Abstract
A parliament holds the constitutional power of the purse. As the guardian of the public purse, parliaments have the right to oversee the budget process in its totality. Parliament must ensure that the revenue and spending measures it authorizes in the budget are fiscally sound, match the needs of the population with the available resources, and are implemented properly and efficiently. Legislatures in both developed and developing countries are seeking to strengthen their role in the budget process. Parliament is responsible for monitoring how the government raises money, how much and on what it spends that money, and what consequences that brings forth to the economy of the country. In this context, parliament must exercise oversight before the money is appropriated (ex-ante control) and monitor public expenditure after money has been spent by the executive agencies (ex-post control). A merely token involvement in the budget process relegates the legislative power of the purse to the realm of constitutional fiction. Is it possible for parliaments in the Westminster system to exercise continuous oversight throughout the entire budget process? It was once common wisdom in systems derived from the Westminster model that budget-making was an executive function and parliament had to simply approve it, with or without amendment. In the early decades of the twenty-first century, however, this conception has widely changed. Some parliaments exercise significant oversight throughout the process, while others exercise minimal oversight. This chapter analyzes the budget-making process of a few developed Westminster democracies and compares it to the case of Bangladesh. The findings suggest that the budget process in Bangladesh is less open and ex ante, and that Parliament has little scope to be involved in it. Ex-post oversight is also limited by systemic constraints. Changes in the ROP could make a substantive improvement in the budget process and create room for exercising effective fiscal oversight on the public purse.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
The UK does not have a codified or written constitution as such, but rather is formed of Acts of Parliament, court judgments, and conventions.
- 2.
Between 1973 and 2006, the Public Accounts Committee published only thirteen reports. During the same period, the equivalent committee in the UK and Canada published on average ten to twenty reports each year and in India, more than ten each year (See Woodly B, Saghal B and Stapenhurst F (eds) Scrutinizing Public expenditure: Role of Public accounts Committee, pp. 12–18. In Bangladesh, there were only four and five reports in total published in the tenures of the Fifth and Seventh Parliaments respectively (Ahmed 2000: 9).
References
Ahmed, N. (2000) Parliament and Public Spending in Bangladesh: Limits of Control. Bangladesh Institute of Parliamentary Studies, Dhaka
Ahmed, N (2002) The Bangladesh Parliament, Ashgate: Anthony Rowe Limited, Chippenham, Wiltshire London
Ahmed, N. (2006) Limits of Parliamentary Control: Public Spending in Bangladesh, UPL, Dhaka
Ahmed, N. and Obaidullah, ATM. (2007) (eds.) The Working of Parliamentary Committees in Westminster System, University Press Limited, Dhaka
Allen, Richard and Daniel Tommasi (eds) (2001) Managing Public Expenditure: A Reference Book for Transition Countries, OECD, Paris
Anderson, B. “The Value of a Nonpartisan, Independent, Objective Analytic Unit to the Legislative Role in the Budget Preparation”, IMF, XVII Regional Seminar on Fiscal Policy. The Role of Parliament in the Fiscal Policy Formulation, January, 25, 2005, pp. 39–40
Anura Priyadharshana Yapa, “Parliament and the budgetary process from a Gender Perspective”, Regional Seminar (Colombo, 2003), pp. 26–28 (IPU: 2002 http://www.ipu.org/splz-e/manila02/report-e.pdf)
Azad, A.K (2007) Towards Good Governance in Public Sector of Bangladesh: The Role of Public Accounts Committee and Office of the Auditor and Comptroller General, Dissertation for the Masters of Economics, Graduate School of Economics, Faculty of Economics, Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi, Japan
Bachrach, E. Bangladesh Parliament Secretariat Budget Analysis and Monitoring Unit (BAMU) Needs Assessment and Recommendations Report, April, 2008
Bangladesh Parliament: Rules of Procedure See Rules 246 and 247
Blackburn, R. & Kennon, A. (2003) Parliament Functions, Practice and Procedures, Thomson, Sweet & Maxwell
Brazier & Ram, V. (2006) The Fiscal Maze: Parliament, Government and Public Money, Hansard Society, London
Budget Process New Zealand Government The Treasury. http://www.treasury.govt.nz/budget/process
Canadian federal budget. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_federal_budget
Carlos Santiso (2004) Legislatures and Budget Oversight in Latin America: Strengthening Public Finance Accountability in Emerging Economies, OECD Journal on Budgeting, Vol. 4, No. 2 © OECD 2004
Chowdhury, R. R. (2006) Riazur Rahman Chowdhury, Manual on Public Accounts Committee, PAC and Comptroller and Auditor- General (C&AG) Operational Relationship, UNDP, Dhaka
Daniel Blais and Fred Schenkelaars (2010) Institutional Risk Assessment Best Practices Compendium (anti-Corruption and Integrity Auditing (A private Publication)
David McGee (2002) Scrutinizing Public Expenditures: Assessing the Performance of Public Accounts Committees. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/8244 World Bank. http://openknowledge.worldbank.or/handle/10986/8244 License 2.0IGO
Dean, P. Government Budgeting in Developing Countries (London, Routledge, 1989)
East, P. (2003a) “The Budget: Purpose, Composition and Terminology”, Regional Seminar on the National Budget, Regional Seminar on the National Budget, (www.ipu.org/conf-e/104.pdf. Colombo, 2003)
East, P. (2003b) “The Respective Roles of Government and Parliamentary Process”, Regional Seminar 26-28, (Colombo, 2003 https://www.iom.int/jahia/webdav/shared/.../colombo/colombo_report_2003.pd)
Emy, H. (1975) The Politics of Australian Democracy, Macmillan, Melbourne.
GOB: Constitution of the Peoples Republic of Bangladesh
House of Commons Treasury Committee (2007) “The 2006 Pre-Budget Report: Government Response to the Committee’s Second Report of Session 2006–2007”. HC 423, p. 14
Islam, S. M. (2005) Public Accounts Committee: Its Role in Bangladesh: A Dissertation by BU ID NO. 07272005 MA in Governance & Development Course. BRAC University, Dhaka
Islam, Shahidul (2010) Public Accounts Committee: Its Role in Bangladesh. A Dissertation for the Degree of M. A. in Governance and Development, Institute of Governance Studies BRAC University, Dhaka
Johnson, N. (1966) Parliament and Administration: The Estimates committee 1945–65, George Allen and Urwin, London
Khan A. A. (2008) People’s Participarion in Budgetary Process: In Search of Some Policy Reforms, Unnayan Shamunnay, 2008, p. 25
Krafchic, W. and Wehner, J. (2004) Legislatures and Budget Oversight, Presented at the open forum held in Kazakhstan, Revenue Watch in Almaty (April 8, 2004)
Mitchell O‘Brien, Legislative Audit, Public Accounts Committee and PBOS? (https://www.oecd.org/gov/budgeting/49788465.pdf
MOF (2008). Stands for Ministry of Finance, Government of the Peoples Republic of Bangladesh (GPRB)
Open budget index 2008. www.openbudgetindex.org
Pre-Budget Report (2003) Presented to Parliament by the Chancellor of the Exchequer by Command of Her Majesty. www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/media/D/1/PBR03completerep[1].pdf
Parliament and the budgetary process, including from a gender perspective
Policy Dialogue on Legislative Development, Brussels, 2002, PP2022 see in www.undp.org/governance/eventsite/policy
Rahman, T. (2008) Parliamentary Control and Government Accountability in South Asia, Routledge, London
Regional seminar for ASEAN+3 Parliaments Manila (Philippines) 23-July 2002. http://www.ipu.org/splz-e/manila02/report-e.pdf
Santiso, C. “Legislative and Budget Oversight in Latin America: Strengthening Public Financial Accountability in Latin America”, OECD Jo
Shamunnay (2002) The Budget Making Process, A Study Commissioned by IDPAA, PROSHIKA and conducted by, UNIversity Press Limited
Simon, H. Administrative Behaviour (New York, 1957).
Stapenhurst, R. (2003) “Accountability and Transparency in the Budgetary Process: Parliamentary Oversight of the Budget: Reading, Analyzing and Questioning Parliamentary Tools and Mechanism”, Regional Seminar, Colombo. www.ipu.org/PDF/publications/colombo_en.pdf
Stapenhurst, Rick, Sahgal, Vinod, Woodley, William, and Pelizzo Ricardo (2005) “Scrutinizing Public Expenditure: Assessing the Performance of Public Accounts Committee” WB Policy Research Working Paper, 3613. WO Washington D.C. World Bank. http://openknowledge.worldbank.or/handle/10986/8244 License 2.0IGO
Staskiewicz, W. (2002) Budget Analysis for Parliaments: The Case of Poland, Bureau of Research, Chancellery of the Sejm Warsaw, Polland) 68th IFLA Council and General Conference August 18-24, 2002 https://www.oecd.org/gov/budgeting/43411793.pdf
The Constitution of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh (Dhaka, Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs, 1998
The Ministry of Finance (2008) Budget Call Circular. GOB
UNDP: Chowdhury, N. (1997) Sangsad Unnayan Prokalpa (BGD/96/ 017, Implementation Plan of on Strengthening of the Parliament, Dhaka
UNDP: David Butcher (2004) Mission Report, November, Dhaka
USAID (2011) Bangladesh: Promoting Governance, Accountability and Transparency (PROGATI) Assessing Parliament Capacity to Conduct Public Expenditure Oversight, DAI/Asia Foundation: Dhaka
Wehner, J. (2003) General Introduction to the Budgetary Process, Reviewing the Variety of National Approaches, Regional Seminar on the National Budge, (www.ipu.org/PDF/publications/colombo_en.pdfGColombo, 2003)
Wieslaw Staskiewicz (2002) Budget Analysis for Parliaments: The Case of Poland, Bureau of Research, Chancellery of the Sejm Warsaw, Polland) 68th IFLA Council and General Conference August 18–24, 2002. https://www.oecd.org/gov/budgeting/43411793.pdf
Wildavasky (1964) An Incrementalist View of Budget outcomes. https://books.google.com/books?isbn=1416577629
Constitutional Mandate Office of the Comptroller and Auditor General. www.cagbd.org
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Obaidullah, A.T.M. (2019). Comparative Budget Process in Westminster Parliaments: A Lesson for Effective Fiscal Oversight. In: Institutionalization of the Parliament in Bangladesh. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5317-7_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5317-7_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5316-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5317-7
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)