Skip to main content

History of “Making a Thumb”

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover The Thumb
  • 775 Accesses

Abstract

The thumb plays an important role in the hand function. Routine work related to pinch, grip, grasp, and precision handling can be easily accomplished with opposable thumb.

Attempts to restore thumb function were recorded as early as 1874, when Huguier (Arch Gen Med. 1, 78, 1874) reported on the phalangization of the thumb metacarpal. In 1900, Nicoladoni (Arch Klin Chir. 61, 606–14, 1900) described a reconstruction procedure following traumatic amputation of the thumb in which a staged, pedicled transfer of the great toe was performed.

The causes of thumb deficiency are traumatic loss and congenital anomalies. In the late nineteenth century, three basic methods of thumb restoration were established for various levels of amputation. There were digital transplantation, variable reconstruction, and use of hand structures such as phalangization and pollicization.

Congenital thumb anomalies, such as duplication, hypoplasia, and agenesis, are common and have a significant impact on the important functional role of the thumb. In the last century, they were classified and reconstructed with adequate variable techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Huguier PC. Du remplacement du pouce par son metacarpien, par l’agrandissement du premier espace interosseux. Arch Gen Med. 1874;1:78.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Littler JW. On making a thumb: one hundred years of surgical effort. J Hand Surg Am. 1976;1(1):35–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nicoladoni C. Daumenplastik und organischer Ersatz der Fingerspitze (Anticheiroplastik und Daktyloplstik). Arch Klin Chir. 1900;61:606–14.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Buncke HJ Jr, Buncke CM, Schulz WP. Immediate Nicoladoni procedure in the Rhesus monkey, or hallux-to-hand transplantation, utilising microminiature vascular anastomoses. Br J Plast Surg. 1966;19(4):332–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cobbett JR. Free digital transfer. Report of a case of transfer of a great toe to replace an amputated thumb. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1969;51(4):677–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Graham DJ, Venkatramani H, Sabapathy SR. Current reconstruction options for traumatic thumb loss. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2016;41:1159–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Littler JW. Reconstruction of the thumb in traumatic loss. In: Converse JM, editor. Reconstructive plastic surgery. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1977. p. 3352.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lister G. The choice of procedure following thumb amputation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984;195:45–51.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Moberg E. Aspects of sensation in reconstructive surgery of the upper extremity. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1964;46:817–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Littler JW. Neurovascular pedicle transfer of tissue in reconstructive surgery of the hand. J Bone Joint Surg. 1956;38A:917.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Woo SH, Lee GJ, Kim KC, et al. Immediate partial great toe transfer for the reconstruction of composite defects of the distal thumb. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117(6):1906–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Piñal F, Moraleda E, de Piero HG, Ruas J, Galindo C. Onycho-osteo-cutaneous defects of the thumb reconstructed by partial hallux transfer. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2014;39(1):29–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Foucher G, Khouri RK. Digital reconstruction with island flaps. Clin Plast Surg. 1997;24(1):1–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gurdin M, Pangman JW. The repair of surface defects of fingers by trans-digital flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1950;5:368–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hoskins DH. The versatile cross-finger pedicle flap. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1960;42:261–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Costa H, Soutar DS. The distally based island posterior interosseous flap. Br J Plast Surg. 1988;41(3):221–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Groenevelt F, Schoorl R. The reversed forearm flap using scarred skin in hand reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg. 1985;38(3):398–402.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Harii K, Omori K, Torii S, Murakami F, Kasai Y. Free groin skin flaps. Br J Plast Surg. 1975;28(4):225–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Oh SJ, Koh SH, Chung CH. Wide thumb and the first web reconstruction using a neurovascularised instep free flap. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010;63:1565–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ivy RH. Who originated the Z-plasty? Plast Reconstr Surg. 1971;41(1):67–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Woolf RM, Broadbent TR. The four flap Z-plasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1972;49(1):48–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Marble K, Fudem G. First web space release with the dorsal hand rotation flap: closing the donor site. Ann Plast Surg. 1995;35(1):83–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Woo SH, Choi BC, Oh SJ, Seul JH. Classification of the first web space free flap of the foot and its applications in reconstruction of the hand. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;103:508–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. McGregor IA, Jackson IT. The groin flaps. Br J Plast Surg. 1972;25(1):3–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kelleher JC, Sullivan JG, Baibak GJ, Dean RK. “On-top plasty” for amputated fingers. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1968;42(3):242–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Matev IB. Thumb reconstruction through metacarpal bone lengthening. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1980;5(5):482–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Yim K, Wei FC, Lin C. A comparison between primary and secondary toe-to-hand transplantation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114(1):107–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wei FC, Chen HC, Chuang CC, Noordhoff MS. Reconstruction of the thumb with a trimmed-toe transfer technique. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1988;82:506–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Morrison WA, O’Brien BM, MacLeod AM. Thumb reconstruction with a free neurovascular wrap-around flap from the big toe. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1980;5(6):575–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Biemer E. Thumb replacement by transplantation of the second toe. Handchirugie. 1981;13(1–2):31–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. McGregor I, Simonetta C. Reconstruction of thumb by composite bone-skin flap. Br J Plast Surg. 1964;17:37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Noesske K. Uber den plastischen ersatz von ganz oder teilweise verlorene fingern, insbesondere des daumens, und iiber handtellerplastik. Munch Med Wochenschr. 1909;56:1403.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Pierce GW. Reconstruction of thumb after total loss. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1927;45:825.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Shepelmann: Plastischer ersatz bei totaldefekt des rechten daumens. Z Orthop Chir. 34:1914; 35:1916; 39:1919.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Albee F. Synthetic transplantation of tissue to form a new finger with restoration of the function of the hand. Ann Surg. 1919;69:379.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Eo SR, Kim YS, Kim JYS, Oh SJ. The Versatility of the dorsalis pedis compound free flap in hand reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2008;61:157–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Moberg E. Discussion of paper, in Brooks, D.: Nerve grafting in orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1955;37:299–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Oh SJ, Koh SH, Chung CH. Twin digital and in-step neurovascularised free flap for reconstruction of the degloved mutilated hand. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010;63:1853–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Gosset J. La Pollicisation de L’index (technique chirurgicale). J Chir (Paris). 1949;65:403–11.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Iselin M. Reconstruction of the thumb. Surgery. 1937;2:619.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Hilgenfeldt 0. Operativer daumenersatz, Stuttgart, 1950, F Management

    Google Scholar 

  42. Dautel G. Strategy for congenital thumb differences in paediatric patients. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017;103:125–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Wassel HD. The results of surgery for polydactyly of the thumb. A review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1969;64:175–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Dautel G, Barbary S. Duplications du pouce. Chir Main. 2008;27(Suppl. 1):S82–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Dobyns JH, Lipscomb PR, Cooney WP. Management of thumb duplication. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;195:26–44.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Tada K, Yonenobu K, Tsuyuguchi Y, Kawai H, Egawa T. Duplication of the thumb. A retrospective review of two hundred and thirty-seven cases. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1983;65:584–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Bilhaut M. Guerison d’un pouce bifide par un nouveau procede.operatoire. Congrés Francais de. Chirurgie. 1889;4:576–80.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Tonkin MA, Bulstrode NW. The Bilhaut-Cloquet procedure for Wassel types III, IV and VII thumb duplication. J Hand Surg Eur. 2007;32:684–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Müller W. Die angeborenen Fehlbildungen der menschlichen Hand. Leipzig: Thieme; 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Blauth W. Der hypoplastische Daumen. Arch Orthop Unfallchir. 1967;62:225–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Strauch B. Dorsal thumb flap for release of adduction contracture of the first web space. Bull Hosp Joint Dis. 1975;36(1):34–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Camitz H. Über die beHandlung der Opposition-lähmung. Acta Chir Scand. 1929;65:77.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Royle NO. An operation for paralysis of the intrinsic muscles of the thumb. JAMA. 1938;111:612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Huber E. Hilfsoperation bei Medianuslahmung. Dtsch Z Chir. 1921;162:271–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Lister G. The hand: diagnosis and indications. 2nd ed. London: Churchill Livingstone; 1984. p. 312–51.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Matthews D. Congenital absence of functioning thumb. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1960;26:487.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Zancolli E. Transplantation of the index finger in congenital absence of the thumb. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1960;42:658.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Buck-Gramcko D. Pollicization of the index finger method and results in aplasia and hypoplasia of the thumb. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1971;53:1605.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Oh, S.J. (2019). History of “Making a Thumb”. In: Woo, S. (eds) The Thumb. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4400-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4400-7_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-4399-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-4400-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics