Abstract
Biological ultrasonic microscopy, also known as biological scanning acoustic microscope, provides quantitative acoustic parameters like sound speed and characteristic acoustic impedance that are relevant to elastic properties.
References
Miura, K., Yamamoto, S.: Pulmonary imaging with a scanning acoustic microscope discriminates speed-of-sound and shows structural characteristics of disease. Lab. Invest. 92, 1760–1765 (2012)
Gunawan, A.I., Hozumi, N., Yoshida, S., Saijo, Y., Kobayashi, K., Yamamoto, S.: Numerical analysis of ultrasound propagation and reflection intensity for biological acoustic impedance microscope. Ultrasonics 61, 79–87 (2015)
Gunawan, A.I., Hozumi, N., Takahashi, K., Yoshida, S., Saijo, Y., Kobayashi, K., Yamamoto, S.: Numerical analysis of acoustic impedance microscope utilizing acoustic lens transducer to examine cultured cells. Ultrasonics 63, 102–110 (2015)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
1.1.1 Derivation of Eq. (1.1)
Sound speed of the soft tissue can be assessed by either time domain or frequency domain analysis. An example of frequency domain analysis is as follows: The spectrum of the reflection from the object slice is normalized by the reference waveform. Assuming fm as one of the minimum and maximum points in the intensity spectrum, and ϕm as the corresponding phase angle, the phase difference between the two reflections at the minimum point is (2n − 1)π, giving
where d, c0, and n are the tissue thickness, sound speed of the water, and a nonnegative integer, respectively. The phase difference at the maximum point is 2nπ, giving
The phase angle Ï•m can be expressed by
since ϕm is the phase difference between the wave passed through the distance 2d with sound speed c and that passed though the corresponding distance with sound speed c0. Equation (1.4) gives
for the minimum point. For the maximum point, Eq. (1.5) gives
Sound speed is finally calculated as
which corresponds to Eq. (1.1).
1.1.2 Derivation of Eq. (1.2)
Hereafter, the signal component at an arbitrary frequency will be symbolized by S. Considering the reflection coefficient, the target signal Starget can be described as
where S0 is the transmitted signal and Ztarget and Zsub are the acoustic impedances of the target and substrate, respectively. On the other hand, the reference signal can be described as
where Zref is the acoustic impedance of the reference material. In case of using water as the reference, its acoustic impedance was assumed to be 1.5 × 106 Ns/m3. One can measure Starget and Zref; however, S0 cannot be directly measured. The acoustic impedance of the target is subsequently calculated as a solution of the simultaneous equations for Ztarget and S0, as
assuming that S0 is constant throughout the observation process.
1.1.3 Derivation of Eq. (1.3)
Phases of the two reflection signals (D and R) are represented as
where wave numbers k0 and kR are defined as \( k_{0} = 2\pi f/c_{0} \) and \( k_{R} = 2\pi f/c_{R} \), respectively. Relative phase shift per unit distance of z is represented as
Two signals emphasize together when \( \left( {\phi_{D} (z) - \phi_{R} (z)} \right) \) is 2Ï€. Hence, periodical change appears on the V(z) curve.
The interval Δz between minima can be represented by
Applying \( \theta_{R} = \sin^{ - 1} (c_{0} /c_{R} ) \) (Snell’s law),
thus
Speed of LSAW is determined as
which corresponds to Eq. (1.3).
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hozumi, N. (2018). Acoustic Microscopy. In: The Surface Science Society of Japan (eds) Compendium of Surface and Interface Analysis. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6156-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6156-1_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-6155-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-6156-1
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)