Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Sustainable System-of-Systems Approach: Identifying the Important Boundaries for a Target System in Human Factors and Ergonomics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ergonomics and Human Factors for a Sustainable Future

Abstract

The problems now facing humanity are complex and rapidly evolving. In fact, these problems even threaten our very existence as a species. The sustainable system-of-systems model, which has been developed to help characterise the various different levels of human factors and ergonomics approaches to dealing with these problems, is explained and critiqued this chapter. We then look at the various possible ways to address the “fuzzy boundary” problem of complex adaptive systems for human factors and ergonomics. These possible solutions include the Pareto Principle, Stakeholder Salience Theory, Soft Systems Methodology, and Network Theory. The example of the design of a green building workplace layout is used to illustrate the concepts. The chapter concludes with a critique of what we consider to be the most promising of these solutions at present, the Network Theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ali, S. H. (2004). A socio-ecological autopsy of the E. coli O157: H7 outbreak in Walkerton, Ontario, Canada. Social Science & Medicine, 58, 2601–2612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amoroso, L. (1938). Vilfredo Pareto. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 6, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnhart, M., & Mish, J. (2017). Hippies, hummer owners, and people like me: stereotyping as a means of reconciling ethical consumption values with the DSP. Journal of Macromarketing, 37, 57–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, S., & Morse, S. (2004). Experiences with sustainability indicators and stakeholder participation: A case study relating to a ‘Blue Plan’ project in Malta. Sustainable Development, 12, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergvall-Kåreborn, B., Mirijamdotter, A., & Basden, A. (2004). Basic principles of SSM modeling: An examination of CATWOE from a soft perspective. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 17, 55–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boudeau, C., Wilkin, P., & Dekker, S. W. (2014). Ergonomics as authoritarian or libertarian: Learning from Colin Ward’s politics of design. The Design Journal, 17, 91–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, A. (1998). Ergonomic approaches to office layout and space planning. Facilities, 16, 73–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, T., Bojicic-Dzelilovic, V., Olin, N., Rigterink, A., & Schomerus, M. (2014). Practice without evidence: Interrogating conflict resolution approaches and assumptions. Justice and Security Research Programme, International Development Department, London School of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. B. (1972). Towards a systems-based methodology for real-world problem solving. Journal of Systems Engineering, 3, 87–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. B. (2000). Soft systems methodology: A thirty year retrospective. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 17, S11–S58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. B., & Davies, L. (1986). The use of the term ‘Weltanschauung’ in soft systems methodology. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, 13, 109–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conklin, J. (2006). Dialogue mapping: Building shared understanding of wicked problems. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R., & Patten, B. C. (1995). Defining and predicting sustainability. Ecological Economics, 15, 193–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dekker, S. W., Hancock, P. A., & Wilkin, P. (2013). Ergonomics and sustainability: Towards an embrace of complexity and emergence. Ergonomics, 56, 357–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easley, D., & Kleinberg, J. (2010). Networks, crowds, and markets: Reasoning about a highly connected world. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, C., Spence, P. R., Gentile, C. J., Edwards, A., & Edwards, A. (2013). How much Klout do you have… A test of system generated cues on source credibility. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, A12–A16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. (1998). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Oxford, UK: Capstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genaidy, A. M., Sequeira, R., Rinder, M. M., & A-Rehim, A. D. (2009). Determinants of business sustainability: An ergonomics perspective. Ergonomics, 52, 273–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, L. H., & Holling, C. S. (2002). Panarchy: Understanding transformation in human and natural systems. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haines, H., Wilson, J. R., Vink, P., & Koningsveld, A. E. (2002). Validating a framework for participatory ergonomics (the PEF). Ergonomics, 45, 309–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hakansson, H., & Ford, D. (2002). How should companies interact in business networks? Journal of Business Research, 55, 133–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, J. (2001). The fourth pillar of sustainability: Culture’s essential role in public planning. Melbourne, Australia: Common Ground.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecht, A. D., Fiksel, J., Fulton, S. C., Yosie, T. F., Hawkins, N. C., Leuenberger, H., et al. (2012). Creating the future we want. Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy, 8, 62–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel, E. (2012). FRAM: The functional resonance analysis method: Modelling complex socio-technical systems. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, R. E., & Weber, R. P. (2007). New tools for resolving wicked problems: Mess mapping and resolution mapping processes. Watertown, MA: Strategy Kinetics LLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imai, M. (1986). Kaizen – The key to Japan’s competitive success. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C., & Keys, P. (1984). Towards a system of systems methodologies. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 35, 473–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karsh, B. T., Waterson, P., & Holden, R. J. (2014). Crossing levels in systems ergonomics: A framework to support ‘mesoergonomic’ inquiry. Applied Ergonomics, 45, 45–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kodas, M. (2014). How did palm oil become such a problem – And what can we do about it? ENASIA, November 3, 2014. http://ensia.com/features/how-did-palm-oil-become-such-a-problem-and-what-can-we-do-about-it/. Accessed 13 July 2016.

  • Lange-Morales, K., Thatcher, A., & García-Acosta, G. (2014). Towards a sustainable world through human factors and ergonomics: It is all about values. Ergonomics, 57, 1603–1615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, K., Cashore, B., Bernstein, S., & Auld, G. (2012). Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: Constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change. Policy Sciences, 45, 123–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maier, M. W. (1998). Architecturing principles for systems of systems. Systems Engineering, 1, 267–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manuaba, A. (2007). A total approach in ergonomics is a must to attain humane, competitive and sustainable work systems and products. Journal of Human Ergology, 36, 23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, D. (1999). Leverage points: Places to intervene in a system. Hartland, VT: The Sustainability Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1936). The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action. American Sociological Review, 1, 894–904.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgram, S. (1967). The small world problem. Psychology Today, 2, 60–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22, 853–886.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munasinghe, M. (2009). Sustainable development in practice: Sustainomics methodology and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, R. (2012). Sustainability: A wicked problem. Sociologica, 6, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M. E. (2003). The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review, 45, 167–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Öberg, C., Huge-Brodin, M., & Björklund, M. (2012). Applying a network level in environmental impact assessments. Journal of Business Research, 65, 247–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paliwal, P. (2005). Sustainable development and systems thinking: A case study of a heritage city. The International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 12, 213–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philip, S. Y., Han, J., & Faloutsos, C. (2010). Link mining: Models, algorithms, and applications. Berlin, Germany: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, M., & Ball, L. J. (2009). Internal representations, external representations and ergonomics: Towards a theoretical integration. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 10, 335–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rittel, H. W., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, P. M., Walker, G. H., Read, G. J. M., Goode, N., & Stanton, N. A. (2017). Fitting methods to paradigms: Are ergonomics methods fit for systems thinking? Ergonomics, 60, 194–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scerri, A., & James, P. (2010). Communities of citizens and ‘indicators’ of sustainability. Community Development Journal, 45, 219–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, E., & Barnett, B. (2015). Cognitive directive mapping: Designing futures that challenge anthropocentrism. Nordes, 6. http://www.nordes.org/opj/index.php/n13/article/view/398/376

  • Scott, J. (2012). Social network analysis. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snehota, I., & Hakansson, H. (Eds.). (1995). Developing relationships in business networks. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinfeld, H., Gerber, P., Wassenaar, T., Castel, V., Rosales, M., & De Haan, C. (2006). Livestock’s long shadow. Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svedung, I., & Rasmussen, J. (2002). Graphic representation of accident scenarios: Mapping system structure and the causation of accidents. Safety Science, 40, 397–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thatcher, A. (2013). Green ergonomics: Definition and scope. Ergonomics, 56, 389–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thatcher, A. (2016). Longevity in a sustainable human factors and ergonomics system-of-systems. Plenary address at the 22nd Semana de Salud Ocupacional in Medellin Bogota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thatcher, A., & Yeow, P. H. P. (2016a). A sustainable system of systems approach: A new HFE paradigm. Ergonomics, 59, 167–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thatcher, A., & Yeow, P. H. P. (2016b). Human factors for a sustainable future. Applied Ergonomics, 57, 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, G. H., Gibson, H., Stanton, N. A., Baber, C., Salmon, P., & Green, D. (2006). Event analysis of systemic teamwork (EAST): A novel integration of ergonomics methods to analyse C4i activity. Ergonomics, 49, 1345–1369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, G. H., Stanton, N. A., Salmon, P. M., Jenkins, D. P., & Rafferty, L. (2010). Translating concepts of complexity to the field of ergonomics. Ergonomics, 53, 1175–1186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. R. (2000). Fundamentals of ergonomics in theory and practice. Applied Ergonomics, 31, 557–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. R. (2014). Fundamentals of systems ergonomics/human factors. Applied Ergonomics, 45, 5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wisner, A. (1985). Ergonomics in industrially developing countries. Ergonomics, 28, 1213–1224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, H., Calvo-Amodio, J., & Haapala, K. R. (2015). Establishing foundational concepts for sustainable manufacturing systems assessment through systems thinking. International Journal of Strategic Engineering Asset Management, 2, 249–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zink, K. J. (2014). Designing sustainable work systems: The need for a systems approach. Applied Ergonomics, 45, 126–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Psychology Department, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

    Andrew Thatcher

  2. School of Business, Monash University Malaysia, Bandar Sunway, Malaysia

    Paul H. P. Yeow

Authors
  1. Andrew Thatcher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paul H. P. Yeow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Psychology Department, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

    Andrew Thatcher

  2. School of Business, Monash University Malaysia, Bandar Sunway, Malaysia

    Paul H.P. Yeow

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Thatcher, A., Yeow, P.H.P. (2018). A Sustainable System-of-Systems Approach: Identifying the Important Boundaries for a Target System in Human Factors and Ergonomics. In: Thatcher, A., Yeow, P. (eds) Ergonomics and Human Factors for a Sustainable Future. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8072-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8072-2_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-8071-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-8072-2

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation