Skip to main content

Philosophy, Culture and Sino-Japanese Relations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Decoding the Rise of China
  • 527 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter attempts to provide a Cultural Constructivist perspective to explain Sino-Japanese relations. Rather than substantiating the agents and issues, its central theme is to bring forth the relational dynamics of the two nations, against the backdrop of their philosophical ontologies and cultural behavior patterns. From a relational angle, this chapter analyzes how China and Japan are related to each other. The epistemological methodology here is interpretive, based on the ontological assumption that social relationality might be different across cultural boundaries. The purpose of examining the cultural differences between the two peoples is not to distinguish each of their national characters. Rather, it aims to reinterpret the meanings and implications culture has for comprehending contemporary world affairs. Longitudinally reviewing bilateral relations since the 1972 rapprochement, the chapter argues that mutual misunderstandings, born not out of lack of information, but a cultural fault line of relationality, have exacerbated distrust between the two peoples. Thus, the first step towards disentangling the strand must begin with fostering mutual understanding of each other’s philosophical world views and cultural behavior patterns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a proposal for relational study in sociology, see: Emirbayer (1997); for a relational study in IR, see: Jackson and Nexon (1999); for a more general summary of network science, see: Caldarelli and Catanzaro (2012).

  2. 2.

    Recent studies show how these classical schools of Chinese philosophy play significant roles in different social conditions in contemporary China. See for example, Hue (2007).

  3. 3.

    Confucianism , as the official philosophy throughout most of Imperial China’s history, has no doubt shaped much of this onto-ethical thinking that discloses being in moral consciousness and moral action.

  4. 4.

    This yin yang holistic is said to be alien to Western rationality which cannot tolerate opposites. See, Sorajjakool (2000).

  5. 5.

    Shinto does not seek converts, because it is an ethnic rather than a universal religion. It is characterized by its lack of any complex creedal or doctrinal system, and emphasis on attitudes and customs (Kasulis 1990: 440).

  6. 6.

    For an analysis of corporate behavior from this angle, see Siddharthan (1999).

  7. 7.

    Not every philosopher of the Kyoto School can be implicated in pre-war Japanese totalitarianism. Nishitani Keiji and Tosaka Jun for example, obviously distanced themselves from the School’s mainstream such as Nishida. Refer to Shimizu (2015), Parkes (1997).

  8. 8.

    The sudden announcement of Sino-American rapprochement is also known to the Japanese as the “Nixon Shock.”. Tokyo only learnt of Nixon’s planned visit to China a few hours before it was made public. Fearing being left behind in the narrow valley (tanima) of the U.S.-Soviet-China triangle, the Japanese elite and public were under enormous pressure to quickly normalize with China (Shinohara 1971: 149).

  9. 9.

    For a detailed comparison of the negotiation power of China and Japan, refer to Uemura (2013).

  10. 10.

    My account of the Yasukuni issue in the following several paragraphs is mostly based on Murai (2006).

  11. 11.

    Boshin War , also known as the Japanese Revolution, was a civil war fought between the Tokugawa Shogunate and the Imperial Court. The war ended the over 200 years of the Edo era, and brought the Meiji Restoration and a new phase of Japan’s modernization.

  12. 12.

    Collective enshrinement of class A war criminals was not made public until April 1979, when Asahi Shimbun, a major newspaper, covered this issue. Hata (2005).

  13. 13.

    For a detailed account of China’s anti-Japan nationalism, see Gries (2005).

Bibliography

  • Abe, S. 2015. Toward an alliance of hope: Address to a Joint Meeting of the U.S. Congress by Prime Minister Shinzo Abe. (Prime Minister of Japan and His Cabinet). http://japan.kantei.go.jp/97_abe/statement/201504/uscongress.html. Accessed 12 Dec 2015.

  • Ando, Masashi, and Kazuaki Kotake. eds. 1994. Genten Chugoku Gendai-shi, vol.8, Nitchu-kankei [Original sources modern history of China, vol.8, Japan-China relations]. Tokyo: Iwatami-shoten.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, C. 2003. Language, ideology, and Japanese history textbooks. London: Routledge Curzon.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beasley, W.G. 1999. The Japanese experience. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellah, Robert N. 1970. Beyond belief: Essays on religion in a post traditional world. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, T.U. 1993. From sword to chrysanthemum. International Security 17 (4).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bukh, A. 2007. Japan’s history textbooks debate. Asian Survey 47 (5): 683–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldarelli, Guido, and Michele Catanzaro. 2012. Networks: A very short introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Joseph. 1962. Oriental mythology. New York: Viking Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, T.G. 2013. Japan’s containment strategy against China. Foreign Policy, June 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Chung-ying. 2002. An onto-hermeneutic interpretation of twentieth-century Chiense philosophy: Identity and vision. In Contemporary Chinese philosophy, ed. Chung-Ying Cheng and Nicholas Bunnin. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chew, Matthew M. 2014. Rethinking the relationship between intellectuals and nationalism: A sociology of knowledge approach to philosophers’ construction of national cultural identities in modern Japan and China. Current Sociology 62 (3): 314–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, T.J. 1999. China, the U.S.-Japan alliance, and the security dilemma in East Asia. International Security 23 (4).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crossley, N. 1996. Intersubjectivity: The fabric of social becoming. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deal, Peter N. 1991. Ethics in the Japanese religious tradition. In A bibliographic guide to the comparative study of ethics, ed. John Carman and Mark Juergensmeyer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudden, Alexis. 2008. Troubled apologies among Japan, Korea, and the United States. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, John H., and Changsu Kim. 2007. The cultural roots of Guanxi: An exploratory study. The World Economy 30 (2): 329–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emirbayer, Mustafa. 1997. Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology 103 (2): 281–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, T. 2003. ‘Religion’ and the ‘secular’ in Japan. Electronic Journal of Japanese Studies. www.japanesesudies.org.uk/discussionpapers/Fitzgerald.html. Accessed 18 May 2016.

  • Foucault, M. 1987. Mental illness and psychology. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujioka, N. 2000. “Jigyaku rekishi kanno byouri [The pathology of a “masochist view of history”]. Tokyo: Bungei shunju.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasner, S.B. 2015. South China Sea FON Op. Cogitasia Podast (Center for Strategic and International Studies). http://csis.org/multimedia/cogitasia-podcast-south-china-sea-fon-op-jokowis-dc-visit. Accessed 12 Dec 2015.

  • Gries, P.H. 2004. China’s new nationalism. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. China’s ‘new thinking’ on Japan. The China Quarterly 184: 831–850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hata, Ikuhiko. 2005. Gendaishi no taiketsu [Clash over contemporary history], 51–63. Tokyo: Bunshun Bunko.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, Y. 2009. The search for reconciliation: Sino-Japanese and German-Polish relations since World War II. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hue, Ming-Tak. 2007. The influence of classic Chinese philosophy of Confucianism, Taoism and Legalism on classroom discipline in Hong Kong junior secondary schools. Pastoral Care in Education 25 (2): 38–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, Christopher. 2009. Japan’s response to China’s rise: Regional engagement, global containment, dangers of collision. International Affairs 85 (4): 837–856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, Kwang-kuo. 1987. Face and favor: The Chinese power game. The American Journal of Sociology 92 (4): 944–974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibaraki, S. 2006. Rekishi kyokasho ni miru nichu no sogo ninshiki [Mutual perception in the Japanese and Chinese history textbooks] In Tairitsu to kyozon no rekishi ninshiki [History perception of confrontation and coexistence], eds. Liu Jie et al. Tokyo: The University of Tokyo Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irie, Yoshimasa. 1997. The history of the history textbook controversy. Japan Echo, August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Patrick T., and Daniel H. Nexon. 1999. Relations before states: Substance, process and the study of world politics. European Journal of International Relations 5 (3): 291–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeans, B.R. 2005. Victims or victimizers? The Journal of Military History 69 (1): 149–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, Xinyan. 1992. The law of non-contradiction and Chinese philosophy. History and Philosophy of Logic 13 (1): 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2002. Zhang Dongsun: Pluralist epistemology and Chinese philosophy. In Contemporary Chinese philosophy, eds. Cheng Chung-Ying and Nicholas Bunnin. Blackwell Publishers, Chap. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, L.F. 2004. Zhongguo minzhong dui riben de buqinjingan xianzhu zengqiang [The Chinese common people’s much stronger sense of being not on intimate terms with Japan]. Riben Xuekan [Japanese Studies] 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasulis, Thomas P. 1990. Intimacy: A general orientation in Japanese religious values. Philosophy East and West 40 (4): 433–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1995. Sushi, science, and spirituality: Modern Japanese philosophy and its views of western science. Philosophy East and West 45 (2): 227–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katzenstein, Peter. 1996. Cultural norms and national security : Police and military in postwar Japan. Ithaca/New York: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingston, J. 2015. The ‘Abe Doctrine’ transforms security policy. The Japan Times, May 23. http://www.japantimes.co.jp/opinion/2015/05/23/commentary/abe-doctrine-transforms-security-policy/#.VmfOAIRYso9. Accessed 12 Dec 2015.

  • Kojima, Kazuko. 2012. Kokaryo mondai [The Kokaryo dispute]. In Nichu kannkei shi 1972–2012 vol.1 [The history of Sino-Japan relations 1972–2012 vol. 1], eds. Takahara Akio and Hattori Ryuji. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaFleur, R. William. 2001. Reasons for the rubble: Watsuji Tetsuro’s position in Japan’s postwar debate about rationality. Philosophy East and West 51 (1): 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J. 2009. Shusen to nihon no sekinin ninshiki mondai [The end of the war and Japan’s war responsibility]. In 1945 nen no rekishi ninshiki [History perception of 1945], eds. Liu and Kawashima. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lo, Ming-Cheng M., and Eileen M. Otis. 2003. Guanxi civility: Processes, potentials, and contingencies. Politics and Society 31 (1): 131–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meshino, K. 2015. Is one warship enough? Nikkei Asian Review, November 10. http://asia.nikkei.com/Politics-Economy/International-Relations/Is-one-warship-enough?page=1. Accessed 15 Dec 2015.

  • Mori, Kazuko. 2006. Nitchu Kankei [Sino-Japan Relations]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shinsho.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murai, Ryota. 2006. Sengo Nihon no Seiji to Irei [Politics and war dead memorial]. In Kokkyo wo koeru rekishi ninshiki [History perception across the border], eds. Liu Jie et al. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagami, Isamu. 1981. The ontological foundation in Tetsuro Watsuji’s philosophy: Ku and human existence. Philosophy East and West 31 (3): 279–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, Hajime. 1964. Ways of thinking of Eastern peoples — India, China, Tibet, Japan. English trans. ed. Philip P. Wiener. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakane, Chie. 1970. Japanese society. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Eric S. 2011. The Yinyang and philosophy: From Liebniz to Derrida. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 38 (3): 377–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, Richard E. 2002. The geography of thought: How Asians and Westerners think differently, and why. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishida, Kitaro. 1949. Hataraku mono kara mir mono e [From the acting ot the seeing]. In Nishida Kitaro Zenshu [Collected works of Nishsida Kitaro], vol. 4. Tokyo: Iwanami.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odin, Steve. 1992. The social self in Japanese philosophy and American pragmatism: A comparative study of Watsuji Tetsuro and George Herbert Mead. Philosophy East and West 42 (3): 475–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogasawara, Y. 2015. Meiso suru anzen hosho housei no kanren houan to sono genjitsu sei [Vagary security related laws and their practical implications]. Huffington Post, July 12. http://www.huffingtonpost.jp/yasushi-ogasawara/12_6_b_7778746.html. Accessed 14 Dec 2015.

  • Parkes, Graham. 1997. The putative fascism of the Kyoto school and the political correctness of the modern academy. Philosophy East and West 47 (3): 305–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Moss. 1975. The Metaphysical polemics of the Tao Te Ching: An attempt to integrate the ethics and metaphysics of Lao Tzu. Journal of the American Oriental Society 95 (1): 36–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, C. 1998. Interpreting history in Sino-Japanese relations. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryu, Y. 2007. The Yasukuni controversy. Asian Survey 47 (5): 705–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shields, James Mark. 2010. Beyond belief: Japanese approaches to the meaning of religion. Studies in Religion 39 (2): 133–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shimada, G. 2015. Japan may send military to South China Sea, Abe says. Nikkei Asian Review, November 20. http://asia.nikkei.com/Politics-Economy/International-Relations/Japan-may-send-military-to-South-China-Sea-Abe-says. Accessed 11 Dec 2015.

  • Shimizu, Kosuke. 2015. Materializing the ‘non-Western’: Two stories of Japanese philosophers on culture and politics in the inter-war period. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 28 (1): 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shinohara, Hiroshi. 1971. Beichu sekkin to nihon no boei [Sino-American rapprochement and Japan’s defense]. Chuo Koron. Oct.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirane, Haruo. 2000. Introduction. In Inventing the classics: Modernity, national identity, and Japanese literature, ed. Haruo Shirane and Tomi Suzuki, 1–27. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siddharthan, N.S. 1999. European and Japanese affiliates in India: Differences in conduct and performance. Economic & Political Weekly 34 (22): M 61–MM65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Robert J. 1985. A pattern of Japanese society: Ie society or acknowledgement of interdependence. The Journal of Japanese Studies 11 (1): 29–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorajjakool, Siroj. 2000. Wu Wei (Non-doing) and the negativity of depression. Journal of Religion and Health 39 (2): 159–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starrs, Roy. 2009. Politics and religion in Japan. Religion Compass 3 (4): 752–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Lung-kee. 1991. Contemporary Chinese culture: Structure and emotionality. The Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs 26: 1–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, Daisetz T. 1970. Zen and Japanese culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takeuchi, Yoshimi. 1981. Takeuchi Yoshimi zenshu, vol.11 (Collected works of Takeuchi Yoshimi vol. 11). Tokyo: Chikuma Shobō.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, K. 1992. Kuki Shuzo. Tokyo: Pelican Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uemura, Takeshi. 2013. Understanding Sino-Japanese relations. Journal of Contemporary China Studies 2 (1): 95–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Understanding Chinese foreign relations: A cultural constructivist approach. International Studies Perspectives 16 (3): 345–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wan, M. 2006. Sino-Japanese relations. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Zheng. 2008. National humiliation, history education, and the politics of historical memory: Patriotic education campaign in China. International Studies Quarterly 52 (4): 783–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watsuji, Tetsuro. 1926. Nihon seishinshi kenkyu [Researching on the history of Japanese thinking]. Tokyo: Iwanami.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1961. A climate: A philosophical study. Trans. Geoffrey Bownas. Tokyo: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinmayr, Elmar, John W.M. Krummel, and Douglas Berger. 2005. Thinking in transition: Nishida Kitaro and Martin Heidegger. Philosophy East and West 55 (2): 232–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whiting, Allen. 1989. China eyes Japan. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, Y.H., T.K.P. Leung, Humphry Hung, and E.W.T. Ngai. 2007. A model of guanxi development: Flexibility, commitment and capital exchange. Total Quarterly Management and Business Excellence 18 (8): 875–877.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, D.Q. 2001. Ni-chu ryoukoku no wakai [Reconciliation of Japan and China]. In Nihon no sensou sekinin wo dou kangaeru ka [How to think about Japan’s war responsibility], ed. Funabashi Youichi. Tokyo: Asahi Shinbunsha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Qingzhong. 2008. Possible inspiration offered by the Yin-Yang theory of The Book of Changes (Yi jing) regarding the course of human culture in the twenty-first century. Contemporary Chinese Thought 39 (3): 23–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Yiyin. 2009. Guanxilization or categorization: Psychological mechanisms contributing to the formation of the Chinese concept of ‘us’. Social Sciences in China 30 (2): 49–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, Damon A. 2009. Bowing to your enemies: Courtesy, Budo, and Japan. Philosophy East and West 59 (2): 188–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Dongsun. 1946. Zhishiyu wenhua [Knowledge and Culture]. ShangHai: Commercial Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhuo, Xinping. 2015. Western and Chinese philosophical and religious thought in the twentieth century. Studies in Chinese Religions 1 (1): 91–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Uemura, T. (2018). Philosophy, Culture and Sino-Japanese Relations. In: Leng, TK., Aoyama, R. (eds) Decoding the Rise of China. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8288-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8288-7_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-8287-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-8288-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics