Abstract
The primary purpose of this chapter is to examine whether Japanese marriage patterns are affected by economic and ideational factors. Its second aim is to explore the extent to which the transition from single status to married status has an impact on attitudes towards partnership and family. To achieve these goals, we will begin by considering salient features of Japanese marriage behaviour. Then, we will discuss the relation between Japanese marriage patterns and societal changes. Thereafter, the influence of economic and ideational factors on marriage behaviour will be examined, followed by an explanation of data and methods used in this analysis. Finally, we will examine the influence of marriage on attitudes towards partnership and family relations.
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
For a discussion of the change of marriage patterns in the USA, see Cherline (1992).
- 3.
The two-year junior college is a type of college offering less strenuous higher education which mainly offers elementary liberal arts and vocational training.
- 4.
- 5.
In a sense, filial obligation can be regarded as a kind of inter-generational wealth-flow mechanism (see Caldwell 1982).
- 6.
The propensity scores were calculated by the following logistic regression.
$$\begin{aligned} \log \left( {\frac{q}{1 - q}} \right) & = \alpha + \beta_{1} ({\text{sex}}) + \beta_{2} ({\text{age}}) + \beta_{3} ({\text{marital status}}) \\ & \quad + \beta_{4} ({\text{the years of living in your current house}}) \\ & \quad + \beta_{5} ({\text{educational attainment}}) + \beta_{6} ({\text{residential prefecture}}) \\ & \quad + \beta_{7} ({\text{the number of children ever}} {\text{-}} {\text{born}}) \\ \end{aligned}$$Here, q is the probability of respondents remaining in our sample.
References
Anderson, K. H., & Hill, M. A. (1983). Marriage and labor market discrimination in Japan. Southern Economic Journal, 49, 941–953.
Ariès, P. (1980). Two successive motivations for the declining birth rate in the west. Population and Development Review, 6, 645–650.
Axinn, W. G., & Thornton, A. (1992). The relationship between cohabitation and divorce: Selectivity or causal influence? Demography, 29, 357–374.
Becker, G. S. (1975). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Billari, F., & Rosina, A. (2004). Italian “Latest-Late” transition to adulthood: An exploration of its consequences on fertility. Genus, 60, 71–87.
Bongaarts, J., & Potter, R. G. (1983). Fertility, biology and behavior: An analysis of the proximate determinants. New York: Academic Press.
Brinton, M. C. (1993). Women and the economic miracle: Gender and work in the postwar Japan. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Burgess, S., Propper, C., & Aassve, A. (2003). The role of income in marriage and divorce transitions among young Americans. Journal of Population Economics, 16, 455–475.
Caldwell, J. C. (1982). Theory of fertility decline. New York: Academic Press.
Carter, H., & Glick, P. C. (1976). Marriage and divorce: A social and economic study. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Cherline, A. J. (1992). Marriage, divorce, remarriage. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Cigno, A. (1991). Economics of the family. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Coleman, D. (1993). Britain in Europe: International and regional comparisons of fertility levels and trends. In M. Ní Bhrolcháin (Ed.), New perspectives of fertility in Britain (pp. 67–94). London: OPCS.
Coleman, D., & Salt, J. (1992). The British Population: Patterns, Trends, and Processes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dore, R. P. (1953). Japanese rural fertility: Some social and economic factors. Population Studies, 7, 62–88.
Easterlin, R. A. (1987). Birth and fortune. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Elder, G. H. (1977). Children of the great depression: Social change in life experience. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Eldridge, S., & Kiernan, K. (1985). Declining first marriage rates in England and Wales: A change in timing or a rejection of marriage? European Journal of Population, 1, 327–345.
Elster, J. (1983). Sour grapes: Studies in the subversion of rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ermisch, J. (1981). Economic opportunities, marriage squeezes and the propensity to marry. Population Studies, 35, 347–356.
Ermisch, J. (2003). An economic analysis of the family. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Freiden, A. (1974). The U.S. marriage market. In T. W. Schultz (Ed.), Economic of the family (pp. 352–371). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gabrielli, G., & Hoem, J. M. (2010). Italy’s non-negligible cohabitational unions. European Journal of Population, 26, 33–46.
Giele, J. Z., & Elder, G. H. (1998). Methods of life course research: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
Goldscheider, F. K., & Waite, L. J. (1986). Sex differences in the entry into marriage. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 91–109.
Goode, W. J. (1963). World revolution and family patterns. New York: The Free Press.
Guo, S., & Fraser, M. W. (2014). Propensity score analysis: Statistical methods and applications. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
Gutiérrez-Domènech, M. (2008). The impact of the labour market on the timing of marriage and births in Spain. Journal of Population Economics, 21, 83–110.
Hagenaars, J. A. (1993). Loglinear models with latent variables. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
Hagenaars, J. A., & McCutcheon, A. L. (2002). Applied latent class analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hajnal, J. (1965). European marriage pattern in perspective. In D. V. Glass & D. E. C. Eversley (Eds.), Population in history: Essays in historical demography (pp. 101–143). London: Arnold.
Hajnal, J. (1983). Two kinds of pre-industrial household formation system. In R. Wall, J. Robin & P. Laslett (Eds.), Family forms in historic Europe (pp. 65–104). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Iacovou, M., & Parisi, L. (2009). Leaving home. In M. Brynin & J. Ermisch (Eds.), Changing relationships (pp. 59–72). New York: Routledge.
Kalmijn, M. (2011). The influence of men’s income and employment on marriage and cohabitation: Testing Oppenheimer’s theory in Europe. European Journal of Population, 27, 269–293.
Kiernan, K. (1996). Partnership behaviour in Europe: Recent trends and issues. In D. Coleman (Ed.), Europe’s population in the 1990s (pp. 62–91). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kiernan, K. (1999). Cohabitation in Western Europe. Population Trends, 96, 23–32.
Kiernan, K. (2000). European perspectives on union formation. In L. J. Waite (Ed.), The ties that bind: Perspectives on marriage and cohabitation (pp. 40–58). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Kiernan, K. (2001). The rise of cohabitation and childbearing outside marriage in Western Europe. International Law, Policy and the Family, 15, 1–21.
Kiernan, K. (2002). Cohabitation in Western Europe: Trends, issues, and implications. In A. Booth & A. C. Crouter (Eds.), Just living together: Implications of cohabitation on families, children, and social policy (pp. 3–31). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kiernan, K. (2004a). Cohabitation and divorce across nations and generations. In P. L. Chase-Lansdale, K. Kiernan & R. J. Friedman (Eds.), Human development across lives and generations: The potential for change (pp. 139–170). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kiernan, K. (2004b). Unmarried cohabitation and parenthood in Britain and Europe. Journal of Law and Policy, 26, 33–55.
Langbein, L. I., & Lichtman, A. J. (1978). Ecological inference. London: SAGE.
Lesthaeghe, R. (1983). A century of demographic and cultural change in Western Europe. Population and Development Review, 9, 411–436.
Lesthaeghe, R., & Meekers, D. (1986). Value changes and the dimension of familism in the European Community. European Journal of Population, 2, 225–268.
Lesthaeghe, R., & Surkyn, J. (1988). Cultural dynamics and economic theories of fertility change. Population and Development Review, 14, 1–45.
Lesthaeghe, R. (1995). The second demographic transition in Western countries: An interpretation. In K. O. Mason & J. An-Magritt (Eds.), Gender and family change in industrialized countries (pp. 17–62). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Morgan, S. P., & Hiroshima, K. (1983). The persistence of extended family residence in Japan: Anachronism or alternative strategy. American Sociological Review, 48, 269–281.
Mortimer, J. T., & Shanahan, M. J. (2003). Handbook of the life course. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, Plenum Publishers.
Murphy, M. J. (1987). Differential family formation in Great Britain. Journal of Biosocial Science, 19, 463–481.
Murphy, M. J. (1989). Housing the people: From shortage to surplus. In H. Joshi (Ed.), The changing population of Britain (pp. 90–109). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
National Institute of Population and Social Security Research. (2012). The report on the fourteenth Japanese fertility survey in 2010. Tokyo: National Institute of Population and Social Security Research.
OECE. (2011). Employment outlook. Paris: OECD.
Ogura, S., & Dekle, R. (1992). Explaining the declining fertility of Japanese women since 1970 through prefectural cohort data. JCER Economic Journal, 22, 46–76.
Oppenheimer, V. K. (1988). A theory of marriage timing. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 563–591.
Oppenheimer, V. K. (2000). The continuing importance of men’s economic position in marriage formation. In L. J. Waite, C. Bachrach, M. Hindin, E. Thomson & A. Thornton (Eds.), The ties that bind: Perspectives on marriage and cohabitation (pp. 283–301). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Piotrowski, M., Kalleberg, A., & Rindfuss, R. R. (2015). Contingent work rising: Implications for the timing of marriage in Japan. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77, 1039–1056.
Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. In P. V. Marsden (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1995 (pp. 111–163). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Raymo, J. M. (1998). Later marriages or fewer? Changes in the marital behavior of Japanese women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 1023–1034.
Raymo, J. M. (2003a). Educational attainment and the transition to first marriage among Japanese women. Demography, 40, 83–103.
Raymo, J. M. (2003b). Premarital living arrangements and the transition to first marriage in Japan. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 302–315.
Raymo, J. M., & Iwasawa, M. (2008). Premarital pregnancy and spouse pairing patterns in Japan. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 835–1091.
Raymo, J. M., Iwasawa, M., & Bumpass, L. L. (2004). Marital dissolution in Japan: Recent trends and differentials. Demographic Research, 11, 395–419.
Raymo, J. M., Iwasawa, M., & Bumpass, L. L. (2009). Cohabitation and first marriage in Japan. Demography, 46, 785–803.
Raymo, J. M., & Ono, H. (2007). Co-residence with parents, women’s economic resources, and the transition to marriage in Japan. Journal of Family Issues, 28, 653–681.
Reher, D. S. (2004). Family ties in Western Europe: Persistent contrasts. In G. Dalla Zuanna & G. A. Micheli (Eds.), Strong family and low fertility: A paradox?: New perspectives in interpreting contemporary family and reproductive behaviour (pp. 45–76). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Retherford, R. D., Ogawa, N., & Matsukura, R. (2001). Late marriage and less marriage in Japan. Population and Development Review, 27, 65–102.
Robinson, W. S. (1950). Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. American Journal of Sociology, 15, 351–357.
Rosina, A., & Fraboni, R. (2004). Is marriage loosing its centrality in Italy? Demographic Research, 11, 149–172.
Ryder, N. B. (1965). The cohort as a concept in the study of social change. American Sociological Review, 30, 843–861.
Santos, F. P. (1975). The economics of marital status. In C. B. Lloyd (Ed.), Sex, discrimination, and the division of labor (pp. 244–269). New York: Columbia University Press.
Schofield, R. (1989). Family structure, demographic behaviour, and economic growth. In J. Walter & R. Schofield (Eds.), Famine, disease and the social order in early modern society (pp. 279–304). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Simons, J. (1986a). Culture, economy and reproduction in contemporary Europe. In D. Coleman & R. Schofield (Eds.), The state of population theory (pp. 256–278). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Simons, J. (1986b). How conservative are British attitudes to childbearing. Quarterly Journal of Social Affairs, 2, 415–429.
Smith, R. M. (1981). Fertility, economy and household formation in England over three centuries. Population Development and Review, 7, 595–622.
Smith, R. M. (1986). Transfer incomes, risk and security. In D. Coleman and R. Schofield (Eds.), The state of population theory (pp. 188–211). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Smock, P. J. (2000). Cohabitation in the United States: An appraisal of research themes, findings, and implications. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 1–20.
Sweeney, M. M. (2002). Two decades of family change: The shifting economic foundations of marriage. American Sociological Review, 67, 132–147.
The Institute of Statistical Mathematics. (2009). A study of the Japanese national character. Tokyo: The Institute of Statistical Mathematics.
The Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. (Various years). Report on the Basic Survey of Schools. Tokyo: The Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology.
The Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. (2010). Special report of vital statistics. Tokyo: The Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare.
The Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. (Various years). Vital Statistics. Tokyo: The Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare.
The Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. (Various years). Basic Survey on Wage Structure. Tokyo: The Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare.
The Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. (Various years). Annual Report on Labour Force Survey. Tokyo: The Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications.
The Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. (Various years). National Census. Tokyo: The Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications.
The Population Problems Research Council of the Mainich News Paper. (2000). The Japanese population: Footsteps of the 50 post-war years. Tokyo: The Population Problems Research Council of the Mainichi Newspaper.
Tsuya, N. O., & Bumpass, L. L. (2004). Marriage, work, and family life in comparative perspective: Japan, South Korea, and the United States. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
van de Kaa, D. J. (1987). Europe’s second demographic transition. Population Bulletin 42.
Vermunt, J. K. (1997). Log-linear models for event histories. London: Sage Publications.
Waite, L. J., Goldscheider, F. K., & Witsberger, C. (1986). Non-family living and the erosion of traditional family orientations among young adults. American Sociological Review, 51, 541–554.
Winegarden, C. R. (1984). Women’s fertility, market and marital status: A test of the new household economics with international data. Economica, 51, 447–456.
Young, M., & Willmott, P. (1973). The symmetrical family: A study of work and leisure in the London region. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Zuanna, G. D. (2004). The banquet of aeolus: A familistic interpretation of Italy’s lowest low fertility. In G. Dalla Zuanna & G. A. Micheli (Eds.), Strong family and low fertility: A paradox?: New perspectives in interpreting contemporary family and reproductive behaviour (pp. 105–125). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Zuanna, G. D., Atoh, M., Castiglioni, M., & Kojima, K. (1998). Late marriage among young people: The case of Italy and Japan. Genus, 54, 187–232.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fukuda, N. (2016). Economic Change, Value Shift and Marriage Behaviour. In: Marriage and Fertility Behaviour in Japan. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0294-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0294-6_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0292-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0294-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)