Abstract
Genetic variability among drug-metabolizing enzymes (DMEs) and transporters influences the pharmacokinetics of the drug and is associated with marked interindividual variability in therapeutic effects and toxicity. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) can facilitate the individualization of dose adjustment of the drug by measuring the plasma concentrations of drug. TDM can be incorporated with the pharmacogenomics, and the metabolic status of the patient can be characterized to optimize the dosage regimen according to the patient’s needs. Several polymorphisms among cytochrome P450 (CYP) and phase II enzymes that contribute to the adverse drug reactions (ADRs) have been updated on a regular basis in PharmGKB. A number of pharmacogenomic markers are reported by the Food and Drug Administration and Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) among DMEs for commonly used drugs that are potentially associated with variability in drug response. This review focuses on the genetic polymorphisms of phases I and II DMEs and their associations with drug responses. The drugs discussed in this review requiring a pharmacogenomic test before being prescribed includes efavirenz, voriconazole, clopidogrel, warfarin, tamoxifen, irinotecan, tacrolimus, azathioprine, and risperidone. This chapter also presents the application of pharmacogenomics in the clinic and patient counseling. Finally, a section focuses on the future perspectives of pharmacogenomics and the translation of pharmacogenomic research into routine clinical care.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Daly AK (2013) Pharmacogenomics of adverse drug reactions. Genome Med 5(1):5
Zhou ZW et al (2015) Clinical association between pharmacogenomics and adverse drug reactions. Drugs 75(6):589–631
Hiemke C (2008) Clinical utility of drug measurement and pharmacokinetics: therapeutic drug monitoring in psychiatry. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 64(2):159–166
Ma Q, Lu AY (2011) Pharmacogenetics, pharmacogenomics, and individualized medicine. Pharmacol Rev 63(2):437–459
Hartshorne T (2013) TaqMan(R) drug metabolism genotyping assays for the detection of human polymorphisms involved in drug metabolism. Methods Mol Biol 1015:87–96
Fernandez CA et al (2012) Concordance of DMET plus genotyping results with those of orthogonal genotyping methods. Clin Pharmacol Ther 92(3):360–365
He HR et al (2015) Effects of CYP3A4 polymorphisms on the plasma concentration of voriconazole. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 34(4):811–819
Olagunju A et al (2014) CYP2B6 516G>T (rs3745274) and smoking status are associated with efavirenz plasma concentration in a Serbian cohort of HIV patients. Ther Drug Monit 36(6):734–738
Maganda BA et al (2016) CYP2B6*6 genotype and high efavirenz plasma concentration but not nevirapine are associated with low lumefantrine plasma exposure and poor treatment response in HIV-malaria-coinfected patients. Pharmacogenomics J 16(1):88–95
Ogungbenro K et al (2015) Physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for 6-mercpatopurine: exploring the role of genetic polymorphism in TPMT enzyme activity. Br J Clin Pharmacol 80(1):86–100
Ben Salem C et al (2010) Azathioprine-induced severe cholestatic hepatitis in patient carrying TPMT*3C polymorphism. Pharm World Sci 32(6):701–703
Xu C et al (2016) UGT1A1 gene polymorphism is associated with toxicity and clinical efficacy of irinotecan-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 78(1):119–130
Fukuda M et al (2016) Prospective study of the UGT1A1*27 gene polymorphism during irinotecan therapy in patients with lung cancer: results of lung oncology Group in Kyusyu (LOGIK1004B). Thorac Cancer 7(4):467–472
Sim SC, Kacevska M, Ingelman-Sundberg M (2013) Pharmacogenomics of drug-metabolizing enzymes: a recent update on clinical implications and endogenous effects. Pharmacogenomics J 13(1):1–11
Stingl JC, Brockmoller J, Viviani R (2013) Genetic variability of drug-metabolizing enzymes: the dual impact on psychiatric therapy and regulation of brain function. Mol Psychiatry 18(3):273–287
Yiannakopoulou E (2013) Pharmacogenomics of phase II metabolizing enzymes and drug transporters: clinical implications. Pharmacogenomics J 13(2):105–109
Sissung TM et al (2012) Transporter pharmacogenetics: transporter polymorphisms affect normal physiology, diseases, and pharmacotherapy. Discov Med 13(68):19–34
Nigam SK (2015) What do drug transporters really do? Nat Rev Drug Discov 14(1):29–44
Zair ZM, Singer DR (2016) Efflux transporter variants as predictors of drug toxicity in lung cancer patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. Pharmacogenomics 17(9):1089–1112
Zair ZM, Singer DR (2016) Influx transporter variants as predictors of cancer chemotherapy-induced toxicity: systematic review and meta-analysis. Pharmacogenomics 17(10):1189–1205
Kwara A et al (2009) CYP2B6 (c.516G-->T) and CYP2A6 (*9B and/or *17) polymorphisms are independent predictors of efavirenz plasma concentrations in HIV-infected patients. Br J Clin Pharmacol 67(4):427–436
Cusato J et al (2016) Efavirenz pharmacogenetics in a cohort of Italian patients. Int J Antimicrob Agents 47(2):117–123
Sukasem C et al (2012) Pharmacogenetic markers of CYP2B6 associated with efavirenz plasma concentrations in HIV-1 infected Thai adults. Br J Clin Pharmacol 74(6):1005–1012
Sukasem C et al (2013) High plasma efavirenz concentration and CYP2B6 polymorphisms in Thai HIV-1 infections. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 28(5):391–397
Dolton MJ, McLachlan AJ (2014) Voriconazole pharmacokinetics and exposure-response relationships: assessing the links between exposure, efficacy and toxicity. Int J Antimicrob Agents 44(3):183–193
Owusu Obeng A et al (2014) CYP2C19 polymorphisms and therapeutic drug monitoring of voriconazole: are we ready for clinical implementation of pharmacogenomics? Pharmacotherapy 34(7):703–718
Swen JJ et al (2011) Pharmacogenetics: from bench to byte-an update of guidelines. Clin Pharmacol Ther 89(5):662–673
Wang T et al (2014) Efficacy and safety of voriconazole and CYP2C19 polymorphism for optimised dosage regimens in patients with invasive fungal infections. Int J Antimicrob Agents 44(5):436–442
Lamoureux F et al (2016) Impact of CYP2C19 genetic polymorphisms on voriconazole dosing and exposure in adult patients with invasive fungal infections. Int J Antimicrob Agents 47(2):124–131
Chuwongwattana S et al (2016) A prospective observational study of CYP2C19 polymorphisms and voriconazole plasma level in adult Thai patients with invasive aspergillosis. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 31(2):117–122
Saab YB, Zeenny R, Ramadan WH (2015) Optimizing clopidogrel dose response: a new clinical algorithm comprising CYP2C19 pharmacogenetics and drug interactions. Ther Clin Risk Manag 11:1421–1427
Scott SA et al (2013) Clinical pharmacogenetics implementation consortium guidelines for CYP2C19 genotype and clopidogrel therapy: 2013 update. Clin Pharmacol Ther 94(3):317–323
Li Y et al (2012) The gain-of-function variant allele CYP2C19*17: a double-edged sword between thrombosis and bleeding in clopidogrel-treated patients. J Thromb Haemost 10(2):199–206
Flockhart DA et al (2008) Pharmacogenetic testing of CYP2C9 and VKORC1 alleles for warfarin. Genet Med 10(2):139–150
Ross KA et al (2010) Worldwide allele frequency distribution of four polymorphisms associated with warfarin dose requirements. J Hum Genet 55(9):582–589
Herman D et al (2005) Influence of CYP2C9 polymorphisms, demographic factors and concomitant drug therapy on warfarin metabolism and maintenance dose. Pharmacogenomics J 5(3):193–202
Johnson JA et al (2011) Clinical pharmacogenetics implementation consortium guidelines for CYP2C9 and VKORC1 genotypes and warfarin dosing. Clin Pharmacol Ther 90(4):625–629
Gaikwad T et al (2013) Influence of CYP2C9 and VKORC1 gene polymorphisms on warfarin dosage, over anticoagulation and other adverse outcomes in Indian population. Eur J Pharmacol 710(1–3):80–84
Binkhorst L et al (2015) Individualization of tamoxifen therapy: much more than just CYP2D6 genotyping. Cancer Treat Rev 41(3):289–299
Dezentje VO et al (2013) CYP2D6 genotype in relation to tamoxifen efficacy in a Dutch cohort of the tamoxifen exemestane adjuvant multinational (TEAM) trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat 140(2):363–373
Chamnanphon M et al (2013) Association of CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 polymorphisms and disease-free survival of Thai post-menopausal breast cancer patients who received adjuvant tamoxifen. Pharmgenomics Pers Med 6:37–48
Medhasi S et al (2016) Clinically relevant genetic variants of drug-metabolizing enzyme and transporter genes detected in Thai children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 12:843–851
Nishimura M et al (2016) Influence of the cytochrome P450 2D6 *10/*10 genotype on the pharmacokinetics of paroxetine in Japanese patients with major depressive disorder: a population pharmacokinetic analysis. Pharmacogenet Genomics 26(9):403–413
Del Re M et al (2016) Pharmacogenetics of CYP2D6 and tamoxifen therapy: light at the end of the tunnel? Pharmacol Res 107:398–406
Bradford LD (2002) CYP2D6 allele frequency in European Caucasians, Asians, Africans and their descendants. Pharmacogenomics 3(2):229–243
Zafra-Ceres M et al (2013) Influence of CYP2D6 polymorphisms on serum levels of tamoxifen metabolites in Spanish women with breast cancer. Int J Med Sci 10(7):932–937
Sandanaraj E et al (2008) Influence of UGT1A9 intronic I399C>T polymorphism on SN-38 glucuronidation in Asian cancer patients. Pharmacogenomics J 8(3):174–185
Schulz C et al (2009) UGT1A1 genotyping: a predictor of irinotecan-associated side effects and drug efficacy? Anti-Cancer Drugs 20(10):867–879
Evaluation of Genomic Applications in, P. and G. Prevention Working (2009) Recommendations from the EGAPP working group: can UGT1A1 genotyping reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with irinotecan? Genet Med 11(1):15–20
Etienne-Grimaldi MC et al (2015) UGT1A1 genotype and irinotecan therapy: general review and implementation in routine practice. Fundam Clin Pharmacol 29(3):219–237
Cheng L et al (2014) UGT1A1*6 polymorphisms are correlated with irinotecan-induced toxicity: a system review and meta-analysis in Asians. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 73(3):551–560
Yan L et al (2016) Effects of UGT1A1*6, UGT1A1*28, and ABCB1-3435C>T polymorphisms on irinotecan induced toxicity in Chinese cancer patients. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 54(3):193–199
Atasilp C et al (2016) Correlation of UGT1A1(*)28 and (*)6 polymorphisms with irinotecan-induced neutropenia in Thai colorectal cancer patients. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 31(1):90–94
Hirasawa A et al (2013) Polymorphisms in the UGT1A1 gene predict adverse effects of irinotecan in the treatment of gynecologic cancer in Japanese patients. J Hum Genet 58(12):794–798
van Gelder T, van Schaik RH, Hesselink DA (2014) Pharmacogenetics and immunosuppressive drugs in solid organ transplantation. Nat Rev Nephrol 10(12):725–731
Lancia P, Jacqz-Aigrain E, Zhao W (2015) Choosing the right dose of tacrolimus. Arch Dis Child 100(4):406–413
Birdwell KA et al (2015) Clinical pharmacogenetics implementation consortium (CPIC) guidelines for CYP3A5 genotype and tacrolimus dosing. Clin Pharmacol Ther 98(1):19–24
Watanabe N et al (2010) Relationship between tacrolimus blood concentrations and clinical outcome during the first 4 weeks after SCT in children. Bone Marrow Transplant 45(7):1161–1166
Nair SS et al (2015) Polymorphism of the CYP3A5 gene and its effect on tacrolimus blood level. Exp Clin Transplant 13(Suppl 1):197–200
Oetting WS et al (2016) Genomewide association study of tacrolimus concentrations in African American kidney transplant recipients identifies multiple CYP3A5 alleles. Am J Transplant 16(2):574–582
Yaowakulpatana K et al (2016) Impact of CYP3A5 polymorphism on trough concentrations and outcomes of tacrolimus minimization during the early period after kidney transplantation. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 72(3):277–283
Mac Guad R et al (2016) Effects of CYP3A5 genetic polymorphism on the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in renal transplant recipients. Transplant Proc 48(1):81–87
Fathy M et al (2016) Impact of CYP3A5 and MDR-1 gene polymorphisms on the dose and level of tacrolimus among living-donor liver transplanted patients: single center experience. Biomarkers 21(4):335–341
Xue F et al (2014) CYP3A5 genotypes affect tacrolimus pharmacokinetics and infectious complications in Chinese pediatric liver transplant patients. Pediatr Transplant 18(2):166–176
Karran P, Attard N (2008) Thiopurines in current medical practice: molecular mechanisms and contributions to therapy-related cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 8(1):24–36
Thompson AJ et al (2014) The cost-effectiveness of a pharmacogenetic test: a trial-based evaluation of TPMT genotyping for azathioprine. Value Health 17(1):22–33
Gisbert JP et al (2006) Thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) activity and adverse effects of azathioprine in inflammatory bowel disease: long-term follow-up study of 394 patients. Am J Gastroenterol 101(12):2769–2776
Xin HW et al (2009) Relationships between thiopurine S-methyltransferase polymorphism and azathioprine-related adverse drug reactions in Chinese renal transplant recipients. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 65(3):249–255
Wang L et al (2010) Very important pharmacogene summary: thiopurine S-methyltransferase. Pharmacogenet Genomics 20(6):401–405
Relling MV et al (2011) Clinical pharmacogenetics implementation consortium guidelines for thiopurine methyltransferase genotype and thiopurine dosing. Clin Pharmacol Ther 89(3):387–391
Mauri MC et al (2014) Clinical pharmacology of atypical antipsychotics: an update. EXCLI J 13:1163–1191
Hsia Y et al (2014) Psychopharmacological prescriptions for people with autism spectrum disorder (ASD): a multinational study. Psychopharmacology 231(6):999–1009
Thyssen A et al (2010) Population pharmacokinetics of oral risperidone in children, adolescents and adults with psychiatric disorders. Clin Pharmacokinet 49(7):465–478
Yoo HD et al (2012) Population pharmacokinetic analysis of risperidone and 9-hydroxyrisperidone with genetic polymorphisms of CYP2D6 and ABCB1. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 39(4):329–341
Vanwong N et al (2016) Impact of CYP2D6 polymorphism on steady-state plasma levels of risperidone and 9-hydroxyrisperidone in Thai children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 27(2):185–191
Ngamsamut N et al (2016) 9-hydroxyrisperidone-induced hyperprolactinaemia in Thai children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 119(3):262–272
Vandenberghe F et al (2015) Genetics-based population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of risperidone in a psychiatric cohort. Clin Pharmacokinet 54(12):1259–1272
Gatanaga H et al (2007) Successful efavirenz dose reduction in HIV type 1-infected individuals with cytochrome P450 2B6 *6 and *26. Clin Infect Dis 45(9):1230–1237
Gounden V et al (2010) Presence of the CYP2B6 516G> T polymorphism, increased plasma Efavirenz concentrations and early neuropsychiatric side effects in south African HIV-infected patients. AIDS Res Ther 7:32
Weinshilboum R, Wang L (2004) Pharmacogenomics: bench to bedside. Nat Rev Drug Discov 3(9):739–748
Ritchie MD (2012) The success of pharmacogenomics in moving genetic association studies from bench to bedside: study design and implementation of precision medicine in the post-GWAS era. Hum Genet 131(10):1615–1626
Vivot A et al (2015) Guidance for pharmacogenomic biomarker testing in labels of FDA-approved drugs. Genet Med 17(9):733–738
Relling MV, Evans WE (2015) Pharmacogenomics in the clinic. Nature 526(7573):343–350
Evans WE, Relling MV (2004) Moving towards individualized medicine with pharmacogenomics. Nature 429(6990):464–468
Berm EJ et al (2016) Economic evaluations of Pharmacogenetic and Pharmacogenomic screening tests: a systematic review. Second update of the literature. PLoS One 11(1):e0146262
Mills R, Haga SB (2013) Clinical delivery of pharmacogenetic testing services: a proposed partnership between genetic counselors and pharmacists. Pharmacogenomics 14(8):957–968
Sukasem C, Chantratita W (2016) A success story in pharmacogenomics: genetic ID card for SJS/TEN. Pharmacogenomics 17(5):455–458
Barajas MR et al (2015) A patient-centered approach to the development and pilot of a warfarin pharmacogenomics patient education tool for health professionals. Curr Pharm Teach Learn 7(2):249–255
Plothner M et al (2016) Cost-effectiveness of pharmacogenomic and pharmacogenetic test-guided personalized therapies: a systematic review of the approved active substances for personalized medicine in Germany. Adv Ther 33(9):1461–1480
Plumpton CO et al (2016) A systematic review of economic evaluations of pharmacogenetic testing for prevention of adverse drug reactions. PharmacoEconomics 34(8):771–793
Scott SA (2011) Personalizing medicine with clinical pharmacogenetics. Genet Med 13(12):987–995
Jain KK (ed) (2015) Textbook of personalized medicine, 2nd edn. Humana Press, Basel, p 732
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank (1) Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand; (2) Khoon Poom Foundation, The Project of Her Royal Highness Princess Ubonratana Rajakanya Siriwatana Bhanawadee, and (3) Pharmacogenomics for Autistic Children, Office of National Research Council of Thailand.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sukasem, C., Medhasi, S. (2018). Clinical Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine: New Strategies to Maximize Drug Efficacy and Avoid Adverse Drug Reaction. In: Pathak, Y. (eds) Genomics-Driven Healthcare. Adis, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7506-3_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7506-3_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Adis, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-7505-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-7506-3
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)