Skip to main content

Socioeconomic and Policy Considerations in the Adoption of Agroforestry Systems: An Ecosystem-based Adaptive Governance Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Agroforestry

Abstract

Owing to the shortfalls in conventional approaches to forestry and agriculture, agroforestry has been receiving attention among researchers and policy-makers since the 1970s as an alternative land use strategy in tropical systems. Agroforestry is a promising strategy for deriving a range of benefits, such as food and water security, ecosystem health, energy security, and human health particularly in developing nations. Agroforestry is also posited as a means of producing various ecosystem services necessary for mitigation and adaptation to climate change impacts. In spite of these expected benefits, the adoption of agroforestry policies has been limited, and the potential contributions of agroforestry to resilience and sustainable development remain unrealized. Drawing from theoretical insights in ecosystem management and adaptive governance, this chapter discusses the potential benefits of managing agroforestry systems as complex adaptive social-ecological systems. Ecosystem-based adaptive governance holds promise as a framework for increasing the adoption of agroforestry as a land-use strategy for achieving sustainable development and social-ecological resilience by promoting a more inclusive and dynamic approach to developing locally-based agroforestry models. The modified taungya system in Ghana and other relevant case studies are used to illustrate the argument.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acheampong E, Insaidoo TF, Ros-Tonen MA (2016) Management of Ghana’s modified taungya system: challenges and strategies for improvement. Agrofor Syst 90(4):659–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adesina AA, Zinnah MM (1993) Technology characteristics, farmers’ perceptions and adoption decisions: a tobit model application in Sierra Leone. Agric Econ 9:297–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agyeman V, Marfo K, Kasanga K, Danso E, Asare A, Yeboah O, Agyeman F (2003) Revising the taungya plantation system: new revenue-sharing proposals from Ghana. Unasylva 54(1):40–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Akamani K (2011) Community resilience to drivers of change: an analysis of community and household participation in the collaborative forest management program of Ghana. Ph.D. thesis, University of Idaho, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  • Akamani K (2016) Adaptive water governance: integrating the human dimensions into water resource governance. J Contemp Water Res Educ 158(1):2–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akamani K, Hall TE (2015) Determinants of the process and outcomes of household participation in collaborative forest management in Ghana: a quantitative test of a community resilience model. J Environ Manag 147:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akamani K, Wilson PI (2011) Toward the adaptive governance of transboundary water resources. Conserv Lett 4(6):409–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akamani K, Wilson PI, Hall TE (2015) Barriers to collaborative forest management and implications for building the resilience of forest-dependent communities in the Ashanti region of Ghana. J Environ Manag 151:11–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akamani K, Holzmueller EJ, Groninger JW (2016) Managing wicked environmental problems as complex social-ecological systems: The promise of adaptive governance. In: Melesse A, Abtew W (eds) Landscape dynamics, soils and hydrological processes in varied climates. Springer, New York, pp 741–762

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Allan C, Curtis A (2005) Nipped in the bud: why regional scale adaptive management is not blooming. Environ Manag 36(3):414–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen CR, Gunderson LH (2011) Pathology and failure in the design and implementation of adaptive management. J Environ Manag 92(5):1379–1384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen CR, Fontaine JJ, Pope KL, Garmestani AS (2011) Adaptive management for a turbulent future. J Environ Manag 92(5):1339–1345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altieri MA (2002) Agroecology: the science of natural resource management for poor farmers in marginal environments. Agric Ecosyst Environ 93(1):1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altieri MA (2009) Agroecology, small farms, and food sovereignty. Mon Rev 61(3):102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altieri MA, Nicholls C (2012) Agroecology scaling up for food sovereignty and resiliency. In: Lichtfouse E (ed) Sustainable agriculture reviews. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Altieri MA, Toledo VM (2011) The agroecological revolution in Latin America: rescuing nature, ensuring food sovereignty and empowering peasants. J Peasant Stud 38(3):587–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armitage DR, Plummer R, Berkes F, Arthur RI, Charles AT, Davidson-Hunt IJ, Diduck AP, Doubleday NC, Johnson DS, Marschke M, McConney P, Pinkerton EW, Wollenberg EK (2009) Adaptive co-management for social-ecological complexity. Front Ecol Environ 7(2):95–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armitage D, Berkes F, Dale A, Kocho-Schellenberg E, Patton E (2011) Co-management and the co-production of knowledge: Learning to adapt in Canada's Arctic. Glob Environ Chang 21(3):995–1004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armitage D, de Loe R, Plummer R (2012) Environmental governance and its implications for conservation practice. Conserv Lett 5(4):245–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashby JA, Beltran JA, del Pilar Guerrero M, Ramos HF (1996) Improving the acceptability to farmers of soil conservation practices. J Soil Water Conserv 51(4):309–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Atwell RC, Schulte LA, Westphal LM (2009) Linking resilience theory and diffusion of innovations theory to understand the potential for perennials in the US Corn Belt. Ecol Soc 14(1):30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aytur SA, Hecht JS, Kirshen P (2015) Aligning climate change adaptation planning with adaptive governance: lessons from Exeter, NH. J Contemp Water Res Educ 155(1):83–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgart-Getz A, Prokopy LS, Floress K (2012) Why farmers adopt best management practice in the United States: a meta-analysis of the adoption literature. J Environ Manag 96(1):17–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behnken JA, Groninger JW, Akamani K (2016) Institutional constraints to collaborative ecosystem management within a wetlands conservation partnership. J Contemp Water Res Educ 158:19–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F (2004) Rethinking community-based conservation. Conserv Biol 18(3):621–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F (2007) Understanding uncertainty and reducing vulnerability: lessons from resilience thinking. Nat Hazards 41(2):283–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blay D, Appiah M, Damnyag L, Dwomoh FK, Luukkanen O, Pappinen A (2008) Involving local farmers in rehabilitation of degraded tropical forests: some lessons from Ghana. Environ Dev Sustain 10(4):503–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burch W Jr (1992) Our Theme: Thinking social scientifically about agroforestry. In: Burch W Jr, Parker J (eds) Social science applications in Asian agroforestry. Winrock International, New Delhi, pp 3–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Burch W Jr, Parker J (eds) (1992) Social science applications in Asian agroforestry. Winrock International, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler KF, Koontz TM (2005) Theory into practice: implementing ecosystem management objectives in the USDA Forest Service. Environ Manag 35(2):138–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter SR, Walker B, Anderies MJ, Abel N (2001) From metaphor to measurement: resilience of what to what. Ecosystems 4:765–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cash DW, Adger WN, Berkes F, Garden P, Lebel L, Olsson P, Pritchard L, Young O (2006) Scale and cross-scale dynamics: governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecol Soc 11(2):8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers R (1995) Poverty and livelihoods: whose reality counts? Environ Urban 7(1):173–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapin FS, Folke C, Kofinas G (2009) A framework for understanding change. In: Chapin FS, Kofinas G, Folke C (eds) Principles of ecosystem stewardship: resilience-based natural resource management in a changing world. Springer, New York, pp 3–28

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chapin FS, Carpenter SR, Kofinas GP, Folke C, Abel N, Clark WC, Olsson P, Smith DMS, Walker B, Young OR, Berkes F, Biggs R, Grov JM, Naylor R, Pinkerton E, Steffen W, Swanson FJ (2010) Ecosystem stewardship: sustainability strategies for a rapidly changing planet. Trends Ecol Evol 25(4):241–249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cortner H, Moote MA (1999) The politics of ecosystem management. Island Press, Washington, DC. 179

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortner HJ, Wallace MG, Burke S, Moote MA (1998) Institutions matter: the need to address the institutional challenges of ecosystem management. Landsc Urban Plan 40(1):159–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Current DA, Brooks KN, Ffolliott PF, Keefe M (2009) Moving agroforestry into the mainstream. Agrofor Syst 75(1):1–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derkyi M, Ros-Tonen MA, Kyereh B, Dietz T (2014) Fighting over forest: toward a shared analysis of livelihood conflicts and conflict management in Ghana. Soc Nat Resour 27(3):281–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz T (2013) Bringing values and deliberation to science communication. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110(3):14081–14087

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz T, Stern PC (1998) Science, values, and biodiversity. Bio Sci 48(6):441–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz T, Ostrom E, Stern PC (2003) The struggle to govern the commons. Science 302(5652):1907–1912

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Endter-Wada J, Blahna D, Krannich R, Brunson M (1998) A framework for understanding social science contributions to ecosystem management. Ecol Appl 8(3):891–904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fliegel F, Korsching P (2001) Diffusion research in sociology. Social Ecology Free Press, Middleton. 157

    Google Scholar 

  • Folke C (2006) Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Glob Environ Chang 16(3):253–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke C (2007) Social–ecological systems and adaptive governance of the commons. Ecol Res 22(1):14–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Carpenter S, Elmqvist T, Gunderson L, Holling CS, Walker B (2002) Resilience and sustainable development: building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. Ambio 31(5):437–440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, Norberg J (2005) Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour 30:441–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Pritchard L, Berkes F, Colding J, Svedin U (2007) The problem of fit between ecosystems and institutions: ten years later. Ecol Soc 12(1):30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Chapin FS, Olsson P (2009) Transformations in ecosystem stewardship. In: Chapin FS, Kofinas GP, Folke C (eds) Principles of ecosystem stewardship: resilience-based natural resource management in a changing world. Springer, New York, pp 103–128

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Carpenter SR, Walker B, Scheffer M, Chapin T, Rockström J (2010) Resilience thinking: integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecol Soc 15(4):20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Jansson Å, Rockström J, Olsson P, Carpenter SR, Chapin FS, Crepin A-S, Daily G, Danell K, Ebbesson J, Elmqvist T, Galaz V, Moberg F, Nilsson M, Osterblom H, Ostrom E, Persson A, Peterson G, Polasky S, Steffen W, Walker B, Westley F (2011) Reconnecting to the biosphere. Ambio 40(7):719–738

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Biggs R, Norström A, Reyers B, Rockström J (2016) Social-ecological resilience and biosphere-based sustainability science. Ecol Soc 21(3):41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortmann L (2008) Doing science together. In: Fortmann L (ed) Participatory research in conservation and rural livelihoods: doing science together. Wiley, Oxford, pp 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama F (2001) Social capital, civil society and development. Third World Q 22(1):7–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galjart B (1971) Rural development and sociological concepts: a critique. Rural Sociol 36(1):31–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrity DP (2004) Agroforestry and the achievement of the millennium development goals. Agrofor Syst 61:5–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrity DP (2006) Science-based agroforestry and the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals. In: Garrity DP, Okono A, Grayson M, Parrot S (eds) World agroforestry into the future. World Agroforestry Centre, Nairobi, pp 3–10

    Google Scholar 

  • GFC (2014) National Forest Plantation Development Programme. 2013 Annual Report. Ghana Forestry Commission, Kumasi, Ghana. http://www.fcghana.org/userfiles/files/Plantation%20Annual%20Report/AnnualReport%202013.pdf

  • GFC (2016) National Forest Plantation Development Programme. 2015 annual report. Ghana Forestry Commission, Kumasi, Ghana. http://www.fcghana.org/userfiles/files/Plantation%20Annual%20Report/2015%20ANNUAL%20REPORT%20(2).pdf

  • Grumbine RE (1994) What is ecosystem management? Conserv Biol 8(1):27–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson L (1999) Resilience, flexibility and adaptive management—antidotes for spurious certitude? Conserv Ecol 3(1):7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson L, Light SS (2006) Adaptive management and adaptive governance in the everglades ecosystem. Policy Sci 39(4):323–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haglund E, Ndjeunga J, Snook L, Pasternak D (2011) Dry land tree management for improved household livelihoods: farmer managed natural regeneration in Niger. J Environ Manag 92(7):1696–1705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (ed) (1978) Adaptive environmental assessment and management. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS, Meffe GK (1996) Command and control and the pathology of natural resource management. Conserv Biol 10(2):328–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes TP, Bellwood DR, Folke C, Steneck RS, Wilson J (2005) New paradigms for supporting the resilience of marine ecosystems. Trends Ecol Evol 20(7):380–386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Izac A-M, Sanchez PA (2001) Towards a natural resource management paradigm for international agriculture: the example of agroforestry research. Agric Syst 69(1):5–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalame FB, Aidoo R, Nkem J, Ajayie OC, Kanninen M, Luukkanen O, Idinoba M (2011) Modified taungya system in Ghana: a win–win practice for forestry and adaptation to climate change? Environ Sci Policy 14(5):519–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kates RW, Travis WR, Wilbanks TJ (2012) Transformational adaptation when incremental adaptations to climate change are insufficient. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109(19):7156–7161

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Keough HL, Blahna D (2005) Achieving integrative, collaborative ecosystem management. Conserv Biol 20(5):1373–1382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King KFS (1987) The history of agroforestry. In: Steppler HA, Nair PKR (eds) Agroforestry: a decade of development. International Council for Research in Agroforestry, Nairobi, pp 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasco RD, Delfino RJP, Catacutan DC, Simelton ES, Wilson DM (2014) Climate risk adaptation by smallholder farmers: the roles of trees and agroforestry. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 6:83–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasco RD, Espaldon MLO, Habito CMD (2016) Smallholder farmers’ perceptions of climate change and the roles of trees and agroforestry in climate risk adaptation: evidence from Bohol, Philippines. Agrofor Syst 90(3):521–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee KN (1999) Appraising adaptive management. Conserv Ecol 3(2):3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Dietz T, Carpenter SR, Alberti M, Folke C, Moran E, Pell AN, Deadman P, Kratz T, Lubchenco J, Ostrom E, Ouyang Z, Provenchr W, Redman CL, Schneider SH, Taylor WW (2007) Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science 317(5844):1513–1516

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loomis JB (2002) Integrated public lands management: principles and applications to national forests, parks, wildlife refuges, and BLM lands. Columbia University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Luedeling E, Kindt R, Huth NI, Koenig K (2014) Agroforestry systems in a changing climate—challenges in projecting future performance. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 6:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall G (2008) Nesting, subsidiarity, and community-based environmental governance beyond the local scale. Int J Commons 2(1):75–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall GR (2009) Polycentricity, reciprocity, and farmer adoption of conservation practices under community-based governance. Ecol Econ 68(5):1507–1520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayers J, Kotey ENA (1996) Local institutions and adaptive forest management in Ghana, IIED forestry and land use series no: 7. International Institute for Environment and Development, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mbow C, Smith P, Skole D, Duguma L, Bustamante M (2014a) Achieving mitigation and adaptation to climate change through sustainable agroforestry practices in Africa. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 6:8–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mbow C, Van Noordwijk M, Luedeling E, Neufeldt H, Minang PA, Kowero G (2014b) Agroforestry solutions to address food security and climate change challenges in Africa. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 6:61–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mbow C, Van Noordwijk M, Prabhu R, Simons T (2014c) Knowledge gaps and research needs concerning agroforestry’s contribution to sustainable development goals in Africa. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 6:162–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Measham TG (2013) How long does social learning take? Insights from a longitudinal case study. Soc Nat Resour 26(12):1468–1477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menzies N (1988) 300 Years of Taungya: a study of long-term stability in an agroforestry system. Hum Ecol 16:361–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer DE (2004) Adoption of agroforestry innovations in the tropics: a review. Agrofor Syst 61:311–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Nair PR (1998) Directions in tropical agroforestry research: past, present, and future. Agrofor Syst 38:223–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Napier TL (2001) Soil and water conservation behaviors within the upper Mississippi River Basin. J Soil Water Conserv 56(4):279–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson R, Howden M, Smith MS (2008) Using adaptive governance to rethink the way science supports Australian drought policy. Environ Sci Policy 11(7):588–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Njuki J, Zoungrana I, Temu A, Awimbo J (2006) Building capacity for research in agroforestry. In: Garrity DP, Okono A, Grayson M, Parrot S (eds) World agroforestry into the future. World Agroforestry Centre, Nairobi, pp 147–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson P, Galaz V (2009) Transitions to adaptive approaches to water management and governance in Sweden. In: Huetema D, Meijerink S (eds) Water policy entrepreneurs: a research companion to water transitions around the globe. Edward Elgar, Northampton, pp 304–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson P, Folke C (2001) Local ecological knowledge and institutional dynamics for ecosystem management: a study of Lake Racken watershed, Sweden. Ecosystems 4(2):85–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsson P, Gunderson LH, Carpenter SR, Ryan P, Lebel L, Folke C, Holling CS (2006) Shooting the rapids: navigating transitions to adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc 11(1):18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsson P, Folke C, Galaz V, Hahn T, Schultz L (2007) Enhancing the fit through adaptive co-management: Creating and maintaining bridging functions for matching scales in the Kristianstads Vattenrike Biosphere Reserve Sweden. Ecol Soc 12(1):28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, New York. 280

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C, Lebel L, Knieper C, Nikitina E (2012) From applying panaceas to mastering complexity: toward adaptive water governance in river basins. Environ Sci Policy 23:24–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pannell D (1999) Social and economic challenges in the development of complex farming systems. Agrofor Syst 45:395–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pannell DJ, Marshall GR, Barr N, Curtis A, Vanclay F, Wilkinson R (2006) Understanding and promoting adoption of conservation practices by rural landholders. Anim Prod Sci 46(11):1407–1424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker J, Burch W Jr (1992) Epilogue. In: Burch W Jr, Parker J (eds) Social science applications in Asian agroforestry. Winrock International, New Delhi, pp 181–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattanayak SK, Mercer DE, Sills E, Yang J-C (2003) Taking stock of agroforestry adoption studies. Agrofor Syst 57(3):173–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Place F, Prudencio Y-C (2006) Policies for improved land management in smallholder agriculture: The role for research in agroforestry and natural resource management. In: Garrity DP, Okono A, Grayson M, Parrot S (eds) World Agroforestry into the future. World Agroforestry Centre, Nairobi, pp 71–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Plummer R, Armitage D (2007) A resilience-based framework for evaluating adaptive co-management: linking ecology, economics and society in a complex world. Ecol Econ 61(1):62–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Pretty JN (1994) Alternative systems of inquiry for a sustainable agriculture. IDS Bull 25(2):37–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pretty J (2003) Social capital and the collective management of resources. Science 302(5652):1912–1914

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pretty J, Hine R (2001) Reducing food poverty with sustainable agriculture: a summary of new evidence. Centre for Environment and Society, University of Essex, Colchester

    Google Scholar 

  • Prokopy LS, Floress K, Klotthor-Weinkauf D, Baumgart-Getz A (2008) Determinants of agricultural best management practice adoption: evidence from the literature. J Soil Water Conserv 63(5):300–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rakodi C (1999) A capital assets framework for analyzing household livelihood strategies: implications for policy. Dev Policy Rev 17(3):315–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redman C (2014) Should sustainability and resilience be combined or remain distinct pursuits? Ecol Soc 19(2):37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed M, Evely AC, Cundill G, Fazey IRA, Glass J, Laing A, Newig J, Parrish B, Parrish C, Raymond C, Stringer L (2010) What is social learning? Ecol Soc 15(4):1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reimer AP, Prokopy LS (2014) Farmer participation in US Farm Bill conservation programs. Environ Manag 53(2):318–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rinaudo T (2007) The development of farmer managed natural regeneration. Leisa Mag 23(2):32–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers EM (2003) Elements of diffusion, 5th edn. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosset PM, Altieri MA (1997) Agroecology versus input substitution: a fundamental contradiction of sustainable agriculture. Soc Nat Resour 10(3):283–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosset P, Martínez-Torres ME (2012) Rural social movements and agroecology: context, theory, and process. Ecol Soc 17(3):17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosset PM, Machín Sosa B, Roque Jaime AM, Ávila Lozano DR (2011) The Campesino-to-Campesino agroecology movement of ANAP in Cuba: social process methodology in the construction of sustainable peasant agriculture and food sovereignty. J peasant stud 38(1):161–191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ros-Tonen MA, Insaidoo TF, Acheampong E (2013) Promising start, bleak outlook: the role of Ghana’s modified taungya system as a social safeguard in timber legality processes. Forest Policy Econ 32:57–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ros-Tonen MA, Derkyi M, Insaidoo TF (2014) From co-management to landscape governance: whither Ghana’s modified taungya system? Forests 5(12):2996–3021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudebjer P, van So N, Kaboggoza JRS (2006) Institutional collaboration in agroforestry: Networking and knowledge management. In: Garrity DP, Okono A, Grayson M, Parrot S (eds) World agroforestry into the future. World Agroforestry Centre, Nairobi, pp 141–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan B, Gross NC (1943) The diffusion of hybrid seed corn in two Iowa communities. Rural Sociol 8(1):15–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez PA (1995) Science in agroforestry. Agrofor Syst 30:5–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanginga PC, Kamugisha RN, Martin AM (2007) Conflicts management, social capital and adoption of agroforestry technologies: empirical findings from the highlands of southwestern Uganda. Agrofor Syst 69(1):67–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz L, Folke C, Österblom H, Olsson P (2015) Adaptive governance, ecosystem management, and natural capital. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112(24):7369–7374

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Scoones I (1998) Sustainable rural livelihoods: a framework for analysis. Working paper 72. Institute for Development Studies, Brighton

    Google Scholar 

  • Sendzimir J, Reij CP, Magnuszewski P (2011) Rebuilding resilience in the Sahel: regreening in the Maradi and Zinder Regions of Niger. Ecol Soc 16(3):1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sereke F, Dobricki M, Wilkes J, Kaeser A, Graves A, Szerencsits E, Herzog F (2016) Swiss farmers don’t adopt agroforestry because they fear for their reputation. Agrofor Syst 90(3):385–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith MS, Mbow C (2014) Sustainability challenges: agroforestry from the past into the future. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 6:134–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas JW (1996) Forest Service perspective on ecosystem management. Ecol Appl 6(3):703–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tougiani A, Guero C, Rinaudo T (2009) Community mobilization for improved livelihoods through tree crop management in Niger. Geo J 74:377–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Udawatta RP, Godsey LD (2010) Agroforestry comes of age: putting science into practice. Agrofor Syst 79(1):1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valdivia C, Poulos C (2009) Factors affecting farm operators’ interest in incorporating riparian buffers and forest farming practices in northeast and southeast Missouri. Agrofor Syst 75(1):61–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valman M, Österblom H, Olsson P (2015) Adaptive governance of the Baltic Sea-lessons from elsewhere. Int J Commons 9(1):440–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker B (2012) A commentary on “resilience and water governance: adaptive governance in the Columbia River Basin”. Ecol Soc 1(2):1

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters C (1986) Adaptive management of renewable resources. McMillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters CJ (2007) Is adaptive management helping to solve fisheries problems? Ambio 36(4):304–307

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weston P, Hong R, Kabore C, Kull CA (2015) Farmer-managed natural regeneration enhances rural livelihoods in dryland West Africa. Environ Manag 55(6):1402–1417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams BK (2011) Passive and active adaptive management: approaches and an example. J Environ Manag 92(5):1371–1378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WVI (2012) Farmer managed natural regeneration: an effective approach to restoring and improving agricultural, forested and pasture lands. World Vision International, Monrovia

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu J, van Noordwijk M, He J, Kim K-J, Jo R-S, Pak K-G, Kye U-H, Kim J-S, Kim K-M, Sim Y-N, Pak J-U, Song K-U, Jong Y-S, Kim K-C, Pang C-J, Ho M-H (2012) Participatory agroforestry development for restoring degraded sloping land in DPR Korea. Agrofor Syst 85(2):291–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaffee SL (1996) Ecosystem management in practice: the importance of human institutions. Ecol Appl 6(3):724–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Akamani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Akamani, K., Holzmueller, E.J. (2017). Socioeconomic and Policy Considerations in the Adoption of Agroforestry Systems: An Ecosystem-based Adaptive Governance Approach. In: Dagar, J., Tewari, V. (eds) Agroforestry. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7650-3_35

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics