Skip to main content

Defining Sustainable and “Decent” Work for Human Factors and Ergonomics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ergonomics and Human Factors for a Sustainable Future

Abstract

Sustainable work is a vital factor in the transition towards global sustainability. The term itself, as well as its relations to work content, working conditions, and quality of life, is somewhat vague. In applying a resource management perspective, this chapter aims at bridging the long-term needs of the three main work-life stakeholders—individuals, enterprises, and society—to the economic, environmental, and social pillars of sustainability. A key factor in this regard is the reciprocity in values and goals between human factors and ergonomics and programmes promoting quality of work, such as the Decent Work Agenda. Sustainable work implies enabling workers to engage and develop throughout their career. To the authors, this seems impossible without facilitation of ideas and values linked to decent work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It could be wisely noted here that the word career stems from middle Latin “carrāria”, meaning cart road, not necessarily made for high-speed and smooth driving.

References

  • Antonovsky, A. (1987). Unraveling the mystery of health: How people manage stress and stay well. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, C. (2011). Understanding disability and the importance of design for all. Journal of Accessibility and Design for All, 1, 55–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baruch-Mordo, S., Breck, S. W., Wilson, K. R., & Broderick, J. (2011). The carrot or the stick? Evaluation of education and enforcement as management tools for human-wildlife conflicts. PLoS One, 6, e15681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belser, P., de Cock, M., & Mehran, F. (2005). ILO minimum estimate of forced labour in the world, (7). Retrieved March 2, 2017, from http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/nondiscrim/7/

  • Bhatti, K. K., & Qureshi, T. M. (2007). Impact of employee participation on job satisfaction, employee commitment and employee productivity. International Review of Business Research Papers, 3(2), 54–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S. (2014). Conceptualising lifelong learning in contemporary times. In T. Halttunen, M. Koivisto, & S. Billett (Eds.), Promoting, assessing, recognizing and certifying lifelong learning (pp. 19–35). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Blustein, D. L. (2008). The role of work in psychological health and well-being: A conceptual, historical, and public policy perspective. American Psychologist, 63, 228–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blustein, D. L., Olle, C., Connors-Kellgren, A., & Diamonti, A. J. (2016). Decent work: A psychological perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1–10. Retrieved August 30, 2016, from https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00407

  • Bolis, I., Brunoro, C. M., & Sznelwar, L. I. (2014). Work in corporate sustainability policies: The contribution of ergonomics. Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation, 49, 417–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonnet, F., Figueiredo, J. B., & Standing, G. (2003). A family of decent work indexes special issue: Measuring decent work. International Labour Review, 142, 213–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brundtland, G., Khalid, M., Agnelli, S., Al-Athel, S., Chidzero, B., Fadika, L., et al. (1987). Our common future (‘Brundtland report’). Retrieved July 19, 2016, from http://www.citeulike.org/group/13799/article/13602458

  • Brunoro, C., Bolis, I., & Sznelwar, L. (2016). Exploring work-related issues on corporate sustainability. Work, 53, 643–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budd, J. W., & Spencer, D. A. (2015). Worker well-being and the importance of work: Bridging the gap. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 21, 181–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busck, O., Knudsen, H., & Lind, J. (2010). The transformation of employee participation: Consequences for the work environment. Economic and Industrial Democracy. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831x09351212

  • Carayon, P. (2006). Human factors of complex sociotechnical systems. Applied Ergonomics, 37, 525–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carden, L. L., & Boyd, R. O. (2014). Age discrimination and the workplace: Examining a model for prevention. Southern Journal of Business and Ethics, 6, 58–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnevale, A. P., & Smith, N. (2013). Workplace basics: The skills employees need and employers want. Human Resource Development International, 16, 491–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crews, D. E., & Zavotka, S. (2006). Aging, disability, and Frailty: Implications for universal design. Journal of Physiological Anthropology, 25, 113–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Lange, A. H., Van Yperen, N. W., Van der Heijden, B. I. J. M., & Bal, P. M. (2010). Dominant achievement goals of older workers and their relationship with motivation-related outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77, 118–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Fabio, A., & Maree, J. G. (2016). Using a transdisciplinary interpretive lens to broaden reflections on alleviating poverty and promoting decent work. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 503. Retrieved December 8, 2016, from https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00503

  • Di Ruggiero, E., Cohen, J. E., Cole, D. C., & Forman, L. (2015). Competing conceptualizations of decent work at the intersection of health, social and economic discourses. Social Science & Medicine, 133, 120–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dick, P., & Hyde, R. (2006). Consent as resistance, resistance as consent: Re-reading part-time professionals’ acceptance of their marginal positions. Gender, Work & Organization, 13, 543–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DuBois, C. L. Z., & DuBois, D. A. (2012). Strategic HRM as social design for environmental sustainability in organization. Human Resource Management, 51, 799–826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dul, J., Bruder, R., Buckle, P., Carayon, P., Falzon, P., Marras, W. S., et al. (2012). A strategy for human factors/ergonomics: Developing the discipline and profession. Ergonomics, 55, 377–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dul, J., & Neumann, W. P. (2009). Ergonomics contributions to company strategies. Applied Ergonomics, 40, 745–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, P., & Greasley, K. (2010). Absence from work. The European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (Eurofound). Retrieved July 22, 2016, from http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/docs/ewco/tn0911039s/tn0911039s.pdf

  • Ehnert, I. (2009). Theorising on strategic HRM from a sustainability approach sustainable human resource management: A conceptual and exploratory analysis from a paradox perspective (pp. 79–121). Heidelberg, Germany: Physica-Verlag HD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st-century business. Oxford, UK: Capstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. (2006). Governance for sustainability. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14, 522–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fields, G. S. (2003). Decent work and development policies special issue: Measuring decent work. International Labour Review, 142, 239–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figge, F., Hahn, T., Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2002). The sustainability balanced scorecard – Linking sustainability management to business strategy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11, 269–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flecker, J. (2009). Outsourcing, spatial relocation and the fragmentation of employment. Competition & Change, 13, 251–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fölster, S. (2014). Vartannat jobb automatiseras inom 20 år–utmaningar för Sverige [Every other job will be automated within 20 years – Challenges for Sweden]. Stockholm, Sweden: Stiftelsen för Strategisk Forskning [Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research]. Retrieved July 28, 2016, from http://stratresearch.se/wp-content/uploads/varannat-jobb-automatiseras.pdf

  • Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2013). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation. The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 254–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, D. G., & Sverke, M. (2005). Contingent employment contracts: Are existing employment theories still relevant? Economic and Industrial Democracy, 26, 181–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, L. C., & Moseley, W. G. (2005). A geographical perspective on poverty–environment interactions. The Geographical Journal, 171, 9–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groshen, E. L., & Potter, S. (2003). Has structural change contributed to a jobless recovery? Current Issues in Economics and Finance, 9(8). Retrieved July 1, 2016, from https://ssrn.com/abstract=683258

  • Hall, R., & Lansbury, R. D. (2006). Skills in Australia: Towards workforce development and sustainable skill ecosystems. Journal of Industrial Relations, 48, 575–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, P. A., & Diaz, D. D. (2010). Ergonomics as a foundation for a science of purpose. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 3, 115–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasle, P., & Jensen, P. L. (2012). Ergonomics and sustainability – Challenges from global supply chains. Work, 41(Supplement 1), 3906–3913. https://doi.org/10.3233/wor-2012-0060-3906

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasle, P., & Petersen, J. (2004). The role of agreements between labour unions and employers in the regulation of the work environment. Policy and Practice in Health and Safety, 2, 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hepple, B. (2006). Rights at work. In D. Ghai (Ed.), Decent work: Objectives and strategies (pp. 33–75). Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hignett, S., Wilson, J. R., & Morris, W. (2005). Finding ergonomic solutions—Participatory approaches. Occupational Medicine, 55, 200–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilborn, R., Walters, C. J., & Ludwig, D. (1995). Sustainable exploitation of renewable resources. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 26, 45–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hursh, D. W., & Henderson, J. A. (2011). Contesting global neoliberalism and creating alternative futures. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 32, 171–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • ILO (International labour Organization). (1999). Report of the Director-General: Decent work. Retrieved January 23, 2017, from http://www.ilo.org/public/english/standards/relm/ilc/ilc87/rep-i.htm

  • ILO (International Labour Organization). (2003). Working out of poverty. Report of the ILO Director-General. Retrieved July, 23, 2016, from http://www.ilo.org/public/english/standards/relm/ilc/ilc91/pdf/rep-i-a.pdf

  • ILO (International Labour Organization). (2013). Decent work indicators: Concepts and definitions, guidelines for producers and users of statistical and legal framework indicators, manual, ILO. Retrieved July, 25, 2016 from http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---integration/documents/publication/wcms_229374.pdf

