Skip to main content

Cardiovascular Computing in the Intensive Care Unit

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cardiovascular Computing—Methodologies and Clinical Applications

Part of the book series: Series in BioEngineering ((SERBIOENG))

  • 758 Accesses

Abstract

Clinical practice in the intensive care unit (ICU) faces a number of challenges, including accurate and early detection of pathological processes, and the related decision-making often relies on haemodynamic monitoring. In this chapter, applications are presented of computerised approaches for analysing data obtained from haemodynamic monitoring in the ICU. Haemodynamic monitoring is primarily concerned with assessing the performance of the cardiovascular system and conventionally relies on blood pressure measurements and echocardiography, for estimating cardiac output and other physiological variables. In addition to haemodynamic monitoring, less common techniques in the ICU (applanation tonometry, carotid and venous ultrasound), can also be used in cardiovascular computing applications. Such applications span a wide range of clinically relevant issues, including organisation and archiving of data into structured databases, data analytics, decision making and prediction, as well as estimation of arterial stiffness. Large, comprehensive, publicly available databases facilitate benchmarking of machine learning algorithms using real-world data. Such algorithms can in turn contribute to improving sepsis prediction in the ICU through (a) the identification of new features useful for prediction and (b) the processing of large data amounts, so as to consider combined contributions of individual features. The evidence produced so far indicates that cardiovascular data archiving and analysis using advanced computing methodologies is promising for addressing crucial issues in the ICU, and highlights the role that clinical data analysis will increasingly play in both knowledge generation and medical practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Angus DC (2007) Caring for the critically ill patient: challenges and opportunities. JAMA 298:456–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Vincent JL (2006) Is the current management of severe sepsis and septic shock really evidence based? PLoS Med 3(9):e346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Laher AE, Watermeyer MJ, Buchanan SK, Dippenaar N, Simo NCT, Motara F, Moolla M (2017) A review of hemodynamic monitoring techniques, methods and devices for the emergency physician. Am J Emerg Med 35:1335–1347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Huygh J, Peeters Y, Bernards J, Malbrain MLNG (2016) Hemodynamic monitoring in the critically ill: an overview of current cardiac output monitoring methods. F1000Res 5: F1000Faculty Rev-2855

    Google Scholar 

  5. Augusto JF, Teboul JL, Radermacher P, Asfar P (2011) Interpretation of blood pressure signal: physiological bases, clinical relevance, and objectives during shock states. Intensiv Care Med 37(3):411–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Au SM, Vieillard-Baron A (2012) Bedside echocardiography in critically ill patients: a true hemodynamic monitoring tool. J Clin Monit Comput 26(5):355–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pinsky MR, Payen D (2005) Functional hemodynamic monitoring. Crit Care 9(6):566–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Meidert AS, Huber W, Müller JN et al (2014) Radial artery applanation tonometry for continuous non-invasive arterial pressure monitoring in intensive care unit patients: comparison with invasively assessed radial arterial pressure. Br J Anaesth 112(3):521–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gassner M, Killu K, Bauman Z, Coba V, Rosso K, Blyden D (2015) Feasibility of common carotid artery point of care ultrasound in cardiac output measurements compared to invasive methods. J Ultrasound 18(2):127–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nakamura K, Qian K, Ando T, Inokuchi R, Doi K, Kobayashi E, Sakuma I, Nakajima S, Yahagi N (2016) Cardiac variation of internal jugular vein for the evaluation of hemodynamics. Ultrasound Med Biol 42(8):1764–1770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Celi LA, Mark RG, Stone DJ, Montgomery RA (2013) “Big data” in the intensive care unit. closing the data loop. Am J Respir Crit Care 187(11):1157–1160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. McShea M, Holl R, Badawi O, Riker RR, Silfen E (2010) The eICU research institute - a collaboration between industry, health-care providers, and academia. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 29:18–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Johnson AEW, Pollard TJ, Shen L, Lehman LH, Feng M, Ghassemi M, Moody B, Szolovits P, Celi LA, Mark RG (2016) MIMIC-III: a freely accessible critical care database. Sci Data 3:160035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pinsky MR, Dubrawski A (2014) Gleaning knowledge from data in the intensive care unit. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 190(6):606–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mayaud L, Lai PS, Clifford GD, Tarassenko L, Celi LA, Annane D (2013) Dynamic data during hypotensive episode improves mortality predictions among patients with sepsis and hypotension. Crit Care Med 41(4):954–962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Vieira SM, Mendona LF, Farinha GJ, Sousa JM (2013) Modified binary PSO for feature selection using SVM applied to mortality prediction of septic patients. Appl Soft Comput 13(8):3494–3504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Carrara M, Baselli G, Ferrario M (2015) Mortality prediction model of septic shock patients based on routinely recorded data. Comput Math Methods Med 2015:761435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ghosh S, Li J, Cao L, Ramamohanarao K (2017) Septic shock prediction for ICU patients via coupled HMM walking on sequential contrast patterns. J Biomed Inform 66:19–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sandfort V, Johnson AEW, Kunz LW, Vargas JD, Rosing DR (2018) Prolonged elevated heart rate and 90-day survival in acutely ill patients: data from the MIMIC-III database. J Intensiv Care Med (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lee J, Kothari R, Ladapo JA, Scott DJ, Celi LA (2012) Interrogating a clinical database to study treatment of hypotension in the critically ill. BMJ Open 2:e000916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Oh J, Cho D, Park J et al (2018) Prediction and early detection of delirium in the intensive care unit by using heart rate variability and machine learning. Physiol Meas 39: 035004, 14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Heerman JR, Segers P, Roosens CD, Gasthuys F, Verdonck PR, Poelaert JI (2005) Echocardiographic assessment of aortic elastic properties with automated border detection in an ICU: in vivo application of the arctangent Langewouters model. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 288:H2504–H2511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lamia B, Teboul JL, Monnet X, Osman D, Maizel J, Richard C, Chemla D (2007) Contribution of arterial stiffness and stroke volume to peripheral pulse pressure in ICU patients: an arterial tonometry study. Intensiv Care Med 33:1931–1937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wittrock M, Scholze A, Compton F, Shaefer JH, Zidek W, Tepel M (2009) Noninvasive pulse wave analysis for the determination of central artery stiffness. Microvasc Res 77:109–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Monge GarcĂ­a MI, Cano AG, Romero MG (2011) Dynamic arterial elastance to predict arterial pressure response to volume loading in preload-dependent patients. Critic Care 15(R15):9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mackenzie IS, Wilkinson IB, Cockroft JR (2002) Assessment of arterial stiffness in clinical practice. Q J Med 95:67–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Golemati S, Cokkinos DD, Zakynthinos S (2018) Shear strain in the carotid artery of young and elderly subjects using B-mode ultrasound: a pilot study. In: World congress on biomechanics, Dublin, Ireland

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Spyretta Golemati .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Golemati, S. (2019). Cardiovascular Computing in the Intensive Care Unit. In: Golemati, S., Nikita, K. (eds) Cardiovascular Computing—Methodologies and Clinical Applications. Series in BioEngineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5092-3_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5092-3_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5091-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5092-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics