Abstract
Technical key points of deflection refracturing are the selections of the most reasonable refracturing time and parameters, based on the changes of original geostresses. Production-induced stress due to pore pressure change is one of the dominant factors influencing geostress reorientation; however, displacement discontinuity of the fracture surface has hardly been considered in numerical models for production-induced stress both at home and abroad; also the solution procedures of the present models are relatively complicated, and the convergences are relatively poor. In this paper, based on poroelasticity theory and seepage mechanics, a modified fluid–structure interaction model for production-induced stress in refracturing gas well was established and solved by the hybrid method of displacement discontinuity method (DDM) and finite difference method (FDM), and then the distribution characteristics of the production-induced stress with time and space were obtained. Calculations indicate that decreasing range of maximum horizontal principal stress is greater than that of minimum horizontal principal stress due to pore pressure reduction, and this is a major factor leading to stress reorientation. The higher the production time and production pressure drop are and the smaller the original horizontal stress difference is, the easier it will be to form stress reorientation area. Meanwhile, shear stress around the fracture increases due to the fluid–structure interaction during production, which helps increase the complexities of new fractures. The new numerical model for production-induced stress takes discontinuous displacement of the fracture section into consideration. In addition, the calculation method is simple and has satisfactory convergence. The study results have certain significance to improve the success rate of refracturing in oil gas well by providing scientific guidance for well and layer selection and construction time selection.
Copyright 2017, Shaanxi Petroleum Society.
This paper was prepared for presentation at the 2017 International Field Exploration and Development Conference in Chengdu, China, 21–22 September 2017.
This paper was selected for presentation by the IFEDC&IPPTC Committee following review of information contained in an abstract submitted by the author(s). Contents of the paper, as presented, have not been reviewed by the IFEDC&IPPTC Committee and are subject to correction by the author(s). The material does not necessarily reflect any position of the IFEDC&IPPTC Committee, its members. Papers presented at the Conference are subject to publication review by Professional Committee of Petroleum Engineering of Shaanxi Petroleum Society. Electronic reproduction, distribution, or storage of any part of this paper for commercial purposes without the written consent of Shaanxi Petroleum Society is prohibited. Permission to reproduce in print is restricted to an abstract of not more than 300 words; illustrations may not be copied. The abstract must contain conspicuous acknowledgment of IFEDC&IPPTC. Contact email: paper@ifedc.org or paper@ipptc.org.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Roussel N, Sharma M (2012) Role of Stress reorientation in the success of refracture treatments in tight gas sands. SPE Prod Oper 27(4):346–355
Ghassemi A, Suresh KG (2007) Changes in fracture aperture and fluid pressure due to thermal stress and silica d-issolution/precipitation induced by heat extraction from subsurface rocks. Geothermics 36(2):115–140
Siebrits E, Elbel JL, Hoover RS et al (2000) Refracture reorientation enhances gas production in Barnett Shale tight gas wells. Paper 63030-MS presented at the SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, 1–4 Oct 2000, Dallas, Texas, USA. SPE, New York
Wright CA et al (1994) Reorientation of propped refracture treatments in the lost hills field. Paper 27896-MS presented at the SPE Western regional meeting, 23–25 Mar 1994, Long Beach, California, USA. SPE, New York
Abou-Sayed A, Zhai Z (2011) Thermal-poro elastic stress effect on stress reorientation in production and injection wells. Paper 140949-MS presented at the SPE Middle East oil and gas show and conference, 25–28 Sept 2011, Manama, Bahrain. SPE, Manama
Altmann JB, Müller TM, Müller BIR et al (2010) Poroelastic contribution to the reservoir stress path. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 47(7):1104–1113
Wang HF (2000) Theory of linear poroelasticity: with applications to geomechanics and hydrogeologoy. Princeton University Press, New York
Chen HY, Teufel LW, Lee RL (1995) Coupled fluid flow and geomechanics in reservoir study-I. theory and governing equations. Paper 30752-MS presented at the SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, 22–25 Oct 1995, Dallas, Texas, USA. New York
Curran J, Carvalho JL (1987) A displacement discontinuity model for fluid-saturated porous media. In: 6th ISRM congress. International Society for Rock Mechanics
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Xu, H.X., Wang, Z.W., Zhang, M. (2019). A Modified Numerical Model for Production-Induced Stress in Refracturing Gas Well. In: Qu, Z., Lin, J. (eds) Proceedings of the International Field Exploration and Development Conference 2017. Springer Series in Geomechanics and Geoengineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7560-5_161
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7560-5_161
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-7559-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-7560-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)