  • ILO (International Labour Organization). (2014). Rules of the game: A brief introduction to International Labour Standards. Retrieved January 24, 2017, from http://www.ilo.org/global/standards/information-resources-and-publications/publications/WCMS_318141/lang--en/index.htm

  • ILO (International Labour Organization). (2015). World employment and social outlook 2015: The changing nature of jobs 2015. Retrieved January 24, 2017, from http://www.ilo.org/global/research/global-reports/weso/2015-changing-nature-of-jobs/WCMS_368626/lang--en/index.htm

  • ILO (International Labour Organization). (2016). Decent work. Retrieved December 8, 2016, from http://www.itcilo.org/pt/the-centre/programmes/atividades-dos-trabalhadores/resources/decent-work-booklet_pt/view

  • ILO (International Labour Organization). (2017). Decent work and the 2030 agenda for sustainable development #8- Decent work and Economic growth. Retrieved February 2, 2017, from http://ilo.org/global/topics/sdg-2030/resources/WCMS_436923/lang--en/index.htm

  • International Ergonomics Association (IEA). (2017). Definition and domains of ergonomics. Retrieved January 12, 2017, from http://www.iea.cc/whats/index.html

  • Iverson, R. D., & Pullman, J. A. (2000). Determinants of voluntary turnover and layoffs in an environment of repeated downsizing following a merger: An event history analysis. Journal of Management, 26, 977–1003. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S. E., & Schuler, R. S. (1995). Understanding human resource management in the context of organizations and their environments. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 237–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jahoda, M. (1982). Employment and unemployment: A social-psychological analysis (Vol. 1). New York: Cambridge University Press Archive.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, P., Everard, M., Santillo, D., & Robèrt, K.-H. (2007). Reclaiming the definition of sustainability. Environmental Science and Pollution Research – International, 14, 60–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalleberg, A. L. (2009). Precarious work, insecure workers: Employment relations in transition. American Sociological Review, 74, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keane, A., Jones, J. P., Edwards-Jones, G., & Milner-Gulland, E. J. (2008). The sleeping policeman: Understanding issues of enforcement and compliance in conservation. Animal Conservation, 11, 75–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, N. O., & Olmstead, S. M. (2016). Markets and the environment (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Island Press/Center for Resource Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleiner, B. M. (2006). Macroergonomics: Analysis and design of work systems. Applied Ergonomics, 37, 81–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lange-Morales, K., Thatcher, A., & García-Acosta, G. (2014). Towards a sustainable world through human factors and ergonomics: It is all about values. Ergonomics, 57, 1603–1615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. S. (2005). Ergonomics in total quality management: How can we sell ergonomics to management? Ergonomics, 48, 547–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lillie, N., & Sippola, M. (2011). National unions and transnational workers: The case of Olkiluoto 3, Finland. Work, Employment & Society, 25, 292–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., & Diamond, J. (2005). China’s environment in a globalizing world. Nature, 435(7046), 1179–1186. Retrieved July 18, 2016, from http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v435/n7046/suppinfo/4351179a_S1.html

  • Mabogunje, A. L. (2002). Poverty and environmental degradation: Challenges within the global economy. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 44, 8–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manuaba, A. (2007). A total approach in ergonomics is a must to attain humane, competitive and sustainable work systems and products. Journal of Human Ergology, 36, 23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, K., Legg, S., & Brown, C. (2013). Designing for sustainability: Ergonomics – Carpe diem. Ergonomics, 56, 365–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mastekaasa, A. (1996). Unemployment and health: Selection effects. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 6, 189–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meister, D. (1999). The history of human factors and ergonomics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messer, K. D. (2010). Protecting endangered species: When are shoot-on-sight policies the only viable option to stop poaching? Ecological Economics, 69, 2334–2340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moldan, B., Janoušková, S., & Hák, T. (2012). How to understand and measure environmental sustainability: Indicators and targets. Ecological Indicators, 17, 4–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, D., & Barnard, T. (2012). With eloquence and humanity? Human factors/ergonomics in sustainable human development. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 54, 940–951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumayer, E. (2003). Weak versus strong sustainability: Exploring the limits of two opposing paradigms. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, K. B. (2006). Productivity impacts of offshoring and outsourcing a review. A review. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 2006/01. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved September 1, 2016, from https://doi.org/10.1787/685237388034

  • Posthuma, R. A., & Campion, M. A. (2008). Age stereotypes in the workplace: Common stereotypes, moderators, and future research directions. Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308318617

  • Pouyaud, J. (2016). For a psychosocial approach to decent work. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1–14. Retrieved December 8, 2016, from https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00422.

  • Ramazzini, B. (1713/1940). Diseases of workers. [De Morbis Artificatum Diatriba] (W. C. Wright, Trans.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randers, J. (2012). 2052: A global forecast for the next forty years. Chelsea, UK: Green Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reijnders, L. (2000). A normative strategy for sustainable resource choice and recycling. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 28, 121–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin III, F. S., Lambin, E., et al. (2009). Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and Society, 14(2), 32. Retrieved January 27, 2017, from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss2/art32/

  • Ros, M., Schwartz, S. H., & Surkiss, S. (1999). Basic individual values, work values, and the meaning of work. Applied Psychology, 48, 49–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, A. (2008). The new geography of work: Power to the precarious? Theory, Culture & Society, 25, 31–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosso, B. D., Dekas, K. H., & Wrzesniewski, A. (2010). On the meaning of work: A theoretical integration and review. Research in Organizational Behavior, 30, 91–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rushton, S., & Williams, O. D. (2012). Frames, paradigms and power: Global health policy-making under neoliberalism. Global Society, 26, 147–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. (1998). The contours of positive human health. Psychological Inquiry, 9, 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sengenberger, W. (2013). The International Labour Organization: Goals, functions and political impact. Retrieved February 2, 2017, from http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/iez/10279.pdf

  • Shane, S. (2009). Why encouraging more people to become entrepreneurs is bad public policy. Small Business Economics, 33, 141–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheavly, S. B., & Register, K. M. (2007). Marine Debris & Plastics: Environmental concerns, sources, impacts and solutions. Journal of Polymers and the Environment, 15, 301–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soman, D. (2004). Framing, loss aversion, and mental accounting. In D. J. Koehler & N. Harvey (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making (pp. 379–398). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Standing, G. (2011). The precariat. The new dangerous class. New York/London: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strully, K. W. (2009). Job loss and health in the U.S. labor market. Demography, 46, 221–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, J. L. (2012). Work and psychological health. In N. A. Fouad, J. A. Carter, & L. M. Subich (Eds.), APA handbook of counseling psychology, Practice, interventions, and applications (Vol. 2, pp. 3–27). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thatcher, A. (2012). Early variability in the conceptualisation of “sustainable development and human factors”. Work, 41(Supplement 1), 3892–3899.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thatcher, A., & Yeow, P. H. P. (2016). Human factors for a sustainable future. Applied Ergonomics, 57, 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. P. (2016). The making of the English working class. New York: Open Road Integrated Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (2015). Adoption of the Paris Agreement. Retrieved February 20, 2017, from https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/l09r01.pdf

  • Van Daele, J. (2005). Engineering social peace: Networks, ideas, and the founding of the International Labour Organization. International Review of Social History, 50, 435–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vink, P., Koningsveld, E. A. P., & Molenbroek, J. F. (2006). Positive outcomes of participatory ergonomics in terms of greater comfort and higher productivity. Applied Ergonomics, 37, 537–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waite, M. (2013). SURF framework for a sustainable economy. Journal of Management and Sustainability, 3(4), 25–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walliser, B. (2008). Cognitive economics. Leipzig, Germany: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. R. (2000). Fundamentals of ergonomics in theory and practice. Applied Ergonomics, 31, 557–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winch, C. (2013). Learning at work and in the workplace: Reflections on Paul Hager’s advocacy of work-based learning. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 45, 1205–1218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wisman, J. D. (2013). Wage stagnation, rising inequality and the financial crisis of 2008. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 37, 921–945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yerxa, E. J. (1998). Health and the human Spirit for occupation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52, 412–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zink, K. J. (2005). From industrial safety to corporate health management. Ergonomics, 48, 534–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zink, K. J. (2014). Designing sustainable work systems: The need for a systems approach. Applied Ergonomics, 45, 126–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zink, K. J., & Fischer, K. (2013). Do we need sustainability as a new approach in human factors and ergonomics? Ergonomics, 56, 348–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fostervold, K.I., Koren, P.C., Nilsen, O.V. (2018). Defining Sustainable and “Decent” Work for Human Factors and Ergonomics. In: Thatcher, A., Yeow, P. (eds) Ergonomics and Human Factors for a Sustainable Future. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8072-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8072-2_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-8071-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-8072-2

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics