Skip to main content

Augmenting Small Farmers’ Income Through Rural Non-farm Sector in India: Role of Information and Institutions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 491 Accesses

Abstract

The low level of income of farmer s is a critical concern in India against the backdrop of which the current Union Government proposes to double farmers’ income by 2022. As the land size of small and marginal farmers, who constitute 80 per cent of the farmer population in India, is limited, reducing farmers’ distress and doubling of farmers’ income through the farm sector alone is almost impossible. In this regard, the non-farm sector can not only absorb the excess labour from agriculture but also generate additional income for farm households. Further, the sector can help mitigate risks for farmers and check migration to urban areas. However, the non-farm sector’s importance has not been duly recognized in the country, and against this backdrop, this chapter discusses the nature and extent of non-farm activities in India using the unit record data of the India Human Development Survey. An exercise carried out to understand the determinants of income from non-farm activities using Tobit regression shows that households that can avail themselves of larger loans (for any purpose, including agriculture) or insurance from financial institutions and have access to information and networks are the ones that are able to earn higher non-farm income. As the credit for non-farm activities per se is rather limited, it can be inferred that higher levels of credit even for farm activities can help the non-farm sector as well, possibly through production linkages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The figures on the shares of each sector in total GDP are based on current prices and were taken from Central Statistical Office (CSO) Data.

  2. 2.

    Figures were obtained from the Economic survey 2016–17, Government of India.

  3. 3.

    We consider in our subsequent analysis the number of members in a household who can be used for non-farm activities started by the household. Hired labour can be more expensive, thereby reducing possible earnings.

  4. 4.

    Rajeev and Vani (2011) show s that about 70 per cent of marginal farmers’ net profit from the farm sector is close to zero.

  5. 5.

    We also ran a regression with per capita non-farm income as dependent variable and arrived at qualitatively similar results.

  6. 6.

    This was observed during our survey in various parts of the country (Rajeev and Bhattacharjee 2017).

References

  • Awotide, B.A., T. Abdoulaye, A. Alene, and V. M. Manyong. 2015. Impact of Access to Credit on Agricultural Productivity: Evidence from Smallholder Cassava Farmers in Nigeria. Presented at 2015 Conference, 9–14 August 2015, Milan, Italy (No. 210969), International Association of Agricultural Economists.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, C.B., T. Reardon, and P. Webb. 2001. Non-farm Income Diversification and Household Livelihood Strategies in Rural Africa: Concepts, Dynamics, and Policy Implications. Food Policy 26 (4): 315–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, C.B., M.B. Clark, D.C. Clay, and T. Reardon. 2005. Heterogeneous Constraints, Incentives and Income Diversification Strategies in Rural Africa. Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture 44 (1): 37–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaumik, S.K. 2002. Employment Diversification in Rural India. Indian Journal of Labour Economics 45 (4): 719–744.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braido, L.H. 2003. Insurance and Incentives in Sharecropping, CESIFO Working Paper No. 1098, Retrieved from http://www.cesifo-group.de/portal/page/portal/DocBase_Content/WP/WP-CESifo_Working_Papers/wp-cesifo-2003/wp-cesifo-2003-12/cesifo1_wp1098.pdf . Accessed 21 Dec 2016.

  • Chakrabarti, S., A. Kundu, and A.K. Nandi. 2011. Farm Non Farm Linkage in India: A Structuralist Perspective. Indian Journal of agricultural Economics 66 (2): 178–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggblade, H., P.B.R. Hazell, and T. Reardon. 2007. Transforming the Rural Nonfarm Economy: Opportunities and Threats in the Developing World. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J.R., and M.P. Todaro. 1970. Migration, Unemployment, and Development: A Two Sector Analysis. The American Economic Review 60 (1): 126–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymer, S., and S. Resnick. 1969. A Model of an Agrarian Economy with Non-agricultural Activities. American Economic Review 59 (4): 493–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanjouw, P. 2007. Does Rural Nonfarm Economy Contribute to Poverty Reduction. In Transforming the Rural Nonfarm Economy: Opportunities and Threats in the Developing World, ed. S. Haggblade, P.B.R. Hazell, and T. Reardon. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanjouw, J.O., and P. Lanjouw. 2001. The Rural Non-farm Sector: Issues and Evidence from Developing Countries. Agricultural Economics 26 (1): 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, W.A. 1954. Economic Development with Unlimited Supplies of Labour. The Manchester School 22 (2): 139–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellor, J.W., and U.J. Lele. 1973. Growth Linkages of the New Food Grain Technologies. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics 18 (1): 35–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajeev, M., and M. Bhattacharjee. 2017. Mapping of Farm Non-farm Linkages in Rural India. Project Report, Bangalore: Institute for Social and Economic Change.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajeev, M., and B.P. Vani. 2011. Farm Sector in Karnataka: Farmers’ Indebtedness and Risk Management, Project No. CESP/93, Institute for Social and Economic Change, Bengaluru.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajeev, M., M. Bhattacharjee, and B.P. Vani. 2015. Crop Insurance and Risk Mitigation: Experiences from India, ICDD Working Paper No.15, Germany: University of Kassel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranis, G., and J.C. Fei. 1961. A Theory of Economic Development. American Economic Review 51 (4): 533–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1963. The Ranis-Fei Model of Economic Development: Reply. American Economic Review 53 (3): 452–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reardon, T., J. Berdegué, C.B. Barrett, and K. Stamoulis. 2007. Household Income Diversification into Rural Nonfarm Activities. In Transforming the Rural Nonfarm Economy: Opportunities and Threats in the Developing World, 115–140. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Braun, J., and R. Pandya-Lorch. 1991. Income Sources of Malnourished People in Rural Areas: Microlevel Information and Policy Implications. Vol. 5. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolridge, J. 2002. Econometric Analysis of Cross Sectional and Panel Data. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Table 4.4 Distribution of farmer households (small and marginal) on the basis of main occupation (rows add up to 100)
Table 4.5 Percentage of small and marginal farmer households having first business, second business and third business
Table 4.6 Distribution of small and marginal farmers in terms of the nature of returns from non-farm business activities (rows add up to 100)
Table 4.7 Percentage of small and marginal farmer households having debt in last five years (%)
Table 4.8 Percentage of small and marginal farmer households having debt from formal institutions in last five years

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rajeev, M., Bhattacharjee, M. (2017). Augmenting Small Farmers’ Income Through Rural Non-farm Sector in India: Role of Information and Institutions. In: Xaxa, V., Saha, D., Singha, R. (eds) Work, Institutions and Sustainable Livelihood. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5756-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5756-4_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5755-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5756-4

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics