Abstract
This chapter analyzes the data given by Freedom House in its 2015 Report. There are now 125 electoral democracies; in 1989 there were 69, giving a growth rate of 25% among the 195 member countries of the United Nations. In the last few years the distribution of countries between “free,” “partially free” and “not free” is unchanged.
The diffusion of human rights and democracy throughout the world is an ambiguous phenomenon: human rights and democracy are differently conceived in each culture and civilization. In the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) human rights are qualities of human beings independently of their race, color, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. In the Universal Islamic Declaration of Human Rights (1981) “Human rights … are firmly rooted in the belief that God, and God alone, is the Law Giver and the Source of all human rights” (Foreword). In the Arab Charter on Human Rights there is an analogous statement about the origin of human rights.
In the African renaissance there is an autonomous foundation of human rights. Human rights are conceived as the best expression of Akan and Ubuntu culture. In the same time, the authors analyzed in this chapter propose a firm refusal of the Westminster model and a strong preference for the Consensus model of democracy. Family is the basis for a consensus or deliberative democracy.
In the Confucian renaissance there is not only a new proposition of Confucianism as a philosophical vision of the world but also a new perspective on human rights. The theses of Political Confucianism may be so summarized: (1) human rights are best founded in the Confucian vision of the world; (2) Chinese meritocracy as a form of government is better than the Western model of democracy; (3) the global order can be best construed through tanxia (all that is under the sky) philosophy than through the Western vision of international relations. The Western vision is based on the hierarchy of nation-state, communities and individuals; the Chinese proposal is for the hierarchy of tianxia, states and families. Family ties are the basis for a construction of a new global order. On this basis—some say—the two political traditions of tianxia and agora can encounter each other.
In his conclusions, the author observes that these challenges for the Western vision of humanity, of its rights and democratic form of rule, concerns the global (international) scene but also the local—internal to each society. Cultural pluralism is a universal phenomenon. Peace and order can be guaranteed only by dialogue. But for authentic dialogue it is necessary to abandon reciprocal prejudices, from the Westerners towards Asiatic, African and Islamic peoples but also from the Islamic, African and Asiatic populations towards Westerners.
Translation from Italian by Kay Mc Carty.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
The activities of this group may be followed at http://www.hrichina.org/en.
- 2.
It is practically impossible to provide references, as the issue is so vast. My discussion will, therefore, follow a number of lines which, in my opinion, seem very important when seeking to discuss human rights, democracy and the world order.
- 3.
de Bary analyzes the contributions of prestigious intellectuals such as Zhu Xi (1130–1200), Huang Zongxi (1610–1695) and Liang Qichao (1873–1929).
- 4.
Deng had already expressed this position in his address to the United Nations in 1974. This was the politics of the China of the previous decades, led by Mao and Zhou Enlai. It is proposed again, at least formally, today as well. During the eighteenth congress of the Chinese Communist Party, in fact, it was repeatedly stated that China does not seek hegemony (People’s Daily Online, November 15, 2012). It is difficult to say whether Chinese foreign policy still adheres to this principle. China’s economic and cultural activism at world level, in particular in Africa and Latin America, leads one to suppose a new phase in the presence of China within the world’s geopolitical competitive arena: no longer an actor playing a secondary role but a star. All the data available confirm this impression.
- 5.
Bell goes beyond theoretical enunciation. In Appendix I to his book, he draws up a Harmony Index (HI), which contrasts with some of the indices devised by different foundations and associations, marked by harmony within the family (parent–child relations and relations between spouses; trust in the family and various other family relationships); harmony within the country (peace, trust and equality in society; government relations, diversity in society); harmony in the world (world peace; integration in global institutions; economic interaction); harmony with nature (general relationship with nature; local relationship with nature). Based on these variables and related indicators, Bell draws up a social and human Harmony Index. China is not located at the top of the list. It rates, however, higher than its direct competitors, the USA and India.
References
Ames, Roger T. 1988. Rites as Rights: The Confucian Alternative, in “Human Rights and the World’s Religions”: 199–216.
Angle, Stephen C. 2012. Contemporary Confucian and Islamic approaches to democracy and human rights, “Comparative Philosophy”, 4 (1):7–41.
Angle, Stephen C. 2002. Human Rights and Chinese Thought: A Cross-Cultural Inquiry, Cambridge-New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bell, Daniel A. 2000. East Meets West. Human Rights And Democracy In East Asia, Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Bell, Daniel A. (ed). 2008a. Confucian Political Ethics, Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Bell, Daniel A. 2008b. China’s New Confucianism. Politics and Everyday Life in a Changing Society, Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Bell, Daniel A. 2015. The China Model. Political Meritocracy and the limits of Democracy, Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Bell, Daniel A., Chaibong, Hahm (eds). 2003. Confucianism for the Modern World, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bell, Daniel A., Coicaud, Jean-Marc (eds). 2007. Ethics in Action: the ethical challenges of international human rights nongovernmental organizations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chan, Joseph. 1999. A Confucian Perspective on Human Rights for Contemporary China, in Bauer, Joanne R., Bell Daniel A. (eds.), The East Asian Challenge for Human Rights, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1999, 212–240.
Chan, Joseph. 2014. Confucian Perfectionism: A Political Philosophy for Modern Times, Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Cotesta, Vittorio. 2010. Europa. Da regina delle civiltà a provincia del mondo, in Cotesta, Vittorio (ed). Europa. Idee, immagini, percezioni, Vol. 1, Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino, 2010, p. 263–300.
Cotesta, Vittorio. 2012. Global Society and Human Rights, Leiden and Boston, MA: Brill.
Cotesta, Vittorio. 2015a. Kings into Gods. How Prostration Shaped Eurasian Civilizations, Leiden and Boston, MA: Brill.
Cotesta, Vittorio. 2015b. Modernità e capitalismo. Saggio su Max Weber e la Cina, Rome: Editore Armando.
de Bary, Wm. Theodore, Tu Weiming (eds). 1998. Confucianism and Human Rights, New York: Columbia University Press.
de Bary, Wm. Theodore. 1998. Asian Values and Human Rights. A Confucian Communitarian Perspective, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
de Bary, Wm. Theodore. 1988. Neo-Confucianism and Human Rights, in Rouner Leroy S. (ed), Human Rights and the World’s Religions, Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1988: 183–198.
Deng, Xiaoping. 1978. Realize the four modernizations and never seek hegemony, in Deng, Xiaoping. Selected Works, II, Beijing: Foreign Languages Press, 1994: 85–86.
Deng, Xiaoping. 1987. We must emancipate our minds and think independently, in Deng, Xiaoping, Selected Works, III, Beijing: Foreign Languages Press, 1994:79–80.
Fairbank, John K. 1987. The Great Chinese Revolution, New York: Harper & Row.
Freedom House 2015a. Freedom in the World 2015, New York (www.freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/freedom-world-2015).
Freedom House 2015b, Freedom in the World 2015: Methodology, New York (www.freedomhouse.org/ report/freedom-world/freedom-world-2015).
Jiang, Qing. 2013. A Confucian Constitutional Order. How China’s Ancient Past Can Shape Its Political Future, edited by Daniel A. Bell and Ruiping Fan, Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Lijphart A. 1999, Patterns of Democracy, New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.
Mauzy D. K. 1997, The human rights and ‘Asian values’ debate in Southeast Asia: Trying to clarify the key issues , “The Pacific Review”, 10, 2.
Papa Francesco. 2015. Laudato si’. Enciclica sulla cura della casa comune, Milano: San Paolo.
People’s Daily Online, 15 novembre 2012.
Rawls, John. 1999. Laws of Peoples, Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press.
Robinson, Richard. 1996, The politics of ‘Asian values’ , in “The Pacific Review”, 9, 3.
Scarpari, Maurizio. 2015. Ritorno a Confucio. La Cina di oggi fra tradizione e mercato, Bologna: il Mulino.
Sen, Amartya. 1997. Human Rights and Asian Values, Sixteenth Morgenthau Memorial Lecture, New York: Carnegie Council on Ethics and International Affairs.
Sen, Amartya. 2004. Elements of a Theory of Human Rights, “Philosophy & Public Affairs”, 32 (4): 315–356.
Sen, Amartya. 2005, Human Rights and Capabilities, “Journal of Human Development”, 6 (2):151–166
Ssu-Yu, T., Fairbank, John K. 1973. China’s Response to the West, New York: Atheneum.
Subramaniam, Surain. 2000. The Asian Values Debate: Implications for the Spread of Liberal Democracy, “Asian Affairs”, 27,(1):19–35
Thompson, Marc R. 2004. Pacific Asia after ‘Asian values’: authoritarianism, democracy, and ‘good governance’ , “The Pacific Review”, 25, 6.
Weatherley, Robert. 1999. The Discourse of Human Rights in China: Historical and Ideological Perspectives, New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Wei, Jinsheng. 1980. The Fifth Modernization. China’s Human Rights Movement 1978–1979, in Seymour, James D. (ed). The Fifth Modernization, New York: Human Rights Publishing Group, 1980: 47–69
Zhao, Tingyang. 2008. La philosophie du tianxia, «Diogène», 221 (Janvier): 4–25.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cotesta, V. (2018). Democracy and Meritocracy: A New Intercivilizational Challenge. In: Giri, A. (eds) Social Theory and Asian Dialogues. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7095-2_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7095-2_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-7094-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-7095-2
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)