophy East and West 45 (2): 227–248.
Katzenstein, Peter. 1996. Cultural norms and national security : Police and military in postwar Japan. Ithaca/New York: Cornell University Press.
Kingston, J. 2015. The ‘Abe Doctrine’ transforms security policy. The Japan Times, May 23. http://www.japantimes.co.jp/opinion/2015/05/23/commentary/abe-doctrine-transforms-security-policy/#.VmfOAIRYso9. Accessed 12 Dec 2015.
Kojima, Kazuko. 2012. Kokaryo mondai [The Kokaryo dispute]. In Nichu kannkei shi 1972–2012 vol.1 [The history of Sino-Japan relations 1972–2012 vol. 1], eds. Takahara Akio and Hattori Ryuji. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.
LaFleur, R. William. 2001. Reasons for the rubble: Watsuji Tetsuro’s position in Japan’s postwar debate about rationality. Philosophy East and West 51 (1): 1–25.
Liu, J. 2009. Shusen to nihon no sekinin ninshiki mondai [The end of the war and Japan’s war responsibility]. In 1945 nen no rekishi ninshiki [History perception of 1945], eds. Liu and Kawashima. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.
Lo, Ming-Cheng M., and Eileen M. Otis. 2003. Guanxi civility: Processes, potentials, and contingencies. Politics and Society 31 (1): 131–162.
Meshino, K. 2015. Is one warship enough? Nikkei Asian Review, November 10. http://asia.nikkei.com/Politics-Economy/International-Relations/Is-one-warship-enough?page=1. Accessed 15 Dec 2015.
Mori, Kazuko. 2006. Nitchu Kankei [Sino-Japan Relations]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shinsho.
Murai, Ryota. 2006. Sengo Nihon no Seiji to Irei [Politics and war dead memorial]. In Kokkyo wo koeru rekishi ninshiki [History perception across the border], eds. Liu Jie et al. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.
Nagami, Isamu. 1981. The ontological foundation in Tetsuro Watsuji’s philosophy: Ku and human existence. Philosophy East and West 31 (3): 279–296.
Nakamura, Hajime. 1964. Ways of thinking of Eastern peoples — India, China, Tibet, Japan. English trans. ed. Philip P. Wiener. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii.
Nakane, Chie. 1970. Japanese society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Nelson, Eric S. 2011. The Yinyang and philosophy: From Liebniz to Derrida. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 38 (3): 377–396.
Nisbett, Richard E. 2002. The geography of thought: How Asians and Westerners think differently, and why. New York: Free Press.
Nishida, Kitaro. 1949. Hataraku mono kara mir mono e [From the acting ot the seeing]. In Nishida Kitaro Zenshu [Collected works of Nishsida Kitaro], vol. 4. Tokyo: Iwanami.
Odin, Steve. 1992. The social self in Japanese philosophy and American pragmatism: A comparative study of Watsuji Tetsuro and George Herbert Mead. Philosophy East and West 42 (3): 475–501.
Ogasawara, Y. 2015. Meiso suru anzen hosho housei no kanren houan to sono genjitsu sei [Vagary security related laws and their practical implications]. Huffington Post, July 12. http://www.huffingtonpost.jp/yasushi-ogasawara/12_6_b_7778746.html. Accessed 14 Dec 2015.
Parkes, Graham. 1997. The putative fascism of the Kyoto school and the political correctness of the modern academy. Philosophy East and West 47 (3): 305–336.
Roberts, Moss. 1975. The Metaphysical polemics of the Tao Te Ching: An attempt to integrate the ethics and metaphysics of Lao Tzu. Journal of the American Oriental Society 95 (1): 36–42.
Rose, C. 1998. Interpreting history in Sino-Japanese relations. New York: Routledge.
Ryu, Y. 2007. The Yasukuni controversy. Asian Survey 47 (5): 705–726.
Shields, James Mark. 2010. Beyond belief: Japanese approaches to the meaning of religion. Studies in Religion 39 (2): 133–149.
Shimada, G. 2015. Japan may send military to South China Sea, Abe says. Nikkei Asian Review, November 20. http://asia.nikkei.com/Politics-Economy/International-Relations/Japan-may-send-military-to-South-China-Sea-Abe-says. Accessed 11 Dec 2015.
Shimizu, Kosuke. 2015. Materializing the ‘non-Western’: Two stories of Japanese philosophers on culture and politics in the inter-war period. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 28 (1): 3–20.
Shinohara, Hiroshi. 1971. Beichu sekkin to nihon no boei [Sino-American rapprochement and Japan’s defense]. Chuo Koron. Oct.
Shirane, Haruo. 2000. Introduction. In Inventing the classics: Modernity, national identity, and Japanese literature, ed. Haruo Shirane and Tomi Suzuki, 1–27. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Siddharthan, N.S. 1999. European and Japanese affiliates in India: Differences in conduct and performance. Economic & Political Weekly 34 (22): M 61–MM65.
Smith, Robert J. 1985. A pattern of Japanese society: Ie society or acknowledgement of interdependence. The Journal of Japanese Studies 11 (1): 29–45.
Sorajjakool, Siroj. 2000. Wu Wei (Non-doing) and the negativity of depression. Journal of Religion and Health 39 (2): 159–166.
Starrs, Roy. 2009. Politics and religion in Japan. Religion Compass 3 (4): 752–769.
Sun, Lung-kee. 1991. Contemporary Chinese culture: Structure and emotionality. The Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs 26: 1–41.
Suzuki, Daisetz T. 1970. Zen and Japanese culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Takeuchi, Yoshimi. 1981. Takeuchi Yoshimi zenshu, vol.11 (Collected works of Takeuchi Yoshimi vol. 11). Tokyo: Chikuma Shobō.
Tanaka, K. 1992. Kuki Shuzo. Tokyo: Pelican Press.
Uemura, Takeshi. 2013. Understanding Sino-Japanese relations. Journal of Contemporary China Studies 2 (1): 95–127.
———. 2015. Understanding Chinese foreign relations: A cultural constructivist approach. International Studies Perspectives 16 (3): 345–365.
Wan, M. 2006. Sino-Japanese relations. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Wang, Zheng. 2008. National humiliation, history education, and the politics of historical memory: Patriotic education campaign in China. International Studies Quarterly 52 (4): 783–806.
Watsuji, Tetsuro. 1926. Nihon seishinshi kenkyu [Researching on the history of Japanese thinking]. Tokyo: Iwanami.
———. 1961. A climate: A philosophical study. Trans. Geoffrey Bownas. Tokyo: UNESCO.
Weinmayr, Elmar, John W.M. Krummel, and Douglas Berger. 2005. Thinking in transition: Nishida Kitaro and Martin Heidegger. Philosophy East and West 55 (2): 232–256.
Whiting, Allen. 1989. China eyes Japan. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Wong, Y.H., T.K.P. Leung, Humphry Hung, and E.W.T. Ngai. 2007. A model of guanxi development: Flexibility, commitment and capital exchange. Total Quarterly Management and Business Excellence 18 (8): 875–877.
Yang, D.Q. 2001. Ni-chu ryoukoku no wakai [Reconciliation of Japan and China]. In Nihon no sensou sekinin wo dou kangaeru ka [How to think about Japan’s war responsibility], ed. Funabashi Youichi. Tokyo: Asahi Shinbunsha.
Yang, Qingzhong. 2008. Possible inspiration offered by the Yin-Yang theory of The Book of Changes (Yi jing) regarding the course of human culture in the twenty-first century. Contemporary Chinese Thought 39 (3): 23–38.
Yang, Yiyin. 2009. Guanxilization or categorization: Psychological mechanisms contributing to the formation of the Chinese concept of ‘us’. Social Sciences in China 30 (2): 49–67.
Young, Damon A. 2009. Bowing to your enemies: Courtesy, Budo, and Japan. Philosophy East and West 59 (2): 188–215.
Zhang, Dongsun. 1946. Zhishiyu wenhua [Knowledge and Culture]. ShangHai: Commercial Press.
Zhuo, Xinping. 2015. Western and Chinese philosophical and religious thought in the twentieth century. Studies in Chinese Religions 1 (1): 91–98.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Uemura, T. (2018). Philosophy, Culture and Sino-Japanese Relations. In: Leng, TK., Aoyama, R. (eds) Decoding the Rise of China. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8288-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8288-7_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-8287-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-8288-7
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)